Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: O.U. Magnet force shielding 2 and so on  (Read 5089 times)

Floor

  • Guest
O.U. Magnet force shielding 2 and so on
« on: May 30, 2021, 08:37:51 PM »
These get better and better...

The device can of course be oriented so that the
shield magnet's motion is at 90 degrees to gravity.

Floor

  • Guest
Re: O.U. Magnet force shielding 2 and so on
« Reply #1 on: May 30, 2021, 09:17:25 PM »
 3  minute video

              @
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x81mi0v

  floor

Floor

  • Guest
Re: O.U. Magnet force shielding 2 and so on
« Reply #2 on: May 30, 2021, 09:52:39 PM »
We will look into and measure  CITFTA's  interpretations.

Also build and test / measure the Lumen and / or
Telecom innovation (immediately below)and others.

  floor
« Last Edit: June 02, 2021, 03:11:52 PM by Floor »

Floor

  • Guest
Re: O.U. Magnet force shielding 2 and so on
« Reply #3 on: June 02, 2021, 12:12:08 AM »
This variation of MagnetForceShield 2, has a good output
magnet displacement length

                but also

an exceptional capacity / distance of attracting the output
magnet back to start position, once  the shield magnet has
been restored !

But
Shield insertion and removal require a lot of work input and I don't know /
have not measured the total in to out ratios.
« Last Edit: June 02, 2021, 03:09:50 PM by Floor »

Floor

  • Guest
Re: O.U. Magnet force shielding 2 and so on
« Reply #4 on: June 02, 2021, 03:06:03 PM »
Output strokes of any length can be arrived at, for any of these
designs.

Floor

  • Guest
Re: O.U. Magnet force shielding 2 and so on
« Reply #5 on: June 02, 2021, 03:21:24 PM »
I need to build a new (left side) deck / extension for the test bench,
in order to install a second sliding unit at 90 degrees to the first sliding
unit. This is something I have put off for as long as I can.

I have some thing improvised at present, but it is inadequate.

I will update with that progress.

Also a short video of the magnetic force shield 2 design.
                      Later today ?
  best wishes
       floor

   best wishes floor

Floor

  • Guest
Re: O.U. Magnet force shielding 2 and so on
« Reply #6 on: June 03, 2021, 12:01:11 AM »
                      magnet shield 2
                           short video

                         @
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x81pgdx

    floor


Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5031
Re: O.U. Magnet force shielding 2 and so on
« Reply #7 on: June 04, 2021, 11:44:57 AM »
Reply #3 A,B outer magnets wipping-possibility           magnetic force effect under 90°,60°,30° vertical/horizontal position ( spring ?)


the Lumen magnetic forced track (from green shield view above and below comparation : 100% symmetry )


the "asymmetry" = outer input ! transformation efficiency to output ? <100% (!?)


the "fine tuning single magnets" : steel plate ?


the "fine tuning magnets (one or both) : coil(circuit) wrapped ?
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=7&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19931019&CC=US&NR=5254925A&KC=A


https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19820817&CC=US&NR=4345174A&KC=A
instead D-battery capacitor ?


The operation of the inventive engine 10 will now be described. It is first to be noted that the pull of an electromagnet varies as a function of the area of the holding surface muliplied by the square of the flux density divided by a constant. Also, that the flux density increases as the distance to the holding surface decreases. Hence, changes in the flux density is the greatest contributor to the pulling force of an electromagnet. Experiments conducted by the inventor have shown that an electromagnet powered by two "D" cell batteries can produce a holding force of 500 pounds and that the magnetic attraction force varies with the distance between the surface of the electromagnet and the item to be lifted.


It was found, that at a distance of one-eighth of an inch, the force is approximately 7.8 pounds; at a distance of approximately one-twelfth of an inch the force is 31 pounds; at a distance of approximately one/twenty-fourth of an inch the force is 125 pounds; and, as stated, at contact, the force is 500 pounds. Thus, a usable force begins when the distance is one-eighth of an inch and increases rapidly thereafter.


electret (material):
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elektretmikrofon


http://translationportal.epo.org/emtp/translate/?ACTION=description-retrieval&COUNTRY=DE&ENGINE=google&FORMAT=docdb&KIND=A1&LOCALE=en_EP&NUMBER=3628988&OPS=ops.epo.org/3.2&SRCLANG=de&TRGLANG=en


Future Standart normation




Sincere


OCWL

Floor

  • Guest
Re: O.U. Magnet force shielding 2 and so on
« Reply #8 on: June 04, 2021, 03:28:30 PM »

the Lumen magnetic forced track (from green shield view above and below comparation : 100% symmetry )

symmetry yes / force is balanced between the output magnets, WHEN THE SHIELD ARRAY IS
IN PLACE (BETWEEN).

note... Green colored structures / materials are not magnetic.


the "fine tuning single magnets" : steel plate ?


Symmetry / force balancing, in order to remove and / or install the shield array
is difficult to arrive at. 

A magnet attracting  to the shield array at a given near distance, is more effective than
a magnet repelling to the shield array at that same given near distance
                 (in the direction the shield insertion and / or removal )
                             (into the page and out from the page).

                                                         therefore
More magnets are required on the repelling to the shield array, sides of the shield,  in order
to arrive at a balance / neutralization of forces IN REGARD TO INSERTION AND / OR REMOVAL
OF THE SHIELD ARRAY.

The "fine tuning" magnets are as an aid in arriving at a more precise balance in THAT regard.
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
That design
@
https://web.archive.org/web/20040204061206/http://www.magnet.au.com/magnet-force-calc.html

increases force at the cost of distance of field extension, trades force for distance.
No gain in kinetic energy.
... ... ... ... ... ... ...
The other links ......
I'm not ready to move into / discuss the Flynn / other  methods at this time / in this topic.

  regards / thanks
            floor


Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5031
Re: O.U. Magnet force shielding 2 and so on
« Reply #9 on: June 04, 2021, 04:08:48 PM »
I am moderated !
« Last Edit: June 04, 2021, 07:35:18 PM by lancaIV »

Floor

  • Guest
Re: O.U. Magnet force shielding 2 and so on
« Reply #10 on: June 04, 2021, 05:28:55 PM »
I do not know why ,but I feel to see this device like a "mechanical flip-flop" !


Related the attraction/repulsion force difference : http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/2magpup.htm

but  the  tangential repulsive force measured is 574 g.

        the  axial repulsive force measured is 1254 g

                      Did You attractive force and repulsive force difference measurements ?

1. As you know, force multiplied  by displacement = kinetic energy.
                          Not force alone.

2. Behaviors / that which is possible in attracting modes
           and
behaviors / that which is possible in repelling modes are very different.

3. There are perhaps a dozen minor variations possible and worth exploring
in EACH of these designs.  Multiply that times 6 designs and you have
                                                      60 variations (at least).
                  Too many to discuss and also build / measure and /or maintain
                                                      continuity to the topic.
4. Post / discuss these other, although relevant and related designs (PEMANANT MAGNET ONLY)
                                        in the
                   https://overunity.com/18501/the-magnet-fantasic/

topic, and we will build the best archive / body of discussions of  "the magnet fantastic"
on the entire internet ?  Or make a chaotic discontinuous mess ?

THE CHOICE IS OURS.
     best wishes
           floor

« Last Edit: June 05, 2021, 02:24:42 AM by Floor »

Floor

  • Guest
Re: O.U. Magnet force shielding 2 and so on
« Reply #11 on: June 08, 2021, 11:51:42 PM »
As LankaIV has recently reminded / pointed out, WHEN EVER these magnet interactions
DO NOT add up as Input = output,  we have something worth looking into.

It is possible that work done by the shield element and which is caused by magnetic
forces, will be of a greater magnitude of work than the combination of the other interactions.

What is not desirable, is that they be of the same magnitude of work / energy.

Only measurements and time can  tell.

      floor

Floor

  • Guest
Re: O.U. Magnet force shielding 2 and so on
« Reply #12 on: July 05, 2021, 04:40:54 PM »
@ All readers

I have been very busy else where and will be for the another two weeks.

      Best wishes
            floor

Floor

  • Guest
Re: O.U. Magnet force shielding 2 and so on
« Reply #13 on: December 06, 2021, 05:16:13 PM »
I moved this post to here,  from the "Magnet shear to direct pull work ratio" Topic

Hello
an interesting video.


Wixen in action. DMI Effect. - YouTube

   floor

Floor

  • Guest
Re: O.U. Magnet force shielding 2 and so on
« Reply #14 on: December 13, 2021, 04:53:19 AM »