Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL  (Read 126460 times)

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #45 on: June 10, 2021, 01:30:36 PM »
For energy transfer to happen voltage and current must be in phase.

Reactive power means voltage and current are not in phase, energy bounces back n forth.

Resistance brings them in phase.

Exception is an antenna, voltage and current are 90° outta phase, yet it radiates.

They have radiation resistance.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OuVQqFhualI

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #46 on: June 10, 2021, 01:37:08 PM »
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomsonsche_Schwingungsgleichung
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomsonsche_Schwingungsgleichung

oscillating circuit


 E : magnetic field energy of the coil
 E : electrical field energy of the capacitor:


 Total energy of the system (constant)

how a circuit " becomes harvester/generator/converter" ?!    "imaginary/real" magnetic field "particles" and electric field "particles"
                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                magneton
                                       
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.chemie-schule.de/KnowHow/Bohrsches_Magneton           
                                                                                                                graviton ?


                                                                                                               https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

Thomson or Kelvin
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Thomson,_1._Baron_Kelvin
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Thomson,_1._Baron_Kelvin


condensator/capacitor and spring analogon related         maximal temperature and minimum temperature : 0°K(elvin)


bedingt das e-Feld das b-Feld,oder inverse  oder ist es nur "gedankliche Annaehrung" ? 1/2/3/4D ?
does the e-field cause the b-field, or inverse, or is it just ,the e-/b-field images,static "mental approximation"? 1/2/3 / 4D?

e-field : + to - orientation
b-field : cw/ccw spin (arrow) orientation


the two in one

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/16/Lorentzkraft_und_Induktion.svg/220px-Lorentzkraft_und_Induktion.svg.png

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentzkraft
                                                            or Biot-Savart also Ampere also Laplace Force

natural particles  behavior or enforced being -in tube/in coil - "enclosed" and deficient in freedom degrees or (brownian/temperature) movement speed increasing cause (sub-)ion(-particle)-"wind shadow" effect (spin positive/negative ,neutral)


different particles and their polarisation (and MeV) lifetime !


air core versus solid core : movement ! ( Ether -GEDANKENPROBLEM : wave/light !  ::)  )


Resistance brings them in phase.  in Ohm,in Mho (or Siemens ),by RESISTANCE ZERO ?                   


  A/m finitum number ?


https://phys.org/news/2012-03-efficiency.html  "voltage decrease" is the boss here


Plancksche or Diracsche Konstante ! https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.chemie.de/lexikon/Plancksches_Wirkungsquantum.html


is the boss its number here : https://overunity.com/18878/reactive-current-parallel-rcl/dlattach/attach/181834/image//




They have radiation resistance. :o 


"They" ? the device/s ? the "emissive/receiving" medium particles ?  L.A.S.E.R,M.A.S.E.R   : .... E.R.   ( P.H.A.S.E.R.)

" resistance " : electrical,magnetical,kinetical-mechanical ?


a bullit shoots out the pistol/gun chamber/channel  : in chamber phase velocity,outer chamber :
in air/solid medium ( bullit straight/rotative movement ?) ballistics

carbon : conductor or isolator ?


nano-carbon : conductor or isolator


carbon or nano-carbon on/off switch ? METAmaterial

Nano tubes internal a-/normal movement behaviour ? attraction/cohaesion (e/-, m/-) forces ?






decreasing Voltage and high A/m :


  http://www.rexresearch.com/kemeny/kemeny.html


A new electric circuit system for electric cars



https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=2&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20190328&CC=DE&NR=112017003611A5&KC=A5


Device for an electric drive for electric vehicles




                                                reactive-displacement current-circuits

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #47 on: June 10, 2021, 02:53:13 PM »

They have radiation resistance. :o 


Yes, antennas have radiation resistance.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_resistance

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #48 on: June 10, 2021, 02:58:48 PM »
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_resistance

Unlike other resistances found in electrical circuits, radiation resistance is not due to the opposition (resistivity) of the material of the antenna conductors to electric current; it is a virtual resistance due to the antenna's loss of energy as radio waves.[2][1]

to radio conversion (resistance) losts
give me please an (near) 100% conversion principle !


Betz/Carnot cycle efficiency ( also valid for e.-m.-circuits ) : over this given efficiencies !


You can get high C.O.P. devices,but the efficiency factor <(theoretical limit same) =1  :


https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnot-Wirkungsgrad


                                                                            eta

But 8)  : f.e. https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=DE&NR=102010044865A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=3&date=20120315&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP


in using "forbidden "( non Physics ,algebra and geometry) "pure statistical/abstract " maths lessons formula its laws and order :


Bruch/Division : Divident and Divisor = Quotient  Divisor = positive number or negative number ,NEVER ZERO

                                                   simple calculator gives : SYNTAX ERROR ( forbidden ! Denied !)

                      When a number is negative than there has to be a cross point from negative to positve ,in time - ,in local distance)

in PHYSICS ZERO is the MIDDLE POINT from the XYZ Coordination-Cross,with movement from/to/cross ZERO

                                         Multi-dimensional  PHYSICS SYNTAX in formulas applying !




                                       We read even about "negative time " in Quantum-mechanics  !


                                                reactive and active current compact circuit,off-grid,self-charging

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #49 on: June 10, 2021, 03:25:15 PM »
Like i said before, EVERYTHING RADIATES in almost all circumstances.

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #50 on: June 10, 2021, 03:27:07 PM »
EVERYTHING SPINS


NOT EVERYTHING RESISTS

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #51 on: June 10, 2021, 03:28:49 PM »
Or rather, everything orbits and orbiting is acceleration.

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #52 on: June 10, 2021, 03:32:47 PM »
Or rather, everything orbits and orbiting is acceleration.


F( + direction arrow) = m x a        a= acceleration.(or) not  !?


F( +direction vector) = orbit/-s/-ing !?  ???

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #53 on: June 10, 2021, 03:36:32 PM »
Circular motion is acceleration, velocity vector changes constantly.

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #54 on: June 10, 2021, 04:26:52 PM »
Moon-Earth
The other planets their moons
The planetary elipsoid movement around the sun ,in our solar system

the comets
.........
all this in accelerative manner ?
the periodic table elements their particles in their orbis : self enriching by acceleration

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #55 on: June 10, 2021, 04:50:03 PM »
All

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #56 on: June 10, 2021, 05:19:50 PM »
Can we radiate a simple ( or complex) experiment to show any anonymous gain
Mechanism?


With out pointing to a stack of patents
Or a myriad of old fuzzy ( in how to replicate successfully ) videos ?
 100’s perhaps 1000’s of open source replicators and builders would be more than casually
Interested .
ANY simple reproducible anomaly?
“Gain mechanism “
Please ?
Respectfully submitted
Chet


Edit
Sorry I missed a comment below
...


nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #57 on: June 10, 2021, 05:38:08 PM »
...

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #58 on: June 10, 2021, 06:29:58 PM »
All


classsical physics dox             and quantum physics dox + to classical para-dox


dox( docere,docent,doctor/a,doctrin,doctorate )


positive f= m x a                                                 not f= m x v


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acceleration             https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velocity or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed

conditionized = not ALL and everywhere

in vaccuo,in air,in solid,....

phase acceleration,average acceleration,...


negative f


https://cnx.org/contents/UYPplaH7@29.32:CvRVM0Jk@14/Acceleration-and-deceleration
A total of six (6) attributes viz time, distance, displacement, speed, velocity and acceleration are used to describe motion.


Three of these namely time, distance and speed are scalar quantities, whereas the remaining three attributes namely displacement, velocity and acceleration are vectors. Interpretations of these two groups are different with respect to (ii) negative and positive sign and (i) sense of increase and decrease. Further these interpretations are also affected by whether we consider these terms in one or two/three dimensional motion.
The meaning of scalar quantities is more and less clear. The scalar attributes have only magnitude and no sense of direction. The attributes “distance” and “speed” are positive quantities. There is no possibility of negative values for these two quantities. In general, time is also positive. However, it can be assigned negative value to represent a time instant that occurs before the start of observation. For this reason, it is entirely possible that we may get negative time as solution of kinematics consideration.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acceleration#/media/File:Oscillating_pendulum.gif
related https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.physik.uni-wuppertal.de/de/physik-home/oeffentlichkeitsarbeit/das-foucaultsche-pendel/die-idee-des-herrn-foucault-2.html


https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e4/Acceleration_components.JPG/220px-Acceleration_components.JPG

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #59 on: June 10, 2021, 06:32:44 PM »
Can we radiate a simple ( or complex) experiment to show any anonymous gain
Mechanism?


With out pointing to a stack of patents
Or a myriad of old fuzzy ( in how to replicate successfully ) videos ?
 100’s perhaps 1000’s of open source replicators and builders would be more than casually
Interested .
ANY simple reproducible anomaly?
“Gain mechanism “
Please ?
Respectfully submitted
Chet


Edit
Sorry I missed a comment below
...

Mechanical  SOLARSYSTEM PROCESS MIMICRY

 Sonnen-Planeten-Rad-Getriebe

https://www-ingenieurkurse-de.translate.goog/assets/courses/media/planetengetriebe-schema-ca.webp?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=de&_x_tr_pto=ajax 


                                compared

 offered by nix85 https://overunity.com/18878/reactive-current-parallel-rcl/dlattach/attach/181837/image//


https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.ingenieurkurse.de/fahrzeugtechnik/antriebe/antriebsstrang-eines-kraftfahrzeugs/arten-von-getrieben/planetengetriebe.html



https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://harmonicdrive.de/de/technologie/harmonic-planetengetriebe


let us look for fuzzies description
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=4&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19951107&CC=US&NR=5463914A&KC=A


and a fuzzy guy ,cited documents :


https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=1&ND=4&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19701013&CC=US&NR=3533484A&KC=A


his fuzzy ouvre :


https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=&IN=WOOD+GARFIELD+A+JR&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search


with which he reached world-records