Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Gravity powered devices => Gravity powered devices => Topic started by: iacob alex on January 04, 2007, 01:01:12 AM

Title: Wheel vs. spoke...
Post by: iacob alex on January 04, 2007, 01:01:12 AM
...is like a cake face to face,a piece of it.If we know a part of the pancake,we know the fully realized.A gravity engine,in a wheel concept(many alike spokes) is defined by a single spoke.This way,if we are interested to imagine, in the beginning ,then build a gravity power collector as a wheel,the first question is regardful to a single spoke.It can be,nothing more,than an arm and a mass in a "someway" motion.The only and the last question,is about this "someway" motion.Now,we can join ,this little issue:a switching mass at the end of a supporting arm.The last step-problem:how can we determine this mass to make a self-switching motion ,on the arm?At this time,we can talk,imagine,or what you need,about the one only "knotty point" of a possible gravity engine("wheel" as you like to dream up):the self motion of a working mass face to gravity and inertia...But,be carefully;the more we dream,the less we believe.A dream must be tempered with reality.Garage people know more about it.All the Bests!/Alex
Title: Imagine it big...
Post by: iacob alex on January 09, 2007, 11:33:04 PM
   Thinking in a black box style,can be a provocative,stimulative and short manner to dream up about the unknown.
   This time,in the line with the topic,the black box is supposed to 'hide"  inside, a "wheel" ,or something like this.
   We know the input and the output of the black box.
   The input is the gravity,the output is hoped for a working torque.
   How  about the "wheel"?
   Here,it's  a full place for fancy,guess,suppositions...as this place and topic is intended to be.
   My opinion ,is to think big about this  "wheel".
   My  first suggestion is to imagine it,as a big-size radius mechanism,machine(as a Ferris Wheel,or better as that buildt by Aldo Costa).
   My  second suggestion is to make a big "cut" in the design:we need two spokes ,only.
   The next step is a big change in the concept:we  are  dealing not with a wheel,but with a lever(if you like more a wheel image,you can call,name this lever as a  "minimal" wheel).
   One more step,is to add,couple this one with a mechanically store-restore power system(let's say a flywheel,a pulsatory flywheel).
   The  last but one proposition, is to bring about the self switching long arm-short arm  configuration,on the same side of the fulcrum/pivot ,with the help of an incline .
   And finally,the last invitation is to leave you, unaccompanied to think about.
   So,if I completed my description in some words,I hope you can understand it,someway.
                               All  the Bests! / Alex
Title: Re: Imagine it big...
Post by: iacob alex on December 26, 2017, 08:52:45 AM
.....let's say , as : http://alphaplanets.com
     Al_ex
Title: Re: Imagine it big...
Post by: sm0ky2 on December 26, 2017, 12:19:54 PM
.....let's say , as : http://alphaplanets.com (http://alphaplanets.com)
     Al_ex


They claim over 3000% efficiency
They state the device is up to 97% efficient


Which is it?
Title: Re: Wheel vs. spoke...
Post by: vince on December 26, 2017, 07:08:32 PM
https://youtu.be/HQKEQB-IoeM


Wonder if it‘s the same guy? Several patents out there on the concept.
Title: Re: Wheel vs. spoke...
Post by: vince on December 26, 2017, 07:12:19 PM
edit.