Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Maybe some NEW info?  (Read 21996 times)

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Maybe some NEW info?
« Reply #30 on: November 22, 2021, 12:36:01 AM »
Nigel drew a few in his videos, his symbols look funny
but he shows what he’s doing

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Maybe some NEW info?
« Reply #31 on: November 22, 2021, 05:12:22 AM »
4-Led’s lit up now.
Open circuit 1-wire


0A
0V
From every angle


https://youtube.com/shorts/G_VZAk-8zj0?feature=share

MasterPlaster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 530
Re: Maybe some NEW info?
« Reply #32 on: November 22, 2021, 01:09:31 PM »
@Sm0ky2If you examin the light emitted with a photo diode/transistor on a oscilloscope, is the light continuous, pulsed, meandering?
Thanks

Floor

  • Guest
Re: Maybe some NEW info?
« Reply #33 on: November 22, 2021, 02:33:57 PM »
@ smOKy2

In regard to the "Telluric Rectifier"

Have you tried ...

1. Building the circuit mechanically robust (solid electrical connections, no wiggly parts)
   then
2. Transporting the unit to some place which is remote from electrical power sources (at least a few
hundred yards distant).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHIhgxav9LY

best wishes
  floor

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Maybe some NEW info?
« Reply #34 on: November 22, 2021, 10:16:41 PM »
@Sm0ky2If you examin the light emitted with a photo diode/transistor on a oscilloscope, is the light continuous, pulsed, meandering?
Thanks


There are no readings.
0


I can tell from a video, slowed down, the diode is pulsing (or flickering bright to dim)




I also took it outside, so its nothing to do with the ‘air’ in my home.

It ionizes my room fairly quickly, when i bring it inside. Smells like Ozone,
my filing cabinet (across the room) begins to shock me when i touch it.
Also, holding the ‘antenna’ in my hand makes the hairs on my arm stand up.
Very intense ionic field





sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Maybe some NEW info?
« Reply #35 on: November 23, 2021, 02:04:38 AM »
From all possible tests
This is where my understanding is going:




https://youtu.be/-LEdjNVYJl8

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Maybe some NEW info?
« Reply #36 on: November 24, 2021, 03:18:13 AM »
Increased the power 3x
Up to 0.052 Lumens produced by my 0 Watt light bulb


https://youtu.be/PbvkdtR1CgA

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Maybe some NEW info?
« Reply #37 on: November 24, 2021, 03:43:18 AM »
When i try to use this value of 0.052 Lumens
to reverse engineer the circuit


What i come up with is something in the milliwatt range
to cause these led’s to produce this value of light


This is not a large amount of power
It is however, 233.4 x greater than the abilities of my 2-wire earth battery
(made using the same anode and the center pin of the coax as the cathode)


electrically speaking, this is an open circuit
that’s why i had to use the light output to reverse engineer the power


and no, theres no readings on the back-loop either

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Maybe some NEW info?
« Reply #38 on: November 25, 2021, 02:25:40 AM »
In an attempt to balance the load between the 2 diode chains
I replaced the reverse loop with a close match


https://youtu.be/hM3nC_5XxF0




And then replaced the first set with a duplicate
So they are truly identical now (within reasonable measurement)
3-diodes in series
2 chains in parallel, one going the other way.


Or if you prefer: 6 series diodes, fold in half and twist the ends
Taps are between the twisted end and the center fold


One end to earth, the other to an ion source


https://youtu.be/qWLq58OymgA

Final Luminosity reading: 0.4785 Lumens

And for those interested, it does charge electrolytic capacitors
in various configurations, just as presented by the Inventor


The generous Nigel ‘Hands’ Cheese or whatever he calls himself.




sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Maybe some NEW info?
« Reply #39 on: November 25, 2021, 02:44:56 AM »
Had to try one last thing before i head to St Louis for the weekend


I hooked up a 2nd wire to the same earth ground and another 6-diode loop
to the same ion source
And those also light up
So im up to pretty much 1 Lumen




Floor

  • Guest
Re: Maybe some NEW info?
« Reply #40 on: November 25, 2021, 06:35:16 PM »
https://www.answers.com/Q/How_many_lumen_are_in_1_Joule

683 Lumen = 1 Joule per Second
1 Lumen = 1/683 Joule per Second  or approximately 0.001567 joule per second
1 joule per second = 1 watt

other conversion software sites give the conversion as

0.01 watt per lumen ?

Floor

  • Guest
Re: Maybe some NEW info?
« Reply #41 on: November 26, 2021, 06:51:54 AM »
What ever the output (large or small)...

If "conventional" inputs have been eliminated as a source ...
You have some thing here...
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Joule thief "had to be" rewired to make sense in a conventional way.

I have always suspected that, that was its ruination.

Please keep expoloring this smOKy2 and keep us posted

  best wishes
             floor
« Last Edit: November 26, 2021, 02:56:00 PM by Floor »

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Maybe some NEW info?
« Reply #42 on: November 27, 2021, 12:18:34 AM »
https://www.answers.com/Q/How_many_lumen_are_in_1_Joule

683 Lumen = 1 Joule per Second
1 Lumen = 1/683 Joule per Second  or approximately 0.001567 joule per second
1 joule per second = 1 watt

other conversion software sites give the conversion as

0.01 watt per lumen ?


Not sure the accuracy of that site.


Here are my experimental results: (using 13 lumen flames)


13 Lumens (through photovoltaic conversion) provides
0.4V @ 205ma
or about 80mW/s

0.01 seems pretty close

Now: solar panel can only convert some % of the energy of the photons
So the real experimental value is much higher.


Also - my Lumens were measured by CandlePower as was performed in the old days
many new experiments use some LED-based Lumen equivalent.
Real flame having more fluctuations, and a higher photon energy density


I confirmed this research by testing 30 Lumen flames and 30 Lumen flashlights
Flames give about 20-30% more current at ~ the same voltage
LED’s provide a more consistent light source


I have brought a duplicate circuit with me to St Louis, i will be testing this location soon
To see if the conditions can be recreated here 1000+ miles away.

MasterPlaster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 530
Re: Maybe some NEW info?
« Reply #43 on: November 27, 2021, 01:27:03 PM »

I have brought a duplicate circuit with me to St Louis, i will be testing this location soon
To see if the conditions can be recreated here 1000+ miles away.
That is taking it a bit too far!

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Maybe some NEW info?
« Reply #44 on: November 27, 2021, 06:00:55 PM »
Nigel showed us this works in Croatia,
I have replicated it in Texas,
And now also St. Louis
Its’ probably safe to say this will work anywhere


https://youtube.com/shorts/GVCuRSlmIps?feature=share