Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 84248
  • *Latest: khniki

  • *Total Posts: 898017
  • *Total Topics: 15837
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 1
  • *Guests: 6
  • *Total: 7

Author Topic: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL  (Read 28276 times)

Offline nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 849
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #135 on: June 12, 2021, 06:10:36 PM »
More dodging. You are trying to make it look as if asking about inertial propulsion is trolling. That's just pathetic.

No more dodging, declare your stance on this physical principle.


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #135 on: June 12, 2021, 06:10:36 PM »

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4794

Offline nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 849
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #137 on: June 12, 2021, 07:16:13 PM »
Hopefully there is no more confusion between heat transport and generation.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #137 on: June 12, 2021, 07:16:13 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4794
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #138 on: June 12, 2021, 07:18:17 PM »
                                                          (actio/reactio) superposition


Such a chain has in the absence of any temperature gradient, an efficiency near unity.


Such a chain has in the absence of any temperature gradient, an heat transport and electricity generation efficiency near unity.




                       temperature is : .......


                       heat is : .......


                       gradient is : ......




Francis Russell (v.)Bichowsky died early,with 52 years (1889-1951)
https://www.nytimes.com/1951/04/06/archives/dr-f-bichowsky-research-chemist-critic-of-navy-gunnery-expert-on.html
https://books.google.pt/books?id=o1XVCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA607&lpg=PA607&dq=Francis+russell+von+bichowski&source=bl&ots=KyDVsJZ9p6&sig=ACfU3U33-GecxO0fk3bFxLAcIrcy7NUA7A&hl=de&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiP1ebS85LxAhWLasAKHYjgBfMQ6AEwDXoECBMQAw#v=onepage&q=Francis%20russell%20von%20bichowski&f=false
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/212063409.pdf 1918 received ( so with 29 years written by F.R.B.)
http://www.poles.org/db/B_names/Bichowski_FR.html

Matei Marinescu https://www.edusoft.ro/matei-marinescu-corifeu-al-ingineriei-romane/




Simple question : when becomes an infrared radiation heat ?


at first : http://www.energie-innovation.com/astro_foil.html   


 It is in the nature of the pure, (99.9%) aluminum surfaces of ASTRO-FOIL to reflect 97% of the radiant heat waves that strikes its surface.


other Infrared waves reflector information :


http://www.radiantbarrier.com/resources-articles-how-radiant-barrier-works-heat-gain-loss/#:~:text=The%20surface%20of%20aluminum%20has,of%20the%20rays%20are%20absorbed.&text=The%20absorption%20rate%20of%20your%20face%20is%2099%25.


The surface of aluminum has the ability not to absorb, but to reflect 95% of the infrared rays which strike it.
Since aluminum foil has such a low mass to air ratio, very little conduction can take place, particularly when only 5% of the rays are absorbed.


Each kitchen aluminium foil ergo  ! https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215017X1930373X
(Trademark/company independent)

Ceiling and roof materials and exposed structural members have an emissivity that may be as high as 0.9. Special aluminum paint can lower the emissivity to between 0.5 and 0.2. Polished metal such as polished aluminum or aluminum foil has an emissivity of 0.05.


Magnesium foil mass to air ratio ?


Titanium    foil mass to air ratio ?


next statement :


All the objects in an enclosed structure give off (emit) radiant heat waves, exchanging them with the other objects and wall/ceiling surfaces.
 The walls and ceilings will absorb the radiant heat waves, converting them to conductive heat that can then pass through the wall system to the cooler outside environment. The job of mass insulation is to slow down that heat transfer by resisting its flow.


emitts radiant heat waves             or          emitts radiant waves,which transforms to heat in a this wave absorbing objekt

The amount of radiation emitted is a function of the emissivity factor of the source’s surface. Emissivity is the rate at which radiation (emission) is given off. Absorption of radiation by an object is proportional to the absorptivity factor of its surface which is reciprocal of its emissivity.


By reflecting the radiant heat waves, the foil surface remains relatively cool, leaving very little heat to be absorbed and conducted through the surface to the cooler outside of the building.




But from Astro-foil the most impressive statement : IR-waves have no temperature !

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared#:~:text=Infrared%20(IR)%2C%20sometimes%20called,invisible%20to%20the%20human%20eye.&text=Black%2Dbody%20radiation%20from%20objects,almost%20all%20at%20infrared%20wavelengths.





                        Boltzmann black body view or white body view


A comparison of a thermal image (top) and an ordinary photograph (bottom). The plastic bag is mostly transparent to long-wavelength infrared, but the man's glasses are opaque.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/44/Human-Infrared.jpg/200px-Human-Infrared.jpg
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9b/Human-Visible.jpg/160px-Human-Visible.jpg





Materials with higher emissivity appear closer to their true temperature than materials that reflect more of their different-temperature surroundings. In this thermal image, the more reflective ceramic cylinder, reflecting the cooler surroundings, appears to be colder than its cubic container (made of more emissive silicon carbide), while in fact, they have the same temperature.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/67/Effect_of_emissivity_on_apparent_temperature.jpg/220px-Effect_of_emissivity_on_apparent_temperature.jpg





Heating
 One energy advantage is that the IR energy heats only opaque objects, such as food, rather than the air around them

Cooling
A variety of technologies or proposed technologies take advantage of infrared emissions to cool buildings or other systems. The LWIR (8–15 μm) region is especially useful since some radiation at these wavelengths can escape into space through the atmosphere.




                                           No temperature,but IR cools or heats


                                         movement or spin versus/compared  temperature

Heat is energy in transit that flows due to a temperature difference. Unlike heat transmitted by thermal conduction or thermal convection, thermal radiation can propagate through a vacuum.
 Thermal radiation is characterized by a particular spectrum of many wavelengths that are associated with emission from an object,
 due to the vibration of its molecules at a given temperature.






https://www.univie.ac.at/geographie/fachdidaktik/FD/site/external_htmls/imagers.gsfc.nasa.gov/ems/infrared.html
the planet Earth : https://www.univie.ac.at/geographie/fachdidaktik/FD/site/external_htmls/imagers.gsfc.nasa.gov/ems/earthir.jpg


anymore blue,but violett https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violett


 red blood + blue blood
« Last Edit: June 12, 2021, 10:14:00 PM by lancaIV »

Offline nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 849
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #139 on: June 12, 2021, 07:24:00 PM »
Input 250w output 20kw = 8000% efficiency. All that matters.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #139 on: June 12, 2021, 07:24:00 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2965
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #140 on: June 12, 2021, 07:29:39 PM »
More dodging. You are trying to make it look as if asking about inertial propulsion is trolling. That's just pathetic.
No more dodging, declare your stance on this physical principle.

No my friend. 
 but first let me address  some of your previous  questions:

You ask me  what is my interest in  physics:
Here is the answer:
https://youtu.be/7Ldus3AQSpE?t=766

And here is another  one:
https://youtu.be/QHBEHOOsxT4
watch only  ~3 minutes of each video.
_____________________________________________
Here is some of my work:1.https://youtu.be/izzujmKROWI?t=159
2.https://youtu.be/k2PJVIkyW5Y?t=33
3.https://youtu.be/A_cJDvtcAxE?t=966
4.https://youtu.be/YrRc-xieWjE?t=703
5.https://youtu.be/Mn8TLBsR3r0?t=410
Your  questions are not silly or stupid.
And there is nothing  wrong with  questioning  dear nix85.
but  first   this:

No one cares about your titles, i simply referred to your supposed 30 years of physics experience yet, you are ignorant of even the most basic
// isn't it ironic that you dare to crown yourself with such title//
// material physics is inferior to Spiritual Physics. //
//Bunch of pulp again. There is God, our most inner Self beyond Mind//
And who are you to question OU
So now can you show me  similar material  about  yourself?
 any experiments?
 any  youtube?
 anything?
 
My friend : when you start to  provide  answers   to the extend similar with my  previous answers than we have platform for conversation.
 So answer  my questions first. (
right from above.) and provide  expected material.



Wesley

Offline nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 849
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #141 on: June 12, 2021, 07:38:58 PM »
And more dodging.

It's a yes or no question.

Is inertial propulsion nonsense, stivep1?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #141 on: June 12, 2021, 07:38:58 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4794
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #142 on: June 12, 2021, 10:18:10 PM »
nix85,read about "magnetic electron" ,by Bichowski and Urey disclosure,and think :


https://books.google.pt/books?id=o1XVCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA607&lpg=PA607&dq=Francis+russell+von+bichowski&source=bl&ots=KyDVsJZ9p6&sig=ACfU3U33-GecxO0fk3bFxLAcIrcy7NUA7A&hl=de&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiP1ebS85LxAhWLasAKHYjgBfMQ6AEwDXoECBMQAw#v=onepage&q=Francis%20russell%20von%20bichowski&f=false


Doppler-Effect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doppler_effect


( the "4th law of motion" does not exist by Newton ,only  1.,2.,3., Axiomatic Laws ! Superposition : like to see as !)

Offline nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 849
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #143 on: June 12, 2021, 10:21:13 PM »
I don't need to read anything to know electron is a deformation of a magnetic field, wave, not a particle.

I know what doppler effect is.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #143 on: June 12, 2021, 10:21:13 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4794
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #144 on: June 12, 2021, 10:24:53 PM »

I don't need to read anything to know electron is a deformation of a magnetic field, wave, not a particle.

I know what doppler effect is.
Fine,also the Minkowski-Dimension https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativistic_Doppler_effect


and clearly,in combination : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiedemann%E2%80%93Franz_law


Really : " to know electron is a deformation of a magnetic field " ?


              particle-wave or photon-wave


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wien%27s_displacement_law

Offline nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 849
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #145 on: June 12, 2021, 10:36:55 PM »
Yes, deformation of magnetic field.

I highly recommend you to read what some our solar neighbours have to say about science..

I myself used to
wonder where these electrons came from.
They must have come from somewhere, but where?
They do not come from anywhere, they were generated within the magnetic field.
How? They are the result of a deformation brought about within the magnetic field
by the movement of the rotor.
Supposing we take this generator and enclose it in an airtight vessel, we still get a
flow of electrons as soon as we start the rotor turning, and if we had a pressure
gauge inside the vessel we would see that in spite of the large current flowing
between the two conductors, the atmospheric pressure would remain the same. This
being the case, we can define the electron as deformed magnetic space, propagated
in wave form. An eloquent proof that the electron is a wave form and not a particle
is obtained by refracting it through a spectrum.
There is an experiment that Earth scientists have done to prove this: a gamma ray (a
gamma ray is of electro-magnetic origin), when passing close to a nucleus, pulls an
electron away with it. It is true that the moment of inertia of the gamma ray is
changed. To explain this phenomenon they devised the rather thin hypothesis that
the ray's acceleration was transformed into energy, but it is absurd to believe that
the moment of inertia of a vector in space could be transformed into energy.
There is a relationship between energy and the force that imparts acceleration to a
body, but only a certain relationship. Water activates a turbine, but the gravitational
force which activated the water could never be turned into electrical energy.
All that happened then was that the rotor moved inside the generator and caused a
deformation of the magnetic space. The deformation that the points M' of the mass
M of the rotor brought about in the magnetic field corresponds to the force of
gravity in the water in a turbine.
If it is absurd to say that a vector moment creates energy, it would be even worse to
say that this moment generates matter, in other words that an electron is a particle.
The only rational explanation is that a gamma ray, being of electromagnetic origin,
deformed itself for an instant near the nucleus and from this deformation an
electron was created which must therefore be a charge of wave form……..
...In the first instance God supplied the power that brings about the deformation of
space and the Sun, by an opposite process, turns it back into energy, thus reestablishing the balance.
Everything comes from God and everything returns to
Him.
That is why neither matter nor energy exist, but only deformed space, which is
called matter, and what you call energy is nothing more than a phenomenon of
transition between primordial space and deformed space.


https://avalonlibrary.net/ebooks/Dino%20Kraspedon%20-%20My%20Contact%20With%20Flying%20Saucers.pdf

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #145 on: June 12, 2021, 10:36:55 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4794
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #146 on: June 12, 2021, 10:42:58 PM »
Argument : http://www.quantumphysicslady.org/what-is-the-difference-between-an-electron-and-a-photon/
 
Photons have neither negative nor positive charge. They are not matter and have no mass. They travel the speed of light when in a vacuum like in outer space (which is not a complete vacuum, really). But they can travel much slower when traveling through a medium like water or even air.
Photons and electrons interact to create flows of electricity. Both are involved. Electricity is not merely a flow of electrons in a wire; it is also a flow of photons in an electromagnetic wave.

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klein-Gordon-Gleichung

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter#:~:text=In%20classical%20physics%20and%20general,up%20space%20by%20having%20volume.&text=Usually%20atoms%20can%20be%20imagined,which%20%22take%20up%20space%22.


In classical physics and general chemistry, matter is any substance that has mass and takes up space by having volume.

                 compared Your article sentence :


 This being the case, we can define the electron as deformed magnetic space, propagated
in wave form.

                                           Photon : They are not matter and have no mass.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ion


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleon




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality

Offline nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 849
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #147 on: June 12, 2021, 10:58:25 PM »
I'm aware mainstream paradigm thinks electron is "matter" and photon is not, but what is matter but standing waves. Collide two gamma rays and you'll get electron and positron. Also calling electron negative is arbitrary, it is negative relative to proton cause it is 1836 times smaller, it's gravitational field is much weaker than proton's gravitational field (vortex). Keep in mind everything is ultimately made of very very tiny NEUTRAL bubbles of energy, no polarity in them AT-ALL, so is something positive or negative is just function of size and direction of vortexial flow of these neutral bubbles. These neutral bubbles that make up everything cascade from the Godhead being smallest and most numerous at the source level, then by ratio of 49 they condense into ever larger bubbles that form smallest bubbles of lower planes, this goes on on all 7 great cosmic planes and ratio below is given just for our, lowest of 7 cosmic planes.

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4794
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #148 on: June 12, 2021, 11:02:08 PM »
concret or abstract by conventional quantum physics theorem ( with opposition)


https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantentheorie_der_Ur-Alternativen

Offline nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 849
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL
« Reply #149 on: June 12, 2021, 11:04:24 PM »
Lanca kilometer links again

 

OneLink