Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL  (Read 86676 times)

Offline ne0

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 34
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #720 on: August 31, 2022, 06:44:43 PM »
Sir
It is your arrogant assumptions that persons who question you suddenly become
Bad guys or worse

Eh the projections, it's exactly your arrogant assumptions that most of the devices talked of here
are "known to be dubious", arrogant assuption from someone who never even tried.

I don't assume anyone is a bad guy or worse, i only call out flat out LYING like your pal stivep who
calls E V E R Y T H I N G here "fake"...

1) overunity itself
2) ether
3) magnet motors
4) gravity control
....

He OPENLY claims all these things are "bs" and you are with him, you two are exactly the same.

Quote
Here you write of thousands of devices!!
And share not one proof of your own !( independent replication)

I shared much of my benchwork, what did you do but whine. I am at least trying.

Quote
And you are actually insulting many here that toil on the bench for decades !

Projections again. It exactly you insulting many here and elsewhere by calling honest inventors "frauds" and their devices "fakes". How dare you.

Quote
also you submit as proof previous you tubes here which are known to be dubious!

Only thing "known to be dubious" is you. GREAT MAJORITY of videos i shared are real as time will show. That you call 'em "dubious" only exposes your ignorance.

Quote
Best you maintain a polite stance as those who have actually been continuously experimenting
really are  the open source FE communities best resource for vetting these “thousands of YouTube “ claims.
And without 3rd party independent replication ?
It is hearsay!

Projections again. You, a non-builder who calls real devices fake, you who put shame on great
people/inventors of this field, tell me who have been building for 8 years to "take stance".
Oh the irony. I been building since 2014, 8 years of exprimenting with overunity, inertial propulsion
etc. I documented my efforts trying to replicate Don Smith etc... and am now at certain level of
experience and understanding in all these field i am most grateful for... what have you done, where
is your build-diary, pics....You have no right to say a word.

Firstly just cause someone "tried" and failed says nothing about the original device and the inventor.
I did not get DS to work (yet) like 99,9999% people, does that lead to conclusion DS was a fraud,
ofc not, it only means me and others did not do it right and it's a most delicate thing.

As Nelson Rocha wrote here

"Like I already told many times ; Most of people are not interested in hard work ,
but instead want "baby food" in their own mouth ... Myself lose 2 years only study
some aspects of that circuit , and see people already give up just because some
Illustrious persons, Pout ..... In general i think this is a lost case. When happens
such behavior's, i could only say that is a waste of TIME to everyone!
"

Rocha's demo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9H3JMMKu-DM&

People usually want quick solutions and that only means 100% failure and frustration, on the other
hand some keep tinkering with it for decades but don't get themselves on proper energy level, of
course they also fail. Such are also not fit to vet any OU device on YT or anywhere, all they
really know is how to fail perpetually. Many of these people are humble and don't go calling devices
and principles fake just cause they fail, respect to them, they understand that it's delicate and
nuances make big difference. But some are not and become toxic bigmouths on forums, spreading
misinfo and skepticism, discouraging people from even trying.

Quote
That being said
I really like that WITTs water heater…

You like that heater but you "know" all others are "duboius" probably that heater too. My my.

Quote
And I am by no means a skeptic,I feel the only path forward is replication!
Independent replication
Or independent lab results!

You are a skeptic and a non-builder.

Quote
Please don’t rinse and repeat your position above on thousands etc etc !
Please “do “ share a result from your bench!
Just one !
Respectfully
Chet K

Oh the hypocrisy, show me one thing you built ever.

Online ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7825
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #721 on: August 31, 2022, 07:13:32 PM »
Sideways …. off point arguments ….or lighting fires elsewhere?
To pull the view from “your “ claim of thousands??



Just one Reproducible FE device (of the thousands) will do ?


Do you even look at where you post ?
It’s not a knitting club , just one true reproducible
Anomalous gain mechanism!
Would have tons of builds here !


Just one !!
PLEASE!!

Sorry I don’t have your free time to waste
Just be certain you stay within terms of service


I see you already make assumptions and troll for arguments


Not a good sign for a guy who has thousands of FE devices
TEACH
—-///——/////—-////
EDIT for below
You are in a house filled with builders
One very serious builder posted to you above !


And you danced …finger pointed and waved your way off the opportunity
To actually help …


There is nothing more important at this point in time


TEACH!!
Teach the hundreds- thousands of potential builders here !
///—-///—-/////——///


Final edit comment for below “YouTube proof”


“Movie Proof “??
Is like the person with a checkbook trying to convince bank that they
Must have money in bank
Because they still have checks in the book !!


LOOK Everyone it has a MOT !!




Proof ?
Your “other”dimension must be much nicer than my reality
A few microwave transformers
A hacksaw … some wires and ….
Wallah
FE unit # 2002 !!
Easy peasy !


You keep going like this you’ll need a bigger boat..


My formal training is in test lab  ( many here who are builders also Test
Very very strict protocols for proof !
This is Why you can  get on trains planes and automobiles and have little concern !
 Industries where proof is a set of engineered plans that can traverse the internet
Arrive at a factory on the other side of the world
And a commercial aircraft leaves and flies back to sender !
That is proof
A replication actually!!


In this case of FE


Power in power out etc proof!
And of course looping or self running once a unit is to a certain level
Should be self evident!


IMO it would be much better you show parts of your build that explain your
Reasoning ( beyond the use of words)


8 years ?
There are thousands of years combined scientist EE’s physicists etc etc in these open source forums
 You post movies as proof and start flamewars ( even have prewritten and numbered this editions “word battles” above with numbers ?


For a guy with FE in sooo many sizes and flavors?
You chose word battles as a priority!


Your point in the multiverse sounds fabulously frivolous!


Yeesh
TEACH
FE Results and how to


Not FE thesaurus flame wars 101


At this time I chose to leave your reality
And return to mine where proof requires more than words and movies
Where people actually suffer for lack of these techs
As well our entire planet and ecosystem!


You live in a very separate or detached  reality!




BTW
I love to build …



« Last Edit: September 01, 2022, 12:18:06 AM by ramset »

Offline ne0

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 34
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #722 on: August 31, 2022, 07:33:43 PM »
Oh the hypocrisy, who is making "off point arguments ….or lighting fires"...
calling REAL devices "fakes".....

I look very well where i post, question is do you ever.

Your eternal skepticism and beggin for "just one real one" is worn out and
reminds of a bad script.

You clearly have much more free time than me, while i have been researching
and building you were writing those 7-8 thousand skeptical posts.

If someone is trolling for arguments it's you. You may remind yourself of TOS, saying device is fake when it's not is not allowed.

Stop begging, enough of bla bla, start building for a change.

EDIT for EDIT:

Quote
You are in a house filled with builders

Of which i am one and have been for 8 years.

Quote
One very serious builder posted to you above !

I seen how "serious" he is, posting uncalled for personal attacks,
and quick skip through his previous posts reveals he was exposed before.

I wonder if your "serious builder" would even know to
measure resonant frequency of a coil.

Quote
And you danced …finger pointed and waved your way off the opportunity
To actually help …

All you do is dance and finger point, never did you actually contribute or help.

Just with this thread i helped more than you and your pal combined
in all your posts, not to mention all the other threads.

Just in this thread i brought to attention and removed any doubt, contrary
to the claim of your pal stivep, that there can be power amplifcation in parallel
RLC as video i linked multiple times shows very clearly

105W in 2.34kW reactive

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVgp-gOBqsg

200W in 3.5kw reactive

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sfOKPIi6CM

Now google "parallel rlc" site:overunity.com

And it becomes clear except in 2 of my threads this term has been mentioned
only 3 times and none of those 3 talked of current or power amplification.
This is the key principle and i brought it to wide attention. Who helped more.

All you do is whine and dramatize, i go to the core of things are share for all.

Quote
There is nothing more important at this point in time

More bla bla, empty words with no substance.

Quote
TEACH!!
Teach the hundreds- thousands of potential builders here !

I been doing exactly that for years, you have not been paying attention.

Researching, building, sharing......

If you only done 1/10 as much as me you would be
100 times more helpful to the community and the world.




Final edit for "Final edit".................

Quote
“Movie Proof “??
Is like the person with a checkbook trying to convince bank that they
Must have money in bank
Because they still have checks in the book !!


LOOK Everyone it has a MOT !!

More stupid sarcasm, you just prove my point


Quote
Proof ?
Your “other”dimension must be much nicer than my reality
A few microwave transformers
A hacksaw … some wires and ….
Wallah
FE unit # 2002 !!
Easy peasy !

And more stupid sarcasm...lame

Quote
You keep going like this you’ll need a bigger boat..

How ironic coming from someone so ignorant and detached from reality.

Quote
My formal training is in test lab  ( many here who are builders also Test
Very very strict protocols for proof !

Your formal training is distracting people from simple truths.

Quote
This is Why you can  get on trains planes and automobiles and have little concern !
 Industries where proof is a set of engineered plans that can traverse the internet
Arrive at a factory on the other side of the world
And a commercial aircraft leaves and flies back to sender !
That is proof
A replication actually!!
In this case of FE

Bla bla bla, more empty words, distractions

Quote
Power in power out etc proof!
And of course looping or self running once a unit is to a certain level
Should be self evident!

How many have demonstrated looped devices,
......but ofc they are all "frauds" for you :facepalm:

Quote
IMO it would be much better you show parts of your build that explain your
Reasoning ( beyond the use of words)

I suppose Kapandaze and all those replicating him
did not convince you enough, or did they............

Quote
8 years ?
There are thousands of years combined scientist EE’s physicists etc etc in these open source forums

"Scientist" "EE" :D When they are so great where are the solutions...
Since you got none by your own admission, you don't get to boast.

Thousands of years, yet no one even mentioned power amplification in parallel RLC,
the key to it all, before i did, interesting isn't it......

Quote
You post movies as proof and start flamewars ( even have prewritten and numbered this editions “word battles” above with numbers ?

More useless personal attacks from you, intentional flaming and
distracting from the science/tech with garbage.

Notice how he always sleazily calls it "movies" to create the mental image
of something worthless, unreal......in vain are you efforts....

Is this a "movie" OR REALITY.....

105W in 2.34kW reactive

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVgp-gOBqsg

NO MATTER HOW MUCH DERAILING SPAM YOU POST
WILL NOT CHANGE THE FACT OF PARALLEL RLC POWER
AMPLIFICATION AND BASIS OF OU EXTRACTION

Quote
For a guy with FE in sooo many sizes and flavors?
You chose word battles as a priority!

You describe yourself again, all you do is rant and personal attacks
while i share the key principles for enlightement of all.

Quote
Your point in the multiverse sounds fabulously frivolous!

And you desribe yourself yet again. Seems you're getting poetic too.

Quote
Yeesh
TEACH
FE Results and how to


Not FE thesaurus flame wars 101

Yeesh to you, hypocrite. Admit the OU reality
and stop "FE thesaurus flame wars 101"


Quote
At this time I chose to leave your reality
And return to mine where proof requires more than words and movies
Where people actually suffer for lack of these techs
As well our entire planet and ecosystem!

"My reality" :D YOU are living in a separate reality,
denying the obvious, how long, it's becoming ridiculous...

I don't even need resonant transformers to expose your lies
I can expose you with a simple Milkovic 2-stage pendulum,
proven to be 11-12x OU.

How much energy would he need to lift that 74 pound (33kg) weight
few inches and drop it dozens and dozens of times, it is doing
work every time it drops.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gC6Qlj1Mbo8

Are you denying this is OU, if you are you are CLEARLY lying....

So here we have PROOF of OU you been (supposedly) "looking for".
Why i got a hunch you're again gonna dodge and sleazily try to avoid
admitting the SIMPLE TRUTH i been saying all along, be it mechanical
or solid state.....

Quote
You live in a very separate or detached  reality!

Very very ironic considering you are the one living in
"a very separate or detached  reality"...denying simple,
obvious OU devices, as well as more complex ones.

Quote
BTW
I love to build …

Only thing you build is useless rants...

Let's make it concrete, i wanna hear your official denial
that video above is showing 11-12X energy amplification.

« Last Edit: September 01, 2022, 03:00:54 AM by ne0 »

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3405
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #723 on: September 01, 2022, 12:16:08 AM »
200W in 3.5kw reactive
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sfOKPIi6CM
You nix85 didn't even want to read the comment below the video.
Quote
Azamat Farrakhov 5 years ago
// (параллельный резонанс) с парой дросселей от ЛДС. Замерял их начальную и конечную температуры, продолжительность нагрева, учёл массу железа, меди и тепловые потери (для подсчёта потерь достаточно замерить время остывания, остальные данные те же). Ток в контуре в 2,5 раза больше входного. Полученная после расчётов мощность нагрева с точностью 5% сошлась с потреблением по бытовому индукционному счётчику (20 Вт). Дроссели конечно мелковаты, всего ватт на 30, запаса по мощности нет, как говорил Андреев.
Translation: "parallel resonance) with a pair of chokes from LDS.
I measured their initial and final temperatures, the duration of heating, took
into account the mass of iron, copper and heat loss (to calculate losses,
it is enough to measure the cooling time, the rest of the data are the same).
The current in the circuit is 2.5 times greater than the input.
The heating power obtained after the calculations with an accuracy of 5%
coincided with the consumption of a household induction meter !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(20 W).
The chokes are of course shallow, only 30 watts,
there is no power reserve, as Andreev said." = there is no extra power there!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



It is quite simple trick:
The household power meter should operate properly up to 400Hz but many Chinese  power meters are not.
The "phenomenon" - (error in reading) is achieved in resonance  outside of range of the meter.

The title of the video didn't claim any over- unity or energy from nothing.
Quote
Экономный Резонансный Нагреватель
Economical Resonant Heater
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sfOKPIi6CM
____________________________________________________________
Quote
Ігор Козубаль 6 years ago
Вячеслав  спасибо!! А  при подключении  нагрузки  резонанс  в контуре  будет  держаться???
Translation: Igor Kozubal 6 years ago Vyacheslav thank you!! And when the load is connected, the resonance in the circuit will hold???

Answer:
Quote
Вячеслав
6 years ago
Но здесь нет съёмного контура,  если в резонансный контур вмешиваться, то будет уходить резонанс...
Translation: Vyacheslav 6 years ago But there is no load circuit, if you interfere with the resonant circuit, the resonance will go away...

Quote
Это же схема похожа на старую Андреева, только без обратной связи и съёмного...
На мой взгляд здесь экономия есть против индукционного нагрева или тэнового, а коэффициент теплоотдачи меньше.
Translation:
This schematic is similar to the old of Andreeva, only without feedback and removable ...
In my opinion, there is savings against induction heating or heat transfer, and the heat transfer coefficient is less. 

Quote
Вячеслав 6 years agoещё как возможно ))   
если вместо дросселя трансформатор поставить с съёмной обмоткой и обратной связью то это как раз схема Андреева... Я просто показал устойчивость резонанса при изменении в сети напряжения, как это происходит в схемах Андреева
Translation:
Vyacheslav 6 years ago is still as possible )) if instead of a balast a transformer is placed - with a removable winding and feedback then this is just andreev's scheme...
I just showed the stability of the resonance when the voltage in the network changes, as it happens in Andreev's schemes.

_______________________________________________________
for these interested with schematic of Andreev:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pEpbVs8-No

if he doesn't stop bullying. I will vote for his total ban.

Wesley

Offline ne0

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 34
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #724 on: September 01, 2022, 02:23:54 AM »
You nix85 didn't even want to read the comment below the video.

Another false claim from you. I did read the description, that is where the
input output data comes from....

Did i ever claim that video shows overunity?

E-VER, ANY-WHERE? No, i did not. So what is all this bs you just posted.

Video is clearly linked as an example of POWER AMPLIFICATION in parallel RLC...

Something which you called impossible at the very beginning of this thread,
need i quote.... yet here we see two examples of 20 times more power oscillating
in the parallel RLC tank than is being input into it.

As for load affecting the resonance.......i spoke about that, as bolt said 11 years ago
and as Dan Combine wrote 16 years ago in RE-OU-v6_1.pdf (in attachment)......
everything affects resonance, that is where "tuning for load" phrase comes
from, but load CAN be connected and powered by almost purely reactive power as
many reported over the years.....as same guy from first video i linked demostrated,
also posted here number of times already....

Quote
Guy i shared before who pumps 2.34kW in his big trans with 105W input.

Here he is looping it with UPS battery, battery starts at 13.69V.

Then he powers 280W of lights + charges the batter to 14.3V.

Reactive power is 1163W here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYWgcRB73bw

Quote
if he doesn't stop bullying. I will vote for his total ban.

Wesley

Clearly troll is hurt badly by the truth and all he has left is personal attacks,
projections, calling me a "troll" when he is in fact a troll bullying and disinforming.
He knows well truth has been exposed here, the essence of it, he has only two
ways to destroy the truth, to defame me personally and/or the materials i post...
He of course cannot do this in the eyes of those who see, but he hopes he can
do it for the majority, if he only constructs his attacks sleazily enough to work
on their skepticism or should i say lack of sight, combined with massive amount
of bs content, he has high hopes that this wave of enlightenment will pass over
the heads of the most. But even if he (they) is successful in blinding the most, more and
more will see through the fog and when enough candles turn on, dark will seize.

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3405
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #725 on: September 01, 2022, 02:40:06 AM »
The unfortunate is that posted by you nix85 video doesn't show any extra energy from RLC  circuit.
Author of the video doesn't claim any extra energy.
Economical Resonant Heater
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sfOKPIi6CM
and:
LC circuit doesn't amplify as it is made from passive elements:

 QUOTE:         
         You can apply whatever frequencies you want but, the further you are away from the natural resonant frequency,
          the lower will be the resulting amplitude.  – Andy aka  May 3, 2020 at 9:47   
   3     Also an LC tank is made of passive components so amplification is not something that can happen.
         You cannot get more signal power out than you put in.
Bimpelrekkie  May 3, 2020 at 9:59   
   
Nature of your confusion is quote:
         Yes, but not very effectively. This is a huge problem in RF receiver design because high level input signals near
         (but outside) the tuned circuit bandwidth break through (attenuated, but still louder than the signals you want)
          interfering with the wanted signal.  – user_1818839  May 3, 2020 at 14:12 

here is a link:
https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/497328/can-a-lc-tank-circuit-amplify-frequencies-beyond-the-bandwidth-region

Wesley

Offline ne0

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 34
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #726 on: September 01, 2022, 02:48:05 AM »
Again you copy paste the same nonsense and lies.

1) Power clearly is ampilfied since we can clearly measure current and voltage
in the circuit and calculate power P=IV which is 20 times (or more) the input

2) Some of the power clearly can be taken to power the real load as guy shows
280W of lights being powered WHILE CHARGING THE BATTERY that keeps the RLC
tank going

3) With fine tuning much bigger outputs are possible

Online ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7825
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #727 on: September 01, 2022, 03:35:32 AM »
Nix
I Strongly suggest you stop twisting your words and just
Host the claim!
The man in the video ( whom you also apparently taunt in comments at his video channel ( if it’s the same one from above)
Seems you really have no evidence at all in these vids ( actual method to validate ?


Since “you” understand this easy 20 fold gain mechanism
Put it into a schematic
And just give a 2fold result for replicators!
Should be a much easier task!



Show us the easy 2 fold
Any fold of more out than in !


Or is it really just the flamewars you want ?
It is really looking this way!


2 fold please even .2 will do
And no batteries
Capacitors please , they are a much easier to model and measure in the circuit
And easy for replicators to follow along dependably !


Please?
TEACH
We don’t need flamewars lessons !
Ps
I am sure it is late where you are atm
Please model the experiment
Not 20 times input
Just. 2 times will do!
And if that’s to hard
Try .2
No more flamewars Over YouTube’s with no evidential protocols ( circuits and expected results!
You Nix can believe all the theatre you wish
But slanderous actions which hold theatrical musings….?  as evidence …a basis for slander ??


HUH ?
Get your own forum and put your own assets on the line !


Or do the much simpler thing and post schematic, specs etc
For a cop greater than 2





Offline ne0

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 34
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #728 on: September 01, 2022, 04:05:23 AM »
Again the exact same bs....As if i did not predict EXACTLY
that he's just gonna dodge and sleazly avoid answering
and just repeat the same nonsense.....

Enough bs....stop twisting, dodging, demanding my replication
and pretending to beg for "2 fold", stop starting flamewars
(seems that's all YOU want).... stop the slandering.......
we all seen enough of your act

1) Answer CLEARLY

Are you denying that he very clearly shows 20x power amplification?

2) Answer CLEARLY

Are you denying other video very clearly shows 11-12X energy amplifcation?


Online ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7825
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #729 on: September 01, 2022, 08:18:49 AM »
Nix
Movies can show anything the presenter wants
Whether he actually understands what he is looking
At is a completely different story!


So you say he understands ( and then you actually yell at him in comments?


I think this conversation from my side is over
It would seem you absolutely do not have the ability to TEACH
Just fights
We don’t need help in fighting department
It’s not something We waste time with here
Flame wars are forbidden!



 aa a man who picks multiple fights ( your list above) which have absolutely nothing to do with a successful replication!
When he could simply show he is right ?( about more power out than in )


Well ?


And you are not in a fight club here !
And our planet really does pay a huge price for burning our very thin atmosphere and poisoning our very precious water !
People really will freeze to death this year ( more than usual) or die do to cold side effects




And here you play a fight game ?


Your “fight flame” will go out here…. it’s not what we do !
Read the sign on the door below!
That’s our mission statement


You in or you out ?
Gonna fight ( somewhere else of course)
Or TEACH!

You say you have thousands of flavors of OU
Just one will do !


After over one year or more of this ?
You must have one test set up to show “more out than in “
On your bench !( amongst your mentioned thousands of FE device’s)

And if it’s just movie proof with no schematic or ?
 Take that fight somewhere else !






Offline kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1042
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #730 on: September 01, 2022, 11:14:07 AM »
Что вы на моего Веслика нападаете ?  :(

Offline ne0

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 34
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #731 on: September 01, 2022, 02:29:44 PM »
There, he again repeats exactly the same bs with slighty
rearranged words.... again he calls it "movies".....impyling
"deception" and accuses me of "picking fights" while that
is exactly what he is doing, picking fights to derail from
the SIMPLE TRUTH.

Now he lies that i said they "understand"....i did not.
I don't care if they understand altho they clearly do
to a certain extent....all i care about is demonstration
of the principles.

Your post is quick few word dismissal of videos and then
ton of personal attacks....

WE ALL SEE ENOUGH OF YOUR ACT, CUT IT.

Not to mention what a hypocrite you are to call real,
key videos "deceptions", to attack me personally
and post that silly welcome page screenshot
implying how you supposedly "look for a solution".
Nothing stinks more than a hypocrite.

I am asking you a simple OBJECTIVE question, so focus
on that, not personal attacks and bs.


Since you claim these videos are deception, say in which way
what is deceptive about them, be objective, let's hear it.

105W in 2.34kW reactive, clear 20 times power amplification.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVgp-gOBqsg

Lifting 74 pounds (33kg) dozens of times with slight finger push
Clear 11-12 times energy multiplication.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gC6Qlj1Mbo8


Online ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7825
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #732 on: September 01, 2022, 02:52:38 PM »
Nix
You don’t need to jump around to all your flavors of over unity.
Pick one
Within skill set of forum …which you know works ( works on your bench)
Start a new build topic !
The builders community  will definitely get the message!


Just one you have had in your own hands !


And even .2 will do


BTW
I am going to try to contact someone you have mentioned this last year
and see if ?


Persons who build and share are life’s blood of forum!


Please do!
Respectfully
Chet K
Ps noise to signal
Noise =random video evidence with no ability to replicate!
Signal = bench replication


BTW open source community skill set has few limits


Offline ne0

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 34
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #733 on: September 01, 2022, 03:20:16 PM »
Your tactique is

1) call it a deception or strongly imply so
2) insist on my replication or nothing
3) repeat repeat repeat

People are not stupid they see what you do.

I am showing concrete KEY principles while
you are jumping around, derailing with lies and bs.

You continue to pretend to beg for a solution, asking for a build
yet when shown clearly real obvious gain mechanims you call it
"deception" have you no shame.

Let's focus on the second vid, we can see the old guy lift this
74lb 33kg weight dozens of times with his pinky.

If that is not OBVIOUS ENERGY GAIN what is.

Are you calling video a montage, a CGI or what....

If not, how do you explain that he lifts that big weight so many times and he could
clearly do it for 20-30min cause input energy is so tiny while output is AT LEAST
11-12 times more.

Online ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7825
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #734 on: September 01, 2022, 03:34:48 PM »
Nix
There is a huge reason that you do not get enuff attention ( a following)
Of builders !
First the fights … true builders here would prefer their fingernails pulled before engaging in such atmosphere!
2nd


Persons who build and share results get respect of open source community ,


Persons who see overunity at every YouTube?
And tell others to “build it “ you’ll see ?
It really is amazingly naive!
A rabbit hole which will consume years of life chasing ??( nothing OU at all)




I have not yet looked at any of videos you posted as it is your bench endorsement
The community seeks !
We have had years of lives wasted on such unproven assumptions


Do you have replication of any flavor?
Personal experience
“I did this it works”
Or is this where we end ?


I have no time for such bouncing around


Pick one
Anything
And I will be sure to get the needed input ( will bring hundreds of years combined experience to your bench !


Stop playing games !
It’s not a game
And for clarity
It will be 100% transparent process !


Scientific rigor will apply !

Respectfully
Chet K
PS
Who has the captains paddle?


Kolbacict
Quote

Что вы на моего Веслика нападаете


End quote