Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Lords of the Ring  (Read 940744 times)

aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1049
Re: Lords of the Ring
« Reply #60 on: January 07, 2007, 11:28:22 PM »
Radient energy detector from c0m????????????????????????????????????

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: Lords of the Ring
« Reply #61 on: January 07, 2007, 11:30:04 PM »
And for all those watching...

"One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them,
One Ring to bring them all and from the darkness free them."

--giantkiller.

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: Lords of the Ring
« Reply #62 on: January 07, 2007, 11:31:04 PM »
Radient energy detector from c0m????????????????????????????????????
yeah, he posted before in another thread. We just talked about the necessity of it due to the danger involved and the increased number of coils coming on board. I've seen preliminary tests and data gathering real time.
Comes right out of the patent office too.

--giantkiller. Keep up. 8)

aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1049
Re: Lords of the Ring
« Reply #63 on: January 08, 2007, 12:07:27 AM »
Searched, but I can't find the post you refer to, I'd loooooove a radiant energy detector.

gyulasun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4117
Re: Lords of the Ring
« Reply #64 on: January 08, 2007, 12:13:55 AM »

Mannix

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 564
Re: Lords of the Ring
« Reply #65 on: January 08, 2007, 12:44:22 AM »
Steven has said that using lampwire is much safer because, if harmonic perfection is reached,then the wire will just burn up....ending the units operation.

PLEASE  heed this and do not find out the hard way....

He also said that" you may not have time to get to your kill switch"..

Up untill now many people may not have taken those warnings in the context that they were given in.

As gk said ,this is the first step down a rickety path.

What he said about pure frequency may now be apparent for everybody finding "q".

GK, and all  I recomend a program called multisim 8.3.3.0 it will be useful in the long run
BTW I am not suggesting that people search for torrents!

be safe

Lindsay Mannix




Loki67671

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 277
Re: Lords of the Ring
« Reply #66 on: January 08, 2007, 12:49:09 AM »
I finished the control windings on my TPU_003. Feedback winding next. I still don't like the sloppy 555 R/C oscillators so I will be working on the AD9833 DDS waveform generators and pulse drivers. There are many ways to couple these waves into the TPU windings so I'll be working on some switching ckts also.  ;) ;)
Judging by the cautionary statements I have seen I believe I'll move slowly into the tuning of this critter. I used to get headaches all the time working in the TV and Microwave shop. Singing coils in the horizontal sections of a set will drive you bonkers. Radio shop work seems to make you sleepy. But both of these experiences tells me I can switch very repidly with Triodes. I'm ordering those soon.

Heat is not necessarily a bad thing! I'd sure like to disconnect the water heater from the gas line :D :D

Working toward computer synthesis and control of this device so I can place it in a safe place and still adjust and test it properly.......................................... :-X :-X

All........... Please remember that RF emission is a by product of this testing let alone the things we don't understand........................... ;D

aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1049
Re: Lords of the Ring
« Reply #67 on: January 08, 2007, 01:13:29 AM »
I am of the opinion that the energies from this device can be altered to be highly beneficial, they don't have to be harmful.

However I would add that a Dr. Hans Becker made a ring device, it was something along the lines of a Slim Spurling ring wrapped with a caduceus coil, it levitated and output gamma rays.

So anyone with a gieger counter might wanna test their ring out, I have a Geiger counter that should still work when I get my TPU running.


ps. So Lindsay, you're more of a usenet guy eh? ;) joking.


giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: Lords of the Ring
« Reply #68 on: January 08, 2007, 01:16:13 AM »
Well I just noticed something different in Otto's diag. compared to what I did. His collectors show a single turn and mine are 22 turn. Just a curious thing. I got results just the same. Not a show stopper. Go with we've designed already.

status?

--giantkiller.

Spherenot

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 90
Re: Lords of the Ring
« Reply #69 on: January 08, 2007, 01:18:25 AM »
Thoughts on Question Control & Information Management at Overunity

I was just reading starcruiser's  reply #54.  He mentions his copper-core TPU.  I wonder about the specific wire size and specification, and how many turns.

I want to ask a question but I feel that I should go back over EVERYTHING starcruiser has posted all over the various SM threads BEFORE I ask, spending my time to insure that I do not waste his time reposting the same data.

Others, I have noticed, do not take the same precaution.  I see GK posting the same answers to the same questions.  Getting a little old, GK?

So, I am wondering, what would be a better way.  Then I realized that we can edit our own posts.  Bingo!

I propose making the first post of any thread the common information source.

Now that GK has his own thread that he started, he has total control of the first post.  I propose that he edit his first post with FAQ answers and any new, or old, necessary attachments.

When starcruiser, or whomever finds the second ring, feels that he is ready for his own thread then he can do likewise.

It is an easy method requiring nothing from our moderator.  If anyone has a question then they will be expected to look at the one place, the first post, for the answer before asking the question, possibly again.

Just running it up the flagpole.  Salute it or shoot at it.  Just trying to help everyone out.  The inquisitive will have quicker access to basic replication data and the experts should have more time by not re-answering the same old questions.  If TPU waves make them unstable then the same questions asked time and time again could push them over the edge.  Nobody wants that.  ;)

Spherenot

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 90
Re: Lords of the Ring
« Reply #70 on: January 08, 2007, 01:22:20 AM »
Sorry, my geek.  :-[

This is my 42nd post here at overunity.com.
42: the answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe, and everything.   :D

Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy
Douglas Adams, R.I.P.  :'(

(I loved, Marvin, the paranoid android: "I think you ought to know I'm feeling very depressed.  Pardon me for breathing, which I never do any way so I don't know why I bother to say it, oh God, I'm so depressed.  Funny, how just when you think life can't possibly get any worse it suddenly does.  I'm not getting you down at all, am I?  Do you want me to sit in the corner and rust, or just fall apart where I'm standing?  Would you like me to go and stick my head in a bucket of water?"  Good stuff.)
« Last Edit: January 08, 2007, 04:58:04 AM by Spherenot »

IronHead

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 970
Re: Lords of the Ring
« Reply #71 on: January 08, 2007, 01:33:01 AM »
Yes, I to think organization is a good idea at this point .

**Good post Spherenot **

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: Lords of the Ring
« Reply #72 on: January 08, 2007, 02:06:52 AM »
Yes, I to think organization is a good idea at this point .

**Good post Spherenot **

I am on it.
I think I will just locate docos and just stick them in as I find them and organize the post as I go along and build like a web page.

Thanks.

Spherenot

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 90
Re: Lords of the Ring
« Reply #73 on: January 08, 2007, 02:33:54 AM »
...and organize the post as I go along and build like a web page.
"That's whatI'mtalkin'bout, Willis!" -D.S.

aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1049
Re: Lords of the Ring
« Reply #74 on: January 08, 2007, 03:26:43 AM »
GK, The thing is, with a 2.2uf cap which you reported you used, and 2x 200kohm pots, the pots both need to be set around the 1k level to get the frequencies you talk about, which must mean you have a hell of a time tuning these things in as the range of frequencies you report are all within the first .5%-.1% of the pot range.

So is it possible you caps are a different value? what type are they also.

And one of your caps you mentioned way 4.7uf (or 4 something) which makes it even worse.

EDIT: 2.2 nf would fit rather well.
EDIT2: Oops, no it's minimum freq would be about 1khz, 22nf would be fine though.
« Last Edit: January 08, 2007, 04:55:03 AM by aether22 »