Electric vehicles > Electric cars
The MAD MAX e-car
lancaIV:
By way of example, an automobile engine of current design, operated at its most efficient speed, is expected to have an efficiency of 20 to 25 percent.
Nevertheless, the average efficiency of the ordinary motor car is much less,being only on the order 2-5 percent, primarily because of poor compression ratios at low speed operation.
The problem is how to avoid inefficiencies which are incident to the operating cycle rather than to the basic engine construction.
real 2-5% energy efficiency from peak " apparent power" 20-25% effficiency
Forschungsfeldvergleich : engine or machine
Der Mensch or the Human
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Jung : Mariendorf "Die Maschine Mensch" experiment ,living with/out target -motive : Motivation
https://www.uni-goettingen.de/de/3240.html?id=5463
motorische/notorische Effizienz der Mensch-Maschine.individual or cooperative
the 90´ work(er)-reengineering change :
The problem is how to avoid inefficiencies which are incident to the operating cycle rather than to the basic human construction.
the Human "worker" society :
non motivated real 2-5% energy/performance efficiency from nominal and average " apparent power" 20-25% effficiency (physio-biological )
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.wort.lu/de/business/der-traum-von-der-mensch-maschine-5f609376de135b9236900af7
2062 pari ? Functional soon 2021 pari ,the "humanoids" !
" virtual human"-chip implants ,not human-body look robots
Is applied EE-technology for traffic better than applied IC ?
Or when/how is EE better ?
fix revolutions electric motor + ( when AC : inverter) battery
variable revolutions electric motor + " " "
nominal current,inrush phase current
primarily because of poor compression ratios at low speed operation.
traffic average low speed ,average and specific rush-hour
the nominal motor-generator/alternator performance
by rated 1000 RPM ,technical efficiency over 90%
by low speed RPM ,technical efficiency over 90%
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=1&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20121011&CC=US&NR=2012256422A1&KC=A1
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=3&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19780418&CC=US&NR=4085355A&KC=A
by 1000 W rated 1000 RPM delivers 1000 W power
by 1000 W rated 100 RPM delivers 1 W power
EE and FUZZY NEURO-LOGIK ;D
From 100% potential input 10 Per Centum/Prozent = 1 Per Milia/Promille output ratio
2 lever applied in 1 comparison
non-linear,dynamical performance
lancaIV:
--- Quote from: Jerry Volland on July 25, 2021, 04:08:36 PM ---No, I'm not Chinese. But eugenics just isn't right, no matter what the nationality.
And aren't you the same one who said a 1kWh battery, charged and discharged 25,000 times gives 25,000 kWh, for driving a million miles? How do you charge it while driving?
"Under Natural Law, stupidity is a capital offence" - Robert Heinlein.
What if someone decided to abort unwished stupidity?
--- End quote ---
related " .... a 1kWh battery, charged and discharged 25,000 times gives 25,000 kWh, for driving a million miles ..."
https://www.autoweek.com/news/green-cars/a35367888/the-eternal-promise-of-solid-state-batteries/
QuantumScape, a California-based 2010 spinoff from Stanford University that has a joint venture with Volkswagen Group (which invested more than $300 million), said in January that it is indeed making great strides toward commercializing the cells. The company said it had created fire-resistant test batteries that continue to function after 1,100 cycles, retaining at least 80% of its capacity. “This corresponds to over 300,000 miles for a 300-mile battery pack and over 500,000 miles for a 500-mile battery pack,” the company said in a tweet.
300 miles range x 1100 cycles = over 300 000 miles capacity -limit 80% capacity- servicelife
500 miles range x 1100 cycles = over 500 000 miles capacity -limit 80% capacity - servicelife
ergo
300 miles range x 25 000 cycles LTO battery Yinlong = 7 500 000 miles servicelife
300 miles range x 40 000 cycles LTO battery XALT = 12 000 000 miles servicelife
300 miles range x 250 000 cycles AIB battery = 75 000 000 miles servicelife
dividing < 10 000 miles/per year average car use in Europe
7 500 000 / 10 000 = 750 years use
12 000 000/ 10 000 = 1200 years use
and as non plus ultra :
75 000 000/ 10 000 = 7500 years use
human life in years,average : 80 years car life in years,average : 15 years
Some could mean that this represents longitivity enough ::) ( ;D )
In Europe : 15 years car life x 10 000 miles = 150 000 miles capacity range
80 years human life x 10 000 miles = 800 000 miles capacity range
1x 800 000 miles battery pack serves for 5-6 car generations
by 300 miles range pack = 2500-3000 effective 100% DoD charge cycles
by this charge concept http://www.bticcs.com/ or similar "algorythmic charge concepts"
( Oldie but Goldie Reply #19 shown charge alternatives )
" Articles and Publication "
CCS a New Technology for the Automatic Charge Controle of Rechargeable Batteries
CCS ein neues Ladeverfahren zum automatischen Laden von Akkus
citation :
3. Cost & Energy Impact:
• For NC batteries, per example, manufacturers are quoting 500 to 1,000 charge cycles.
In real life most of these batteries have just a life of 100 cycles and often fail in much shorter time.
As CCS is proving, much of it is the inadequate charging process, that cuts a battery life short.
With CCS a battery life of 5000 charge cycles can be reached.
Taking this information with precaution ( peak/maximal and average performance !) and as comparison benchmark for own experiments and experience !
And by other battery kind as given NC example !
1 KWh battery capacity as solely car energy storage and 1 000 000 miles capacity servicelife
depends
a. vehicle weight , average speed
nonstop delivery and use
b. the Tanaka Saburo inverter system effect or Dr. Pavel Imris,CSc. double battery/cap-generator charge system
lancaIV:
battery range would be more important than charging cycles : das Eine bedingt das Andere ;)
Satellites : equipped mostly with nuclear batteries
btw I forgot to listen :
300 miles range x 1 000 000 charge cycles Kilowattlabs superbattery ::)
12 KWh Reva NGX 37 KW AC motor concept car consume per 100 Km,less 3 KWh brake energy recuperation
physical ,by concept, AC e-drive C.O.P. < 1 to C.O.P. 10 e-drive change ( earth use )
1,2 KWh modified Reva NGX pulsed DC motor concept car consume per 100 km,
here without modification improvement :
less 3 KWh brake energy recuperation :
surplus 1,8 KWh per 100 Km
with brake energy system improvement : recuperation gain to 6 KWh + per 100 Km
surplus 5 KWh and more
Physically and experimental we are some steps beyond the market
Probably in Future concept cars technical up-to-date refurbish : https://www.rinspeed.com/de/Concept-Cars 8) https://www.rinspeed.com/en/
https://esoro.ch/konzeptfahrzeuge/ https://esoro.ch/en/concept-vehicles/
wmbr
OCWL
p.s.:
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=andreja+todorovic&IN=&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search
https://patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=15379
lancaIV:
I am in search : for the perfection ! ;) easy to produce,ecological,economical ; if possible soft-ware-free or free-/share-ware use
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=89&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20140320&CC=US&NR=2014078802A1&KC=A1
Tanaka Saburos concept uses an inverter
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20190207&CC=JP&NR=2019022271A&KC=A
but this idea/application also :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=102&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20090326&CC=US&NR=2009079393A1&KC=A1
to Garfield Wood his 1969 superelectric car the more modern pendant :
https://esoro.ch/en/portfolio-item/exasis-ein-hauch-von-auto-2007/
but for calculation we use GarWoods 2x 1,5 hp 90V DC motor concept = 3 hp = 2,25 KW rated power
the installation :
not motor belt wheel
but motor to transmission https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19840807&CC=US&NR=4464095A&KC=A to belt to wheel
the motor physical torque/rev. transformed/transduced by
Halbach/Ronbach magnet array Sankar Pat
or here https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=&IN=chad+vandenberg&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search
-50% Vandenberg,-70% Ogino basic factor power/energy savings - related conventional electric motor - ever wellcomed !
Assumption : 2250 Wh for 50 Km ( or near 30 miles range) 1969 car performance
= 4500 Wh/100 Km
2250 Wh/100 Km reduced by Iida cw rev./ccw rev. motor (instead blades) transmission configuration,conventional electric motor
1125 Wh/100 Km reduced by above motor power saving modification
as average
the brake energy recuperation gain,not as high Reva NGX their number to expect( car mass difference) will compensate a great electric motors energy consume part
The effect from the
Self-Charging Generator US2009079393
the claim/statement " .... [0008] My invention generated several times the power it consumes to operate and does so by an all electric means with no moving parts."
has to become tested !
Each experimental measured/tested number over C.O.P. 1 will be wellcomed !
But if only C.O.P.1 ,it does not bother,the e-car need an energy storage ! ::)
Irgendwann mal /someday in future : C.O.P. 10 cap-motor + a. Ozkan cycle b. Saburo cycle c. Imris double battery cap-generator cycle
lancaIV:
At first : this is actually an unimportant solution research/answer finding question !
The most important fact is that urban/city zone vehicles by given 30 Km/h speed maximum only needs ,included brake energy recuperation, well organized 250 Wh electric energy storage for driving the average 60 Km activity per day as also remarked by the "concept cars" design page by esoro/rinspeed !
( 15 000 Km per year european range average /365 = ? per day )
Pulse, 2 = Hz
how is the EMP nuclear defined ?
how explains it ,EMP I and II ,Dr.Pavel Imris,CSc. in his "artificial nuclear atom strike"
Pulse-effect ?
Bernd Koehler ,solar cell/ fluorescent lamp tube as battery charge concept
DeBuyant.rotative DC motor-generator battery charge concept
Harold Goldbaum electric generator with shoe-box dimension but Pulse quantity dependent work process KW or MW output
Have we to determinate the nuclear decay in concepts like NANO-BOXX in Pulse numbers ?
The energy storage is not anymore the problem in an "autonomous and intelligent -fixed speed max.- urban traffic drive " world !
Well organized e-trikes and e-bikes less than function priority related heavy cars !
World-wide shows us "freaks,developper,enthusiasts" over youtube and other video channels what with conventional equipment is possible,what with
the best known solution will become possible ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hf31fQJVWOU rated 750 W power electric drive ,by 30 Km/h max. energy consume in average ?
after specific drive improvement ?
Ex-SIEMENS Dr.Wolfgang Volkrodt publication : rated 100 W bike to electric bike modification
with modern 2021 equipment rated power/effective energy consume per 100 Km/per day ?
Does he not correct EE geral opinions in this paper ?
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=17&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19860717&CC=DE&NR=3501076A1&KC=A1
http://translationportal.epo.org/emtp/translate/?ACTION=description-retrieval&COUNTRY=DE&ENGINE=google&FORMAT=docdb&KIND=A1&LOCALE=en_EP&NUMBER=3501076&OPS=ops.epo.org/3.2&SRCLANG=de&TRGLANG=en
Beginning with that difference :
According to theories customary up to now, 25 kW losses would have to occur in the aforementioned ferrite magnetic core. This contradicts practical experience.
[0004]
The energy requirement for a magnetizing reversal pulse is around 25 mWs when using a magnetizing coil with low resistance as a single-start secondary winding of a pulse magnetizing transformer. 10,000 pulses per second therefore require a power supply of 0.25 kW,
i.e. one hundredth of the hysteresis losses that are allegedly caused by this.
How many scientists/researcher/inventors are citing these points in their disclosure :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/citingDocuments?CC=DE&NR=3501076A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=3&date=19860717&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP
Sincere
OCWL
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version