Partzman,
Please note that in CL's videos (5 & 7, I believe), CL has a blue post-it
with the schematic as EMJ has posted and as you have copied above.
However, in those same videos, CL has redrawn the schematic several
times in his note book with the L2 dot to the left of the coil (all dots to
the left of all three coils).
Perhaps CL will confirm which schematic/convention he adhered
to in his videos...
PW
PW,
Yes, and in CL's video #9, I see a schematic that has L2 one way and L3 the other way? So, the important thing is that Chris says the two POCs that is L2 and L3 conduct during the charging phase of L1 in which case his schematic is correct. The key then as I understand it is, L1 and L2 must be creating bucking flux in the core at the same time and the result will be that as the load is being driven, the energy returned to the supply during the collapse of L1 will be greater than the charging energy. If this were true, his device would have infinite OU.
I've attached his response to my post below-
Pm
Partzman,
If I were you, I would stop trying to correct, and follow the basic layout!
Each Partnered Output Coil carry's a Current due to Electromagnetic Induction, each is the others Primary Coil - So claiming I am incorrect is Wrong! You need to follow basic well known rules here!
Study Carefully:
Quote from: Floyd Sparky Sweet link="
http://www.hyiq.org/Downloads/Nothing%20is%20Something.pdf"
"The principle of superposition states that; "In order to calculate the resultant intensity of superimposed fields, each field must be dealt with individually as though the other were not present". The resultant is obtained by vector addition of each field considered singularly. Consider for a moment the construction of the triode which includes the bifilar coils located within the fields of the two conditioned magnets.
When the current in one half of the conductors in the coils (i.e., one of the bifilar elements in each coil) of the device is moving up, both the current and the magnetic field follow the right-hand rule.
The resultant motional E-field would be vertical to both and inwardly directed.
At the same time the current in the other half of the conductors in the coils is moving down and both the current and magnetic field follow the right-hand rule.
The resulting motional E-field is again vertical to both and inwardly directed.
Thus, the resultant field intensity is double the intensity attributable to either one of the set of coil conductors taken singularly.
Expressed mathematically:
E = ( B x V ) + ( -B x -V ) = 2 ( B x V )"
Now, Study Carefully:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsKoAu_X25A Quote from: EMJunkie on Today at 12:36:55 AM
My Diagram is correct, change it, it wont work! Period!
Each Coil has a Magnetic Field Changing in Time, this is directly related to the Changing Current! di/dt, you all should know this already!
Electromagnetic Induction can occur more than once in a Single Machine! That's why This statement was made:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oa4nUEsBer8 If your Partnered Output Coils do not Oppose, you have it wrong! Period!
Again I define Magnetic Resonance: Each Current, in each Partnered Output Coil, is 180 Degrees out of Phase - Simple! Antenna Theory is the same basic Rules!
You must stop trying to change things! It will not work if you change things! This is so Simple! Yet so easy to balls it up! Only if you don't follow the basic, simple, straight forward Rules already laid out!
Shown below, when you have this all correct, the Input Power sent back to your Power Supply, can be greater than the Input Power Sent to the Coil! Input can become Negative!
I am not posting on overunityresearch, I don't like that forum! I only post on My Forum and sometimes here.