Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?  (Read 98185 times)

Ilya Tsimbaluk

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
« Reply #375 on: May 24, 2023, 09:29:21 PM »
I continue to work on my device, which should charge a conditionally large number of batteries with one battery. In fact, this device will resemble a radio, because it will also work on radio frequencies. In fact, we can say that it is almost a Hertz transmitter. right now I am actively working with some nodes in LTSpice. I really want to test the concept during this summer.

Some time ago I was working on a mechanical device, more precisely an electromechanical device, in which there was an interaction of two bodies by means of Lorentz forces. This criticism turned out to be inappropriate for the reason that a magnetic field, as something that is part of the ether or physical vacuum, cannot store mechanical energy in itself.

Now we conducted an experiment in which it turned out that the frame of an electric motor having low active resistance, which implies Joule-Lenz heat losses has problems associated with the Coulomb forces. Accordingly, precisely because of the low heat losses, there is an opinion that the electric motor supposedly converts electrical energy into mechanical energy. Which is completely wrong.

Ilya Tsimbaluk

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
« Reply #376 on: May 24, 2023, 09:50:20 PM »
The main phenomenon of the conductor is that a conductor can be affected by a huge number of radio waves, while it may seem that there is silence in the ether, aka physical vacuum. But in fact the reactive properties of the conductor are unique for the reason that just on one side is what scientists at the time of the Stanley and Morley interferometer were trying to study.

However, the problem of Lorentz and not only him was that they studied relative motion in space, while never giving a fundamental answer to the question of energy motion as mass...This is a significant gap. which still does not give an answer to the emergence of the cause of such a phenomenon as inertia. We have to admit. that there is matter in space, which has dynamic properties, whereas acceleration of a body. as well as deceleration from the point of view of physical vacuum is a dynamic process.

But the emergence of mathematics in matters of dynamically changing matter. which brakes the physical body and tries to speed it up will be a difficult task.

Ilya Tsimbaluk

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
« Reply #377 on: May 26, 2023, 09:04:41 PM »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaGLT0ISq-0

Hello

Greetings friends, I decided to post a video that was created a few years ago. Essentially the experiment itself resembled an advanced Joule experiment. But instead of heat, we were aiming to charge a capacitor. We were looking at the work done by a body and how much mechanical energy was communicated to a second body, which was a flywheel with an offset center of gravity.




Ilya Tsimbaluk

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
« Reply #378 on: May 26, 2023, 09:24:11 PM »
It is sad to consider news not about science and technology. but about politics. The last thing to consider here, in my opinion, is politics. Considering that more often than not, propaganda on either side is a matter of payment.

As a rule, questions of propaganda here are based on people who, most likely, are dissatisfied with something, but their dissatisfaction is expressed not in achievements, but in propaganda. I really hope that the subject of relations by couch experts will be stopped, and preferably removed from the place where people come to exchange some questions related to the subject of energy.

Therefore, I would be happy to communicate on topics related to science.

dsquared18

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
« Reply #379 on: May 27, 2023, 12:49:27 AM »
I wish I could just 'like' a post, but in my opinion, you hit the nail squarely on the head my friend.

If this forum cannot support each other in our joint passion and desire and wish to create a better world for humanity, without the politics, then it is surely doomed.

My greatest wish is to stay focused, stay respectful, and keep to the topic at hand.

D2

It is sad to consider news not about science and technology. but about politics. The last thing to consider here, in my opinion, is politics. Considering that more often than not, propaganda on either side is a matter of payment.

As a rule, questions of propaganda here are based on people who, most likely, are dissatisfied with something, but their dissatisfaction is expressed not in achievements, but in propaganda. I really hope that the subject of relations by couch experts will be stopped, and preferably removed from the place where people come to exchange some questions related to the subject of energy.

Therefore, I would be happy to communicate on topics related to science.


ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
« Reply #380 on: May 27, 2023, 02:11:06 AM »
It is sad to consider news not about science and technology. but about politics. The last thing to consider here, in my opinion, is politics. Considering that more often than not, propaganda on either side is a matter of payment.

As a rule, questions of propaganda here are based on people who, most likely, are dissatisfied with something, but their dissatisfaction is expressed not in achievements, but in propaganda. I really hope that the subject of relations by couch experts will be stopped, and preferably removed from the place where people come to exchange some questions related to the subject of energy.

Therefore, I would be happy to communicate on topics related to science.


I agree
And truly hope forum can resist other topics ( which have perhaps millions
Of other sites on worldwide web)
And do what we are here to do …open source FE research and experiments …and share with the world!


There are many of like mind here ( and elsewhere)


Respectfully
Chet K
Ps
Thank you for sharing your work

Ilya Tsimbaluk

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
« Reply #381 on: May 27, 2023, 09:15:06 AM »
Greetings, it is great that there is still a site and a place where we enthusiastic people can communicate on the topic related to FREE ENERGY

Now I have to use a translator. because without artificial intelligence I would do all this very slowly, so it would be great if someone could help somehow shape my thoughts more correctly.
The language problem is one of the problems. That's why I made this video without sound.

Trying to contact Aaronom or Russ to create a collaboration somehow did not lead to a response. I myself have some basic skills in Adobe Premere Pro, Vegas, simple skills in Aftyer Effects.
Maybe someone. who has a good microphone, and who speaks English - I think you can make a series of video clips to explain the essence of the experiments done. for now I decided to make a discussion in the form of a text to talk about all those topics that concerned me a few years ago and what I was doing.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FpV4pwymbkA

Ilya Tsimbaluk

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
« Reply #382 on: May 27, 2023, 09:38:11 AM »
Maybe someone. who has a good microphone, and who speaks English - I think you can make a series of video clips to explain the essence of the experiments done. for now I decided to make a discussion in the form of a text to talk about all those topics that concerned me a few years ago and what I was doing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ooq_AMImK7U

Ilya Tsimbaluk

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
« Reply #383 on: May 27, 2023, 10:57:36 AM »
I would also like to meet those people who are now in this community to understand. how some experiments could be organized. possibly together. I think that there is a huge gap in science that still remains at its level. But I think. this subject should be revealed gradually, going through the description of some important hypotheses.

To initially consider the processes in electromagnetism, it would be proper to consider how the relationship of electricity and magnetism occurred. I think it makes sense to begin the narrative of the Arago disk.

Actually, eddy currents were first attributed to the French scientist D.F.
Arago (1786-1853) in 1824.
axis with a magnetic arrow. At the expense of eddy currents the disk the arrow also came into
rotation. This phenomenon, called the Arago phenomenon, was explained a few years later
a few years later by M. Faraday from the perspective of the law of electromagnetic induction discovered by him:
A rotating magnetic field induces currents (eddy currents) in a copper disc, which
interact with a magnetic arrow. (1831) Eddy currents were studied in detail
by the French physicist Foucault (1819-1868) and named after him.


One can understand that the idea of the Arago disk was already introduced by Michael Faraday in the form of
Faraday's disk. If you look closely, Faraday's disk itself differs from the disk in that
that instead of a stationary magnet and disc, Faraday's magnet or disc was
stationary, except when Michael Faraday rotated the disk along with the magnet.
The latter would be interesting to consider now in terms of his
notions...But now we are talking about the fact that with Arago the disk and the magnet were
stationary and the disk itself was driven by the magnet by Lorentz forces.

The idea of Faraday's disk eventually evolved into the idea of an oscillator and an electric motor
instead of the disk a winding based on enameled wire was used.
A generator has a stator that rests on a support and a rotor - which is driven
rotation.

Ilya Tsimbaluk

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
« Reply #384 on: May 27, 2023, 11:31:43 AM »
Now we need to go back to Newton's laws

Newton's First Law
Newton's first law of motion postulates the existence of inertial reference frames. Therefore, it is also known as the law of inertia. Inertia (aka inertia) is the property of a body to keep its velocity unchanged in magnitude and direction when no forces are acting, as well as the property of a body to resist changes in its velocity. To change the velocity of a body, it is necessary to apply some force, and the result of the same force on different bodies will be different: bodies have different inertia (inertia), the value of which is characterized by their mass.

Newton's Second Law
Newton's second law of motion is a differential law of motion that describes the relationship between the force applied to a material point and the resulting acceleration of that point. In fact, Newton's second law of motion introduces mass as a measure of inertia of a material point in a selected inertial reference frame (ISO).

The mass of a material point is assumed to be constant in time and independent of any peculiarities of its motion and interaction with other bodies

With a suitable choice of units, this law can be written in the form of a formula:

where
a- is the acceleration of the material point;
F - is the net result of all forces applied to the material point;

m is the mass of the material point.

Newton's second law can also be formulated in an equivalent form using the concept of momentum

Newton's Third Law


of the law describes how two material points interact. Let there be a closed system consisting of two material points in which the first point can act on the second point with some force
F1-2, and the second can act on the first with force F2-1
. Newton's third law of Newton states: the force F1-2
 is equal in modulo and opposite in direction to the counterforce F2-1


Newton's third law of Newton is a consequence of homogeneity, isotropy and mirror symmetry of space.

Newton's Third Law of Newton, as well as the other laws of Newtonian dynamics, gives practically correct results only when the velocities of all bodies in the system in question are negligibly small compared to the speed of light

AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
« Reply #385 on: May 27, 2023, 02:25:30 PM »
The problem is newtons law's and all those 1600 vintage laws are out of date your quoting,
If the Ebons can travel here from Veda Reticulli then your quoting stuff you cant prove one way or the other
but in fact both instances Albert Einstein and Maxwell proved their was inconsistencys in all those old
Oxford university faculty doctoring edited published laws.

Sil

kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1418
Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
« Reply #386 on: May 27, 2023, 03:01:56 PM »
I just have looked  your school galvanometer. And I thought, is it possible to increase the sensitivity of the galvanometer using the Stovbunenko tooth effect? At least I haven't seen it.

Ilya Tsimbaluk

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
« Reply #387 on: May 27, 2023, 11:01:13 PM »
The talk of error consists in the notion of transformations

The talk of error consists in the notion of transformations

Mayer came to the most important conclusion that the body is governed by natural physical and chemical laws and, above all, by the law of conservation and transformation of energy. Returning from a trip, he wrote an article "On the quantitative and qualitative determination of forces" (Meyer designates energy by the term "force"), which he sent on June 16, 1841 to the journal "Annals of Physics".

In his writings, Mayer lists various types of energy: the kinetic energy of moving masses, the potential energy of a lifted load, internal, electrical and magnetic (it should be noted Mayer's brilliant intuition, who realized that electromagnetic phenomena also obey the law of conservation of energy).


oule's interest in this topic first arose after becoming acquainted with electrical machines that had just been invented. Joel was a man of practical mind. He was fascinated by the idea of ​​creating an eternal source of energy. He made a voltaic battery, started a primitive electric motor of his own design from it, and saw that it was impossible to get something out of nothing: the zinc in the battery was eaten away, and its replacement was quite expensive. Joel later proved to his own satisfaction that it was always cheaper to feed a horse than to change the zinc in the batteries, so that the horse would never be driven out by the electric motor. This prompted him to investigate the relationship between heat and energy of all kinds, and he set out to find out if there was an exact quantitative relationship between heat and mechanical energy. Joule devoted most of his life to this idea. He was able to roughly estimate the mechanical coefficient of heat from the experiments of Rumfoord, who recorded how much the temperature of a known mass of matter increased when, with the help of a horse team, the metal of a cannon barrel was drilled with a blunt drill. A more accurate result was obtained by Joule in an experiment on mixing water with a rod with blades.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DxiUiHeY8LLEXB_dJ4mhLFtoyMjsI5XuYpiYoLX86P0/edit?usp=sharing

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dJehJcdPnRBfMDeDIZ1IasX2jq4C4ffh34tA8x_J7Wk/edit?usp=sharing

Ilya Tsimbaluk

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
« Reply #388 on: May 27, 2023, 11:23:07 PM »
I had to find articles in full on the history of the development of the law of conservation of energy. some excerpts I have marked here in bold. To make it clear. I also did a machine translation of the articles themselves.

The internal energy of a thermodynamic system can change in two ways: through work on the system and through heat exchange with the environment. The energy that the system (body) receives or loses in the process of heat exchange with the environment is called the amount of heat, or simply heat[1]. Heat is one of the basic thermodynamic quantities in classical phenomenological thermodynamics. The amount of heat is included in the standard mathematical formulations of the first and second principles of thermodynamics.

To change the internal energy of a system by means of heat exchange, work must also be done. However, it is not mechanical work, which is associated with moving the boundary of a macroscopic system. At the microscopic level, this work is carried out by the forces acting between the molecules at the contact boundary of a more heated body with a less heated one. In fact, in heat exchange, energy is transferred through electromagnetic interaction in collisions of molecules. Therefore, from the point of view of molecular-kinetic theory, the difference between work and heat is manifested only in the fact that the performance of mechanical work requires orderly motion of molecules on a macroscopic scale, while the transfer of energy from a more heated body to a less heated one does not require it.

Energy can also be transferred by radiation from one body to another without direct contact.

Ilya Tsimbaluk

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
« Reply #389 on: May 27, 2023, 11:44:06 PM »
So, I had to get into historical questions and also go into theory, but here's what the theory itself says - heat or thermal energy itself is transmitted electromagnetically. Which was established by Maxwell - light and heat are electromagnetic in nature and propagate in a physical vacuum. However, there are certain questions - are waves matter that propagates in a vacuum or are radio waves a change in the vacuum, i.e. waves consist of a building material?
Adherents of the theory of ether believe that just there is a certain filled space in which as in a fluid we produce disturbances. However, at one time the understanding of the Aether was hampered by a situation in which the Aether was considered stationary.  It is dynamic. Like the dynamic behavior of a liquid to the reaction of perturbation. Therefore, it has no stationary state and the mass, of which the physical vacuum itself consists, is just the cause of inertia.

Even if my idea regarding the structure of the vacuum is wrong, I can admit it, after Maxwell heat is already considered through electromagnetism. But so far no one considers that heat is transmitted by electromagnetism and electromagnetism itself is the cause of the motion of atoms and molecules or all that we consider Brownian motion.

all I am summarizing now in the conversation is that the process in Joule's experiment should not be considered through transformation. but through the course of two processes, processes in the physical and in the vacuum.