Consider this:

It takes one nanosecond for an electrical impulse to travel about one foot along a wire.  That's the equivalent to a one gigacycle pulse.  Tesla remarked that the radiant event would happen during this window of no current flow during switch closure.

So, if you have 10 feet of wire your rise and fall time would have to be around 1 100 millionth of a second.  I believe that's 10 nanoseconds.  The best MOSFET can barely do that.  So, you may want to try going to at least 20 feet of wire for your control coils and see what happens (the pulse width needs to be short).  You may start to see a more dramatic effect.

I whole heartedly agree that rotating fields from the control coils are likely key based on previous research. (though I'd expect it possible to do it without a rotating field)

I also think that we should take note of the fact that he either tuned his input to match the control coils, or tuned the control coils to match the input, based on the circumference of the control coils.

This seems to suggest that at least one of the control coils is an open coil (at both ends), free to resonate a bit like a Lakhovsky MWO, either that or oscillations take place within the coil treating the coil as if it's an odd dipole, the two ends being 180 degrees apart.

BTW I think i know how you can possibly significantly advance progress with this coil, and it's an odd one.

Power it from a dynamo rectified and smoothed, or a DC motor run backwards (working as a generator), I believe that there is more than electricity coming from these things, there are many examples but for instance look at the Kipper motor gen setup, I can tell you right away that the coil he uses alone won't do much.
http://www.phact.org/e/z/KipperScam_files/6900052Kipper_Tricks.htm

Look at Tesla, he also used high voltage DC generators to power his coils, no one gets the same results as him because no one uses these to power their coils (which aren't even designed correctly of course).

Look at Alexander, even EV Gray used an Alexander motor/generator!

If you don't want to do that then at least use a vacuum tube as Mark said, as that can help get some aether flowing in the circuit.


As for my photo's, I have taken them, but at the moment my PC is running on a (not totally legal Vista OS, so until I boot it into XP (which has the drivers for my camera) the photo's are stuck.

Hi,
One of the ideas I have held on to since I got here was counter rotation. With the right output material you could get xray from Mhz signals. You run 1 freq one way and a 2nd freq opposite direction. The opposing waves clash into each other causing a higher interference pattern. Something that cropped up was the bifilar feed back coil. we'll use ottos config and at the +v tie them together and see what happens at the other end of the 2nd run which is the position of the start of the first run. This gives the interference from the field opposition. Anyway that is one of the ways to hook up. JDO300 also suggested a 4" tpu made totally out of lamp cord. All bifilar. Cheap and fast. That also gives controllers made of magwire size runs. Instead of all those seperate windings. That would explain the fatness of SM4 & SM6 and outputs hooked directly to a 12awg outlet. The wire can handle the amps! 

--giantkiller.

I, for one, have wondered what would happen if I were to build three of E. Grey's "Splitting the positive" type spark gaps to use for switching the cntl windings of a TPU. The patent states that it is "suitable for inductive loads". Problem is right now........I don't have access to a bunker.................   

I've had a hard copy of Lindemann's book for about 4 or 5 years. Actually it's pretty beat and burned...................

TPU's and the Radient Event in progress.................

As always GK, very nice work.

 

Why so much current?  This is not an inductive coupling effect.  

No one here understands the radiant energy effect.  The only person that did - Turbo - was driven away.  

No wonder Bedini, Grey, Tasla, and the many others were so frustrated.  You can explain it 100 different ways and no one else can understand it.

Thank you, Sir.
Just thought I would pull up more attempts to make others git'r done!

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,1679.msg18317.html#msg18317
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,1761.msg22256.html#msg22256

I never saw that I would be hooking 2 TPUs together on the same circuit. The reason? Because I can!. The result? Who knows what I will find.

I say it doesn't matter how you get kicks! What are you going to do with them when you get them? That is the real solution!

My sister, who has no education in this area, understands the concept of radiant energy. She goes to the beach everyday and is awed of the waves crashing on the shore.
Surfs up, dudes! The water is great and the Sun is warm!

--giantkiller.

Here's a radiant oscillator that's triggered using a neon bulb.  It should trigger at about 65 volts.  You could probably adjust the voltage upward by adding a resistor in series with it.  Also, for the transistor substitute - Q1.  The BD234C substitute should be one with reasonably high gain from what I can see.  You may need to put in a trim pot and a lower value resistor in series with it and adjust the bias.

NOTE: schematic removed due to errors.

You may find D3.PDF by Patrick Kelly useful. It contains this circuit and a lo more.


AM