Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL  (Read 123551 times)

magnet1c

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #645 on: July 20, 2022, 08:30:40 PM »
Speaking of ITER, i read, i think it was in Suppressed_&_Incredible_Inventions
that fusion overunity (more out than in) was achieved in the 60s and immediately
classified top secret.

Dangerous and not needed.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #646 on: July 20, 2022, 08:45:10 PM »
the biggest energy disinfo //in history
nix
nix, nix85 , nixx85  or whatever nick name you are using.
When I said I may start to moderate disinfo , you called me  with names and implementing me delusion.
 


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITER

Wesley

magnet1c

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #647 on: July 20, 2022, 08:55:30 PM »
nix, nix85 , nixx85  or whatever nick name you are using.
When I said I may start to moderate disinfo , you called me  with names and implementing delusion.
It was  so many times in the past I was contributing to "untrolling" efforts
You are not, taking total ban with supervision into consideration I assume.
Wesley

There's the troll again trying to destroy a good thread.
still deluded that he is a mod here when in reality he
needs to be permabanned.

I don't know why is this guy tolerated,
He claims that ether, magnet motors, overunity, antigravity etc are all "bs".
Despite the fact that none of these are bs, despite the fact that magnet
motors work....

Now he dares attack me for saying ITER is disinfo. And what is ITER,
supposedly seeking energy solution for the world, if that is the case,
how come they overlooked all the next to free solutions. There is nothing
new about fusion research, it is but a smokescreen for the public, to
make it appear as if they're trying. They know well magnets are
source of energy, no need for expensive and dangerous fusion.
How come they don't invest 25 billion $ into Holcomb...

This forum really needs mods, what he is doing should not be allowed.




stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #648 on: July 20, 2022, 09:05:57 PM »

the original statement was:
Back to the topic. I believe RCL can give excess energy but only as a way of tapping unknown source of energy.
my response was:
Yes. absolutely true.
Resonant circuit can act  as an interface.
please show proof regarding the claim.
tapping unknown source of energy doesn't talk about - unknown form of energy.
But in any case if  LRC circuit can sense it and couple into it ,than it  becomes an  interface between the energy from the source and that energy sensing apparatus( including loads)
Wesley

magnet1c

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #649 on: July 20, 2022, 09:19:27 PM »
Even if we forget all other lies, just his claim that magnet only motors are impossible is enough.

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #650 on: July 20, 2022, 10:33:33 PM »
Mister
N
Tomorrow I will email you when I get Email


Or you already have my Email
?
ChetKremens@gmail.com
Been in my profile since day one here!


PLEASE!!






alan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 716
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #651 on: July 22, 2022, 04:47:02 PM »
Even if we forget all other lies, just his claim that magnet only motors are impossible is enough.
Ken W. is saying the same, I believe in this video:  https://youtu.be/xFLDsyrlTG4

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #652 on: July 23, 2022, 04:38:09 PM »
Ken W. is saying the same, I believe in this video:  https://youtu.be/xFLDsyrlTG4
Brilliant skills in formulating total nonsense by mixing proven physical  phenomena to the public that can hear and recognize words
like Tesla, Heaviside , Larmor frequencies ,  ether, .
example:
"Dielectric acceleration conventionally called gravity." - what is of course the total nonsense 
here:
https://youtu.be/xFLDsyrlTG4?t=680

Explanation
word:conventionally= (traditional and ordinary) has nothing to do with physics
Physics is based on precised models,

Gravity is explained here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity
Dielectric Wall Accelerator (DWA is  here:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dielectric_wall_accelerator
_______________________________________________________


A guy who happen to be also "fat, tattoo, carrier," without use of teleprompter, talks to the typical "nonscientific"  listener at twice speed of typical youtube video.
He makes some good statements about, overunity and perpetual motion , immediately mixing it with word "ether" and  limiting his statement to " nonsense of overunity but for mechanical devices. only"


After watching this video most of you are possibly lazy to examine with internet his every sentence.
Without  specifically directed education there is no solid base for listener to realize that :
most of ingredients  of the salt are real but the mix is absolutely wrong,
and essentially not healthy to your perception.

Wesley

alan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 716
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #653 on: July 23, 2022, 05:03:18 PM »
Well, at least he agrees with you regarding PM magnet contraption. 
He has invented this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9yzaoZh0nc 
I didn't care about ether, but he made me wonder.   

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #654 on: July 23, 2022, 05:26:10 PM »
Continuation of my comment from above:
Hopers,  dreamers, amateurs, half baked enthusiasts,  professionals to be- but not yet.
All of you  are value to this forum.

But you need to know that  disinformation is spread by :
e.g Russian trolls, and paid by them real good English speakers.
Their agenda is often  proven by old practice.
Uneducated and confused crowd is easy to  convince and maneuver.

The educated one were
terminated in ,e.g  Katyn
 send to Gulag or Siberia


- individuals like nix, evolving to nixx85 and than to magnet1c.
 can be a product of disinformation, or brainwash or paid to make you one.

"traveling" back in time is just fantasy and doesn't exist
overunity doesn't exist,
perpetual motion  doesn't exist and doesn't make sense to earn nothing.
"anti-gravity"  doesn't exist,
Ether/eather doesn't exist,
Magnet can't perform work
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/661513/can-magnetic-field-do-work

God/gods "ideas", "concepts", ,
are in conflict with modern science and are rejected by means  of being not recognized.
e.g  geology, geophysics, natural history, paleontology, archeology, biology,
(Darwin, physics)
philosophy: 
Science of physics  - is not based on religion nor beliefs but solid models


But you  have rights to believe in anything you want, including Hitler, Putin, Angles,  Devils, heaven
and other nonsense ... from physics stand point.


I wish you the best.
Wesley

alan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 716
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #655 on: July 23, 2022, 05:56:26 PM »
I disagree with nix but he isn't a russian troll. Are you?

God/gods "ideas", "concepts", ,
are in conflict with modern science and are rejected by means  of being not recognized.
e.g  geology, geophysics, natural history, paleontology, archeology, biology,
(Darwin, physics)
philosophy: 
Science of physics  - is not based on religion nor believes but solid models 

lolol 
all scientists of the day that laid the foundations were believers, especially Maxwell and Newton, and Maxwell believed in an ether. 
Do you know who wrote the big book Tesla reads in front of his huge coil?

"anti-gravity"  doesn't exist, 
But is actively being researched, lookup quantum inertia, it's a darpa funded research.

kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1418
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #656 on: July 23, 2022, 05:57:26 PM »
"anti-gravity"  doesn't exist,
Why, when we get rid of the body.  This will.
The body is like weights on the legs. Pulls us to the ground. :)

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #657 on: July 23, 2022, 06:24:54 PM »
I disagree with nix but he isn't a russian troll. Are you?

I never said he is.
I'm nobody- I only exist as value in minds of these who finds value in me.
including my own wife :)
________________________________________


God/gods "ideas", "concepts", ,

are in conflict with modern science and are rejected by means  of being not recognized.
e.g  geology, geophysics, natural history, paleontology, archeology, biology,
(Darwin, physics)
philosophy: 
Science of physics  - is not based on religion nor beliefs but solid models 
all scientists of the day that laid the foundations were believers, especially Maxwell and Newton, and Maxwell believed in an ether. 
Do you know who wrote the big book Tesla reads in front of his huge coil?
Citizens of Russia aren't all good or bad nor educated or not- it is diversity like in any country.
But Russia exists in its recognizable form.
Scientists aren't/weren't  seen as believers or not but as physical value contributors to conservative physics.
their diversity was not important to recognizable form of physics.


"anti-gravity"  doesn't exist, 
But is actively being researched, lookup quantum inertia, it's a darpa funded research.
Yes.
I was in DARPA programs as principal investigator and chief of scientific team.
That only says that someone designated monetary value to prove again that models in
physics are valid .

Wesley

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #658 on: July 23, 2022, 06:31:57 PM »
..

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #659 on: July 23, 2022, 06:54:06 PM »
Gravity.:
Why, when we get rid of the body.  This will.
The body is like weights on the legs. Pulls us to the ground. :)
mass is undeniable cause of gravity and
Quote
gravity (from Latin  gravitas 'weight'[1])
is a fundamental interaction which causes mutual attraction
between all things with mass or energy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity

Entire concept of Big Bang is based on conversion energy to mass.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang
Wesley