Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Acoustical feedback energy system  (Read 28626 times)

Willy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 236
Re: Acoustical feedback energy system
« Reply #60 on: April 11, 2023, 04:09:42 PM »
...

aleks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 673
    • DC Acoustic Waves Hypothesis
Re: Acoustical feedback energy system
« Reply #61 on: April 11, 2023, 06:44:33 PM »
Wouldn't want this to forum to fall into the same state of affairs....
Well, you are taking it too hard. First of all, your statement "this does not work" is unsubstantiated - because in the video it does seem to work, at least for some time. You haven't demonstrated an analogous device which you can't make to work. Secondly, I'm trying to rely an idea of "opposition" that IMO permeates ALL "perpetual motion" devices. The reason why opposition may work is that it creates a "clash": while on one hand a piezo-element or voice coil moves under controlled EMF, at the same time it moves in an opposite direction under acoustical pressure, which also creates EMF, but an opposing one. A kind of "stoppage" happens, and on "atomic" level (I'm hypothesizing) such "stoppage" leads to creation of electric potential of yet unknown nature.

Willy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 236
Re: Acoustical feedback energy system
« Reply #62 on: April 11, 2023, 09:38:18 PM »
Well, you are taking it too hard. First of all, your statement "this does not work" is unsubstantiated - because in the video it does seem to work, at least for some time. You haven't demonstrated an analogous device which you can't make to work. Secondly, I'm trying to rely an idea of "opposition" that IMO permeates ALL "perpetual motion" devices. The reason why opposition may work is that it creates a "clash": while on one hand a piezo-element or voice coil moves under controlled EMF, at the same time it moves in an opposite direction under acoustical pressure, which also creates EMF, but an opposing one. A kind of "stoppage" happens, and on "atomic" level (I'm hypothesizing) such "stoppage" leads to creation of electric potential of yet unknown nature.

IT DOES NOT WORK.

It does not work any more than that monkeys might fly out of my but.

That "it does seem to work " is just a pointless and unintentionally silly statement by you.
Obviously, its SEEMING to work was the whole point as to why someone posted the video on you tube in the first place.

Meanwhile compressed air directed at the magnets causes them to spin and that's all folks.


aleks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 673
    • DC Acoustic Waves Hypothesis
Re: Acoustical feedback energy system
« Reply #63 on: April 12, 2023, 04:07:22 AM »
IT DOES NOT WORK.

Meanwhile compressed air directed at the magnets causes them to spin and that's all folks.
What kind of compressed air makes "Liberty engine 2" spin its motors perpetually? You know, if LE2 works, the posted simple device may work, too. Same principle. Beside that, you obviously missed that the author of the video rotates the device in hands. What compressed air?

Don't turn the talk into talk about impossibility to overcome thermodynamic laws. We are on OU forum after all.

aleks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 673
    • DC Acoustic Waves Hypothesis
Re: Acoustical feedback energy system
« Reply #64 on: April 13, 2023, 04:42:53 AM »
On Nikola Tesla. After studying his published works a bit, I've came to the conclusion he NEVER found a free energy source in OU sense. His major claim is that energy always comes from some "medium" meaning Sun, hydro-energy, or underground heat - these were his "free energy" sources compared to fossil fuels. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nikola_Tesla_writings


As I've concluded myself, Tesla even did not see his own Tesla Coil fired energy into the depths of the aether. That was the reason Wardenclyffe tower was a flop - it simply wasted energy. Tesla wasn't OU apologist, claims to otherwise are a fantasy. But his electrical engineering works are marvels nevertheless, way ahead of his time.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Acoustical feedback energy system
« Reply #65 on: April 13, 2023, 08:15:26 PM »
Grebennikov is not well-known beyond Russia, but this scientist discovered the "secret" of gravity force. In some interviews, however, he admitted stopping research, because of unknown geopolitical complications of gravity devices. In light of my idea outlined above, a wing of an insect may represent the outlined device.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pbpupEgw2Es
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Grebennikov
Grebennikov  revelations belongs to a  concept, or action   that is purely fictional - like antigravity  ,perpetual motion and  overunity.
Wesley

Willy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 236
Re: Acoustical feedback energy system
« Reply #66 on: April 14, 2023, 04:57:52 AM »
What kind of compressed air makes "Liberty engine 2" spin its motors perpetually? You know, if LE2 works, the posted simple device may work, too. Same principle. Beside that, you obviously missed that the author of the video rotates the device in hands. What compressed air?

Don't turn the talk into talk about impossibility to overcome thermodynamic laws. We are on OU forum after all.

This liberty engine ? @

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3bnwQzsp14A

There is nothing shown in the video that would make it self run.

How could it be faked ?
There  are many ways.


Willy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 236
Re: Acoustical feedback energy system
« Reply #67 on: April 14, 2023, 05:04:52 AM »
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Grebennikov
Grebennikov  revelations belongs to a  concept, or action   that is purely fictional - like antigravity  ,perpetual motion and  overunity.
Wesley

I don't know of any anti gravity devices but this does not mean that such a thing
does not exist.

Wesley..
1. There is not a single thing that you can name, that is not perpetually in motion.
2. Also you know very well that there are over unity devices.

aleks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 673
    • DC Acoustic Waves Hypothesis
Re: Acoustical feedback energy system
« Reply #68 on: April 14, 2023, 05:33:04 AM »
What are you doing on this OU forum? Are you some kind of agents of unrevealed forces? If you do not believe in OU or do not believe in videos, what are you doing on these forums? You contribute nothing except confusion.

aleks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 673
    • DC Acoustic Waves Hypothesis
Re: Acoustical feedback energy system
« Reply #69 on: April 14, 2023, 05:36:34 AM »
How could it be faked ?
There  are many ways.
I think you do not have a keen eye and can't relate knowledge of physics to what you are seeing. That's your problem. Educate yourself more, there's plenty of OU information and believable videos on YouTube, you just have to be curious. Electrical perpetual motion machines is a fact. E.g. Bedini or TPU is so old school today.

Willy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 236
Re: Acoustical feedback energy system
« Reply #70 on: April 14, 2023, 06:04:36 AM »
Aleks quote
"I think you do not have a keen eye and can't relate knowledge of physics to what you are seeing. That's your problem. Educate yourself more, there's plenty of OU information and believable videos on YouTube, you just have to be curious. Electrical perpetual motion machines is a fact. E.g. Bedini or TPU is so old school today. "
End Aleks quote

...

You may of course, think any stupid thing you wish.
I am not here to tell you what you should think or not think.

I know over unity devices exist, because I have seen it for my self, first hand, in real life.  But also I understand the principles by which some can function.

I also Know that Out of the many thousands of supposed self running devices presented on the internet nearly ever one is faked.  I know this precisely because I have enough physics and engineering knowledge to know this with certainty.

For you, maybe a video is enough to make you believe something is true. There are plenty of internet sites for people who want to believe something is true, even though they have no evidence to support that belief.

Before you begin speaking of evidence you posses, you should first learn what that word means.

If you are not here to learn, you don't belong here.

aleks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 673
    • DC Acoustic Waves Hypothesis
Re: Acoustical feedback energy system
« Reply #71 on: April 14, 2023, 08:25:26 AM »
If you are not here to learn, you don't belong here.
You've missed threads. This thread is about my own OU proposition, and I'm providing reasoning behind my idea, and making relations to other devices in the field. The problem, there's no generally-accepted theory of OU, and I'm providing one based on my idea. You have no theory and you are just dismissing working devices based on absence of such theory. "Clash" or "stoppage" or "squeeze" of electric currents is a very simple idea, and once you get it (to do so you'll have to admit existence of discrete aether, with particle sizes on the order of 10^-25 meters), you start seeing the physics of devices presented on YouTube. There are many fakes, especially very popular ones, but also there are real devices, usually quite niche videos.

Willy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 236
Re: Acoustical feedback energy system
« Reply #72 on: April 14, 2023, 09:33:38 AM »


Good.  Its good to stand up for one self. Just remember that this isn't about any of us
pretending to be better than anyone else or deserving more than others.

Over Unity .com is an an open source community and the only way this works is when
we all do our best to respect each other.

aleks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 673
    • DC Acoustic Waves Hypothesis
Re: Acoustical feedback energy system
« Reply #73 on: April 15, 2023, 07:45:12 PM »
After a bit of thinking and "mind experiments" I've came to the conclusion that during the outlined "squeeze" the energy comes from collapsing free electrons. The amount of energy released should be in tune with E=mc^2 and the mass of electron. Why they are collapsing? This requires "new physics" to explain. In my understanding, an electron is a spherical electromagnetic wave akin to yellowish-orange ball lightning (if anyone saw it); Tesla coils sometime produce transient ball lightnings which demonstrates mechanics of sphere formation. The reason for electron collapse is loss of symmetry due to compression arising from opposition of electric currents/fields.


That's mechanics. But more importantly is that aether has infinite energy on cosmic scale. It's an open question IMO where "free electrons" come from. It's very likely they are constantly formed and collapse "for free". If not for this, electronics in deep space missions would fail pretty quickly. Also note friction processes that produce "static charge" - but which never goes over some amount: formation of electrons stops at some point.


So, in OU we are taking a natural process of electron collapse under control. But the supply is limitless.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Acoustical feedback energy system
« Reply #74 on: April 15, 2023, 08:37:35 PM »
Over Unity .com is an an open source community and the only way this works is when
we all do our best to respect each other.
Dear Alex and Willy.
Yes you are right Willy, but  open source  is unlikely appreciating all garbage to be thrown there.
Talking about respect. what kind of respect do you have to this forum,  members, guests, and other readers?
Какого Чeрта -эта, вся  «ерунда», «чепуха», «глупости» «нелепость» здесь имеет место,  вам это нужно?
Perpetual motion, overunity OU, ether/eather is a nonsense.
It looks like  you both manifest not even a basic knowledge  in physics typical to an average 12 years old from Western European high school.
Where did you come from ? :)
 

_____________________________________________________

"squeeze" the energy comes from collapsing free electrons. The amount of energy released should be in tune with E=mc^2 and the mass of electron.
// aether has infinite energy on cosmic scale//
So, in OU we are taking a natural process of electron collapse under control. But the supply is limitless.

Please  explain:
1. -how  you are "squeezing" collapsing  free electrons and what for - explain entire process.?
2.- eather  infinite energy in cosmic scale?- prove it based on  current modern physics
3.- how  E=mc^2 and the mass of electron is related to releasing energy (in your case), and how we personally can use this energy ? - explain entire process.

Proving  the answer  to that,  will double the  $1000  = 82275.65 Russian Rubles  offer  from below. making it $2000  per  each of you.

4. Prove me that  the nonsense  you formulated  in the quote from above according  to physics works  in energy
extraction(conversion)  process and we can use it to power our appliances,

- and I'll give each one of you two $1000  = 82,275.65 Russian Rubles or more. :)

That in total makes $3000= 246,827.42 Russian Rubles per each of you.
If any of the points in all questions and concerns is or becomes   invalid than entire  offer of mine  becomes  unavailable to  you two. 
or maybe all of this  nonsense is to collect  more counts on comments here in hope to become Hero member in nonsense.?

Note :
Word invalid =  invalid argument
However  money is available only under condition that:  official physics (-as of today) stand point is in agreement with entire  explanation  you provide  exactly to the points
listed above and text of quoted comment.
Denying any or all of the points to make it  in agreement  with physics doesn't make you the  defender of your claims nor rewarded.
https://web.stanford.edu/~bobonich/terms.concepts/valid.sound.html#:~:text=Invalid%3A%20an%20argument%20that%20is%20not%20valid.%20We,and%20invalidity%20apply%20only%20to%20arguments%2C%20not%20statements.

Wesley
« Last Edit: April 16, 2023, 02:44:36 AM by stivep »