Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Hogan and Jakovlewich overunity generator  (Read 30249 times)

hanon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 616
    • https://figueragenerator.wordpress.com/
Re: Hogan and Jakovlewich overunity generator
« Reply #15 on: April 20, 2015, 12:19:52 PM »
A user in another thread has related this generator to magnets placed in Siberian Colia Configuration:

http://www.overunity.com/15083/the-new-generator-no-effect-counter-b-emf-part-2-selfrunning/msg424465/#msg424465

hanon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 616
    • https://figueragenerator.wordpress.com/
Re: Hogan and Jakovlewich overunity generator
« Reply #16 on: April 20, 2015, 07:45:47 PM »
This video collect the foundation of these devices:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtiMQPeYJrQ


Between two magnets there is a "dead zone" or "potential well" where the repulsion of one magnets is counteracted with the attraction of the other: one magnet repels and one magnet attracts. Therefore the net result force is null and the iron/magnet/conducting wire can be moved without cogging along the middle zone.


No dragging: this is the resulting force of the two force components, but induction is always present because there is a strong magnetic field. 


That´s the magic of using two magnets instead of just one!!


N     
|                            (N-N = repulsion)
|_________N                                             Net force = 0
|                            (S-N = attraction)
|
S

Enjoykin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 269
Re: Hogan and Jakovlewich overunity generator
« Reply #17 on: April 21, 2015, 03:04:29 AM »
Магнитная яма Геннадий Васильевич Николаева из 6 магнитов.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAm2mv50Uko

Magntic pit or Magnetic Hollow or Magnetic Pocket by Gennadiy Vasilevich Nikolaev,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZbDhx6earA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PINTYbsOYVw

more videos
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F+%D1%8F%D0%BC%D0%B0+%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B0

.........................................................................

ps: Magntic pit is very old discovery of Gennadiy Vasilevich Nikolaev - and could not be explained except Scalar Magnetic Field - 2nd Mag.Filed which is THE SOURCE OF OVERUNITY in all OVERUNITY devices including properly tunned Tesla Transformers (not like arcs, streamers or corona discharge generator as we usually see).

Scalar Magnetic Field is cooling down conductor and space volime where exist Scalar Magnetic Flow. Has non-electrical properties unlike B-filed. Mst simplest way to get Scalar Magnetic Field is volumetric sum of two vector magnetic fileds H with opposite sign. Shortly use properly constructed bucking coils (partnered coil as somebody here call) to generate Scalar Magnetic Field.


hanon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 616
    • https://figueragenerator.wordpress.com/
Re: Hogan and Jakovlewich overunity generator
« Reply #18 on: April 21, 2015, 10:49:41 PM »
Enjoykin,


Thank you very much for spreading the work of Nikolaev into this forum. It is a pity that there is very few info in english about this scientist. I have collected very good info about him in this thread from the moment you post the first info about Nikolaev : [size=78%]http://www.overunity.com/14711/is-faradays-induction-law-correct/msg442544/#msg442544[/size]


I think Nikolaev could be in the right path and I would like to study more in depth his theory. I think current EM theory is missing a part of the physical behaviour.


You said that the easiest way to get the scalar magnetic field is with two H-field of opposite sign: are you refering to two magnets with like poles facing each other (N-N or S-S) or two magnets with opposite poles facing each other (N-S) ? Is there any other requirement to get this scalar field ?


Apart from Hogan Jakovlewich patent there is another patent from Clemente Figuera that is quite similar to this one. I do not know if you know this patent: [size=78%]http://www.alpoma.com/figuera/figuera_30376.pdf[/size]  Please tell me your opinion about this patent. Figuera was a well known engineer , and he appeared in newspapers for having a generator using the "atmospheric energy"


The magnetic pit is also used in the design of Maglev to levitate the trains: the repulsion and attraction forces are compensated



Enjoykin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 269
Re: Hogan and Jakovlewich overunity generator
« Reply #19 on: April 22, 2015, 03:30:42 AM »
Hello Hanon - thank you for reply. !!

I have not studied great inventor Clemente Figuera patents. Nor Maglev invention so i can't make any conclusions.

About configuration of Scalar and Vector magnetic field i was answered here in topic "Partnered Output Coils".

http://www.overunity.com/15395/partnered-output-coils-free-energy/msg447021/#msg447021

http://www.overunity.com/15395/partnered-output-coils-free-energy/msg447055/#msg447055

ps: There is also link of Nikolaev Gennadiy Vasilevich Lifework - The Electrodynamics of Physical Vacuum !! I was uploaded on forum. !!

Reg.
Enjoykin !!

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Hogan and Jakovlewich overunity generator
« Reply #20 on: April 22, 2015, 08:50:48 AM »
Wow! Great guys ! I really like to see if somebody could make a simple yet costly experiment building small maglev track in shape of closed circle with permanent magnets and put a small model of maglev inside. How long that would run on single push ?


Then try it again with maglev model having around coils and inside a capacitor and a bulb to see current generated.Again how long that would run ?

hanon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 616
    • https://figueragenerator.wordpress.com/
Re: Hogan and Jakovlewich overunity generator
« Reply #21 on: April 22, 2015, 11:44:55 PM »
Hi Enjoykin,


Thank you for bringing us the info about Nikolaev. I was so fascinated by your posts about Nikolaev that I started to research across the net for info about Gennady Nikolaev and Marinov. I found a link to his 2003 book in text format (not scanned, but in ASCII format). Book: "Modern electrodynamics and the causes of its paradoxical nature. Theories, Experiments, Paradoxes"[/font]


http://www.doverchiv.narod.ru/Nikolaev/Nikolaev_modern_electrodynamics.htm


I thought that it was important to have this book in english language to spread the knowledge of Nikolaev into the world. So, I used Google Translator to get a version in english and I posted the PDF file in the next link:


http://www.overunity.com/14711/is-faradays-induction-law-correct/msg442869/#msg442869
(see the pdf attached in the botton of that post)


If you know of more Nikolaev´s books in text format please tell me and we could make the same in order to spread his work.


I found two videos about his theory in Youtube but I do not understand what they do in those videos:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avvVH6xspIE




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhLsDWXDaWM
(Comment of this video: "Scalar magnetic field is orthogon[/font][/size]al to the vector magnetic field.Where we have maximum voltage vector field, we have a minimum voltage of the scalar" )




Regards

Enjoykin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 269
Re: Hogan and Jakovlewich overunity generator
« Reply #22 on: April 23, 2015, 04:09:41 AM »
Hello Hanon - thank you for your research and reply !!


The name of Gennady Vasilevich Nikolaev (1935-2008) is not unknown to western science at all - but his work at western was classified.

Belive me they already have made all translations of his lifework to many western languages
(professional translations of all his science books) but they don't have intention to put his knowledge into the world because that new knowledge can bring mankind Free Energy. So they (official science mainstream) using very simple tactic. Keep their mouths shut and act like all hypocrites do - pretend never heard anything about him and his lifework. Same worth for Dr. Stefan Marinov lifework and his science books.

In his lifetime Gennady Nikolaev has several conferences precisely presentations of his science work to western science. Of course all of them were closed for public - Top classified !!

But now time is coming for presentation his remarkable knowleadge to the world.

His remarkable book "Un-paradoxical Electrodynamics" need to study every serious researcher and inventor of free energy, every 22-century physicist - because with this new knowleadge mankind can make a giant step into the future and long jump into the deep space.

GENNADY NIKOLAEV WORK IS A NEW PARADIGMA PHYSICS OF 22 CENTURY !! IT IS A REVOLUTIONARY NEW SCALAR PHYSICS AND UN-PARADOXICAL WITH EXPERIMENTS AT CURRENT LEVEL OF MANKIND EVOLUTION !!!!
............................

On these links you will find a lot of his books you can download and make OCR conversion.

Полезные книги и материалы по Физике
http://www.microsmart.eu/index.php?PHPSESSID=9b240e04d2a6ded60da1f5abb7257d1a&topic=24.0

and also books of his science work followers А.К. Томилин and  Р.Г. Сигалов

............................
Электродинамика А.К. Томилина
http://www.microsmart.eu/index.php?PHPSESSID=9b240e04d2a6ded60da1f5abb7257d1a&topic=25.0
............................

Электродинамика Р.Г. Сигалова
http://www.microsmart.eu/index.php?PHPSESSID=9b240e04d2a6ded60da1f5abb7257d1a&topic=26.0
............................

К Н И Г И Г.В. Николаева
http://www.microsmart.eu/index.php?PHPSESSID=9b240e04d2a6ded60da1f5abb7257d1a&topic=24.0

1. Непротиворечивая электродинамика. Теория, эксперименты, парадоксы. Книга 1. Томск, 1997 год.

2. Научный вакуум. Кризис в современной физике. Есть ли выход? Новые концепции физического мира. Томск, 1999 год.

3. Тайны электромагнетизма и свободная энергия. Новые концепции физического мира. Издание 2-е, дополненное. Томск, 2002 год.

4. Современная электродинамика и причины её парадоксальности. Перспективы построения непротиворечивой электродинамики. Теории, эксперименты, парадоксы. Издание 2-е, дополненное. Томск, 2003 год. 

[5. Электродинамика физического вакуума. Новые концепции физического мира. Томск, 2004 год.
............................

С Т А Т Ь И
http://www.microsmart.eu/index.php?PHPSESSID=9b240e04d2a6ded60da1f5abb7257d1a&topic=24.0

Экспериментальные парадоксы электродинамики

Почему хоронят изобретение альтернативных источников электроэнергии

СВОБОДНАЯ ЭНЕРГИЯ - БЕЗПЛАТНО!

ПОЧЕМУ БОЙКОТИРУЮТ ВЕЧНЫЕ ДВИГАТЕЛИ
............................

ps: Use the best OCR program ABBYY FINEREADER 12 or higher for conversion from djvu to pdf, word etc. formats. I wish you luck !! All the best !!  :)

Regards
Enjoykin

hanon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 616
    • https://figueragenerator.wordpress.com/
Re: Hogan and Jakovlewich overunity generator
« Reply #23 on: October 20, 2015, 03:50:26 PM »
 Hello,
 
I've been reading things about Gennady Nikolaev, Russian scientist who proposed an amendment to the electromagnetic equations of Maxwell to include the existence of longitudinal waves. He demonstrated experimentally the existence of these waves (there are several videos on Youtube but they are in Russian ... and I do not understand). They are longitudinal waves are those waves used in Tesla´s power wireless transmission. This scientific postulates that a second magnetic field, a magnetic field scalar not predicted by the current equations which predict only a transverse magnetic field. This field is the one that says that accommodates all overunity systems. It seems that his designs to get this field require two magnets with opposite poles very close.
 
For me in this patent used TWO magnets. Among them, in the center, it is placed the induced circuit. Using two magnets located very close is related to the proposed Nikolaev ideas.
 
Look what Nikolaev tells us:
 
Top photo: "In the middle of two magnets with the opposite poles (situated in one plane) the total vectorial magnetic field vector is zero, which is proven by the absence of magnetic interaction between magnets and a ferromagnetic material. This ferromagnetic material is placed in the space where usual magnetic field is zero. However, in the space where the total vector magnetic field vector of the two magnets is zero, the total value of the scalar magnetic field of the two magnets is maximum. In spite of this fact, the magnetic scalar field between magnets is maximum, this field does not interact with ferromagnetic materials. That is why the ferromagnetic material on the tray is not attracted to magnets. However if we create electric currents (or equivalent Amper´s currents of this double magnet) in this space, where usual magnetic field is zero, than under the action of longitudinal interactions of these currents with the total magnetic field of the magnets scale the forces of attraction or repulsion appear"
 
Bottom photo: "It is a device to demostrate the existence of longitudinal electromagnetic waves. Two loop antennas are emitting the antipodal waves. That is why the total signal of transverse electromagnetic waves in the plane between the loops is equal to zero. However, the longitudinal electromagnetic waves have the maximal value in the plane between the loops. These waves are easily recorded by the loop antennas, even in spite of fact that the plane of the loop antennas appears to be perpendicular to the plane of polarization vector of transverse electromagnetic waves. Any registration of transverse electromagnetic waves is impossible in this case. "
 
----
This scalar field is allowing this rare effect between three magnets: the creation of a magnetic coupling or well where the attraction and repulsion are canceled:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtiMQPeYJrQ

Also look at the zoomed picture that I post below

hanon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 616
    • https://figueragenerator.wordpress.com/
Re: Hogan and Jakovlewich overunity generator
« Reply #24 on: October 26, 2015, 12:24:42 PM »
Watch carefully this patent:


https://www.google.com/patents/CA2368426A1


Permanent magnet electrical generator with improved efficiency 
Patent CA 2368426 A1
by Bud T.J. Johnson  (Filed in 2002)


It is basically the same as Hogan-Jakovlewich patent




nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Hogan and Jakovlewich overunity generator
« Reply #25 on: May 26, 2020, 10:26:57 PM »
...

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Hogan and Jakovlewich overunity generator
« Reply #26 on: May 26, 2020, 10:37:27 PM »
Hi all,

I think that the principle under Hogan and Jakovlewich generator is the same as in one of the Clemente Figuera´s patent. I am referring to Figuera´s patent Nr. 30376 (year 1902), the one with the rotary induced circuit and stationary internal and external electromagnets (Link to pdf).In this patent a SINGLE MOVING WIRE crosses between TWO OPPOSITE MAGNET POLES. According to Figuera´s patent text this configuration produces electricity without dragging the movement of the induced wire.

The key for avoiding dragging is the use of two opposite poles to generate the induction in the intermediate wire:  N -- | -- S  ; in contrast with common generators with just one pole exposed to the induced wire.

       1- A wire is settle into a moving magnet system, between two opposite poles: North and South

       2- As a consequence an induce current will appear in the wire

       3- This induced current generates a magnetic field (B) around the wire

       4- One pole (let´s say  N pole) will repel the wire because of magnetic repulsion with the magnetic field in the wire (creating a drag). But the other pole ( S pole in our example) will attract the wire (magnetic attraction between the S pole and the wire)

       5- Therefore the net sum of both forces (repulsion + attraction) will be null and the wire finally will be moved without any drag while at the same time will generate an induced current.

       6- The force of repulsion suffered in one disc (magnet 1) and the force of attraction done in the other disc (magnet 2) will be transmited to the common shaft. Therefore the net sum over the shaft will be cancelled and the machine will rotate without any drag.

I think it is as simple as explained here. Figuera also stated that he could not believe how such a simple principle had not been used before him.

Hogan and Jakovlewich patent requires two opposite magnets instead of just one. All Figuera´s patents are based also on the induction created between two electromagnets, instead of common induction with just one pole exposed. IMHO, This is the key of his discovery.

I attach an sketch with the representation of this principle. Please study this sketch and tell your comments. Both patents (Figuera and Hogan & Jakovlewich) share the same principle, and both patent are representing an overunity generator withoudt dragging. Please have a look into Figuera thread in the next link:

http://www.overunity.com/12794/re-inventing-the-wheel-part1-clemente_figuera-the-infinite-energy-machine/msg413741/#msg413741

I used to think this must be right but it's not. I see "logic" of the poster but in reality wire doesn't see two poles, there is single field and wire is repelled from it on approach and attracted when leaving it, just as the opposite is true, if we placed that single wire in the field and let the current through it, it would be ejected according to lorenz force aka left hand rule up or down depending on the direction of the current.

At least that's what seems to be the case. The question remains what did Figuera really do.

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Hogan and Jakovlewich overunity generator
« Reply #27 on: May 17, 2023, 05:00:11 PM »
At least that's what seems to be the case.

Not only that seems to be the case, that is most definitely the case.