Language:
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

### GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

Custom Search

### Author Topic: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL  (Read 85473 times)

#### stivep

• Hero Member
• Posts: 3392
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #735 on: September 01, 2022, 04:55:56 PM »

few things:
1. pendulum as lever action
2.  resonance (will be covered later if needed)
3. energy concentration (will be covered later if needed)

re  1.
Quote from comment under video :

Quote
ibpointless2
10 years ago
You have to push the counter weight over ten feet to move the heavy weight two inches, this is clearly use a lever action.
You can lift a car with a big enough lever but it does not mean its free energy.

Quote:
howsybee
14 years ago
Let's analyse this video a little closer.
If the 46-pound pendulum was released from a 90° angle the centrifugal force could lift a maximum weight 3 times the pendulum's weight = 138 pounds.
With the bar ratio of 1.41:1 the pedulum could still lift a weight of 98 pounds.
Now, with a max. angle of approx. 77° as shown in the video, the pendulum could lift 76 pounds at the bottom which is roughly the left weight.

https://youtu.be/X9zLgWfYcXI?t=167
Wesley

#### ne0

• Newbie
• Posts: 34
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #736 on: September 01, 2022, 05:10:21 PM »
Of course just the same sleazy filth, personal attacks, dodging, distracting, injecting skepticism...

He accuses me of "fights" yet all he does is fight,

while he avoids the concrete subject like a hot iron!!!

Now he uses the idea of "community" against me, just same dirty tricks over and over again...

Look how SLEAZY this is....

Quote

Persons who see overunity at every YouTube?
And tell others to “build it “ you’ll see ?
It really is amazingly naive!
A rabbit hole which will consume years of life chasing ??( nothing OU at all)

So i am "naive" just cause i can see, as do thousands if not millions who know this principle is OU,
around the world......and he tries to make it look as if i am trying to make people waste their lives
on something which is "nothing OU at all" (his words).

But it IS OU no matter how that hurts you and i am not suggesting anyone to build this
relatively primitive OU device, i am just sharing for those who are still not aware of it
to SEE AND UNDERSTAND IT, to know that YOU ARE A LIAR, that OU has been proven
long ago, it is already used world-wide.

Question is WHY are you still denying this unquestionable OU principle, what is your agenda,
or rather, how much are 'they' paying you for this (no matter who 'they' is).

I am building other stuff, i don't have to build this one to know it is OU, so many already have
and confirmed it, they all agree you can keep the pendulum oscillating with your pinky,
while energy due to big falling weight is many many times the input beyond any doubt.

And STILL he refuses to admit, he calls it "deception". WHY, what is this.

It is not a game but it is a DIRTY DIRTY game YOU play.

Stop playing games, admit the obvious or explain CONCRETELY why you claim
this principle which has been proven to be at least 11-12x OU, which so many
of us world-wide know to be true, is "deception" according to you.

#### ne0

• Newbie
• Posts: 34
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #737 on: September 01, 2022, 05:23:09 PM »
Look how stivep sleazily tries to confuse and distract people from the fact
that energy in is MANY times smaller than out.

Energy gain is due to combination of centrifugal force and gravity through lever action,
that is quite obvious. But input is definitely many times smaller than output.

There is

Force = Mass * acceleration
Work = force * distance moved  unit: newton meter or joule or Work = Mass * Gravity * Height
Work = Change in Energy
Power = work / time = force * displacement / time = force * velocity
Power (hp,watt) = work(ENERGY)/time aka time rate of energy transfer
Energy = Power x Time

So work done is proportional to mass x g x height it drops from.

If you lift 74lb aka 33kg vertically say 5 or 10 cm and drop it energy you input lifting it
will be equal to energy released as it impacts the surface.

Now, how much energy do you have to invest to lift 74lb aka 33kg just once,
we all know that is significant weight, doing it just 5 times would start to tire anyone.

How bout doing it for half an hour non stop, every 2 seconds.

And here we have a device doing exactly that, yet input is literally just maintaining
the swinging pendulum with slight pinky pushes.

DO YOU SEE WHAT HE'S DOING; HE'S TRYING TO CONVINCE YOU ENERGY IN = ENERGY OUT.

He is literally calling you morons.

#### ramset

• Hero Member
• Posts: 7819
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #738 on: September 01, 2022, 05:27:59 PM »
Nix

Not looking at YouTube’s of others which you hold as proof !
Over the years I have engaged hundreds of “open source “
Builders !
Still do …
Not one would ever waste time here on your video evidence!
And all true builders always pay attention!

Got anything with plasma ?
Personally?

Rumors flipping around about some plasma work which maybhold evidence of provable gain ?
Would be surprised what people call plasma …

Or
Keep playing Flame game
BTW I think your hairs on fire ( in the back a bit ….

Maybe less jumping and waving and pointing?
Do you have a mirror?

Sigh
Plasma ?
I’ll make a few calls on that too ..
You happened to catch me slowly recovering from a pretty nasty illness last 10 days

More time than usual…but now I’m getting my voice back!

Honestly IMO you really do mean well …
Just happens that your in a very deep talent pool here …

EDIT
So nothing of your own to show ?

BTW
That’s all that matters!

Jump and stamp a bit more …. Good exercise at least!

#### ne0

• Newbie
• Posts: 34
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #739 on: September 01, 2022, 05:37:27 PM »
There he admits it openly, he does not even want to look at it, i rest my case, drop the mic.

This reminds me of the LAETRIL when medical mafia told the doctor who was saving hundreds
of people "We don't care if it works" and same mafia to woman who was also saving hundreds
of people with indian herb potion "We can't let you do this to us".........

I love it when they expose themselves like this.

All i am doing is saying the TRUTH which obviously hurts you a lot...

You can keep "playing Flame game" and "jumping and waving and pointing"
as much as you like....................

but it ain't gonna change the fact that you are working against the Truth.

Just checked the mirror, nope, my hair is just fine, but you are completely consumed by the flames.

PLIEsma

Go go, edit some more, do some more jumpin' and stampin'

gotta keep your deception muscle in shape

as if you have not spilled enough of your venom, geee.

#### stivep

• Hero Member
• Posts: 3392
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #740 on: September 01, 2022, 08:25:37 PM »
response to a person with nick  Nix85

Posts: 78
Country: Croatia ( it  was country listed on EEVblog)

Re: Microwave TL coax impedance
« Reply #29 on: June 10, 2019, 11:45:51 pm »
Quote from: vk6zgo on June 10, 2019, 11:41:55 pm
Do whatever you like, I give up!
Again, you try to make me look as if i am arguing with you while everyone sees i am respectful and just trying to learn.

All of the rest of quoted conversation is one big argument of a person with nick  Nix85 with others.

https://www.eevblog.com/forum/rf-microwave/microwave-tl-coax-impedance/msg2479140/#msg2479140
From Administrator to a person with nick  Nix85
That's not how forum's work. You don't get to tell people to stop providing their answers or opinions.
You won't make friends here with that sort of approach.

______________________________________________________________
the last comment addressed to all with regards to activity  of a person with nick  Nix85

KaneTW  Frequent Contributor
Posts: 689
Country: Germany https://www.eevblog.com/forum/rf-microwave/microwave-tl-coax-impedance/msg2962800/#msg2962800
« Reply #52 on: March 14, 2020, 02:52:20 am »
Can we please not feed the troll?
(
The following users thanked this post: Andy Watson

Wesley

#### kolbacict

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1036
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #741 on: September 01, 2022, 08:50:18 PM »
The question has been tormenting for a long time, is this the whole Westernway of thinking ,
how is it presented on the Overunity website ? If so, then I'm not happy.

#### ramset

• Hero Member
• Posts: 7819
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #742 on: September 01, 2022, 08:53:27 PM »
Kolbacict
You refer to mission statement?
Reason for being here ?( I hope)

#### ne0

• Newbie
• Posts: 34
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #743 on: September 01, 2022, 09:10:30 PM »
Notice how troll sivep again resorts to personal defamation
attempts when he's exposed for LYING and has no arguments.

Here is that full thread from the beginning for anyone wanting to read
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/rf-microwave/microwave-tl-coax-impedance/

Remember just one post ago he was trying to deceive you all into
believing energy in = energy out in Milkovic double oscillator
altho energy out is obviously AT LEAST 11-12 times bigger.

Remember he also claims magnet motors are "impossible" "bs",
same for overunity, ether, antigravity.....e-v-e-r-y-t-h-i-n-g
we speak about here and strive to. What to say but my my.

EDIT for below...

As everyone here knows eevblog.com is 100% convetional, mainstream
forum OWNED BY GUY WHO CALLS FE "BS" and even made a 45min video

And more of out of context pathetic defamation attempts, quoting guys who
would put their right hand in fire that free energy is "bs".

stivep has really hit the rock bottom, no arguments, only lies and ad-hominems.

#### stivep

• Hero Member
• Posts: 3392
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #744 on: September 01, 2022, 09:12:28 PM »
Here is another example of EEVblog acting to a person using nick name Nix85

https://www.eevblog.com/forum/renewable-energy/zvs-mazzilli-driver-rectified/msg2490819/#msg2490819
Quote
Quote:
If you are going to pedal over unity BS I suggest you just leave.
If you have a serious question do feel free to ask.

https://www.eevblog.com/forum/renewable-energy/zvs-mazzilli-driver-rectified/msg2490837/#msg2490837
Simon  Global Moderator
Posts: 16866
Country:  United Kingdom
Quote
Did that just blow up? No? might work after all !!
Re: ZVS Mazzilli Driver rectified  « Reply #30 on: June 17, 2019, 11:56:00 am »
Quote
Show me the God that can ban you for 2 days to see if you can come to your senses and ban you permanently if you do not!

Sincerely God's deputy!

Wesley

#### stivep

• Hero Member
• Posts: 3392
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #745 on: September 01, 2022, 09:26:27 PM »
..

#### ne0

• Newbie
• Posts: 34
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #746 on: September 01, 2022, 09:35:13 PM »
No it is you who has a problem .
the response to video  "Free energy overunity Rubbish"-
was formulated here by me.

look at it:
Part 1 EEV blog criticism creates protest of FE community
Wesley

No it's YOU who has a problem, you are even now contradicting yourself,
in this video you protest and make fun of him, at the same time you use
him/his forum to supposedly defame me. HA.

Your list of lies grows and grows.

This is just another of your attempts to distract from the subject, in this case
Milkovic 2 stage pendulum......which you claim is not OU........

Why are you lying

#### ramset

• Hero Member
• Posts: 7819
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #747 on: September 01, 2022, 09:38:43 PM »
Evblog guy is definitely one of the fellows (Dave?)
Would get a demonstration in OZ

I know Jimboot would love to do that …
Served up ……

Nix
you fight too much with paper sword and words

Empirical evidence which can be independently reproduced  or replicated !

I bow out
Gotta get test bed to 3000 psi ( news for T Reed)
For acetylene experiments!
And water in ICE

#### stivep

• Hero Member
• Posts: 3392
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #748 on: September 01, 2022, 09:48:54 PM »
..

#### stivep

• Hero Member
• Posts: 3392
##### Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #749 on: September 01, 2022, 09:52:39 PM »
for these interested with part #2 here is a link