Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL  (Read 123560 times)

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #510 on: July 10, 2022, 08:05:09 PM »
@Wlwy (Zily) I know you're reading, that's good, you should learn. :)

Remember how you posted that guy with same pole ferrite rings attracting (apparently).

I replicated it few days ago.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8AdMe85hwnE

And no, same poles do not attract. The thing is ferrite is weak and easily
demagnetized. As it get's partially and asymmetrically demagnetized and
even polarity flipped around the ring it is possible, by spinning one relative
to the other find a sweet spot where they 'attract' but it's not strong and
quite unstable.

And no, it's not cause one edge is broken off. I had the similar effect happen
before it broke off, maybe it did help it a bit, but it can be done without.

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #511 on: July 10, 2022, 08:28:58 PM »
Good point onepower, from Daniel Cook who indeed spent 35 years studying
magnetism before allegedly stumbling upon the scalar effects, to Tesla and
all the others, it is so simple a child can understand......yes, but at the same
time SOOOO FREAKING DELICATE a team of 150,000 scientists may wander
in circles for eons and not get it if they don't know EXACTLY how.

Jo-EL

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #512 on: July 11, 2022, 12:25:51 PM »
All of you.

Do what all doing, you are get what all have.
Thinking out of the box or looking over the edge of your round table !
When time is ready, mankind will connecting to nature, but first understand nature.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #513 on: July 11, 2022, 04:01:49 PM »
There is ether,//Earth is surrounded by this substance and it's density decreases as we go farther into space. // of multiple kinds, one kind is particularly responsible for converting sun's odic rays into hertzian light. ETC
science rejected ether that's why you can't:"
-list  its properties,
-explain its interaction nor provide any credible links.
True physics stems from knowledge of God and of One Substance / One Force. Approaching from unity perspective is the key to Nature's penetralia.
There is no terms/ meaning- "True Physics"
science rejected to recognize God that's why you can't:"
-list God's properties,
-explain God interaction nor provide any scientific credible physics/al links
-science explains processes and doesn't keep it secret as oppose to unrecognized by it "God"
___________________________________________________

ether/ eather , Overunity, Perpetual motion
-all of it doesn't exist  and you can't:
-list  its properties,
-explain its interaction nor provide any credible links,
-you can't even explain why you are calling science
 opposing that nonsense :
Disinfo.  bs

You been promoting Russan FE videos for 10+ years,
there is a technical value in you, and in some Russians too.
Magnet is but a water tap for the etheric streams of certain order and can be tapped as a source of energy as they are in so many OU devices.
If Ether doesn't exist and you can't provide credible scientific info/proof than "etheric streams" can't exist too.
 
Hans Coler determined frequency of ferromagnetism at 180KHz
look here: Deterministic switching of ferromagnetism at room temperature using an electric field https://www.nature.com/articles/nature14004
Quote
17.12.2014 · This was superimposed with a 2 V peak-to-peak amplitude, applied at both the normal cantilever contact resonance frequency of approximately 1.8 MHz,
Phhh. No frequency range is the key and big gains
~Frequency from 7 Hz to 17 kHz is where the access to that energy is, due to low losses  of EM energy in the interface and in TM mode.

Your problem nix85 is in :
 - your statements without supported by science explanation:
    Dog barking on the street  is possibly making some unexplained statements too. ( joke)

Wesley

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #514 on: July 11, 2022, 04:14:28 PM »
Jo-EL < Broken english aside, there's another one playing the i know it
you don't games, ironic and comical.

Jo-EL

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #515 on: July 11, 2022, 06:02:34 PM »
@nix85

Ich weiß das Du nix ( = NICHTS ) weisst = I know that you know nothing ( from this thuff )
Ich spiele nicht ich forsche ! = I don't play, i am in reseach !
Und ja, Englisch ist nicht meine Muttersprache = And yes, english is not my native language.

Darüber hinaus antworte ich nicht mehr auf so Scheiß Bemerkungen !!!

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #516 on: July 11, 2022, 06:03:31 PM »
science rejected ether that's why you can't:"
-list  its properties,
-explain its interaction nor provide any credible links.

"Science" you refer to is fundamentally a joke.

You are either amazingly blind or a shill, there is no third option.

Ether is absolute certainty, and as i said, it's of multiple types, as it is written
in Etidorhpa:

""Do you say that the atmosphere is composed of substances unknown to man?"

"Yes; several of them are gases, and others are qualities of space condition, neither gas, liquid, nor solid. One particularly interferes with light in its passage. It is an entity that is not moved by the motion of the air, and is unequally distributed over the earth's surface. As we ascend above the earth it decreases, so it does as we descend into it. It is not vapor of water, is neither smoke, nor a true gas, and is as yet sensible to man only by its power of modifying the intensity of light. It has no color, is chemically inactive, and yet modifies the sun's rays so as to blot objects from view at a comparatively small distance from a person on the face of the earth. That this fact is known to man is evident from the knowledge he possesses of the difference in the power of his organs of vision at different parts of the earth. His sight is especially acute on the table lands of the Western Territories.""

And something i already shared on the forum...

A little bit from Oahspe telling few important things well known in occult circles, that light we see is created in the atmosphere and that there are various strata, plateaus of the vortex surrounding the Earth, these are the 7 astral shells i talked about.

Earth, Needles in the Atmosphere, and Plateaus.

When Jehovih condensed the earth, and it became firm and crusted over, there rose up from the earth heat and moisture, which continue to this day. But Jehovih limited the ascent of the substances going upward, and the boundary of the limit of moisture was the same as the clouds that float in the air; and the heat was of similar ascent. And while the moisture and heat rise upward, they are met by the etheric substance of the vortex of the earth, and the moisture and the gases of the air assume the form of needles. On the side of the earth facing the sun the needles are polarized and acting, driving forth, which is called light; but on the face of the earth opposite from the sun the needles are in confusion, and this is called darkness. Jehovih said: So that man may comprehend the structure of the belt that holds the earth, I will give him a sign high up in the air. And Jehovih caused the vapor in the firmament to be frozen and fall to the earth, white, and it is called snow. For the snowflake shows the matrix in which it is molded. Jehovih said: Let this be a sign also, that even as heat and moisture rise up from the earth, so are there representatives of all things on the earth which have also evaporated upward, and all such things rise up to the level of density that is like themselves, every one to its own level, and they take their places in the strata of the vortex. These are called plateaus; or spheres, for they surround the whole earth. Some of them are ten miles high, some a thousand, some a hundred thousand or more miles. And all these spheres that rotate and travel with the earth are called atmospherea, or lower heavens.

As I made a limit to the ascent of clouds, so I made a limit to the places of the different kinds of substances in atmospherea; the more subtle and potent to the rim, and the more dense and impotent nearer to the earth.

According to the condition of these different plateaus in atmospherea, whether they are near the earth or high above, |65| so shall the spirit of man take its place in the first heaven; |66| according to his diet, desires and behavior, so shall he dwell in spirit on the plateau to which he has adapted himself during his earth life.

Earth and Plateaus of Lower Heaven. E, Etherea; B, periphery of the earth’s vortex. This line was called by the ancients the Bridge of Chinvat.* All within this area is called Atmospherea. The center circle is the earth; land mass is black; O, the ocean. 1, 2, 3, represent atmospherean plateaus on and near the earth. The O, O, O, with a line through it, represent atmospherean oceans.

*Note that to make the earth, etc., apparent, this Chinvat line is not to scale. That is, were Chinvat drawn in actual proportion to the shown size of the earth, the B line would be drawn some 30 of earth’s diameters distant from the center of the earth."


......

There is no question if there is an ether,

Aspden effect is relatively well known in OU community, i read skeptical forums,
they tried to explain it away by the fact that heated ball bearing will have less
resistance :) I am sure you will favor this "explanation"

http://exo-science.com/aspden.html

http://villesresearch.com/ether.html

Then you have Etheric Rainmaking with Trevor James Constable

Watch it, slowly, fully, attentively. Then you will have to decide,
either it's a hoax or there is ether.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjeUhQJp5WE

How long are you gonna live in silly denial of the obvious.

Quote
There is no terms/ meaning- "True Physics"
science rejected to recognize God that's why you can't:"
-list God's properties,
-explain God interaction nor provide any scientific credible physics/al links
-science explains processes and doesn't keep it secret as oppose to unrecognized by it "God"

What you call God is not something outside you nor is there such thing as "outside".
You are IT, and it's easy to know it if you withdraw attention...

...beyond linear time (and space), beyond mind, it takes no effort, it's already there,
silent background, still awareness, isness, being, it's not a philosophy or a belief,
it is the source of all, the driving power, the only true reality. But forget about
spiritual realization just by withdrawing from linear time, ultimate bliss is not
attained easily. Most of us at best see but glimpses of it from time to time.

"Science" that does not approach from the God-side, from source-downward, even
if it stumbles at certain effects will always be extremely limited and flawed to the core.

Quote
___________________________________________________

ether/ eather , Overunity, Perpetual motion
-all of it doesn't exist  and you can't:
-list  its properties,
-explain its interaction nor provide any credible links,
-you can't even explain why you are calling science
 opposing that nonsense

It all exists and properties are well known and explainable by those in the know,
surely not to you.

I know it surely exists and that it's of various kinds and that it creates light and
heat, influences weather, affects what we call weight, is closely related to vitaly etc.
It is a whole new (old) science, only TRUE science.

Look how he sleazily insists on "credible links". He knows well this stuff is far
removed from what is commonly called "credible" or "peer reviewed", but in
vain, ether IS.

Quote
If Ether doesn't exist and you can't provide credible scientific info/proof than "etheric streams" can't exist too.

As long as you deny the ether you will live in denial of true science.

Quote
look here: Deterministic switching of ferromagnetism at room temperature using an electric field https://www.nature.com/articles/nature14004

Random unrelated article that does not even mention frequency of any kind.

Quote
~Frequency from 7 Hz to 17 kHz is where the access to that energy is, due to low losses  of EM energy in the interface and in TM mode.

Phh. Losses depend on the core, in electrical steel they become
too high above 500Hz yet in ferrite they are low even at many MHz.

What you say is nonsense, has no relation to reality. Danger is some noob might
fall for your deception. How many have you lead into the hertzian death, how many lights have you destroyed. God knows.

Quote
Your problem nix85 is in :
 - your statements without supported by science explanation:
    Dog barking on the street  is possibly making some unexplained statements too. ( joke)

Wesley

Your problem, stivep, is you are as limited as a horse with blinders

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blinkers_(horse_tack)

What you call "science" is the bottom side of the two sided coin and that bottom
side is in the shadow and covered with filth. The upper side, the side closer to
the sunlight, which is blemish and dirt free is totally beyond your grasp.

Horse runs after a carrot cause he knows not he will never reach it that way (joke?)

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #517 on: July 11, 2022, 06:28:47 PM »
Please understand - I'm not your enemy.
Jo-EL < Broken english aside,
You can find only shortcuts / abbreviations. e.g: "physics/al links" for word: "physical"
Show me please in my text from above  any broken English phrases ?
________________________________________
there's another one playing the i know it
you don't games, ironic and comical.


I assume you meant: - "your"  instead of word "you."
or  there is missing word "are"
in phrase:
you don't games, - "are" ironic and comical.
_________________________________________
for average reader here, my explanation and questions are precise and concise.

where is your physics based response to the "God" question?
where is your physics based response to ether/ eather , Overunity, Perpetual motion
where is your physics based response denying "Frequency from 7 Hz to 17 kHz quote."
please provide scientifically recognized links to the articles conforming your revelations.


No single answer to the previous post was provided by you, not even one.
and your last response is by that "ironic and comical."
please correct me if I'm wrong?

Wesley

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #518 on: July 11, 2022, 06:35:24 PM »
@nix85

Ich weiß das Du nix ( = NICHTS ) weisst = I know that you know nothing ( from this thuff )
Ich spiele nicht ich forsche ! = I don't play, i am in reseach !
Und ja, Englisch ist nicht meine Muttersprache = And yes, english is not my native language.

Darüber hinaus antworte ich nicht mehr auf so Scheiß Bemerkungen !!!

Funny, i like how you describe yourself cause you indeed know nothing.

You can't even spell research, back to square one.

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #519 on: July 11, 2022, 06:43:26 PM »
Please understand - I'm not your enemy. You can find only shortcuts / abbreviations. e.g: "physics/al links" for word: "physical"
Show me please in my text from above  any broken English phrases ?
________________________________________

Funny, i was clearly addressing the other guy, not you.

Quote
I assume you meant: - "your"  instead of word "you."
or  there is missing word "are"
in phrase:
you don't games, - "are" ironic and comical.
_________________________________________

No, i meant it as it's written, "playing the "i know it you don't" games"

Quote
for average reader here, my explanation and questions are precise and concise.

Again, i was not addressing you there, as for your explanation and questions
they are limited and flawed, you deny ether and many true natural phenomena.

Quote
Quote
where is your physics based response to the "God" question?
where is your physics based response to ether/ eather , Overunity, Perpetual motion
where is your physics based response denying "Frequency from 7 Hz to 17 kHz quote."
please provide scientifically recognized links to the articles conforming your revelations.

No single answer to the previous post was provided by you, not even one.
and your last response is by that "ironic and comical."
please correct me if I'm wrong?

Wesley

You always play the same silly game with everyone, claiming they did not answer
your supposed questions.

I addressed all the key points, IT IS YOU who again dodges all the points i made
and tries to derail the conversation. Aspden effect, Trevor James Constable etc
etc etc, address this.

Focus on facts, scientifically, objectively.

You deny ether, etheric streams.... you are wrong as wrong can be.

BTW Where then do you imagine Kapanadze's excess energy comes from

from nearby radio tower maybe or some other hertzian source

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #520 on: July 11, 2022, 06:51:01 PM »
"Science" you refer to is fundamentally a joke.
I just got to my office. I'm responding to this part before my lunch time.

invalid argument
science made  you able to respond to me now using computer and Internet.


Aspden effect is relatively well known in OU community, i read skeptical forums,
http://exo-science.com/aspden.html
invalid argument
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Harold_Aspden
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harold Aspden
Wesley

Jo-EL

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #521 on: July 11, 2022, 06:59:45 PM »
@nix85 - you startet this THREAD, but yourself let come out 90% bullshit who has nothing to do with it.

You like a baby, you found a wrong writen word -it's my gift for you - i don't wont it back !!!
If you want know more, i can give you a trail, a light of knowledge,  i don't know if you notice what i wrote just a few second before you !

@stivep alias Wesley, i dont't understand your problem with the word OVERUNITY = OU ? Let me know. Will know if it's worth write with you !

@lancaIV - you write a lot of interesting things, but nobody can read all no want and it's a lot off topic !!!

I am reading from one of you that you have 10 Min a day or week you spent in overunity-forum. And all who can thinking a litle bit are seeing clear thats a big lie !!! So OUT-TOPICS and bullshit i don't answer !!! Hope you understand.


PLEASE, don't disturbing - read, think and answer, if not it's like nothing !!!

@nix85

Reply #7 and #3 the formulars a true and working but what is RESONANCE ??? !!!!!  It's called OMEGA !!!!!

! 2 pi f     -"  SHOULD be for  all  "L x C"  -->  Xc = Xl    for biggest Q but first low  "XXX"  than should be "infinit" !!!"

Looking for time !!! All cases but not    full time !  More HINTS i don't give for TROUBLEMAKERS !!!

Good Luck

PS: change some words !!! But if you don't learning read between the lines you have no chance, USE it !!!

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #522 on: July 11, 2022, 07:08:04 PM »
I just got to my office. I'm responding to this part before my lunch time.

invalid argument
science made to you able to respond to me now using computer and Internet.

HA, like i am talking to a 5 year old. Are you gonna tell me about conventional
"science", ha, and how long would you last in this debate, seconds, less?
You who denied the power amplification in RLC tank and probably still deny it.

And computers, do you want me to ask you which logic gate corresponds
to which binary algebraic operation or how to construct the gates...do you want
me to ask you about internet, exactly how it works or how unlike what you
been told Russians did it first....

Apples and oranges, i made it clear it is FUNDAMENTALLY flawed, a joke, it denies
ether, it denies light is created in the atmosphere, it denies overunity or however
you call it, it denies gravity is a magnetic stream flowing into the earth vertically
and there is a polar opposite at higher frequency,  it claims you would need an
energy of Jupiter to levitate a small craft yet we know it is done for nothing...

It is dark age "science", extremely limited and fundamentally flawed.

Quote
invalid argument
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Harold_Aspden
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harold Aspden
Wesley

HA, and what in that pile of nothing is supposed to "debunk" Aspden.
You just link whatever and that is supposed to be an argument.

And you have yet to make your stance on Trever James Constable rainmaking.


stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #523 on: July 11, 2022, 07:15:12 PM »
@stivep alias Wesley, i dont't understand your problem with the word OVERUNITY = OU ? Let me know. Will know if it's
Overunity doesn't exist. It is model rejected by physics.
Physics is based on models.
https://towardsdatascience.com/the-physics-of-energy-based-models-1121122d0d9
there are three sections you can read my articles here to find out if it is worth your time:
 Re: Wesley's  Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum  « Reply #3385 on: September 25, 2021, 05:47:03 PM »


Topics  targeting  very much specified subject matter.
one is in English another in Russian:
1.https://overunity.com/18335/wireless-energy-transfer-experiments-builders-board/msg560346/#msg5603462.
https://overunity.com/18913/in-russian-ekspierimienty-po-biesprovodnoi-pieriedachie-enierghii-doska-stroitieliei/msg560156/#msg560156
Wesley.

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #524 on: July 11, 2022, 07:17:38 PM »
Overunity doesn't exist. It is old 19 century outdated model rejected by physics.
Physics is based on models.
https://towardsdatascience.com/the-physics-of-energy-based-models-1121122d0d9
there are three sections you can read my articles here to find out if it is worth your time:
 Re: Wesley's  Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum  « Reply #3385 on: September 25, 2021, 05:47:03 PM »
Wesley.

Stop grabbing onto stupid semantics, this is OVERUNITY.COM it is a good term and
we all know it means energy gain from open system, ambient. So drop the bs.