This amounts to an amazing discovery by Ray!

If Ray connected a generator to self run his motor he could start his own power plant and turn into a very rich man. I will back him up if he succeeds.

@Floor,

Have you ever tried sliding diagonally placed magnets by a stationary sideways magnet before like Ray does with his angled generator? He has demonstrated COP 3.

I have some experience with this design @

https://overunity.com/18551/magnet-shear-to-direct-pull-work-ratio/msg553381/#msg553381

But no,

 Ray's design @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4J8uPhKwjG4  (this topic)

has I think, more similarity to     a non O.U.,     GoToLuke design,

                @  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUlDMY1iE5A

It should be borne in mind,  that  Ray's design, is SIGNIFICANTLY different from that
GoToLuke design.

SORRY, I AM NOT TRYING TO IMPROVE THE COP BUT THE FUNCTIONALITY.

Cool / understood

Both Ray and Gotoluc demonstrate gain transfering rotary to reciprocal magnet motion. Kundel achived the same result and has been supressed by overtakers.

Ray's device and video @

     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4J8uPhKwjG4

I'm not an expert, but I think my observations and calculations are correct.

Some observations.   (with corrections, typo fixes and changes )

1. We don't know the exact lifting height of the 72 coins.
2. A long run time (maybe 10 minutes ? ) will give a more accurate result.
3. An auto counter installed upon the lifter would give an exact count of the number of
times lifted in 1 hour.

Note...
It looks like only 1/2 (one direction) of the the back and forth motion of the
output is being utilized to do lifting.

If this is correct, then the out put is actually 2 times more than is being shown in
the video ?   But then again, using both of these motions will affect the input power
as well.

calculations
1 U. S. quarter dollar coin weighs 5.67 grams
5.67 grams per coin, times 72 coins.

5.67  x  72 =  408.24 grams total lifting per stroke

130 lifts in 103 seconds  =   1.262  seconds per lift
(from 5 minutes and 54 seconds to 7 minutes and 37 seconds in the
video = 103 seconds)

lifting height = 3/8 or 0.375 inch ? (approximation from video, could be way off)
should be measured / stated.

0.375 inch = 0.00952 meter

0.00952  x 130 repetitions = 1.2376 meters
... ... ... ... ...
102 grams exerts 1 newton

408.24 grams  / 102 grams = 4.00 newtons
... ... ... ... ...
4 newtons x 1.2376 meters = 4.9504 joules in 103 seconds

4.9504 joules / 103 seconds =  0.048 joules per second
                            or
0.048 watts mechanical out put
                           and
0.01 amp x 4.2 volts = 0.042 watts electrical input.
... ... ... ... ... ...

 



                                IF
Ray's device as presented, is in fact functioning at unity, (that is to say, if my estimation of the
lifting distance of the 172 coins was correct)
                                and
Ray's electric power in, measurements are accurate.
                                then

1. Given that the driving electric motor functions at less than unity, his device
is demonstrating cyclic work from magnets.

2. If the pulley which lifts the coins were made to be eccentric, in such a manner as to
match the       force change   to   distance change      curve of the magnetic forces...
                             then also      (and by consideration of this factor solely)
the device is exhibiting cyclic work from magnets.

3. When the energy expended to cause acceleration against the inertia of the coin mass
is taken into account,
                             then also       (and by consideration of this factor solely)
his device is demonstrating cyclic work from magnets.

4. Even if my estimation of the height lifted is an over estimation, it remains to be
seen, whether or not the device is O.U. or can be made more efficient.

showed screen shots of voltages thought of as impossible being applied to a WFC,

I can't do it. alternating current and high frequency are absorbed by water.
Constant voltage is unattainable due to high electrical conductivity.
I wanted to measure the capacity of the WFC  I'm tired already.

@ seychelles

 I hope you don't mind that I have posted this again.

Ray's device and video @

     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4J8uPhKwjG4

I'm not an expert, but I think my observations and calculations are correct.

Some observations.   (with corrections, typo fixes and changes )

1. We don't know the exact lifting height of the 72 coins.
2. A long run time (maybe 10 minutes ? ) will give a more accurate result.
3. An auto counter installed upon the lifter would give an exact count of the number of
times lifted in 1 hour.

Note...
It looks like only 1/2 (one direction) of the the back and forth motion of the
output is being utilized to do lifting.

If this is correct, then the out put is actually 2 times more than is being shown in
the video ?   But then again, using both of these motions will affect the input power
as well.

calculations
1 U. S. quarter dollar coin weighs 5.67 grams
5.67 grams per coin, times 72 coins.

5.67  x  72 =  408.24 grams total lifting per stroke

130 lifts in 103 seconds  =   1.262  seconds per lift
(from 5 minutes and 54 seconds to 7 minutes and 37 seconds in the
video = 103 seconds)

lifting height = 3/8 or 0.375 inch ? (approximation from video, could be way off)
should be measured / stated.

0.375 inch = 0.00952 meter

0.00952  x 130 repetitions = 1.2376 meters
... ... ... ... ...
102 grams exerts 1 newton

408.24 grams  / 102 grams = 4.00 newtons
... ... ... ... ...
4 newtons x 1.2376 meters = 4.9504 joules in 103 seconds

4.9504 joules / 103 seconds =  0.048 joules per second
                            or
0.048 watts mechanical out put
                           and
0.01 amp x 4.2 volts = 0.042 watts electrical input.
... ... ... ... ... ...

 



                                IF
Ray's device as presented, is in fact functioning at unity, (that is to say, if my estimation of the
lifting distance of the 172 coins was correct)
                                and
Ray's electric power in, measurements are accurate.
                                then

1. Given that the driving electric motor functions at less than unity, his device
is demonstrating cyclic work from magnets.

2. If the pulley which lifts the coins were made to be eccentric, in such a manner as to
match the       force change   to   distance change      curve of the magnetic forces...
                             then also      (and by consideration of this factor solely)
the device is exhibiting cyclic work from magnets.

3. When the energy expended to cause acceleration against the inertia of the coin mass
is taken into account,
                             then also       (and by consideration of this factor solely)
his device is demonstrating cyclic work from magnets.

4. Even if my estimation of the height lifted is an over estimation, it remains to be
seen, whether or not the device is O.U. or can be made more efficient.