Language:
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

### GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

Custom Search

### Author Topic: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL  (Read 35688 times)

#### nix85

• Hero Member
• Posts: 864
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #195 on: June 14, 2021, 10:00:24 PM »
Yes, book is in state of rest. How did you imagine to move it at constant speed without accelerating it while working against friction.

#### lancaIV

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 4820
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #196 on: June 14, 2021, 10:08:53 PM »
By typical average Earth velocity ?

No,let us be serious :

-F/F Forces ( e /e-) movement is important because

Newton's law of gravitation resembles Coulomb's law of electrical forces, which is used to calculate the magnitude of the electrical force arising between two charged bodies. Both are inverse-square laws, where force is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the bodies. Coulomb's law has the product of two charges in place of the product of the masses, and the Coulomb constant in place of the gravitational constant.

Newton's law has since been superseded by Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity, but it continues to be used as an excellent approximation of the effects of gravity in most applications. Relativity is required only when there is a need for extreme accuracy, or when dealing with very strong gravitational fields, such as those found near extremely massive and dense objects, or at small distances (such as Mercury's orbit around the Sun).

#### nix85

• Hero Member
• Posts: 864
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #197 on: June 14, 2021, 10:11:53 PM »
Of course, more unrelated stuff, but no admission that work is done on the book. Again, no surprises.

#### lancaIV

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 4820
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #198 on: June 14, 2021, 10:15:30 PM »
Of course, more unrelated stuff, but no admission that work is done on the book. Again, no surprises.

If

you move the book at constant speed horizontally,

you don't do any work on it,

despite the fact that you have to exert an upward force to counter-act gravity.

Work can only be done on an object if it moves, if the object moves up 2 meters and then it falls back down 2 meters and returns to it's original position then there was no work done on the block. If the distance from the starting position and the ending position does not change then there was no work done on the block. So to answer your question, no gravity has done no work on this object because it just fell back to it's original position.

book calculation vectors  :
Pushing work and anti-pushing work not included

#### nix85

• Hero Member
• Posts: 864
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #199 on: June 14, 2021, 10:24:42 PM »

If

you move the book at constant speed horizontally,

you don't do any work on it,

despite the fact that you have to exert an upward force to counter-act gravity.

Let's ignore the fact that you need to accelerate the book first.

To move the book at constant speed you must constantly work against friction.

If we suppose book is sitting on imaginary frictionless table, then once pushed it would just keep moving, it would not require you to keep pushing it. So your proposition is nonsensical.

#### lancaIV

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 4820
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #200 on: June 14, 2021, 10:28:51 PM »
nix85,forget at first this relatively unimportant "friction" factor !

We are discussing the several forces,positive and negative,under given physics laws and orders conditioning !

and the physical "term : work" in real physics world application !

What I want,what You want,is also unimportant !

#### nix85

• Hero Member
• Posts: 864
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #201 on: June 14, 2021, 10:33:54 PM »
If we're gonna forget friction, then sure, no work needs to be done, this is Newton's first law of inertia. Bodies keep moving in straight lines unless acted upon by external force.

This brings us to inertial propulsion cause here we have an INSIDE force accelerating the system anywhere.

Speaking of inertial propulsion, i'll give you a hint electropolished steel with low viscosity grease has lowest coefficient of friction, even lower than TEFLON.

#### lancaIV

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 4820
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #202 on: June 14, 2021, 10:50:16 PM »
Oh,which surprize,You are beginning to write concrete !
Question when is applying a force ( f.e mass x acceleration )   not work ?
(above Newton,here Coloumb "wattfree transformer ", displacement current circuit )

What is the " lever" as instrument for a phenomen ?
Is each rotative 360° circular process no/work ? ( Here then losts : friction force )

#### nix85

• Hero Member
• Posts: 864
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #203 on: June 14, 2021, 10:56:31 PM »
Sadly, you still don't write concrete, always waving around crumbling in tons of blurry and unrelated stuff (easy way out?)

Anyway, we cannot assume no friction, if that is what you mean you must specify it.

#### lancaIV

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 4820
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #204 on: June 15, 2021, 05:51:08 AM »
Newtons 3.Axioms and the 4.th :the superposition state ,"4.th law"

2.Axiom -ma = ma which unit ?  force ,energy or work representing ?

3.Axiom -F = F  force       |F| = N       |-F| = -N

Unilateral the book " pushing" is bilateral pusher/pushed object and vice-versa/reziprok  to see like a

" Carambolage"

We are not in search for F in Newton but W in Ns and here we have the impulse or momentum to calculate
I= Ft  or p = mv ( p and v with vector arrow) |p|= Ns

Fm( echanics) and Fe( lectric) to Wm(echanic) and We(lectric)

Applying a force is not in motion mechaniqs either not electric motion "work"

Only as [(-F)+(F)]t = Wtotum ,F and -F with vector arrow

-F = F  and  GRT nuclear FORCE  -e = e

Transformed "specific force" Relativity from Einstein/1.wife e= mcv2 to N.Tesla e=tcv2 to emphaized (e,-e)t= W or -W per sec

Positive and/or negative | nuclear particle power |

Minkowski allgemeiner(passiv) Raum-Zeit to spezifischer ( aktiv) Raum-Zeit-Richtung
Orts-Vektor Zeit-Vektor Richtungs-Vektor, + von - zu

Is energy mortal ? Particle/wave power( in force units) and their lifetime ! Particle/wave birth ? Source/incubator ?

Schoepferische Zerstoerung ( Schumpeter)

Sincere

OCWL

p.s.: que horror,nao : que terror ,nao mais: que desastre ,quasi : cata-stropha( das 7) : # 180 : tantos errors

« Last Edit: June 15, 2021, 11:56:00 AM by lancaIV »

#### nix85

• Hero Member
• Posts: 864
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #205 on: June 15, 2021, 01:30:02 PM »
Force = Mass * acceleration
Work = force * distance moved  unit: newton meter or joule or Work = Mass * Gravity * Height
Work = Change in Energy
Power = work / time = force * displacement / time = force * velocity
Power (hp,watt) = work(ENERGY)/time aka time rate of energy transfer
Energy = Power x Time

On deeper level there is no positive or negative "particles", every"thing" is made out of neutral bubbles of consciousness, they appear as tiny voids in the ether, there is no detectable rotation or inner content in them, they are just tiny voids, koilon = ether in greek meaning hollow...

These neutral bubbles make up male and female "atoms" (which would correspond to some subatomic particle probably smaller than quarks). These are positive and negative but their only difference is the direction of flow of NEUTRAL bubbles.

Vitality globules, lifeforces and etheric atoms

Fig. 1. Lifeforce & vitality

According to Leadbeater (1927) the Sun sends out several of forms of etheric energy, for example lifeforce and vitality. The lifeforce seems to be capable of occupying several different kinds of etheric form and most commonly it adopts an octahedron, made of four atoms arranged in a square, and one central atom constantly vibrating up and down. Sometimes it uses exceedingly active little molecule consisting of three atoms. The vitality globule consists of seven atoms, arranged like the atoms in lifeforce, except in a form of hexagon instead of a square. In all of these forms the central atom is in rapid vibration at right angles to disc plane of other atoms, springing up from it to a height greater than the diameter of the disc, and then sinking below the disc to an equal distance, repeating this motion several times in a second.

Fig. 2. Feminine etheric atom

The term "atom" used here refers to etheric atoms. There are two kinds of etheric atoms, positive (masculine) and negative (feminine). In the positive atom the lifeforce flows (counterclockwise) from the fourth dimension to the physical world and in the negative atom the lifeforce flows (clockwise) from the physical world to the fourth dimension. The force flows in from the wider end, causing a heart like shape. It spirals within and around this atom in closed loops. The atom is spinning upon its own axis and it has a regular pulsation, a contraction and expansion, like the pulsation of the heart.

The Sun radiates vitality to all levels. The vital force enters some of the physical atoms, immensely increases their activity and makes them animated and glowing. When vitality wells up within atom, it endows it with an additional life, and gives it a power of attraction so that it immediately draws around it six other atoms which it arranges in a hexagonal form. These globules are conspicuous above all others which may be seen floating in the atmosphere, on account of their brilliance and extreme activity. While the force that vivifies these globules is quite different from light, it nevertheless seems to depend upon light for its power of manifestation. In brilliant sunshine this vitality is constantly welling up afresh, and the globules are generated with great rapidity and in incredible numbers, but in cloudy weather there is great diminution in the number of globules formed, and during the night, the operation is entirely suspended.

http://www.villesresearch.com/ether.html

Learning that vitality atom is hexagonal in shape it may not come as surprise in whole universe hexagonal grid, or honeycomb core material is used for healing.

#### lancaIV

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 4820
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #206 on: June 17, 2021, 12:03:42 PM »
Good Morning,nix85 ,

we are similar,but not same ! And I do not base my research on unidentified foreigners,without experiments !

Am I against the Infinitiysav their claims : C.O.P. 100 excluded controler consume ? Why shall I ?

https://overunity.com/18289/lallemand-heat-pump/  C.O.P. 25

Different input/output ratio : surface/speed/rotation/pressure et cet. ergo process parameters !

in vacuuo

Sincere

OCWL

#### alan

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 468
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #207 on: June 17, 2021, 03:10:19 PM »
distance = speed * time

#### lancaIV

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 4820
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #208 on: June 17, 2021, 03:47:57 PM »
distance = speed * time
distance ( and displacement)  for itself(ves are)  is metrical,without tempus ,a length

distance as route ( velocity," speed has no direction" ,but  in " velocity has direction" )  :

speed = distance/time            speed x time = distance
miles/ph  = miles x hour         mph    x h       = m ?!

mph   /   h       = m !?
per = means  divided m/h but miles x ( = times or multiplied)  hour = mh or m•h
% per centum (one nullus) (2 nullus= per mille ) also known in street traffic as " promille"  Alc in blood
Syntax and right algebraic sign mathematical and lingual for not school/Uni/workplace Crash-course !

Helps white and blue collar relationship and understatement and bilateral satisfaction !

#### alan

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 468
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #209 on: June 17, 2021, 04:48:28 PM »
with a couple of elementary units and its derivatives, we can describe much of classical physics.

position=x
v=dx/dt
a=dx2/d2
jerk=dx3/d3t=da/dt

mass=m  momentum=mv
force=ma
yank=m
jerk=m*da/dt
work e=force*x
power w=force*v
charge=q
current i=dq/dt
volt=e/q
e= v*q
p=v*i=e/q*q/t=e/t
capacitance=q/v
inductance=v /(i/t)
...