Language:
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.
 Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here: https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

Custom Search

### Author Topic: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL  (Read 93665 times)

#### lancaIV

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 4980
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #15 on: June 08, 2021, 05:24:37 PM »
Electrical power (P, in Watts) is composed of voltage (V, in Volts) and current (I, in Amps).
The formula is P= V × I.

In german : Huestel,huestel !

DC is EE power    P= V × I

AC is EE power  P= V × I ?  Hertz -function ? Only tension or current or both processing ?

Puls is EE power P= V × I ? by which duty cycle ?  AM and FM modulation,PWM

electrical engineering history :

1 Daniel cell represents 1 Volt DC source

100 Daniel cells represents 100 V DC source

+ distribution losts = 110-115 Volt DC source

DC electricity = current and tension positive

AC distribution = positive DC =  DC x 2 = 220/230 Volts by 50/60 Hertzian cycles

AC = positive tension phase   + positive current phase

negative tension phase  + negative  current phase

mono-/poly-phase

1 V x A DC =      ? V x A AC       = each in mechanical Watt           linear/curvativ  active/reactive

1 V x A AC =     ? V x A DC       = each in mechanical Watt          curvativ/linear  reative/active

electrical power a. DC b.AC c. pulsed(current on/off)  in mechanical power ? torque x linear/rotative rpm movement ?

EE set theory : EE algebra,geometry

#### alan

• Hero Member
• Posts: 671
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #16 on: June 08, 2021, 05:33:22 PM »
Power is joules per second. Voltage = joule / coulomb. Current = coulomb / second.
Voltage x current = joules / coulomb x coulomb / second = joules / second

#### stivep

• Hero Member
• Posts: 3210
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #17 on: June 08, 2021, 05:48:14 PM »
Wesley,I am not nix85,but related #8   1 in and more than 1 out (conditionized !)
https://phys.org/news/2012-03-efficiency.html
OCWL
Quote
LED's efficiency exceeds 100%

That is possible the same way as COP>1 in refrigerators.
https://www.quora.com/How-does-the-cop-of-refrigerator-is-greater-than-1
and that's is why looking at local phenomena is important .

But that is not overunity.
Wesley

#### lancaIV

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 4980
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #18 on: June 08, 2021, 05:52:24 PM »
That is possible the same way as COP>1 in refrigerators.
https://www.quora.com/How-does-the-cop-of-refrigerator-is-greater-than-1
and that's is why looking at local phenomena is important .

But that is not overunity.
Wesley

reversible thermo-cryo dynamic cylce : dB(noise,sound,loud,oscillations,......) to electrical energy

overunity is not a common used scientifical expression because " mental weakness" from scientist side,to have and show

the      OU-q.e.d. stage and by world-wide peers review and process application and confirmation

for science primates:

let the expression "over-unity efficiency " as evolutive step from https://phys.org/news/2012-03-efficiency.html
be "equivalent same"  in physics target (theory)and physical(practizising)  result as "overunity"

"But that is not"  overunity ,
this discuss with the researchers, Parthiban Santhanam and coauthors from MIT, have published their study in a recent issue of Physical Review Letters.

#### stivep

• Hero Member
• Posts: 3210
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #19 on: June 08, 2021, 06:04:22 PM »
overunity is not a common used scientifical expression because " mental weakness" from scientist side,to have and show

Yes you right.
that is why I'm waiting for  the response from nix85  curing  my "mental weakness"
I'm waiting for him to "have and show" ....
...........no... not his private parts...

Wesley

#### lancaIV

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 4980
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #20 on: June 08, 2021, 06:12:13 PM »
Do not overestimate Your real position,Wesley !

You are NOT academical scientist = WISSENSCHAFTLER,Your position and function is expressed and termed : as researcher=FORSCHER !

Or are You active member from a NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCE ?

Sincere

OCWL

#### stivep

• Hero Member
• Posts: 3210
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #21 on: June 08, 2021, 06:59:41 PM »

Throwing titles doesn't make person taller.
Position in human horde  is affecting this animal influential status.
https://ludwig.guru/s/influential+status

For me : I'm  nobody or nobody special.
And that approach  gives me a chance to become a Person of Value to someone or something.
e.g - my wife
I don't have stress of being humiliated,  as I don't have an agenda, pride
or selfsame characteristics as the expert among  other  other experts.
___________________________________________________________________

I have nothing to lose in value:
- my value is perceived as an evaluation of the merits of a product or service,
and its ability to meet  needs and expectations, especially in comparison with its peers.
If I start at  Zero of Value and come back to the Zero of Value than my losses are  never
placing  me lower than I was  prior to it.
___________________________________________________________________

And that is what "Some Russians" are very  upset about  .
I'm outside of territory Russia.
I'm an American  who is not former Russian and I learned  their language in USA.
I'm not  the  person i
n extreme poverty .
I have more than one
lab or  house or place to stay  and  conduct experiments.
I'm still alive

___________________________________________________________________

I can't be humiliated arrested for comment,  over twit,  or "like" mark - under video  for ~7 years in Russian
Guag - labor camp.

Recent and current debate of Russian  government is to reincarnate  Russian Labor Camps
but now in form of slavery.
GULAG 2.0? | Russia Wants To Resurrect Forced Labor Camps.

Sharashka  for Scientists:
-an informal name for secret research and development laboratories operating from 1930 to the 1950s
within the Soviet Gulag labor-camp system.

Scientists in prison:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharashka

And yet:
I'm very much  the discomfort  to some Russian entities as the FE researcher who now in 2021 speaks Russian better
than most of  Russians from Russian Regions.

opinion expressed is entirely my own.
Wesley

#### nix85

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1191
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #22 on: June 08, 2021, 07:56:30 PM »
I didn't ask you for a hint but for any proof or example  that OU ( overunity) exists.

What are you even doing here if you don't believe OU is possible?

Quote
No I don't.
-can I become enlightened by your knowledge without hints, lies and fakes.. ?

Again, if you don't believe in OU, what are you doing here?

Quote
I questioned your amplification in LCR circuit, and there is no amplification taking place at all.
[/sub]10W AC at  input  of series resonant circuit becomes  less than 10W at output of circuit in resonance.
10W AC at  input  of series resonant circuit becomes                ~0W at output of circuit  not in resonance.
So in this case there is no amplification taking place at all.

Ok, it's not power that is amplified, but voltage or current at expense of the other, except in special cases (as linked above) when you can get more energy than in. You of course think that is impossible.

In general reactive power can and usually is greater than real power consumption.
Reactive load temporary stores energy, does not waste it (unless PS cant take it back).

Power factor = true power / apparent power
Apparent power is RMS voltage x RMS current
Reactive power = sqrt(apparent²-real²)

For example transformer without a load can be plugged into the socket 24/7, we got a short circuit through the primary, yet it consumes almost no energy cause it is like 99% reactive power, current and voltage are almost 90° out of phase (resistance of the primary, eddy current and hysteresis losses are causing them to be less than 90° out of phase), but putting the load on the secondary makes primary feel as if the core suddenly got more lossy and this brings voltage and current more and more into phase, decreasing the reactive and increasing the active power.

Quote
Voltage and Current  will fluctuate but to see it you need to look locally at these [/sub]local phenomena.
If you don't do it than  all you'll see is that "door" is open or closed.

here is a link: Understanding the basics of reactive power
here is a quote:
Electrical power (P, in Watts)
is composed of voltage (V, in Volts) and current (I, in Amps).
The formula is P= V × I.
A good analogy to describe the relationship between voltage and current is water flowing down a river

-end of quote.

Wesley

We all know what reactive power is, we all know formula for power, we all know the water analogy. When you mention the formula, at least give it fully.

P = IV
P = I²R copper losses
P = V²/R
P=VI*PF apparent power (V and I are average, RMS)

#### nix85

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1191
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #23 on: June 08, 2021, 08:14:30 PM »
As for the hint above i was referring to this.

If you add two same waves together amplitude of resulting wave is double.

Yet energy of a wave is amplitude SQUARED.

Don Smith also talked how superposition of waves breaks conservation of E.

There is also a russian paper on experimental verification of this very phenomena.

https://overunity.com/16698/free-energy-from-electromagnetic-wave-fields/

#### stivep

• Hero Member
• Posts: 3210
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #24 on: June 08, 2021, 09:07:22 PM »
What are you even doing here if you don't believe OU is possible?
Again, if you don't believe in OU, what are you doing here?

1. In physics I don't accept any  believes.- OU  doesn't exist.
2. I'm FE  Researcher  just because FE is proven  and exists.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
supporting material for  point #2

Does free energy exist?

We have solar energy wind energy, geothermal energy, hydrogen energy, Tidal energy,  wave energy,

hydroelectric energy biomass energy, nuclear power energy.

All of  those are free energy sources, but we are paying for the access to those sources of energy.
Ideally we should pay just once - for the device that converts mentioned energy sources to the form
of energy we can use but we end up paying and paying and paying every month.

__________________________________________________________________________

Ok, it's not power that is amplified, but voltage or current at expense of the other,
except in "special cases" (as linked above)
Yes in LCR circuit you  can see higher voltage or higher current but never both at the same time.
If there are any "special  case" please list it.
Voltage is defined as the energy difference between two points.   Voltage
__________________________________________________________________________

when you can get more energy than in. You of course think that is impossible.
Yes  it is impossible by law of physics, unless we are coupling to  any or any  other Free Energy Source.
example:
1.energy used to open valve of the pipe connected to the river  is smaller than energy inside  the pipe.
2.energy fluctuation in form of EM wave, inside of Schumann waveguide and than in the interface air/earth (in TM mode) is  our Free Energy source.
__________________________________________________________________________

Example of misconception:
Many encyclopedias, dictionaries, and textbooks contain very clear statements about the nature of Electricity.
They say this:

- Electricity is a type of energy.
- Electric current is a flow of energy.
Is it  true? :
here  is  the link:  COMMON ELECTRICITY MISCONCEPTION

Wesley

#### nix85

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1191
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #25 on: June 08, 2021, 09:43:12 PM »
1. In physics I don't accept any  believes.- OU  doesn't exist.
2. I'm FE  Researcher  just because FE is proven  and exists.
..........
Example of misconception:
Many encyclopedias, dictionaries, and textbooks contain very clear statements about the nature of Electricity.
They say this:

- Electricity is a type of energy.
- Electric current is a flow of energy.
Is it  true? :
here  is  the link:  COMMON ELECTRICITY MISCONCEPTION

Wesley

And who are you to question OU or ever worse define what electricity is?

For God's sake, you don't even believe it is possible, you don't even know how to cancel Lenz, let alone what energy is, what electricity is.

Your perspective is waaay too limited to give informed opinion on these subtle subjects.

I am not giving you concrete solutions, why would i, you are the last person to deserve it with that attitude. But look at this for example, watch the whole playlist, possibly best OU playlist on youtube.

In this ocean of One Substance/One Energy there are many subtle forces you are not aware of, GREAT FORCES that don't exist for you cause you don't know how to resist/extract them. In fact, there is a whole other spectrum to which gravity,antigravity,thoughts,vitality and similar exotic phenomena belong to.

Little introduction into these subtler energies http://www.villesresearch.com/ether.html

To give you a little hint of the immense knowledge you are oblivious to, i'll copy paste my comment from youtube along similar lines....

First is imagined unbound vibration of infinite frequency and amplitude, there is still not time or space.

Then this infinite vibration is bound by secondary vibrations of finite frequency and amplitude along 6 AXIS OF TIME by 60° angle between nearby axis which creates a Cosmic Forcefield and framework of 3D space.

Each time axis is oscillating in place, time moves not, fact known for centuries in occult cosmology, but each universe out of each matter-antimatter universe pair, like a diode or a sprocket wheel captures just oscillations in one direction, thus matter and antimatter times diverge, something known even to mainstream physics.

Key point of how basis for 3D space is created by creating an imaginary angle between time axis "The angle of 60 degrees could only be created by an apparent frequency shift maintaining the harmonic vibrations of the rotating field."

https://galactic.no/rune/iarapdx1.html
http://www.resona.nl/Denaerde/denaerde.html

As for gravitational bubbles, best explanation is given in Falling Bodies Theory by Lloyd Zirbes. Simple and experimentally verified theory of gravity and all forces based on a simple fact that all bodies falling in the gravitational field extract energy from the parent gravitational field along the leading edge, that is, equator, which causes them to rotate, extracted energy thus spiraling around the falling body to a certain distance (just beyond our moon in case of Earth) and returning to the poles detecting the void of neutral energy along the axis of rotation. This same gravitational bubble that sucks everything toward the planet within the bubble REPELS everything including the parent gravitational field outside it due to shearing of magnetic lines of force due to C+ speeds in the most outer layers.

Regarding the two components of the Universal Fluid, electric (male) and magnetic (female) insulated by the G-lines of TIME. Electric lines travel at what is know as "speed of light" while magnetic lines travel 16,000 miles per second faster and have proportionally lesser density. It is the same neutral energy flowing in both of them, there is no polarity on fundamental level.

And finally, what has to be understood is that this magnetic pressure we feel as gravity has superimposed over it it's polar counterpart oscillating at 1/3 higher frequency. This great force returning to space would break the whole planet apart if it's matter was not strictly kept in certain band of nuclear speed. If nucleus is accelerated beyond certain level it will become transparent to gravity and will start to resist it's polar opposite. This can be achieved by mental means as in thousands of cases of documented human levitation or by treatment by neutral ray which is the same energy trapped in all secondary forces with only difference being that that in, for example, electricity is orders of magnitude faster than that in matter. When this force is liberated by disruptive discharges or scalar interferometry all kinds of unusual phenomena can be produced like changing the weight or temperature of an object permanently, complete destruction without any remnants etc.

Also, speed of light, density of matter and rate of time flow all increase x49 for each plane (or octave) above.

#### nix85

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1191
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #26 on: June 08, 2021, 11:07:38 PM »
Estimated energy per cubic centimeter of space.

#### lancaIV

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 4980
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #27 on: June 09, 2021, 01:19:17 AM »
https://overunity.com/18878/reactive-current-parallel-rcl/dlattach/attach/181834/image//

You provoke "interest"    Nice number,conditioning ?

No,here not the comparative answer http://u2.lege.net/John_Keely/keelynet.com/bedmot/bedbear.htm

http://www.calresco.org/
"Chaos often breeds life, when order breeds habit."

but here :
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875389212025151  tuldigung , Sh.. ortening     can(n) happen

1. Introduction

In 1911 Planck introduced his “second equation”[1] E = hν/ (ehν/kT – 1) + ½ hν (1)

This included an additional term, hν/2.

( Das Planksche Wirkungsquantum

When T becomes zero the exponential term becomes infinite and the first term becomes zero, but there is still a residual energy remaining in the form of the second term, which is Planck’s constant times frequency.

Depending upon the value of ν, this energy could be quite high. This has been calculatwed[2] to be as high as 10 v110 J/cc.

In 1916 Walther Nernst [3] suggested that there were vast amounts of zero point energy in the universe.

In 1928 P. Dirac [4]stated that space was filled with a large number of negative spaces, and the holes in these spaces were positive electrons.

In 1947 W. E. Lamb discovered changes in the fine structure of the hydrogen atom that became known as the Lamb Shift. [5]

These changes were later shown to be due to the zero point energy (ZPE) [6].

In 1947 Hendrik Casimir [7] proposed that two closely spaced neutral conducting metal plates would exclude the wavelengths of the ZPE longer than the spacing of the plates. This would produce a weaker pressure between the plates and the stronger external pressure would produce a force on the plates.

In 1951 Dirac [8] proposed an ether of particles in an article in Nature. He stated: “With the new theory of electrodynamics we are rather forced to have an aether.”   ........

and the "white holes" ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_hole

black/white holes spin

Conditionized : https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boltzmann-Konstante

(ultra)black and (ultra)white by physics and between ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_decay

Electron and Positron

Proton  and Anti-Proton

as "long life" particles

other ranking related MeV

by "free particles hunting"

#### nix85

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1191
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #28 on: June 09, 2021, 01:53:20 AM »

https://www.shorturl.at/

#### nix85

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1191
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #29 on: June 09, 2021, 02:14:48 AM »
If anyone has any doubt in presence of etheric energies around us and how they can be influenced to cause among other things rain, anywhere, anywhen, in immense amounts.