seychelles,before medicine taking
:
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN US HUMANS AND MONKEYS ARE 1: WE HAVE IMAGINATIONS
Assumption or AXIOM,that "MONKEYS"
( PRIMATes,little -psychological
- difference between
Primaten – Wikipedia and Primat – Wikipedia )
does not have imagination potential ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fddy6Cl-u3Mhttps://colemaninsights.com/coleman-insights-blog/intelligence-imagination-and-creativity#:~:text=%E2%80%9CIntelligence%20is%20the%20ability%20to,to%20perceive%20what%20could%20be.%E2%80%9Dhttps://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.kita-kinderzimmer.de/bildnerisches-gestalten/kann-man-kreativitaet-lernen/In the not too distant future, programs, robots and vehicles powered by artificial intelligence will do a lot of work for us. Artificial intelligence, that means the ability of machines to learn independently. You feed the machines with data and the result is lots of clever things. Algorithms that make tax returns, chat, evaluate x-rays, drive cars or manage insurance. What you can't feed machines with is creativity: thinking outside the box, looking at problems from a new perspective, building things that nobody thought you could use, making up jokes, making others happy.
Bob McKim, a creativity researcher at Stanford University in the sixties and seventies, kept his new students doing the same exercise. They should take a piece of paper and draw the person sitting next to them. They only had thirty seconds to do this. Then they should show their work to the neighbor they had drawn. The reaction was always the same. Everyone started, then giggled in shame and apologized afterwards because they were embarrassed by the result. They were concerned that the sitter might be offended or make fun of the result.We fear the judgment of our fellow human beings and feel somehow uncomfortable about showing our ideas or creative abilities to the people around us.
This uncertainty leads us to become conservative in our thinking.
We only do what we can because when we have a new, wild idea, we are afraid to share it.
“Oh, that doesn't work”, “No, it didn't turn out well”, “Nobody cares”. Then everything stays the same. And the brave pass in the fast lane.
Natural behaviour,is it not ? Archaical ,some would/could think: primitive !
Cuidado que a machina A.I.
nao pense sobre mi/ti/si : makako !
..... making up jokes, making others happy .....
Entertain Your creativity :
https://triz-journal.com/THE MOTHER AND FATHER OF OVERUNITY IS EFFICIENCY, AND ONE NEEDS TO KNOW
WHERE THE ENERGY IS COMING FROM.
Energy/Mass Equivalence
easy beschrieben and verstaendlich :
ALBERT EINSTEIN formulierte in seiner berühmten Arbeit zur
speziellen Relativitätstheorie im Jahre 1905:
„Die Masse eines Körpers ist ein Maß für dessen Energiegehalt“.
Er stellte fest, dass Masse und Energie äquivalente Größen sind und zwischen diesen Größen der fundamentale Zusammenhang E=m⋅c2 existiert. Diese Gleichung ist die Grundlage für das Verständnis der Energiefreisetzung durch Kernspaltung und Kernfusion sowie vieler weiterer physikalischer Prozesse.
Someone would bring the light velocity acceleration to the formula left side and get = m
m-SRT condition : m= M1-M2
Energy,aus Beschleunigung und daraus des Masseschwundes
for DEUTSCH-foreigner :
In his famous work on the special theory of relativity in 1905, ALBERT EINSTEIN formulated: “The mass of a body is a measure of its energy content”. He established that mass and energy are equivalent quantities and that the fundamental relationship E = m⋅c2 exists between these quantities. This equation is the basis for understanding the release of energy through fission and fusion as well as many other physical processes.
But :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=8&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19931118&CC=DE&NR=4215818A1&KC=A1drei Gleichungen 1. E = m.c<2>, Einstein
+ 2. E = h x v Planck
+ 3. E = J/2. omega <2> Rotationsenergie
https://patents.google.com/patent/DE102008005104A1/de[0011]
In a homogeneous interacting universe with the radius ru without considering an effect of black holes,
the relative mass loss per unit of time t depends on the radius of the interacting universe and is a rough approximation:
