Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL  (Read 123537 times)

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #120 on: June 12, 2021, 02:20:40 PM »
No,8000% is 98% Carnot-factor efficiency ! ( for this specific Infinitysav claim,not geral ! ::) )
Do not accuse me,discuss with Physics determination and experimenting Physicians/Engineers/Technicians
about abstract/concret terms use !
Nonsense,non sense ! No emotion,no feelings !

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #121 on: June 12, 2021, 02:30:16 PM »
You are still pushing the nonsense.

Finally understand the difference between heat transfer and heat generation.

If you generate 20kwh of heat from 250wh that is 8000% efficiency.

This is not a heat pump so you used 250wh to transport heat from some heat source, you generate the energy in the centrifugal boiler itself.

I am not accusing you, i am just saying do not claim it's not OU when it is.

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #122 on: June 12, 2021, 02:46:36 PM »
http://www.rexresearch.com/hensonsihsb/henson.html


High C.O.P. ,OU,but not and never CARNOT-FACTOR-1 OU


and with heat transfer(f.e. as laser light ) and heat generation


Finitum with mental gambling




wmbr


OCWL


p.s. : https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wiktionary.org/wiki/Physik


         Physik,Physics in Suaheli : fizikia


https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olympische_Spiele_der_Antike


                 body,mind and soul games


https://www.worldhistory.org/article/205/the-pythia---priestess-of-ancient-delphi/


https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/apologise  ::)

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #123 on: June 12, 2021, 02:56:30 PM »
Again you are pushing this nonsense that generating 20kW of heat using 250W input is 98% efficiency.
No, it's 8000% efficiency.

nix85.
You have certain brain capacity and you discussing some good physics.
I assume you know that it is you, who is  pushing all of that nonsense.
But question  reminds open , why?
_______________________________

One of  possible conclusions is  that you are being paid for that nonsense by some troll  entity.
That would explain why someone decided to fly so low.
_________________________________
You had no chance to graduate with all of that BS  any college in Civilized Western World .
But  outside of it , yes.. you can become the same "PhD" like  Slobodan Andrey  .

Wesley

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #124 on: June 12, 2021, 03:05:42 PM »
http://www.rexresearch.com/hensonsihsb/henson.html


High C.O.P. ,OU,but not and never CARNOT-FACTOR-1 OU


and with heat transfer(f.e. as laser light ) and heat generation


Finitum with mental gambling




wmbr


OCWL


p.s. : https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wiktionary.org/wiki/Physik


         PHysics in Suaheli : fizikia[/font][/size]

"The Carnot efficiency has little practical value. It is a maximum theoretical efficiency of a hypothetical engine."

We are talking real energy GAIN, not some hypothetical machine that cannot be built.

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #125 on: June 12, 2021, 03:09:08 PM »
nix85.
You have certain brain capacity and you discussing some good physics.
I assume you know that it is you, who is  pushing all of that nonsense.
But question  reminds open , why?
_______________________________

One of  possible conclusions is  that you are being paid for that nonsense by some troll  entity.
That would explain why someone decided to fly so low.
_________________________________
You had no chance to graduate with all of that BS  any college in Civilized Western World .
But  outside of it , yes.. you can become the same "PhD" like  Slobodan Andrey  .

Wesley

Honestly, at the same time, i highly doubt your brain capacity. Here you claim all these devices, call them FE or OU doesn't matter, are bunk, yet your channel is dedicated to promotion of those same machines. Who is the shill, who is the troll here, who is flying so low his face is plowing the soil and getting his mouth stuffed with dirt and worms.

Not to mention you never addressed the 4th law of motion etc.

I want you to address the 4th law of motion, enough of dodging.

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #126 on: June 12, 2021, 03:15:23 PM »
"The Carnot efficiency has little practical value. It is a maximum theoretical efficiency of a hypothetical engine."

We are talking real energy GAIN, not some hypothetical machine that cannot be built.


 ::)  "The Carnot efficiency has little practical value. It is a maximum theoretical efficiency of a hypothetical engine."


                                   IT IS THE NON-PLUS-ULTRA SCALE : 100% ,also and ever for You,nix85


https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/de/presse-und-medien/presseinformationen/2017/gestiegene-effizienz-feldtests-bestaetigen-potenzial-von-waermepumpen-als-wichtigster-heiztechnik-der-zukunft.html


                                their Maximum= IDEAL  orientation


Nicola Tesla,DAIKIN,PANASONIC/MITSUBISHI,CARRIER, and other inventive persons or companies ( in laboratory and market)




                                                        break-even
 https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://studyflix.de/ingenieurwissenschaften/energiebilanz-526


                                       external + internal energy researcher :
                                https://patents.google.com/patent/EP1841544A2


        description statement :


Therefore the ratio between the air kinetic energy to the air internal energy in this case is: 3,201.6/2,952,000= 0.00108,




                           
                                i.e., the kinetic energy is about one thousandth of the air internal energy



and this case is for the maximum operable air speed for the sophisticated 2 MW air turbine.
Weaker winds yield even smaller energy ratios.




centrifugal-boiler /     airpower turbine chamber direction flow : centrifugal or centipetal , ... and .... (turbulent and/or laminar) !?


                          Use of air ( edit: or other moveable medium) internal energy and devices


for Infinitysav max possible in/out results research,with oil as fluid,here air:


Wind kinetic energy can be expressed mathematically by this formula: Eκ= P X V X A X V2 /2


 Where V is the air speed p is the air density


Surprisingly, natural wind air ( artificial oil flow ?)
 has huge amount of energy (called "internal" energy) compared to its kinetic energy even at freezing temperature.
To realize this statement, one must look at equation of energy for isentropic compressible flow for a unit mass: CpT + V2/2=const (Eq. 24 Ref. Book P140)





Since the centrifugal force of the blade is: F=Jω2 R dm,
G> is the rotational speed
R is the local radius of mass element of the propeller blade dm is a differential mass element of the propeller blade


 The rotation speed of the rotor is an important factor to get high output power since the power is equal to the multiplication of direct force multiply by speed, i.e.: P= F x V.


Thus the air speed at the throat 114 is 221.9 FT/SEC, which is 221.9/21.737 = 10.2 times faster than the airflow speed at section 110.
 Therefore we get airflow having 104 times more kinetic energy in section 114 compared to section 110.
This huge increase of kinetic energy is the major aspect of the invention.
Since no external forces was implied on the airflow in the nozzle, some of the airflow internal energy of section 110, i.e.: ΔTx Cp= (492-488.15) x 6000. has been converted into kinetic energy, i.e.: V2]sll4/2 - V2] sπo/2= (221.92-21.7372)/2 and this is the major aspect of the invention.






nix85,You will need and use this : https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/reynolds-number#:~:text=Reynolds%20number%20(Rn)%20is%20defined,L%20is%20a%20typical%20length.
by Infinitysav oil movement efficiency research


                                                         10.2 times faster


when 2 times faster = 8 times the output energy then 10,2 times faster .......


                                                    cube/inverse cube law
« Last Edit: June 12, 2021, 06:03:40 PM by lancaIV »

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #127 on: June 12, 2021, 03:39:49 PM »

 ::)  "The Carnot efficiency has little practical value. It is a maximum theoretical efficiency of a hypothetical engine."


                                   IT IS THE NON-PLUS-ULTRA SCALE : 100% ,also and ever for You,nix85


https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/de/presse-und-medien/presseinformationen/2017/gestiegene-effizienz-feldtests-bestaetigen-potenzial-von-waermepumpen-als-wichtigster-heiztechnik-der-zukunft.html


                                their Maximum= IDEAL  orientation


Nicola Tesla,DAIKIN,PANASONIC/MITSUBISHI,CARRIER, and other inventive persons or companies ( in laboratory and market)




                                                        break-even
 https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://studyflix.de/ingenieurwissenschaften/energiebilanz-526

"The Carnot efficiency has little practical value. It is a maximum theoretical efficiency of a hypothetical engine."

You find that quote funny? Maybe you should do some more reading. :)

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/carnot-efficiency#:~:text=Carnot%20process%20efficiency.,the%20heat%20transfer%20to%20occur.

"Fuel Cell Basic Chemistry and Thermodynamics
Frano Barbir, in PEM Fuel Cells (Second Edition), 2013

2.8 Carnot Efficiency Myth
Carnot efficiency is the maximum efficiency that a heat engine may have operating between the two temperatures (Figure 2-7).

"The Carnot efficiency has little practical value. It is a maximum theoretical efficiency of a hypothetical engine. Even if such an engine could be constructed, it would have to be operated at infinitesimally low velocities to allow the heat transfer to occur. It would be very efficient, but it would generate no power (Figure 2-8), and thus it would be useless."

Also, Carnot engine is by definition NOT an OU device. It simply means ALL input energy would be converted to work, but not more than input energy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EBCBAgSQAlI&ab_channel=UNSWPhysicsUNSWPhysics

OFC you keep pushing the unrelated shenanigans as usual.



lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #128 on: June 12, 2021, 03:50:28 PM »
 :)  Okay, Also, Carnot engine is by definition NOT an OU device. It is exactly COP 1 device.  :)


                       
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ic2Cjw7kydI I am the SKAT-man in SKAT-mens world ::)




            Mog net SKAT ! Und komisch,irgendwie "vorgefertigt" Ihre Antworten,nix85,zu schnelle Reaktion !


Fuet Di


OCWL

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #129 on: June 12, 2021, 03:54:43 PM »
Not COP 1, how quickly you grabbed onto it like a desperate dog :)

Efficiency of 100% which is usually equated to COP1.

Again, we are not talking about heat transfer but heat (energy) generation.

Point being you, Scatman, claimed 8000% EFFICIENCY is 98% efficiency :) :) :)

Let's never forget that.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #130 on: June 12, 2021, 04:32:14 PM »
Honestly, at the same time, i highly doubt your brain capacity. Here you claim all these devices, call them FE or OU doesn't matter, are bunk, yet your channel is dedicated to promotion of those same machines. Who is the shill, who is the troll here, who is flying so low his face is plowing the soil and getting his mouth stuffed with dirt and worms.
Not to mention you never addressed the 4th law of motion etc.
I want you to address the 4th law of motion, enough of dodging.


Typical action or strategy carefully planned to achieve a specific end is used by Russian Troll entity known as: 
The Internet Research Agency
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Research_Agency
of Yevgeny Prigozhin.

 My wife has better  education than Mr Putin President  of Russia - from one of best
European universes ( psychology)


Let me explain it  to the audience  using her advice
Text below  is from  former troll whom I helped to emigrate to USA
and this was part of his education.


1. never answer  questions you have no answer for.
a - ignore them - derail  logical path
2. respond to the   the question  with  your own question
3. respond with attack  instead of  addressing the question.
a - when attacking add another element like:
     e.g  "you never addressed the 4th law of motion"
4. repeat the same offense many times  using different phrases.

______________________________________________________

analysis of nix85:
-
most of questions   (from point #1) have never been answered  or/and were derailed ( point 1b)
- your attack (according to point #3) is evident  look  at your text  from above.
- you derailing logical path (point #1b)
- you adding  additional element (point #3a)
- you repeating the same offense saying that  my channel and I  support and promote OU despite the fact that I 
   answered you  already few times that I don't.
  Look at the  first one minute of this video  again:
  WHAT IS TRUE IN  Free Energy
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ldus3AQSpE


______________________________________________________
Dear nick85:
Here is analysis of your behavioral pattern   in  this forum:
 -  in regards point 2
     when nick 85 "responds to the question  with  his own question
     most likely  he  will get  answer - even if  nick 85  has no idea how to answer

- in regards point 3.
    when nick 85    attacks  instead of answering to the question.
    This  is natural mechanism:
    One child says : -"why you are  dirty?"
                            and the other child  responds
                            -"you are more dirty and  I have better backpack .."

-in regards point 4.
     lie repeated many times  becomes "the truth"
     this is how commercial  advertising  and branding work.

______________________________________________________
Summary:
1.  I  support  conservative  physics
2.   Overunity  and perpetual motion doesn't exist
3.   I support Energy for Free called  FE.
      a.- energy that  doesn't require  to be paid  for.
      b.-energy we can couple to in process of conversion.

 opinion expressed is entirely my own

Wesley
 

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #131 on: June 12, 2021, 04:41:38 PM »
What an hypocrite you are, that is EXACTLY what you are doing.
Dodging questions with unrelated questions, accusations (ad-hominems), being illogical and paradoxical (intentionally insisting on irrelevant semantic issue of OU vs FE), doing anything except one thing...answering the question in scientific and polite manner.

So i ask you again to address the 4th law of motion which defines conversion of centrifugal force into linear acceleration as so:

Any unbalanced mass oscillating in 180° or less or spining 360° with varying speed, produces pure linear acceleration.

Stop dodging and projecting and adhominems, answer scientifically.

Do you claim this law is "nonsense"?

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #132 on: June 12, 2021, 05:20:24 PM »
STIVEP1, IS INERTIAL PROPULSION NONSENSE?

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #133 on: June 12, 2021, 05:51:15 PM »
What an hypocrite you are, that is EXACTLY what you are doing.
As you have noticed  there is plenty of links and quotes to almost every  answer  it was provided to you.
You responded to my comment from above with no  links and quotes supporting  your attack.
But you adding more demands for me to respond.
That is called  change of logical path
 https://overunity.com/18878/reactive-current-parallel-rcl/msg558461/#msg558461
look at point 1a.
______________________________
 I said in https://overunity.com/18878/reactive-current-parallel-rcl/msg558326/#msg558326
Quote
I'm not your enemy.
But how  do you know that?
And this is truth.
I don't have negative emotion, nor disrespect you.
Think about me like  about mechanism with keyboard.
You can predict my  response based on  your  keyboard keystrokes.
No matter how you try I will not respond  to you with  nice bottle of Russian Vodka
Wesley

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #134 on: June 12, 2021, 06:10:24 PM »
nix85




" Point being you(, No,excuse-moi,je ne sais pas :Scatman,) claimed 8000% EFFICIENCY is 98% Carnot-factor efficiency


  Let's never forget that. "!


I do not forget it


How many times You want a repeat on the imaginary overunity.com e-paper-wall repeated ?

Ever good,especially related  " do not forget it"   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZ47gksnesc




Not COP 1, how quickly you grabbed onto it like a desperate dog ( "how quickly" : billige,einfaltsarme , Retourkutsche !  :D  )

https://overunity.com/18878/reactive-current-parallel-rcl/dlattach/attach/181857/image//

Typical swim cap or bridal jewelry in Your living wuw-wuw-wau-wauuuuuuuuuu zone ?


Miao-Miao


OCWL


p.s.: the "Carnot engine" is,like Maxwells/Laplaces Demon,an imaginary process !


       You can it understand,You must it not understand  ::)


       I think Your inner inner pig-dog splitted the relationship and the dog left Your body (wauuuuuuuuuuu)