Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Cheapest / easiest overunity build?  (Read 5869 times)

TriKri

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Cheapest / easiest overunity build?
« on: March 18, 2021, 05:40:53 AM »
Hi!

Has anyone here built an overunity system that actually works? What would be the easiest and/or cheapest build of a overunity system for a complete beginner in these types of constructions? I want to build one myself to have something to experiment with.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: Cheapest / easiest overunity build?
« Reply #1 on: March 26, 2021, 02:19:55 PM »
John  Bedini's SSG tuned to run in Adam's resonance where the magnet rotor is propelled by the back spike is cheap to build. It will run with the input battery voltage unchanged.

TriKri

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: Cheapest / easiest overunity build?
« Reply #2 on: March 29, 2021, 06:00:32 PM »
John  Bedini's SSG tuned to run in Adam's resonance where the magnet rotor is propelled by the back spike is cheap to build. It will run with the input battery voltage unchanged.

Ok, thanks, have you build it yourself so you know from own experience that it produces over unity electricity? And if so, does there exist instructions for how to reproduce it the same way you did it?

lltfdaniel1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 682

TriKri

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: Cheapest / easiest overunity build?
« Reply #4 on: March 29, 2021, 10:52:42 PM »
Thanks for the link; I will definitely check it out! Have you build it yourself? I'm still wondering whether anyone here has build an over-unity system him- or herself and knows by own experience that it works.

Floor

  • Guest
Re: Cheapest / easiest overunity build?
« Reply #5 on: March 30, 2021, 04:55:07 AM »
@ TriKri

Your question pops up every now and then.

It must seem to anyone not involved in the pursuit, that the
only answers you get are

1. People point else where
2. People mention fears of  and / or the past realities of dire consequences for "disclosures".
3. You will probably only ever receive answers which could easily be seen as self reinforcing /
self in denial,  loops.
4. Any one who came forward right now might find their self confronting a great deal of,
and many kinds of, difficulties (most people are unaware of what these would be). 
5.Not just you, but any one, might need to think long and hard, before you could begin to
get any idea at all, of what I am talking about.
6. Some who think they have found it, are mistaken for a time then realize it was some kind of
error. 
Been there myself (more than once).
Typically there is some error in measurement but sometimes the error is a lack of understanding of what would actually constitute "O.U" itself.
7. Refer to number 3.

kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1418
Re: Cheapest / easiest overunity build?
« Reply #6 on: March 30, 2021, 09:40:49 AM »
will it work or what?
https://youtu.be/c3I2zeoUbzg

Thaelin

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1093
Re: Cheapest / easiest overunity build?
« Reply #7 on: March 30, 2021, 02:30:45 PM »
Take notice, it seems to only work when on the same spot of the table. Coil and such underneath taped on the edge to hide. Just another joke.

antijon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 230
Re: Cheapest / easiest overunity build?
« Reply #8 on: March 30, 2021, 03:24:34 PM »
Yeah it's a joke video.

Regarding overunity, that depends on one's own view of what energy is, and what it means to use it. So don't get me wrong, like everyone else, I'd like to have a black box that produced kilowatts of real energy.

With this video as a reference https://youtu.be/3O2ZhagqjEE if you run a motor straight from a battery, you expect that the current was consumed by the motor and converted into mechanical work. But like he shows, wiring a capacitor in series demonstrates that current wasn't "lost" when the motor was used to produce work. The same amount of current used to power the motor can be used again by discharging the capacitor, and the only loss of current is due to heat loss in the wire and leakage of the capacitor.

Obviously, disregarding the motor RPM, current can be used multiple times to produce more "work", so what does that mean for the motor's electrical efficiency? Like the guy in the video, I think we've been misunderstanding the concept of energy consumption and conversion.

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Cheapest / easiest overunity build?
« Reply #9 on: March 30, 2021, 03:40:21 PM »
Yeah it's a joke video.

Regarding overunity, that depends on one's own view of what energy is, and what it means to use it. So don't get me wrong, like everyone else, I'd like to have a black box that produced kilowatts of real energy.

With this video as a reference https://youtu.be/3O2ZhagqjEE if you run a motor straight from a battery, you expect that the current was consumed by the motor and converted into mechanical work. But like he shows, wiring a capacitor in series demonstrates that current wasn't "lost" when the motor was used to produce work. The same amount of current used to power the motor can be used again by discharging the capacitor, and the only loss of current is due to heat loss in the wire and leakage of the capacitor.

Obviously, disregarding the motor RPM, current can be used multiple times to produce more "work", so what does that mean for the motor's electrical efficiency? Like the guy in the video, I think we've been misunderstanding the concept of energy consumption and conversion.


This is the "parametric generator"-principle studied and experimented by Mandelstam and Papalexi ,their Prof. :


Physics Nobel Award prized Karl Ferdinand Braun
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://www.sps.ch/artikel/physik-anekdoten/die-drahtlose-telegraphie-die-einfuehrung-des-schwingkreises-ferdinand-braun-8/


Helmholtz took over the size 4 years later, but gave it his name: "free energy".  ;D


What is defined as : "free energy",classical and resultiv !?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xPF2hn6DPNg




parametric generator or parametric oscillator theory was the entrance to quantum-mechanics !


 page 6,


Quantum mechanics was born (1900) when Planck found himself forced to conjecture that the only oscillator motions achievable in Nature are those for which area = nh : n = 1, 2, 3,... where h is a new natural constant, with the physical dimensions [h]=[xp] = M1L2T −1 of “action.” Thus was Planck led from (9) to this formula En = nω :  ≡ h/2π for the “allowed energies“ of a quantum oscillator.
 
https://www.reed.edu/physics/faculty/wheeler/documents/Sophmore%20Class%20Notes%202007/Chapter%203.pdf

antijon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 230
Re: Cheapest / easiest overunity build?
« Reply #10 on: March 31, 2021, 12:34:54 AM »
Thanks Lanca, I always appreciate your insight, even though it’s sometimes over my head

vasik041

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 209
    • FE R&D

Pattex

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: Cheapest / easiest overunity build?
« Reply #12 on: March 06, 2023, 05:04:56 PM »
Hi!

Has anyone here built an overunity system that actually works?

No. Period. (excluding solar, wind and hydro)

There has been a prize money sense 2007 for anyone who builds such a device. No one has yet claimed it. https://overunity.com/2157/overunity-prize-money-15825-us-total-until-now/

There are many types of devices, claimed to produce OU and many have said to do "successfull build" but this only means they got some output (50%..99% COP). Measurements are usually very difficult to do, and many members in this forum just have some cheap multimeters to go with their medication. Some do have oscilloscopes, but the OU measurements are still with in error margin.

That does not mean such device is impossible. Even if the current laws of physics say so. Which they do not directly. A traditional transformers for example, can not produce any OU and are very well studied.

When someone claims to have, say 150% COP motor or transformer, but they can not make it run even self powered, yet take out useful power, you know it's a measurement error.

Good place to start getting to know the subject, is from someone who at least has the skills and know-how to make proper measurements and documentation of what they have done, like JLNaudin http://jnaudin.free.fr/

For many OU devices (patented), there aren't even a proper build instructions, but infinite amount of configurations put together "with a gut feeling".
In sense, the "gut feeling" is the only way to go, cause there is no physics formula which says you can get more energy out than put in, that would somehow relate to Maxwell's equations etc.
 
So, like the air-con pumps heat energy from outside to inside, the OU device everyone here is looking for, would pump electrons (electricity) from the vacuum space (dark energy, aether, call it what you want) to their transformer wires..

One advice to anyone who invents such device, you can not make money with it. If it works, you will probably get into some accident really soon. The right way is to document very carefully everything, and publish it fast to let anyone use it freely.

Look at for example Joseph Newman, he wasted his whole life trying to make money, and become crazy ass fool https://youtu.be/CrJIzrmX1mI?t=4214
John Bedini is either a con artist or just chasing a dream (like all of us), but he does not have any proof of a working device. No one is at the moment powering their home with Bedini generator, no matter how bad the energy crisis is in Europe. You would think that in this crisis such device would surface, but no, it has not.

We must still keep looking. I am looking for some proper blueprints too, to try something. But I have not yet seen anything worth building.

Please PM me if you have something! at ou-catalog@tutanota.de