Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Acoustical feedback energy system  (Read 23171 times)

Offline aleks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 673
    • DC Acoustic Waves Hypothesis
Re: Acoustical feedback energy system
« Reply #120 on: April 19, 2023, 04:09:12 AM »
Shall we get back onto your topic ?
At the moment I have nothing more to write. I've explained what happens to myself mainly, and shared insights here. If you have any objections to collapsing electrons whose EM energy potential strives to return to aether (with 0 potential revealed by Tesla coil demonstrations), and which (EM energy) becomes readily accessible in a circuit, you can write them.


I'll add that "collapsing electrons" per se, even if they only cause sporadic ionizing radiation, may be completely in tune with "conservation of energy" on cosmic scales. The problem for "the powers that be" is that electrons are too ubiquitous, and are (at least) constantly supplied by the ions from the Sun and cosmic radiation. So, if such "free energy" can be put to good use, it will obsolete all less economically efficient ways to get electrical energy.


So, the obvious "attack vector" of TPTB that I can see is "ionizing radiation" of electrical free energy devices. Get your Sievert and Geiger meters ready to fight disinformation campaigns. They do not care about physics, and what is possible or not, they care about money and ways to put competitors down.
« Last Edit: April 19, 2023, 06:38:09 AM by aleks »

Offline aleks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 673
    • DC Acoustic Waves Hypothesis
Re: Acoustical feedback energy system
« Reply #121 on: April 20, 2023, 07:56:44 PM »

I'm taking some time to go over my insights again (to recheck my own understanding mainly). This isn't directed to Wesley as they have some other agenda it seems.


1. soundwaves, inertial force and electromagnetic energy are orthogonal to electricity.


a) Soundwaves can pass through an operating electrical circuit without causing any interference. b) Electrical circuits operate without issues on moving bodies, and are not subject to interference from kinetic impacts or hits. c) Intensive solar radiation (electromagnetic energy) does not interfere (except thermally) with high-voltage transmission lines even if it's believed that electricity runs over surface of a conductor. All 3 points proven.


2. Aether is a discrete medium with stochastic distribution of particles similar to gas.


If we consider that ALL physical processes happen in the same space-time continuum, and take two coinciding electromagnetic waves into consideration - how can we differentiate one from the other at location x,y,z,t? The field component is undefined UNLESS the field is stochastic and a measurement yields field component probabilistically between wave 1 and 2. Case proven.


3. Surrounding aether has 0 potential.


Tesla coil is basically a high-voltage capacitor. Capacitor carries electrical charge. Tesla coil in vacuum discharges (produces corona) over 360 degree sphere hence surrounding potential relative to capacitor is 0 everywhere, and there is no requirement of presence of some "grounding terminal" for the discharge to happen. Case proven.


4. The interaction point (between soundwave energy and electrical current) arises when a moving voice coil of a loudspeaker (under controlled EMF) is opposed by a moving diaphragm/cone driven by a soundwave from another loudspeaker.


There's nothing to say, it should be obvious. I admit that the "collapsing electrons" is a hypothesis, but it is the only possible way to describe what happens in too many electrical OU devices. You may discard this hypothesis or work on it, I do not have problems with that.

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3529
Re: Acoustical feedback energy system
« Reply #122 on: April 21, 2023, 03:31:30 AM »
Wesley, do not be a child. What kind of peer-reviewed links are you expecting in the overunity field? Just go away, there's no overunity //

Wesley, // what are you doing on *overunity* forum while not believing in overunity? This is not a usual electrical engineering forum.
Answer:
We are helping each other  and you  are  refusing  defend but admitting that you writing - Absurd.
Name of this forum "overunity"- is  only  the name, like your nick name is Alex .
We are based not on  belief but on science, and reality. We are exchanging knowledge here while helping each other.

2. Aether is a discrete medium with stochastic distribution of particles similar to gas.
3. Surrounding aether has 0 potential.
You  continuing to flood this forum  with the same nonsense- Absurd that was  pointed to you
here:
https://overunity.com/18732/acoustical-feedback-energy-system/msg576605/#msg576605
week ago.
You  refused to provide any reference or basis to that nonsense- Absurd here:
https://overunity.com/18732/acoustical-feedback-energy-system/msg576609/#msg576609
-and you were ask to  cooperate here:
https://overunity.com/18732/acoustical-feedback-energy-system/msg576620/#msg576620

It is now 9 pages of  mostly  intentional  disinformation
Consider yourself  notified for the third time.
Thank you for your attention .
Wesley

Offline aleks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 673
    • DC Acoustic Waves Hypothesis
Re: Acoustical feedback energy system
« Reply #123 on: April 21, 2023, 10:03:09 AM »
You  refused to provide any reference or basis to that nonsense
Now you can't read? Please read my post just above your post, and provide *thoughtful* counter-arguments. Overunity is not based on accepted science, it's impossible per existing theories, don't fool anyone here.

Online ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8055
Re: Acoustical feedback energy system
« Reply #124 on: April 21, 2023, 03:51:56 PM »
aleks
Here the forum tries to transition towards experiments or suggestions towards experiments .


The open source community has  plenty of skills… and incredible resources .
Do you have an experiment to share ?
Towards your theory ?
Respectfully
Chet K



Offline aleks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 673
    • DC Acoustic Waves Hypothesis
Re: Acoustical feedback energy system
« Reply #125 on: April 22, 2023, 03:14:17 PM »
aleks
Do you have an experiment to share ?
Oh, read post #1 or https://vixra.org/abs/2012.0066 I'm not taking all this from my imagination only. From what I understood, people don't know what happens when a loudspeaker is hit with an equally-powerful, same-frequency, but opposing soundwave of some phase. It's just not studied at all, probably even looks like a non-sensical system for many. And that was the opportunity: simple experiment, unusual results.


Search for "opposing loudspeakers" on YouTube or Google and you'll get almost nothing.

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3529
Re: Acoustical feedback energy system
« Reply #126 on: April 22, 2023, 11:37:54 PM »
Note: I have like 3-10 minutes per day to write something. I'm not in my office.

Oh, read post #1 or https://vixra.org/abs/2012.0066
I was  advised that:  Link posted by you is infected with quite weird tracking cookies. My IT points at Russian FSB .( former KGB called GRU)
Dear aleks -You are not conducting  mentioned experiment, but talking nonsense/Absurd for 9 pages now.


Reedited by Wesley from "aleks language" into  physics in English language:
Two loudspeakers, for example : 4 meters apart and facing each other, play identical sounds of the same frequency
You stand (or just taking  measurement) halfway between them,- ( the same-frequency, and phase. )

1.sound waves are  pressure waves. have nothing to do with electromagnetic wave.
2.because of the symmetry, an air-element at the midpoint (P) does not move. This gives a displacement-node at P.     
   P is a pressure-antinode because of the movement of the air around P. The air around P moves like this:
 →P← during a compression (increasing pressure at P)
 ←P→ during an expansion (reducing pressure at P)
 but the air at P remains stationary.


Search for "opposing loudspeakers" on YouTube or Google and you'll get almost nothing.

There is plenty of material  available  on the internet- tons of it.

This explanation is supported by:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/standing-waves-between-two-speakers-in-phase.1004763/


Conclusion
Case of Destructive Interference:
As you see from the  simulation below(lower picture) at the right  wavelength the sound wave cancels and the person
at point P( shown in upper picture) will hear no sound at all( in ideal situation).
please look at dark red and dark blue wave shape.
Imagine that  you have two speakers one on the right  and one on the left of the  simulation below:

Imagine that  exactly in the middle of the horizontal line - the two waves destructively interfere between themselves




I'm writing  more about constructive and destructive interference in the comment  below.

Opinion expressed is my own

Wesley
« Last Edit: April 23, 2023, 03:08:44 AM by stivep »

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3529
Re: Acoustical feedback energy system
« Reply #127 on: April 23, 2023, 12:21:31 AM »
Please read my comment from above.
To better understand constructive and destructive interference  here is easy explanation:

Constructive interference happens when two waves overlap in such a way that they combine to create a larger wave.
Destructive interference happens when two waves overlap in such a way that they cancel each other out.
Wave interference also depends on the relative phase of the two waves, as this video shows through the examples of path length differences and pi shifts.

The superposition of the two waves results in constructive interference, which means that the sound heard is loud.
If, on the other hand, destructive interference results in silence.

look at the video here:
https://www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/light-waves/interference-of-light-waves/v/constructive-and-destructive-interference

 Wesley

Offline aleks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 673
    • DC Acoustic Waves Hypothesis
Re: Acoustical feedback energy system
« Reply #128 on: April 23, 2023, 03:11:50 AM »
Oh, stevie/Weslie, you are at it again, following your agenda of hedging someone's interests in energy. Offering a prize for OU proof yet not accepting any proof outside science which denies OU, making fools of everyone in the process.


I'm not talking about "midpoint" interference of soundwaves, that's totally not interesting and is only an acoustical mode, non-destructive to electrons. I'm talking about EMF interference caused at VOICE COILs. That's much more interesting.


As for soundwaves vs electromagnetic waves, they are of course different. But I'm offering a way to look at other OU devices as well, using the reasoning proposed by me. EM waves also carry potential energy and thus can be used to cause a similar interference at some "interaction point". EM waves at their base are orthogonal to electricity, and to cause interference you'll have to use an "open ends" antenna or inductor. But the source of OU will be the same - opposing EMFs. OU systems with motor-alternator (like Liberty Engine 2) can be also described in the terms of opposing EMFs, but it's trickier to do. Acoustical waves are the best way to demonstrate what kind of process physics is lacking understanding of.

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3529
Re: Acoustical feedback energy system
« Reply #129 on: April 23, 2023, 03:23:46 AM »
..

Offline aleks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 673
    • DC Acoustic Waves Hypothesis
Re: Acoustical feedback energy system
« Reply #130 on: April 23, 2023, 03:24:48 AM »
On 0 potential of aether again. Here's a claim that Tesla coil charges a DC capacitor wirelessly. To most physicists that may be impossible, but if you add "0 potential of aether" into reasoning, it's as easy as day and night. The DC capacitor charges simply because Tesla coil creates a voltage gradient around it, and the gradient is created because discharge goes into aether hindered by air molecules.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiBsVx_S6uY

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3529
Re: Acoustical feedback energy system
« Reply #131 on: April 23, 2023, 03:25:53 AM »
I'm not talking about "midpoint" interference of soundwaves,
Yes that is exactly what you pointed at in  your comment.
Here is a copy of it:
// people don't know what happens when a loudspeaker is hit with an equally-powerful, same-frequency, but opposing soundwave of some phase
Search for "opposing loudspeakers" on YouTube or Google and you'll get almost nothing.
I responded to  it.
All other nonsense of yours was not the subject of my  answer.
Please  note that this is United States of America here and we are educated to respond  exactly to the point
when quoting - as I did.
opinion expressed is my own.
I do  wish you all the best .

Wesley

Offline aleks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 673
    • DC Acoustic Waves Hypothesis
Re: Acoustical feedback energy system
« Reply #132 on: April 23, 2023, 03:27:16 AM »
Yes that is exactly what you pointed at in  your comment.
So, you've searched Google, found a topic about "midpoint interference" and now claiming I'm telling the same thing? That's a bit foolish.


You are obviously trying to make a cause for a ban. I won't react to your outrageous inductions about politics.

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3529
Re: Acoustical feedback energy system
« Reply #133 on: April 23, 2023, 01:32:20 PM »
..
« Last Edit: April 23, 2023, 07:06:43 PM by stivep »

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3529
Re: Acoustical feedback energy system
« Reply #134 on: April 23, 2023, 07:06:55 PM »
Note: I have like 3-10 minutes per day to write something. I'm not in my office.
you don't have to be PhD  aleks, to understand that what's below:
You are obviously trying to make a cause for a ban. I won't react to your outrageous inductions about politics.

FACTS ARE NOT  POLARIZED,
-nor Political but physical (-from physics and philosophy stand point !!!!!!!!!!!!)

Few facts for you to understand Aleks:

1. -I don't  try to  cause your ban. Not at all Dear aleks. (causation=the relationship between cause and effect; causality)
2. -location like Russia , EU or USA - it is just me pointing at physical factor and it is not negative. positive  nor political.
3 .-using wording  like: 
"Terrorist" in regards to Russia is just  a physically  existing fact officially conformed by EU and Congress of USA     
4. -calling you  with names : "animal"- dear aleks. is a lovely complement and fact from Darwinist like me (-official science)

5.-From physics standpoint:
Trashing this forum with nonsense on purpose is what I'm against - and that is what Trolls do.

It looks like Russia's old nicknames on this forum are reactivated now but often with different people behind .
Some old nicknames/accounts  shockingly shows conflicting  opposite statements than and now.
For example:
year 2008:

Well, I do not know how aether // may exist at all.

and it looks like that
aleks from 2008 was  absolutely different person: manifesting at least certain education
in our field of interest and you aleks of 2023 do not. ( my opinion)
https://overunity.com/4304/some-clue-on-tpu-device-operation/msg85416/#msg85416


and now here is today's nonsense- Absurd  from aleks
year 2023:

2. Aether is a discrete medium with stochastic distribution of particles similar to gas.
3. Surrounding aether has 0 potential.
I'm not against you alex at all:
Please understand that  all animals  including you aleks deserves  to be loved and that can  often be  confusing to some mammals. 
I repeat my quote from here : https://overunity.com/18335/wireless-energy-transfer-experiments-builders-board/msg576299/#msg576299



Cloxxki:
Date Registered: April 30, 2009, 02:07:08 PM
you've been hating Russians.
There are some dangerous species and they also need  to eat, procreate,and  perform biological functions.
I'm in love to all animals including you aleks too
Knowing that  animals can bite too, I have  helped few cats and few Russians to get better life
Not all animals have equal chances  but all of them deserves better including me and you too. I'm vegetarian.
I definitely can feed quite few Russians  where retiree  earns ~ $80 per month and average earning in regions is ~ $150 per month- ( in black market value of dollar there )
I spend for feeding cats including feral cats much more than  that per month.
e.g: $2650 paid for medical of just one feral cat.
-for this money I could  feed 33 Russian retirees  for 1 month, but I preferred to  help 1 more cat as no Russian animal- mammal is better than  American cat.-mammal
American cats don't kill Ukrainians and didn't kidnap 16000 of Ukrainian children.
Russian human animals did.
link below:

To understand  me and avoid conflicts  please  go here:  https://overunity.com/18335/wireless-energy-transfer-experiments-builders-board/msg576289/#msg576289


Opinion expressed is my own

Wesley
« Last Edit: April 23, 2023, 10:44:48 PM by stivep »