Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: CMOS Oscillator  (Read 11243 times)

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: CMOS Oscillator
« Reply #15 on: August 26, 2021, 02:30:38 AM »
The neutralization pulse oscillation is a fiendishly simple solution for the control pulse that Evostar has complex integrated circuitry to control. He is generating 3500 volts with the coupled Mosfets. The large Capacitor lowers it for discharge back into the coil.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: CMOS Oscillator
« Reply #16 on: August 26, 2021, 02:37:26 AM »
Look at the position of the body diode between the drain and source of the Mosfets.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: CMOS Oscillator
« Reply #17 on: August 26, 2021, 02:43:52 AM »
The sensitivity of the Mosfet gate to ground proximity is many times greater than the best Hall Effect transistor. Connecting both Mosfet gates to the same electrode will insure simultaneous triggering.

I connect the gates to a razor blade by copper magnet wire, position the blade on the face of the factory machined electo magnet, and connect another copper wire from the ground to the ferrite ring I use as the attractor. A field effect triggers the pulse with no physical contact as one can see in my video. The electromagnet has a stack of strong neodymium magnets attached. The ferrite ring is attached to an elastic band.

Half the cycle is free power from the attraction magnets. This by itself delivers a COP of 1. Collecting and recycling the voltage boosted backspike for simultaneous delivery to the Electromagnet coil has to send the even COP overunity!

2 mosfets in series, 3 diodes and a large Capacitor! This can run a compressed air pump and generate excess electrical power as well.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: CMOS Oscillator
« Reply #18 on: August 26, 2021, 03:16:28 AM »
Here's a picture of the ferrite ring at triggering distance , the electro magnet and backing neos and the gate electrode. The "Gray Tube" "married hi voltage and amperage for a super magnetic pulse. The simultaneous dielectric discharge is basically the same. This should be the most efficient electric motor ever built.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: CMOS Oscillator
« Reply #19 on: August 26, 2021, 04:18:39 AM »
Gray.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: CMOS Oscillator
« Reply #20 on: August 26, 2021, 01:18:07 PM »
I reverse the curl on the magnet stack by 90 degrees interupting 3500 volts in the second Orstead video. This is proof that the current is actually traveling sideways through the wire from the vacuum.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8wBt9Q8H5I

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zubp7Woxt8Y

The forcé of the Gray magnet propulsión is an implosive inrush from the Dirac Sea. Master Evostar´s CMOS circuit will draw power through the sides of the Electromagnet from the surrounding Earth field to supply power for the overunity magnet pulse like Gray managed to do. Discharging the hi voltage capacitor charge into the Inductor would be like setting a firecracker off under wáter and the magnet pulse the wáter plume from the implosión pressure supported by the coupled amperage. This delivers a real wallop. A powerfull and super efficient Magnet Popper.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: CMOS Oscillator
« Reply #21 on: August 26, 2021, 04:25:57 PM »
Gray discharged his hi voltage capacitor bank into heavy pound and a quarter coils with ferrite cores. Evo is using spiral speaker wire coils with no magnetic cores. The tough high perm pot core electro magnet sold online that I use can handle the punishment from that kind of cap discharge. The inductance is too low in the coreless spirls to generate any meaningful magnetic effects. The dielectric discharge "Scrubs" the inductor of electrons followed by the force implosion. This is referred to as Radient Power!

The simple elastic ferrite actuator is needed because the pot core is bipolar, between the rim and center: However, the simple oscillation delivers the same 50% duty cycle as the shelf full of electrical equipment that Evostar supplies with needless operating current. Shorting this discharge would produce a green spark.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: CMOS Oscillator
« Reply #22 on: August 26, 2021, 11:05:29 PM »
To be completely faithful to Ed we would need two electro magnets facing each other with opposite polarity backing magnets in attraction and reverse polarity Evo circuits with two bucking Capacitor pulsed neutralization fields in opposition. A central spring could cushion the impact and restrict seperation. These pistons could work two sides of a powerful pancake compressor pump. All four Mosfet gates would connect and trigger simultaneously. The gates electrode would position on the face of one electromagnet and the ground wire to the other.

onepower

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1116
Re: CMOS Oscillator
« Reply #23 on: August 27, 2021, 05:37:32 AM »
Synchro1
Quote
The forcé of the Gray magnet propulsión is an implosive inrush from the Dirac Sea. Master Evostar´s CMOS circuit will draw power through the sides of the Electromagnet from the surrounding Earth field to supply power for the overunity magnet pulse like Gray managed to do. Discharging the hi voltage capacitor charge into the Inductor would be like setting a firecracker off under wáter and the magnet pulse the wáter plume from the implosión pressure supported by the coupled amperage. This delivers a real wallop. A powerfull and super efficient Magnet Popper.

I built and tested Ed Gray's circuits and found there not what most think.

For example, I can charge a capacitor to pulse a coil and almost all the energy dissipates in the coil. Then I add a series resistor and almost all the energy dissipates in the resistor not the coil. Here we can see the properties and layout of the circuit components can determine "where" the energy in a circuit dissipates. So when we understand what energy is and how it works we can dictate where energy concentrates or dissipates within a circuit.

Ed Gray discovered how to move the "zero point/plane" in a coil which normally dissipates energy into a second battery to recharge it. In this case the energy in the circuit doesn't see the coil as a load and blows right through as if it wasn't even there. Most don't understand energy or energy flow so most of this makes little sense. Energy matters...

I rediscovered Gray's working concept by using a shunt/magnetometer to measure the voltage drop across various coils in different configurations. Here one could ask what is a voltage drop?, how does it work?, why does it appear?, what is it's effect?. Most don't know so I will try to explain it. If the coil had no resistance or inductance (which is actually self-inductance) then there would be no voltage drop across the coil and it would act like a plain old wire. So the voltage drop across the coil/conductor is an indicator of how much energy is being dissipated within it.

It's actually kind of strange if we think about it... Power= Voltage x Current. Thus if we know the current across a coil is constant but we can measure a voltage drop across it then the circuit voltage must be changing across the coil hence the drop. Since Power=VI and we know V dropped then so must P over the span/distance of the coil in T(time) which is an energy drop or point of energy dissipation. Most don't get this because there preoccupied with voltage, current and power when they should be looking at energy, more so the total energy in any given system and what it's doing.

One could also ask why I always use a shunt and a hall effect magnetometer on all my load coil experiments?, it's because I want to know the actual strength of the external magnetic field in relation to the voltage drop ie. energy dissipation. Most have never done this and just took it for granted (like most things) that it always falls within textbook theory which is a mistake. Here actually measuring what is happening can give us greater insight versus just guessing.

I don't suspect anyone will get this but I will throw it out as a brain teaser, it is based on some of my past experiments...
Now suppose that we have an average circuit with a constant current I and voltage V from a fixed source in a circuit loop where V drops across each load element constituting a point of energy dissipation. Fair enough and most rules hold until we suppose a motional source which rotates about the loop with the current I. In this case, because the source VI is motional within the circuit loop so must be the voltage drop across each circuit element be equally motional ie. variable with respect to the source. For simplicity I simply call these kinds of systems motional-motional systems, lol.

Here I would simply state Energy is the ability of something to perform work. Since work is a force acting on said something over a distance then "Energy is Motion". Thus changing or transforming the kinds of motion occurring within a system must change the energy within said system. The reasoning behind why FE devices must be possible is because "Energy is Conserved". In every case energy, which is motion on every level, must be conserved. Thus by changing or transforming the kinds of motion taking place we are in fact transforming energy.

So this notion of creation and destruction must be discarded. The laws we know are explicit in this case, nothing we know including energy can be created nor destroyed only transformed... so transform it.

Regards
AC


synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: CMOS Oscillator
« Reply #24 on: August 27, 2021, 10:03:09 AM »
Electromagnets can reverse polarity. Experimenting with two Electromagnets faceing one another to measure their repulsion range is important. Running the oscillating stacks of backing neos in and out of the cores of output coils would generate a significant amount of power. The Capacitor discharge may pass unnoticed through the electro magnet as AC points out.

The same oscilator can work fine on one Mosfet alone without the recovery capacitors.

I was shocking a one Henry choke with a stun gun and getting a magnet pulse. I believe it's proportional to inductance.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: CMOS Oscillator
« Reply #25 on: August 27, 2021, 06:05:31 PM »
After watching coil gun videos I have determined that the pop is directly proportional to capacitor Joules. A common capacitor with auxiliary charging, like a flash circuit attachment would help!

Bumper magnets at the ends of the output coils in opposition to the backing stacks would tighten the throw up and increase the frequency and output voltage. A common capacitor in parallel with the source battery and additionally charged with high voltage from the oscillating magnet stacks should help increase the high voltage dielectric Joules.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: CMOS Oscillator
« Reply #26 on: August 27, 2021, 06:50:09 PM »
Stood on end in a tube, one electromagnet neo backing stack can do all the work pumping inside an overhead output coil. Applying magnet  force will speed up the gravity assisted oscillation, and raise the output voltage to assist a "Coil Gun" Capacitor pulse discharge. Perhaps we can avoid exploding the magnets.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: CMOS Oscillator
« Reply #27 on: August 27, 2021, 09:24:22 PM »
Gotoluc demonstrates practically zero repulsion between electromagnets. The magnet backing stacks would each need an elastic retractor like the prototype. They would still pass through the core of their output coils with the tensioners attached.

The EV Gray pulse requires many more Joules then stored by
The BEMF in Evo's capacitor. However, it can help with the contained field.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: CMOS Oscillator
« Reply #28 on: August 27, 2021, 09:54:29 PM »
An Orbo circuit where the attraction between two tensioned magnet stacks is interrupted by a thin spiral coil between the stator legs. Evostars circuit would be ideal to pulse that kind of magnet flux blocker.

The output from the chattering magnet stacks inside the output coils should generate sufficient power to replenish any losses required to sustain the pulse. Properly balanced, mere mill amps could release tons of force.

I am sitting here asking myself what it would cost to run that kind of generator and I come up with a goose egg. Half a clam shell!

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: CMOS Oscillator
« Reply #29 on: August 28, 2021, 01:19:37 AM »
Here JLN is neutralizing the magnetic attraction of the NS magnets to the ferrite ring core coil with a pulse.

A thin single wire spiral coil between NS tensioned magnets would work without the core. Master Evo's circuit would generate and store power from the mutal re-attraction cycle.

The operating cost would remain fixed at unity regardless of any increase in scale up. This oscillator would be completely frictionless, noiseless and vibration free. Gate electrode and ground electrode corectly positioned to trigger the Mosfet from the field effect alone with no contact.