Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL  (Read 123564 times)

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #105 on: June 12, 2021, 03:38:32 AM »
LOL, few posts back you were justifying term overunity, now you want me to use term free energy. No, you keep using the term OU.

And why are you now using VA unit for apparent power when we are talking about real power.

Again you are mixing apples and pears. Heat pump COP > 1 simply means it doesn't take much energy to TRANSPORT substantial amount of heat energy. If you are GENERATING heat, than according to convention COP will always be less than 1 cause there are always losses. InfinitySav device is generating heat, according to convention it is not possible to generate 251Wh of energy from 250Wh, let alone 20kWh.




I am trying to follow Your expressions,I am so polite ! ::)


We do input Volt x Ampere electrical ( evtl. variable ergo PWM)!


https://infinitysav.com/newinductionboiler/ 99% efficient boiler ! C.O.P.<1  ;)
https://infinitysav.com/induction-boiler/      98%


https://infinitysav.com/cavitator/            350-400%
 This installation consumes 4 times less energy than radiator and other heating systems


https://infinitysav.com/product/boiler-isav/


At each of three edges compressed oil reaches high pressure and gets injected out of the disk through the nozzles and create jet propulsion. Once oil is injected to the deflectors inside the support panel it drains down back to the tank.


Hot oil inside the tank passes between pipes of the flow heat exchanger exchanging temperature with them.


 The flow heat exchanger pipes supply cold water at the input that intake thermal energy from hot oil and withdraw warm water at the output.


The oil after having given away its thermal energy gets cooled and repeats the cycle over and over again generating more and more thermal energy.


                                                      Normal oil degenerates fast,we have to assume it is a synthetic oil !




nix85,


https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19830330&CC=ZA&NR=823054B&KC=B


Hence, one can say the REACTOR TO TRANSMUTE THE MATTER is an apparatus to produce calories


For example, if 2,000 cal (two thousand kilo/calories) is introduced in the REACTOR it will be possible to multiply these calories


 by 100 (a hundred),


1,000 (a thousand)


and even 100,000 (a hundred thousand)


according to what it is chosen to be used.

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #106 on: June 12, 2021, 03:41:27 AM »
WHAT IS TRUE IN  Free Energy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ldus3AQSpE

Wesley

Semantics aside, the impression i get from your channel is that you believe all these devices, Kapanadze, Akula and other work. So what is your stance.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #107 on: June 12, 2021, 03:46:06 AM »
LOL, few posts back you were justifying term overunity, now you want me to use term free energy. No, you keep using the term OU.
No this is lie
-this is your intentional lie.
-and that makes you a lair.


What is wrong with you, stivep1, here you attack OU and anyone "believing" in it, yet your youtube channel is dedicated to promotion of OU.
I'm promoting FE not OU.

WHAT IS TRUE IN  Free Energy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ldus3AQSpE

Wesley

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #108 on: June 12, 2021, 03:48:31 AM »



I am trying to follow Your expressions,I am so polite ! ::)


We do input Volt x Ampere electrical ( evtl. variable ergo PWM)!


https://infinitysav.com/newinductionboiler/ 99% efficient boiler ! C.O.P.<1  ;)
https://infinitysav.com/induction-boiler/      98%

You used the term before, so..

That boiler is completely different device working as name says by induction, it has nothing to do with the subject.

So, illuminate us all, how is producing 20kWh of heat using 250w input not OU? :)

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #109 on: June 12, 2021, 03:58:37 AM »
Yes,I am polite and accept that photovoltaic cells their output,heat pumps their output( average),windgenerators and waterturbines their output : are OU !


All other kinds of output delivering converter ,if not by experimental teste approved,claims "probably OU or free energy" !


Fine sleep,time for dodot,good night(and later: a good Morning)


OCWL








nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #110 on: June 12, 2021, 04:02:48 AM »
No this is lie
-this is your intentional lie.
-and that makes you a lair.

I'm promoting FE not OU.

That was addressed to lanca.

Quote
Some of that "idiots" want to look educated  so they go to forum and "shine ...."

Some of THOSE idiots, Wesly boi.

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #111 on: June 12, 2021, 04:05:19 AM »
Unless proven....we're not talking about validity of their claims, but IF it worked as claimed, then it definitely would be OU.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #112 on: June 12, 2021, 04:07:24 AM »
That was addressed to lanca.

no that was addressed to you  nix85.
Logic is not about words but about sense of your entire  writing.
Lies and manipulation is good for highs school.... sometimes... may be in Russia..

Wesley

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #113 on: June 12, 2021, 04:10:37 AM »
no that was addressed to you  nix85.
Logic is not about words but about sense of your entire  writing.
Lies and manipulation is good for highs school.... sometimes... may be in Russia..

Wesley

Understanding English again...

This...

Quote
LOL, few posts back you were justifying term overunity, now you want me to use term free energy. No, you keep using the term OU.

was for lanca

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #114 on: June 12, 2021, 04:14:12 AM »
nix85
Don't play games please.
This is not kindergarten...
We obey rules  of freedom of speech  in this forum, but  we are here to have constructive interaction.
 
Wesley

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #115 on: June 12, 2021, 04:17:35 AM »
There is nothing to quote, you replied to something addressed to lanca, like i already wrote 2 times.

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #116 on: June 12, 2021, 12:17:53 PM »
Good Morning,
20 000 / 250 = work C.O.P. 80
1- ( 250/20 000)= 0,9875 the process efficiency ,called eta

nix85,You are "dropping" many words into the ring,
the consumer,in search of a energy solution,for his needs,does not interest how this process is called,how microphysically the conversion from a device happens,probably the consumer an analphabet !
Work with plausible,impressive,examples :
there are many commercial/new inventive products claims in efficiency,which by consumer-care organisations physical study does not hold their claims .
This we can take as fact,by this organisation information and comparing own product use experience .

Is a converter OU or free energy or miracle or whatsever to be calling ?
Unimportant !
The device has to reach the result for which it was bought ! Hoping by warranted and longer life-time !
I do not use applications ( hard-/software) because their Trademark,only because their functionality !
When such a centrifugal-boiler like this from Infinitysav works with such a claimed efficiency result : fine !
If not : also fine !
I am not in this company financial invested,nor their employee,so not from their product/s efficiency/claims dependent !

It is sometimes ridiculous,how intensive people defend something and this probably contradictory !
And sometimes positive/negative comments about products are bought ! Own product company worker/family or commercial "product placement" agencies !

With Your "promotion" behaviour You,nix85,even does not help this company Infinitysav and development from a good idea,functionality confirmed,has often a long "ready to market" process steps time,independent from accompaning partners :

Schukey heat engine,anno 70' process patented ,last century ! BMW,VW involved.

When You have a great house with an high warm air conditionig need in cold season so try to get such a heat generator kind (  if not existent : + central heater tube + radiator  installation ) and become lucky and cause economical satisfied !
Infinitysav 5000 US$ +X dealer margin + professional all house rooms "central heater parts"  installation : 20 000 US$ ?

You do not depend of my meaning !

And to do conversation  with You about OU/FE/MIRACLE up to 50 years,2021-2071 :  :-\


Sincere
OCWL

p.s.: Kalinowski " Foldable Portable Building" : claimed 60 sqm commercial price : 15 000 US$
       probably a 5 KW centrifugal-boiler in need ,price range(all included) 2000 US$ MAX !

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #117 on: June 12, 2021, 01:19:30 PM »
Good Morning,
20 000 / 250 = work C.O.P. 80
1- ( 250/20 000)= 0,9875 the process efficiency ,called eta

nix85,You are "dropping" many words into the ring,
the consumer,in search of a energy solution,for his needs,does not interest how this process is called,how microphysically the conversion from a device happens,probably the consumer an analphabet !
Work with plausible,impressive,examples..

Again you are pushing this nonsense that generating 20kW of heat using 250W input is 98% efficiency.

No, it's 8000% efficiency.

I don't care for semantics, OU or FE, but FE is commonly understood to cover solar, wind, tide and similar energy sources, so sticking to OU is more appropriate.

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #118 on: June 12, 2021, 02:11:34 PM »
I have not a problem with the term " efficiency" !
Is for You this term fixed defind ?
When a windgenerator is 60% efficient,its efficiency by Physics view : 60% from ideal 59,5% = ?
When a reversible heat/cold engine is 80% efficient,its efficieny is 80% from "ideal 1" = ?
1 .Betz-limit 2.Carnot-limit

Energy= Exergy + Anergy

Question : how much cold water,by which temperature,has to be introduced per min./sec. to the centrifugal-boiler system,to get this C.O.P. 80 hot/cold : 1 - eta result ,eta = Carnot-Wirkungsgrad efficiency ,better for not
misunderstatement with common used " expression" ,as seen here :

                                                                CARNOT FACTOR

1-eta= Tmax/Tmin
heat reservoir/cold reservoir spread or tension number

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #119 on: June 12, 2021, 02:16:15 PM »
You do have a problem with it if you claim 8000% efficiency is 98% efficiency.