Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL  (Read 36016 times)

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #180 on: June 14, 2021, 04:17:22 PM »
I show by the Dotto/Lahkovsky example that I make error(s) and I do not delete that " silently" !
I do me not ashame to be male human,errare ......

Correctness and concentration is important : f.e Tchernobyl by human recation error !
Working with a sensitive  Tab-keyboard compared the conventional mechanical PC-key-board gives all the userthe chance to learn patiently to correct orthographical errors,faster thinking than writing !
Point,mangare .
I  smell the hot food from the kitchen !

Offline nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 865
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #181 on: June 14, 2021, 04:33:07 PM »
Even worse you refuse to admit your errors.

I was wrong about power amplification in LC tank and i admitted it even without anyone asking me to. (Altho it is so counterintuitive and contrary to all other resonant systems where pumping energy in phase always creates power amplification).

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #182 on: June 14, 2021, 06:41:40 PM »
tic-tac-toe : 9 fields,one=1 the mostly strategical : the middle


Who begins will ever win,if the player


 sets the middle point at first


the rule from the game : win or loose

who begins can dispense to win by not middle point setting


if both dispense to occupy the middle-point how many steps are in need for final result : who wins,the beginner or the second player ?

How often dispense parents to win against their child/s to not demotivate,but to let learn patiency,gladnees,sadness by lost,but the chance to repeat the "game hour/day" per week !?

a-/social behaviour and the looser,but also winner,reaction observation (loud/brute or silently/net)


First and Second or winner and looser !














the Carnot efficiency,the Carnot factor


https://www.e-education.psu.edu/egee102/node/1942#:~:text=The%20Carnot%20Efficiency%20is%20the,reservoir%20operates%20(%20TCold%20).


                                    1= 100 %  is maxime set point


                        and the formula follows  1- = 1 or 100% less


                       99,period99 is the calculatoric theoretical maximum : as imaginary engine


                                    physical,by mechanical stress factor limitated ,not realizeable


You get C.O.P. 10/100/1000/10000/10vX( X>%) but not ever the result by Carnot efficiency formula greater one :


                                                              ever < 1 or   = 1-

     you destroy the formula context - the reversible thermodynamic cycle representing -with saying/writing/thinking   


                                                               (1+X ) -

                                             why ? (higher dimension) logical

                                                                  1 =     (1+X)-




By my  post before I wrote that I admit errors !
You state about me :  " refuse to admit your errors. "


I-A !


In german :" irgendwie durch den Wind !" Do not know what an automatic translator (not fuzzy logic based)will "output" !?

I do not see our disputation as time lost,You both let me inform about for me since yesterday unknown scientists/ researcher their work like Pascual Jordan,by A.Einstein nominated as Nobel Prize candidate,not received cause
P.J. his NSDAP history ,as same case C.F.v.Weizsaecker !

Related Newtons his " superposition",farly also defined as  "4.law of motion " the  Born-Jordan quantum mechanical view and definition



The centrifugal-boiler invention from Infinitysav,who is the inventor,reading in their patent papers mostly korean names,only one with Andrey !
And even calculatoric believing this number,seeing this boiler in work and this 200 W motor in work ,operated by 50 W consume controler,
how long this 10 000 RPM  spiral and chamber will hold the pressure and material stress !?In warranty-able time-frame l!?
How often the oil has to be changed !?
Triboelectricity here to find ? Dis-/advantage !?

Offline nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 865
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #183 on: June 14, 2021, 07:36:21 PM »
If you run around the world and come back to the same point, you have done no work :)))

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #184 on: June 14, 2021, 07:45:38 PM »
If you run around the world and come back to the same point, you have done no work :) ))
Illuminati,are You,not ? ;D



An investment banker stood on the pier and in a small Mexican fishing village
watched a small fishing boat dock with a fisherman on board; he had
loaded some large tuna. The banker congratulated the Mexican on his
magnificent catch and asked how long it had taken him to do it. The Mexican
replied: "Not long - just a couple of hours."
Why didn't he stay longer at sea to catch more? He asked
Banker. The Mexican said the fish were enough for him to be the closest to his family
Days to supply. The banker continued: "But what do you do with the rest of the
Day? "The fisherman:" I sleep in in the morning, go fishing a little; play with
my children, take a siesta with my wife Maria after lunch, go
Walk in the village, have a glass of wine there and play the guitar with mine
Friends, so I have a full life ".
The banker stated, "I'm a Harvard graduate and I could help you a little.
You should spend more time fishing and get a bigger boat with the proceeds
to buy. With this you could buy several boats until you have a whole fleet. Instead of
You could sell the catch to a trader directly to a fish factory
sell them and eventually open their own fish processing factory. You could
Control production, processing and sales yourself. You could then do this
abandoned small fishing village and headed for Mexico City, Los Angeles or maybe even after
Move to New York City and run your thriving business from there. "
The Mexican asked, "How long will this all take?" The banker replied:
"About 15 to 20 years." "And then what?" asked the fisherman. The banker laughed and
said, "Then the best comes. When the time is right, you could do yours
Companies go public; Sell ​​your company shares and get very rich
become. You could make millions. "
The Mexican said: "Millions. And then?" Then the banker: "Then you could
stop working. You could move to a little fishing village on the coast
Sleep in late in the morning, go fishing a bit, play with your kids, one
Have a siesta with your wife, stroll in the village, enjoy a glass of wine in the evening
and play guitar with your friends. "


The fisher and the Walras-law ::)


                                Do You per day positive or negative work ,from general life view ? ;)


https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/physical-processes/work-and-energy-mcat/a/work-can-be-negative


Remember when doing work calculations only the component of force parallel to the direction of movement is used in a work calculation.

For example, in this picture here as a person pushes the book across the table, neither the gravity force or the normal force do any work because there is no displacement in the y-direction,


but the pushing force does do work because the pushing force is in the same direction as the movement of the book.


                                               a person pushes
                              this person changing with a pushing simple machine
             
                  machine F( actio) and -F(reactio) total balance calculation input and effect

                                 

https://cdn.kastatic.org/ka-perseus-images/199e505fbad1a25ed9e46c52a8c214a5fa439a1a.svg

Offline nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 865
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #185 on: June 14, 2021, 07:58:04 PM »
Illuminati,are You,not ? ;D

I just gave another example for what you said ;D

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #186 on: June 14, 2021, 08:03:02 PM »
I just gave another example for what you said ;D


Yes, I wrote under absolutely condition from physics " total balance sheet" with positive and negative work,positive and negative energy and


finaly neutral work and neutral energy view !  :)  two frames : 1 uncertainty

Some visual centimetres literature :


 https://www.jstor.org/stable/41133759


 http://cbpfindex.cbpf.br/publication_pdfs/nf01803.2010_06_23_15_15_02.pdf



Beside :  F + vector arrow and


            -F with vector arrow






You know( have experience),classical physics and quantum physics :




how it is easier to " spit around the corner ",imaginary and real !? 8)  moving train, open window


local quantum physics and temporal quantum physics : nearing frames ZERO POINT = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enrico_Fermi level

Offline nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 865
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #187 on: June 14, 2021, 08:35:12 PM »
Please, we all know what positive and negative work mean,
but to claim no work has been done in that example is absurd.

Or rather, plain stupid.

You might as well say no work is done anywhere, anywhen.


Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #188 on: June 14, 2021, 08:41:18 PM »
We call "absurd",implausibility,but acceptable/applyable through conditioning by § ,common rules !


Has not to be rational ,but by convention from "insider" natural possible ! Sub-nano-/Supra-astrophysics-dimensional !


Learning to work with i(r)-realities,il-/logics is part from "set theory" ,paradox = means also against geral rules/laws = specific case !


The problem is not the denier,not the calculation,not to produce unikat/prototype ,


the problem is the production machinery,which has to mass produce by same quality the quantity !


Probably Hexapod like !




Offline nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 865
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #189 on: June 14, 2021, 08:44:27 PM »
No matter how much nonsense your crumble in, it will not make it right.

If you were right about that no work is done in that book example, again,
you may as well say no work is done anywhere, anywhen.

Which is of course wrong considering universe is one big machine working ceaselessly on all levels.

Overall ENERGY of the universe is indeed zero, but that does not change the fact that work is done constantly, including when you move the book across the table and back.

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #190 on: June 14, 2021, 08:54:10 PM »
You might as well say no work is done anywhere, anywhen.


which rating frame ? Theosophical,theological,economical,scientological,teleological ?


By Buddhism : 100% correct  :) 


But : I am not Buddhist ! ;)  Listen I do ..... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hexzt2Wo-Sw

Offline nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 865
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #191 on: June 14, 2021, 09:04:44 PM »
If you move the book at constant speed horizontally,you don't do any work on it, despite the fact that you have to exert an upward force to counter-act gravity.

 :o :o ;D ;D

You can even make a frame out of your favorite candy

It will still not make that statement true. ;)

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #192 on: June 14, 2021, 09:31:00 PM »
calculus : Euklid,Galilei,Newton,Euler,Kartesian


https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.leifiphysik.de/mechanik/kraft-und-bewegungsaenderung/grundwissen/3-newtonsches-gesetz-wechselwirkungsprinzip


F with ever -F (often forgotten,not counted)


only (quasi) frictionless or also F and -F  influencing,this here :


                        http://www.rexresearch.com/wilkes/1wilkes.htm




https://demoweb.physics.ucla.edu/content/20-paradox-forces    Paradox,not absurd

Offline nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 865
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #193 on: June 14, 2021, 09:41:58 PM »
"you don't do any work on it (the book)".

No matter how much unrelated stuff you now paste about + and - force, frictionless bearing or whatever it changes not the fact that work IS done on the book in your little example.  ;)

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #194 on: June 14, 2021, 09:54:48 PM »
"you don't do any work on it (the book)".

No matter how much unrelated stuff you now paste about + and - force, frictionless bearing or whatever it changes not the fact that work IS done on the book in your little example.  ;)


Reply #15 ,member nix85 :


"If you move the book at constant speed horizontally,you don't do any work on it, despite the fact that you have to exert an upward force to counter-act gravity.


" to move the book at constant speed you must first accelerate it and then work against friction,
 thus you are doing work,
that you have not lifted or lowered it vertically is irrelevant