Author Topic: Acoustical feedback energy system (Read 28631 times)

aleks · « **Reply #75 on:** April 16, 2023, 03:12:23 AM »

Wesley, you are at it again. Nobody needs your poor money.

First of all, read the post #1 in this thread. Then answer a straight question - what happens in the situation when generating speaker is OPPOSED by a soundwave of the same frequency? It's a simple question, but you won't find an answer with all your "modern physics".

Secondly, answer a question why deep space (cosmic) missions/satellites/probes do not run out of free electrons in a vacuum of space, while electrons are repelling. Why free electrons that run the electronics do not repel and leave the body of a satellite?

Thirdly, why the universe has asymmetry between matter and anti-matter, and how processes related to free electrons are involved in this?

Fourthly, the abundance/infinity of energy of cosmos arises from the answer to second and third questions. There's just no way energy is not infinite given we have a source of free electrons EVERYWHERE.

aleks · « **Reply #76 on:** April 16, 2023, 03:39:41 AM »

Quote from: stivep on April 15, 2023, 08:37:35 PM

_{1. -how you are "squeezing" collapsing free electrons and what for - explain entire process.?
3.- how E=mc^2 and the mass of electron is related to releasing energy (in your case), and how we personally can use this energy ? - explain entire process.}

The "squeeze" happens due to opposition of electric currents/fields that mathematically reside in orthogonal planes. Two independent electrical schemes can be considered orthogonal to each other. Also soundwaves, inertial force and electromagnetic energy are orthogonal to electricity in a scheme, they do not interact directly. The interaction point arises when a moving voice coil of a loudspeaker (under controlled EMF) is opposed by a moving diaphragm of the speaker driven by a soundwave from another loudspeaker. This opposition creates "squeeze" causing some percentage of electrons (if they are spherical electromagnetic waves) deform and collapse releasing an electric potential in the process. The reason collapsed electron becomes a potential is because surrounding aether has 0 potential - in common situations a free electron simply collapses and returns the energy into aether not causing any visible effects.

Aether is a discrete medium with stochastic distribution of particles similar to gas. The proof is simple: two independent crossing electromagnetic waves almost do not interact with each other; from the physical modeling standpoint this requires that electromagnetic energy is passed via stochastically-placed particles like in acoustic field modeling. The difference is in mechanics: while in acoustic fields the soundwaves can be continuous (inverse square law), in aether the waves are "packeted" (inverse cubic law).

kolbacict · « **Reply #77 on:** April 16, 2023, 08:41:10 AM »

Quote from: aleks on April 16, 2023, 03:12:23 AM

Why free electrons that run the electronics do not repel and leave the body of a satellite?

Maybe because the charge of the conductor as a whole is neutral.
Free electrons that are found in metals simply leave some atoms of the lattice, giving them a positive charge ?

aleks · « **Reply #78 on:** April 16, 2023, 11:15:29 AM »

Quote from: kolbacict on April 16, 2023, 08:41:10 AM

Maybe because the charge of the conductor as a whole is neutral.
Free electrons that are found in metals simply leave some atoms of the lattice, giving them a positive charge ?

Yes, I've expected such reply. But free electrons are not bound to atoms, so substance charge may be neutral and at the same time conductive. Then if you insist that free electrons contribute to charge it means ALL conductive substances always have some charge due to free electrons, which is false.

aleks · « **Reply #79 on:** April 16, 2023, 11:29:17 AM »

Some may argue that free electrons produce some kind of "ground state charge" in matter, which conserves (I doubt such law exists in physics). The problem with such "conservation" is that it requires electrons to attract and conserve some kind of "charge field", and not repel, which I think is a false idea.

aleks · « **Reply #80 on:** April 16, 2023, 11:57:03 AM »

A fact worth noting related to "appearance of free electrons" is that powerful lightning strikes grow electric channels from both sides - clouds and ground. In my opinion, free electrons appear when conductivity is required (electrical potential difference exists), it's just how nature works: a two-way "path finding" algorithm of sorts that involves appearance of free electrons along the path. They are like bumps in a swamp to make a way.

Then consider lightning strikes between planetary bodies reported by some scientists. Are there "free electrons" available in the vacuum of space?

stivep · « **Reply #81 on:** April 16, 2023, 12:13:51 PM »

Quote from: aleks on April 16, 2023, 03:12:23 AM

read the post #1

In entire set of your comments I was specifically pointing at one particular one.
You are expected to respond to questions with answers and not with new set of questions .
You didn't answer any question and didn't explain anything at all, and your response Alex,
looks like a nonsense, lack of knowledge,- Absurd .
_{Извините, но это не Россия -Я в Соединенных Штатах Америки.}

Wesley

kolbacict · « **Reply #82 on:** April 16, 2023, 12:16:34 PM »

Quote from: aleks on April 16, 2023, 11:15:29 AM

Yes, I've expected such reply. But free electrons are not bound to atoms, so substance charge may be neutral and at the same time conductive.

Yes,free electrons doesn't bonded with atoms,as long as they are free. But they can are captured by other atoms. And that virtual particles appear and disappear from a vacuum, even official science does not object to this. seems me.

Quote from: aleks on April 16, 2023, 03:12:23 AM

Wesley, you are at it again. Nobody needs your poor money.

It need to me. But nobody doesn't give me.

aleks · « **Reply #83 on:** April 16, 2023, 02:45:09 PM »

Quote from: stivep on April 16, 2023, 12:13:51 PM

- the wording used looks like - Absurd .

That's your problems, I'm not here to solve your problems. I'm mostly sharing my findings with those who are interested. But you, my unfriendly american participant, is mostly obsessed with discussing personalities, but not ideas. Don't forget to choose your pronoun wisely.

aleks · « **Reply #84 on:** April 16, 2023, 02:51:56 PM »

Quote from: kolbacict on April 16, 2023, 12:16:34 PM

Yes,free electrons doesn't bonded with atoms,as long as they are free. But they can are captured by other atoms. And that virtual particles appear and disappear from a vacuum, even official science does not object to this. seems me.It need to me. But nobody doesn't give me.

The problem with electron-positron pairs theory is that universe has matter/anti-matter asymmetry, I've pointed that out. Charged particles and charge is a different category. Charging an atom needs energy, atoms can't simply bind to free electrons. Hence, in deep space a satellite would lose all free electrons and electronics would stop working, if one follows a widespread idea of electron-positron pair symmetry, and idea that "energy cannot be created nor destroyed". There's contradiction between theoretic view that electron-positron pairs do appear and the fact that there's more matter than anti-matter in the universe.

https://home.cern/science/physics/matter-antimatter-asymmetry-problem

stivep · « **Reply #85 on:** April 17, 2023, 12:05:16 AM »

Quote from: aleks on April 14, 2023, 05:33:04 AM

_{What are you doing on this OU forum? Are you some kind of agents //?
You contribute nothing except confusion.}

_{"Alex"- is just a name of different people. "Overunity"- is just the name of this forum.
No word:"Alex" nor (coincidental) name of this forum is perceived as nonsensical phenomena - "overunity." by these skilled in art.
-and yes You Alex are contributing nothing except confusion. Are you some kind of agents //?}

Quote from: aleks on April 16, 2023, 03:39:41 AM

soundwaves, inertial force and electromagnetic energy are orthogonal to electricity

Total nonsense.- Absurd _{link please}.

Quote from: aleks on April 16, 2023, 03:39:41 AM

The interaction point arises when a moving voice coil of a loudspeaker (under controlled EMF) is opposed by a moving diaphragm of the speaker driven by a soundwave from another loudspeaker. This opposition creates "squeeze" causing some percentage of electrons (if they are spherical electromagnetic waves)

Total nonsense.- Absurd _{link please.}

Quote from: aleks on April 16, 2023, 03:39:41 AM

The reason collapsed electron becomes a potential is because surrounding aether has 0 potential - in common situations a free electron simply collapses and returns the energy into aether not causing any visible effects.

Total nonsense.- Absurd _{link please.}

Quote from: aleks on April 16, 2023, 03:39:41 AM

Aether is a discrete medium with stochastic distribution of particles similar to gas. The proof is simple: two independent crossing electromagnetic waves almost do not interact with each other; from the physical modeling standpoint this requires that electromagnetic energy is passed via stochastically-placed particles like in acoustic field modeling. The difference is in mechanics: while in acoustic fields the soundwaves can be continuous (inverse square law), in aether the waves are "packeted" (inverse cubic law).

Total nonsense.- Absurd _{link please.}
Wesley's explanation:_{-There is no Aether,,
-no} _{stochastic distribution of particles in this case.
-electromagnetic wave has nothing to do with sound wave. Mentioned quantum physics phenomena has nothing to do with classical one.
- there is no} _{"packeted" wave, no aether , and no (inverse cubic law) in it.
- no collapsed electron, no potential 0.

Highly likely there is a targeted disinformation taking place here for 6 pages now,
by some likely Russian individual/s not willing to explain, nor support his statements with any
suitable links.

I see here conflict in communication where the response of an individual is: ignorance}_:

Quote from: aleks on April 16, 2023, 02:45:09 PM

That's your problems, I'm not here to solve your problems.

I would kindly ask you Dear alex to respond to the questions and concerns with suitable links and I would be delighted to continue this conversation.

_{____________________________________________________

"multiple identity " in association with nicknames
is yet next step related to historical data.}

Wesley

aleks · « **Reply #86 on:** April 17, 2023, 04:19:16 AM »

Wesley, do not be a child. What kind of peer-reviewed links are you expecting in the overunity field? Just go away, there's no overunity in official nobel-prize level physics, nor in classical physics.

Also, it is you who is offering a "prize" to prove a non-sensical stuff. You have some undisclosed interests behind you, akin to interests of transnational oil and energy companies. As for me, I'm not from Gazprom for sure.

stivep · « **Reply #87 on:** April 17, 2023, 12:30:34 PM »

Quote from: aleks on April 17, 2023, 04:19:16 AM

//, there's no overunity in official nobel-prize level physics, nor in classical physics.//
Also, it is you who is offering a "prize" to prove a non-sensical stuff.

Quote from: aleks on April 17, 2023, 04:19:16 AM

What // you expecting in the overunity field?

There is no overunity field - Overunity is just name you trashing on purpose with nonsense?

Dear Alex. enough is enough.
6 pages of mostly Absurd written by you .
No literature, no properties specified.
You writing pure fiction not even supported by you.
- So why you composing it?
-Why you trashing this forum on purpose with nonsense.

It is just coincidentally unfortunate, that most if not all of Trolls were Russian.
- removed from this forum for trashing this forum .
I voted for many of these removals in the past.
It takes takes time but ends the same.

_{multiple identity doesn't help.}

Dear Alex We are here to help each other, not to spreed lies and you by yourself wrote that you knowingly
writing nonsense here._(quoted)
Brainwash of Russian propaganda is not welcomed here.
I wish you the best.
Wesley

aleks · « **Reply #88 on:** April 17, 2023, 02:12:50 PM »

Wesley, please give a straight answer - what are you doing on *overunity* forum while not believing in overunity? This is not a usual electrical engineering forum. You are either just wasting your time or working on purpose voting for flagging of undesired information and removals.

Willy · « **Reply #89 on:** April 17, 2023, 02:21:28 PM »

incomplete quote

Quote from: aleks on April 16, 2023, 03:12:23 AM

what happens in the situation when generating speaker is OPPOSED by a soundwave of the same frequency?

why deep space (cosmic) missions/satellites/probes do not run out of free electrons in a vacuum of space, while electrons are repelling. Why free electrons that run the electronics do not repel and leave the body of a satellite?

Question 1-Aleks, why don't you give us a detailed explanation and diagrams ?

Question 2 -Aleks, Why do you suppose that the electrons should "run out" in a vacuum any more so than they "run out" on earth ?

Aleks, I have to agree with Wesley in that it is apparent, that most of your statements
here are nonsense.

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: Acoustical feedback energy system (Read 28631 times)

aleks

Re: Acoustical feedback energy system

aleks

Re: Acoustical feedback energy system

kolbacict

Re: Acoustical feedback energy system

aleks

Re: Acoustical feedback energy system

aleks

Re: Acoustical feedback energy system

aleks

Re: Acoustical feedback energy system

stivep

Re: Acoustical feedback energy system

kolbacict

Re: Acoustical feedback energy system

aleks

Re: Acoustical feedback energy system

aleks

Re: Acoustical feedback energy system

stivep

Re: Acoustical feedback energy system

aleks

Re: Acoustical feedback energy system

stivep

Re: Acoustical feedback energy system

aleks

Re: Acoustical feedback energy system

Willy

Re: Acoustical feedback energy system