Author Topic: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM (Read 82272 times)

AlienGrey · « **Reply #105 on:** October 23, 2021, 12:45:31 AM »

Yeah and you belive NASA 'It's a military JUNTA' and that's the only truth, and it lies all the time and feeds us all with what it wants us to know and thats fact.

How about we live on a water planet that has a thin shell of rock with holes at the South and north poles.

Sil

ramset · « **Reply #106 on:** October 23, 2021, 12:05:29 PM »

Well
That is Admiral Byrd and operation High jump in 1947 ?

Forrestal too ..

Funny how things like that are ..... ?
Stepped around ?

Confusing to say the least !

One thing is certain, we gain knowledge at speeds
never experienced by any society that has walked this planet ... and lived to talk about it!

Billions of minds connected to hand held super computers...connected and interacting....
but somehow detached from each other ?

I have to say AG ( or son of )

That 1947 Operation high jump “episode “
Is one of those itches

You just can’t quite scratch??

Maybe the billions of very recently connected minds ..... will ?

onepower · « **Reply #107 on:** October 24, 2021, 07:07:21 PM »

Ramset

The tides are turning and more free energy inventors and working devices are showing up as we speak. In my opinion it's almost reached critical mass and will go mainstream soon. Even UFO's have gone mainstream and we have passed the denial stage. As they say, necessity is the mother of invention, and the need to make progress is great.

The greater majority also believe climate change is a very real problem and only a small lunatic fringe still don't which is good news. In Canada nobody denies climate change anymore because they know it makes them look foolish and uninformed. With global heat waves, drought, flooding, crop failures and wildfires it's become impossible to deny.

Public flights into outer space will also become normal soon. Many of the critics don't like this because it reveals the truth that we actually live on a relatively small chunk of rock and water hurtling through space. It reveals the fact we have limited resources and land in which case unlimited growth is suicidal. The notion of limited resources/land then leads to thoughts about conserving what we have and protecting it. Have you noticed the trend that as more people talk about leaving Earth many are now saying we need to protect it?. That's a good sign...

Outer space is the ultimate freedom where no Earthly laws or beliefs apply and many see this freedom as dangerous to there interests. Space opens up endless possibilities but many don't want people thinking about other possibilities and freedom. We were in a bad place the last couple of years but I can feel the trend shifting towards real progress. If there is a will there is a way and I think were finally moving in the right direction...

Regards
AC

onepower · « **Reply #108 on:** November 02, 2021, 05:10:40 PM »

The COP 26 fiasco is in full swing...

All the world leaders agree global warming is much worse than expected and we could be screwed. They also seem to agree that most of mankind is completely clueless and have no solutions to the problems we created.

Meanwhile China, Russia and Brazil didn't even bother to show up. It didn't matter because there still living in the dark ages and have nothing to offer anyways. It's like calling a plumber to figure out a complex networking issue and it's basically pointless.

Apparently everyone is a rocket scientist but they just can't seem to do anything that actually matters in reality. I mean if everyone was even remotely as smart as they think they are then we wouldn't even have all these problems... yet here we are.

What a cluster!@#$, lol.

Regards
AC

bolt · « **Reply #109 on:** November 07, 2021, 03:14:58 AM »

There is a huge difference between climate change and pollution. 95% of climate change is due to changes effecting the entire solar system. Every planet in our solar system is undergoing massive changes over the last 100 years and clearly its not man made. Much of our weather is due to what is happening in space weather and how the earth is effected as a result. For example ONE volcano can chuck out more shit in a week than 10 years worth of man made pollution but no ones mentions that. Maybe they should tax volcanoes instead.

Now of course localised pollution from thousands of factories pumping out crap is another problem and should be dealt with accordingly. BUT they should NOT be forcing the average person to pay the price thru increased fuel prices and restrictions as a result. The idea of a carbon footprint is in itself a huge money making scam. Forcing electric cars en-mass will not solve any problems they are so incredibly short sighted. There not even enough raw materials to make the electric motors let alone the charging infrastructure in any country to find additional hundreds of Giga watts of power.

Its very naive to look at global temperatures and point the figure claiming its all OUR fault.

solotraveler · « **Reply #110 on:** November 07, 2021, 03:28:42 AM »

Hi
This forum has a lot of participants with plenty of knowledge about today's technologies.
I would like to go through and see what went wrong in the beginning and why are we still building very clumsy electrical equipment, when today we know so much more about electricity and nature. We definitely need to put some of the ideas into solutions for power generation, where we have the biggest crisis for humanity. Solar and wind are not working efficiently and the reason is - we are still going forward with the same thinking. I am open to discussion, about some of my own ideas that I have been working on for quite a while, to those that are interested.
Best Regards

Floor · « **Reply #111 on:** November 07, 2021, 03:40:21 AM »

anthropogenic sourced pollution and volcanic sourced pollution

"Volcanic derived pollution has major detrimental impacts on the earth ; the atmosphere, human/animal health, marine ecosystems, and vegetation are all equally impacted by volcanic pollution. Volcanic pollution, although not as prevent as anthropogenic sourced pollution, does have international impacts. Volcanism should not be ignored in terms of pollution; as mentioned before one volcanic eruption has the opportunity to outgas as much carbon dioxide in one day than 250 years of anthropogenic activity (Primer, 2010). Due to the fact that on average only between 50 and 60 volcanoes erupt each year, there is not nearly an adequate amount of volcanic activity to equal or to surpass the amount of anthropogenic sourced pollution (USGS, 2009). Even supervolcnoes, that have had only 8 eruption within the span of millions of years, do not have enough frequency to equalize with anthropogenic source pollution (USGS, 2014). On the occasions were volcanoes do erupt, however, aerosols and other polluting gases are dispersed quickly and expansively. The United States Geological Survey along with many other international environmental organizations recognizes the domestic and international hazards that can originate from volcanism; these organizations continually observe and analyze volcanic activity in order to minimize risk that comes with unawareness."

https://intlpollution.commons.gc.cuny.edu/volcanic-pollution/

onepower · « **Reply #112 on:** November 07, 2021, 06:49:14 AM »

Bolt

Quote

Now of course localised pollution from thousands of factories pumping out crap is another problem and should be dealt with accordingly. BUT they should NOT be forcing the average person to pay the price thru increased fuel prices and restrictions as a result. The idea of a carbon footprint is in itself a huge money making scam. Forcing electric cars en-mass will not solve any problems they are so incredibly short sighted. There not even enough raw materials to make the electric motors let alone the charging infrastructure in any country to find additional hundreds of Giga watts of power.

It is a scam and the oil industry knew about global warming 50 years ago and also predicted peak oil around 2040. This was the oil industries own internal emails not some politicians. You ain't seen nothing yet and here in Alberta there talking about $200 a barrel oil by the end of next year. You see the demand for oil was already starting to spike as the population and industry grew and the only thing keeping it in check was the global pandemic.

Your going to be seeing oil, gasoline/diesel and natural gas triple in price over the next year as the market corrects itself. So a small carbon tax is a joke compared to the killing the oil companies intend to make.

I'm not sure why everyone is whining about electric vehicles and I don't care what they think. I bought a hybrid SUV and it's awesome and my next vehicle will be 100% electric. I'm not going to pay someone $200 to fill my SUV with gas when I can charge an EV for $20. Not to mention the fact an average EV can blow the door off most gas powered jalopies. In fact EV's are destroying the gas powered competition in car racing and breaking all kinds of records. So your definitely on the wrong side of history if you think some gas guzzling piece of crap running at 20% efficiency is the future.

Regards
AC

AlienGrey · « **Reply #113 on:** November 07, 2021, 07:15:01 AM »

.This might be of interest >>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6WQTj15jt0

Sil

bolt · « **Reply #114 on:** November 07, 2021, 08:16:39 AM »

I am not against electric cars its the charging that is the issue. Yes the range is improving and the batteries are better now than just a couple of years ago. Right now i use about 5kwh per day in my house. If i buy an electric car this is going to surge to like 50kwh per day. Then my wife will charge hers too now we are up to 100kwh per day?

What country anywhere can cope with this demand? The cables and transformers cant handle it and there is no power generation capabilty to provide this amount of power. Over the last couple of decades we have been using less and less power thru energy effecient TV's, LED lights, low power PC's etc. This has offset the need to upgrade the infrastructure and build more nuke plants but instead it only just copes with very little overhead margin.

Potentially we are looking at a 20X increase for every household. Currently we only have about 2% of the charging points required to provide on the road top ups. As i mentioned before there isnt enough raw materials on earth to make the electric motors.

There is only ONE mainstream solution .....depopulation. Its the one Bill Gates and others are rolling out now.

ramset · « **Reply #115 on:** November 07, 2021, 01:23:35 PM »

Resources/recycling...new technologies !!
Populations working with basic unaltered resources for centuries

Yes not good

Add new technologies ( FE energy sources)
And there is no limit to how we can improve, point of use energy production/harvesting ....etc etc

Crowded planet ..? ...?
I believe even China has great disparity in population density ( not empty ... however you would not know it from 80% of country ?
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.RUR.TOTL.ZS?locations=CN

ENTIRE PLANET is this way ...plus 1500’s mentality ( limited mindset do to resources ( no FE mindset

FE will give ability to change arid region to Eden , harvest water from atmosphere (they say moisture laden cloud cover is an issue for warming ...
ocean’s and water problems...etc

It is endless... and even underwater or polar regions could be managed habitat with FE !

We can do much better than 1500’s mentality ( burnit waste it etc etc

Even a method to bring hydrogen back into the ICE
Very first car ever produced..hydrogen

It is endless ( our potential for change and becoming good stewards of our planet
And our children’s future.

It’s why we have all this stuff ( swimming in a sea of energy... and we have done .... what ??

Now start killing off people to maintain nice status quo ?

Yeesh

We Can do better than this !!

We need FE !!

Respectfully
Chet K

onepower · « **Reply #116 on:** November 07, 2021, 02:53:28 PM »

Bolt

Quote

I am not against electric cars its the charging that is the issue. Yes the range is improving and the batteries are better now than just a couple of years ago. Right now i use about 5kwh per day in my house. If i buy an electric car this is going to surge to like 50kwh per day. Then my wife will charge hers too now we are up to 100kwh per day?

It seems like more but in fact it's much less...ENERGY.

It's all about efficiency and the EV is to LED lights what the combustion engine is to incandescent bulbs. EV's and LED's use much less energy because they don't waste 80% of it as heat. Why do people buy LED lights?... because there much more efficient and cheaper to operate just like EV's.

Quote

What country anywhere can cope with this demand? The cables and transformers cant handle it and there is no power generation capabilty to provide this amount of power. Over the last couple of decades we have been using less and less power thru energy effecient TV's, LED lights, low power PC's etc. This has offset the need to upgrade the infrastructure and build more nuke plants but instead it only just copes with very little overhead margin.

You may want to read the news and here in Alberta, Canada we just built the largest solar plant in the world. We have also ungraded regional grids and started building a very high voltage super grid across the country. Its crazy how many new solar plants and wind farms are being built and soon they will employ more people than the fossil fuel industry. Canadians love clean energy and we deregulated the power industry to accelerate the adoption of new technology unlike many other countries. 80% of all our electricity already comes from hydro so we only have 20% left to convert which is nice.

Quote

Potentially we are looking at a 20X increase for every household. Currently we only have about 2% of the charging points required to provide on the road top ups. As i mentioned before there isnt enough raw materials on earth to make the electric motors.

The fact is ICE's are 20% efficient and EV's 80%...
So a 20 X increase in electrical use correlates to an 80 X drop in fossil fuels for transportation. This is true for the same reasons LED bulbs are 80% more efficient than incandescent bulbs. On raw materials, where do you think all the materials came from to build all the cars and trucks today?. So we can build countless gas guzzlers but we will mysteriously run out of materials to build EV's, lol.

You also seem to forget were in a FREE ENERGY forum and we all know free energy technology is just around the corner. In fact I heard next year FE is going public and the grid and storage will no longer be an issue. You do believe in FE technology don't you?... so what's the problem?.

Regards
AC

NickZ · « **Reply #117 on:** November 07, 2021, 03:34:00 PM »

I believe in FE. But, not from the present administrations. I also believe in electric cars, and everything else electric, but not by the use of batteries, as their source. However, it does not matter what you or I may think. Now does it? That is the problem. And, FE next year. Keep dreaming. There is still lots and lots of crude oil left. And they keep finding more and more. Isn't that great?
So, for now, I will stick with the cheapest way to go, which is not electric. Especially where I live. Even though there is a charging station, just a 1/4 mile away. And it may be a long while before electric is really cost effective, as it's use and charging is still controlled by the power companies to fill up those aging batteries. Or spend several thousands more, to buy solar panels. Great choice...
NickZ
PS. I do agree that we need to do something about the crowded cities, and pollution, etc. The governments in control should not allow those densities. Or we'll end up worse than communist China. You know how much they care about you and your health, and well being. About as much as Biden does.

onepower · « **Reply #118 on:** November 07, 2021, 05:15:57 PM »

NickZ

Quote

I believe in FE. But, not from the present administrations. I also believe in electric cars, and everything else electric, but not by the use of batteries, as their source. However, it does not matter what you or I may think. Now does it? That is the problem. And, FE next year. Keep dreaming. There is still lots and lots of crude oil left. And they keep finding more and more. Isn't that great?

So you believe in FE but it's political, you believe in EV's but won't buy one, you don't like pollution but think it's great we have so much oil to burn and it doesn't matter what we think?.
That quite a contradiction in terms and seems really confusing...

My thinking is easy to understand, I'm going to buy an EV because it's more efficient, cleaner, less maintenance and cheaper to operate.

As a bonus I can plug the EV into my house for back up power and use the storage to offset peak electrical rates. Charge the EV at the lowest grid rate then use the power when the rate is at the highest. It's a win, win, win situation in my opinion and when the battery pack needs to be replaced I will use it as solar storage so that's another win.

Then when FE goes mainstream next year I can build a FE generator to power my house and charge the old EV storage battery to charge my new EV which is yet another win. It's going to be awesome and I can't wait to go off grid.

P.S. -- I don't care what China or any other government is doing, not my problem.

Regards
AC

bistander · « **Reply #119 on:** November 08, 2021, 06:08:53 AM »

Quote from: bolt on November 07, 2021, 08:16:39 AM

I am not against electric cars its the charging that is the issue. Yes the range is improving and the batteries are better now than just a couple of years ago. Right now i use about 5kwh per day in my house. If i buy an electric car this is going to surge to like 50kwh per day. Then my wife will charge hers too now we are up to 100kwh per day?
...
Potentially we are looking at a 20X increase for every household. Currently we only have about 2% of the charging points required to provide on the road top ups. As i mentioned before there isnt enough raw materials on earth to make the electric motors.
...

Hi bolt,

You exaggerate. Easy to find EV estimates of 30 to 40 miles per 10kwhr. I doubt the average household will have EVs totalling 200,000 to 300,000 miles per year. We shared an EV in our household for 5 years and averaged 10,000 miles/yr. I recall about $30 increase electric utility monthly bill. Certainly less cost than gasoline and enjoyed overnight charging in garage. Charging connection took less than one minute, typically just a few seconds. Of course peoples' experience will vary.

Having spent decades in the electric machinery manufacturing industry I really feel your last statement is way off base. Except for possible rare Earth's, which are not critical, there are plenty of raw materials and capacity to meet any foreseeable electric motor demand.

Charging infrastructure is actually pretty easy in my opinion. It will be more appealing and safer than gasoline distribution.

Regards,
bi

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM (Read 82272 times)

AlienGrey

Re: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM

ramset

Re: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM

onepower

Re: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM

onepower

Re: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM

bolt

Re: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM

solotraveler

Re: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM

Floor

Re: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM

onepower

Re: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM

AlienGrey

Re: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM

bolt

Re: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM

ramset

Re: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM

onepower

Re: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM

NickZ

Re: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM

onepower

Re: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM

bistander

Re: Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM