Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Manelas Device  (Read 3767 times)

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Manelas Device
« on: February 05, 2021, 04:19:25 PM »
Smudge
Quote:
This bench has been started with the intention of investigation of the Arthur Manelas device that bears some similarities to the Floyd Sweet device.  Both used one inch thick rectangular slabs of ferrite magnet material, either strontium ferrite or barium ferrite.  Both devices had sets of coils wound over the ferrite slab, each coil wound around one of the three principal axes of the ferrite slab.  And both devices were witnessed to be overunity.  Sweet used bifilar coils while Manelas used a special form of twirled pair that is different from the usual twisted pair.  The Sweet device has been discussed elsewhere on this forum, and the Manelas device briefly here https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=3862.msg85533#msg85533.  Brian Ahern (Vibronic Energy Technologies Corp) has looked at the latter from the view that the anomalous energy results from Nano-Ferromagnetism where the small grain size in the ferrite (3-12nM) impose collective action of the nuclei to vibrate cooperatively.  Attached is his presentation given some years ago that shows details of the Manelas equipment.

Both Sweet and Ahern demonstrated levitation (repulsion) above a conditioned ferrite magnet, Sweet showed a transformer lamination while Ahern used a steel hat-pin (see image below).  He assumed that this came from oscillations within the magnet where it is known that an alternating ferromagnet will repel conducting objects.  Yet such oscillations have never been detected or measured to date.  That repulsion has been noticed in small regions above magnets with holes through them, and with magnets that have small regions with reversed polarity: it is simply a result of the field pattern.  Most people are conditioned into perceiving magnets as having poles where like poles repel while unlike poles attract.  That simplistic view hides the true reason for the force on a magnet, the non-uniform field in which the magnet sits.  It is quite easy to condition a large ferrite slab by applying to it a smaller NdFeB disc magnet in repulse mode (see image below).  When pressed so as to touch the ferrite the repulsion changes to attraction as the stronger field of the disc magnet causes the local ferrite grains to flip and reverse their magnetization.  This reversed polarity doesn’t penetrate right through the ferrite, only a small depth suffers this reversal.  A FEMM simulation of such a conditioned magnet is shown below, along with the field taken along a vertical line above the ferrite.  This clearly shows a field maximum above the magnet towards which a small ferromagnetic object (such as a hat-pin) will be drawn.  That levitation is not an indication of oscillations within the magnet.

That there is no measurable oscillating field outside a permanent magnet does not mean internal atomic oscillations are absent, it just means that those internal electron movements are incoherent, their long range fields all cancel each other out.  However some of those persistent electron movements can be forced to cohere, as is now well known in the fields of NMR, NQR, ESR, EPR and FMR.  It is hoped that the latest information on the Ahern device will lead to some understanding of how manipulation of the internal movements can lead to power extraction.
 Smudge 
------------------------



Smudge   

------------------------

Manelas test data for lightning club VI.pdf (4263.15 kB - downloaded 2 times.)

Reversed magnetization.jpg (40.58 kB, 459x243 - viewed 26 times.)

levitation field lines.jpg (139.87 kB, 522x437 - viewed 27 time.)

Smudge   
End quote
More info here ,https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4067.msg87444;topicseen#msg87444


Shared with gratitude
Respectfully
Chet K
Ps will update as time permits
Link above has much more yet to be mirrored

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Manelas Device
« Reply #1 on: February 08, 2021, 05:09:48 PM »
Update and suggestions in new PDF ( finally figured out how to attach them ( I hope?
https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4067.msg87556;topicseen#msg87556


Submitted with gratitude
Chet K

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Manelas Device
« Reply #2 on: February 09, 2021, 02:54:56 PM »
Some discussion about experiments and a few movies too !
https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4067.msg87581;topicseen#msg87581



With gratitude
Chet K

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Manelas Device
« Reply #3 on: February 11, 2021, 05:50:57 PM »
 Very interesting observations and remarks
Here
https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4067.msg87647;topicseen#msg87647


Shared with gratitude
Chet K

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Manelas Device
« Reply #4 on: February 12, 2021, 02:03:24 PM »

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Manelas Device
« Reply #5 on: February 14, 2021, 06:47:38 PM »
Smudge shares a really cool idea !


https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4067.msg87729;topicseen#msg87729




Shared With gratitude
Chet K