The first one seems easy enough to build
2 nested (concentric) toroids
Finding a suitable a/c transformer or signal generator
doesnt seem like much of a task.
The patent was abandoned so its free open tech for us to use




What i find disturbing is the description of the flux interactions
One would expect this bucking behavior from axial flux
or even radial flux


However: axial flux does not exist here, and the radial flux (along the wire)
cancels out over each 360-degree loop at any distance from the ferrite.


the toroid produces circumferencial flux
The result being counter-rotational torque - mostly against the smaller toroid
May still produce physical vibrations, within the support structure
But im not satisfied by the description in the patent


Gravitational effects (if any) should be easily testable

Hi Sm0ky2!




John Quincey St. Clair is weird, huh?  His full patent search show's him to be a chemist with dozens n dozens of patents.


The St. Clair wormhole generator's two coils are bucking, but there are no poles to buck.  As toroid coils, one inside the other, the magnetic flux has no polarity (direction and energy density yes).  Toroids join their poles as a flux ring with magnetic polarity hidden in the ring.  Bucking ouroboros.


As you mentioned the toroid makes circumferential flux, the concentric toroidal coils are directional flux vectors with no poles, counter oriented (bucking).  Flux density variations are the edge of the working tool that tickles anomalous and alien features from beneath the electron cloud.  Flux density is modulated over time at the frequency of interest.  Scanning this frequency range with a sense of inductive-qualities shifting is a nose on the trail.


Electromagnetic engineers are troubled with the A-B effect, as little electrical engineering went there, and toroidal innovations are classified military I've read. 

I think to test this will take some electronic fixturing... but a frequency scan from low to high on counter-wound (bucking) toroidal flux (with no external poles pegs my weird-o-meter[/size].  It is so obvious that for so long standard engineering avoids toroidal innovations, and the mentions that it's classified when surfaced... makes my boy scientist's ears perk up. 


I suggest that experiments with bucking coils be scanned for anomaly with a lot of power, to feel-in-the-dark the same way Wilbert B. Smith did when his Caduceus coil on hollow ferrite (bucking sequence of loops).


W. B. Smith used an RF bridge to scan his 'tempic coil' for harmonic sweet spots and found several.


But... when enough RF wattage was applied to the coil, it stopped making heat (with several kilowatts of RF applied to an 8" long coil of 14 gauge solid copper.  Ten kilowatts flowed into his coil, mounted in a brass tube, and it stayed cool while it formed a resonance with the matter lattice (tempic fabric per Smith).


When the coil was running cool with 10 kilowatt applied, anomalous stuff began... coils would couple together, and stay coupled.


Cut to the chase scene... W. B. Smith and others that report anomalous EM dynamics are using bucking magnetics (like the paired output coil philosophy here... stay the course!)


Consider that the anomalies everyone seek occur when magnetic flux densities oscillate at the special frequency  that harmonically couples with the spherical Coulomb field of the atom, rather then the electron shell's common electrodynamic behaviors outlined by Maxwell's equations to perfection (if and only if one does not introduce Aharonov-Bohm effect in the study). 


While there are lots of ways to do the nucleo-mass-jiggle coupling (harmonically forming a lock on the matter lattice) (electronic, magnetic, ultrasonics, per the one man that scientifically outlines the effect... our unknown champion because he has no following...  Engineer Z.


The CIA, Canadian intelligence, US Navy, and a US Navy contractor (a clairvoyant woman in contact with aliens that tutored W. B. Smith via the caduceus coil (tensor beam) mind link.


And that brings up the weird part of this deep research.  The CIA buried seventy years ago that the 'tempic fabric' which is used by alien propulsion is literally bending time (my term).


Time bends by harmonically coupling and loading that resonant envelope with energy ---and the quantum-transition that mediates ALL electromagnetic dyanamics is delayed.


Delayed quantum transitions across a region of space will cause that space to age more slowly at the quantum level. 


Light will bend around that region.  Smith quoted the aliens stating UFO levitate on space-timing that is retarded in a pattern to counteract gravity --to lens gravity, per se.  My term: temporal optics.  Not light optics, but field optics... field shape... field topology.


This study will take some serious wattage at some serious RF frequencies.... my kilowatt NAND gate is designed to reach those frequencies. 


I may  take months to get the shop restored (everything is in storage, the roof comes off for adding a second story on our new home).


Is there anyone that could scan for anomalies at several hundred watts? 


Important: Eng. Z. realized it is the velocity a magnetic flux density waves passes by an atom that will invoke the atom's mass-jiggle)  Finding that dip in the grid-dip meter, and leaning hard on it with gradually increased power, may show a green glow in time. 


The matter lattice will suck energy, and suck, and keep sucking... but if this is because it is developing a 'tempic resonance' then it is forming an anomalie while it sucks energy.  If it sucks, and stays cool, then you are onto it my man!  Hidden 1950-s alien tech on your workbench.  Be the wave... and remember that 'the wave' is psycho-active. (The hard problem of UFOs --the mind operates also upon the tempic fabric, per the big picture.)


Remember not to panic anyone, if your machine decides it won't shut down.  I've heard of two people over the years that resorted to dynamite to shut down a scalar oscillator (this anomalie is THE phenomenon of our search).  Add some way to the device by design to quench the accumulated energy.  Good luck to us each on this 100th monkey mission.


Three things remain to accomplish... 1) finding the anomaly, repeatably, and on demand, 2) amplifying the anomaly, 3) controlling the amplified anomaly.


Sm0ky2 your interest is helping me through this builder dysfunction at the present.  My human animal's all twitipated with anticipation. 






Sm0kes, if you (or any, or a group, or someone's grandmother) want to hack on this idea, I'll be your amateur scientist on your/their six!  My science though is at the level of scientific reporter with no science degree, and mathematics intimidates me, so go figure. 




DonEM
Newbie woodworker and retired programmer
p.s. Free-energy conversations are not applicable, but an electromagnetic refrigerator on the thermal quenching that doubles as an alien mind portal might be ---Check Wilbert's info...


https://groupkos.com/dev/index.php?title=Category:Wilbert_Smith




Aharonov-Bohm Effect: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aharonov–Bohm_effect

The first one seems easy enough to build
2 nested (concentric) toroids
Finding a suitable a/c transformer or signal generator
doesnt seem like much of a task.
The patent was abandoned so its free open tech for us to use




What i find disturbing is the description of the flux interactions
One would expect this bucking behavior from axial flux
or even radial flux


However: axial flux does not exist here, and the radial flux (along the wire)
cancels out over each 360-degree loop at any distance from the ferrite.


the toroid produces circumferencial flux
The result being counter-rotational torque - mostly against the smaller toroid
May still produce physical vibrations, within the support structure
But im not satisfied by the description in the patent


Gravitational effects (if any) should be easily testable

Consider energy density, rather than raw power.


V / cm^3


The threshold is in the upper end of a 1-2million volt range
Depending on the conditions of your surroundings


The current is a matter of the draw on your transformer
needed to maintain the potential.
This will give you your total power requirements


Without doing the exact math, you’re probably looking at
a 1-meter outer toroid minimum
Realistically upwards to 10-m
With a coil diameter of 0.3-1m respectively
Probably air-coil or a light ferrite, not your standard semiconductor ferrite
thick enamel coatings



And very close (but well insulated) spacing between the concentric rings


To do this sort of testing within a reasonable budget:
You will want several signal generators driving your HV circuit
to encompass a broad range of frequencies.
each one having its’ own range that it can produce


There are industrial and scientific machines that can produce virtually every
possible manmade signal within our capabilities
 (most are like i said above, packed in a fancy box)
that costs tens of thousands if not millions of $$


Once you can create the disturbance, study it and understand whats going on
Then you can learn how to create a 3rd larger toroid
 (with 3,5,6,7,or 9 concentric toroidal fields)
to maintain a stable spacial reference to that Hamiltonian space
Thus connecting that one to the reference space, by using the outer toroid as a point of origin




May i ask why you want this information what you intend to do with it?

Start with 2MV/cm^3


then worry about things like field shape or frequency
Density is the key

Not sure if this would be the right thread to ask this, but I'm trying to lay out a generator build. And for some reason I'm kind of unsure about something. Maybe someone can answer a question for me...


Let's say you have a spinning rotor with magnets on it passing 2 types of coils. Both identical size but different wire size and weight. But both produce exactly 10 watts (for ease of understanding). Only difference is wire size. Let's ignore resistance of thinner wire issues and things like that. Just general info needed here.. But one produces 10 volts at 1 amp. The other produces 5 volts at 2 amps. Let's say they are hooked in parralel to a battery setting at 0 volts (for ease of understanding).


Now, if you hook them in parralel, does the charge battery get current from both like it would if the coils produced the same voltage and the current would double. Or does the higher voltage of 1 coil make the 2nd coil not have the potential to charge at all? For instance. Does the battery only see the 10 volt 1 amp pulse, or does it also see the 5 volt 2 amp pulse. Would the battery catch both pulses if pulsed exactly at the same time to recieve 20 watts. Or would it only see 10 watts from the 10 volt pulse?


The point is, wondering if it is a viable option for a generator to have both high voltage low amp coils as well as low voltage high amp coils. That way at very slow speeds, a battery would get enough voltage to at least catch a small charge from the high voltage coils. But as speeds increase, the high amperage coils reach a high enough voltage to start dumping higher amps into it as well. Or are we kind of stuck choosing one or another, or switching between coils dependant on speed of rotor.

Does that question make sense? Any thoughts? I'm hoping if both pulses are exactly in phase that the battery would see both and not just one. But I'm really not sure. Thanks for any responses.

captainpecan

The point is, wondering if it is a viable option for a generator to have both high voltage low amp coils as well as low voltage high amp coils. That way at very slow speeds, a battery would get enough voltage to at least catch a small charge from the high voltage coils. But as speeds increase, the high amperage coils reach a high enough voltage to start dumping higher amps into it as well. Or are we kind of stuck choosing one or another, or switching between coils dependant on speed of rotor.

In the past this was done however a better option is boost/buck or cuk converters. For example inverter generators don't run at 60hz they run at 600hz, rectify the output to DC then convert it to 60hz 120/220v power.

I have done similar experiments and ran a PM generator with low turn thus high amp/low voltage coils. The output was then rectified and sent to a boost converter which could vary the output voltage and amperage.

You may also want to look at MPPT (max power point tracking) which is all I use anymore. I use an Arduino to track voltage and current then calculate power. At some operating level the voltage and current produce the maximum power. The circuit basically continually hunts for the maximum power point (MPP) and tries to hold it.

Regards
AC