Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here: https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

Custom Search

### Author Topic: Allan's Transformer as a Generator  (Read 26118 times)

#### AllanV

• Jr. Member
• Posts: 54
##### Allan's Transformer as a Generator
« on: August 26, 2020, 06:35:03 AM »
Hi,
This could be off topic but the idea is that to make gains it is sometimes necessary to rehash some information.
Usually it is best to stand back and not get involved but over the years many individuals tend to follow others down the rabbit hole and come up with nothing. Most can't get simple things right and then they take on the impossible FE dream. (for them)

Over unity of 10 watts is easily achieved but from testing and experimenting a gain of at least 2000x is possible. The correct and most simple method is the challenge.

What can be done with 10watts?

The idea is to produce greater power in two circuits by separately generating a much increased flux in the core.
This will reduce turns and the devices footprint and require minimal circuitry. Set up cost is small.

The magnetism that links two separate circuits, an input and an output, is insignificantly small and so is the power to make it.
Some technical information on transformers reads that the flux in the core depends on the voltage applied to the windings, the frequency but not the current the transformer is delivering.

In a transformer - Pressure (voltage) and rate of change (frequency) produces the flux.

In a generator acting on one winding it is the rate of change and the strength of the field. There is a lot of opposition.

In a two winding situation it would be applying more AT in one winding in a 1/4 cycle and then more AT in the other in the next 1/4 cycle. This produces large currents which when increasing diminish magnetism and decreasing makes the flux. The flux is present with almost no current.

The transformer core is NOT involved in limiting the power delivered. Heat in the winding and voltage drop is the limiting factor.
This is written by technical people who make and build equipment but not necessarily FE advocates.

A method has been developed to get more magnetism into the core with very little opposing voltage. From some testing and experimentation and understanding transformer action it is possible. Doing this does not involve the power in the input or output.

When a short or overload occurs on the secondary winding an installed fuse will blow, but not always. The huge increase in the magnetic field and the resulting voltage spike can damage equipment.
A transformer can have a gap up to 1mm with a strong magnetic field present is inefficient and produces less output.

The difference is the short produces magnetism that occurs from two currents slightly out of phase while flowing in opposite directions. The output current is lagging as a driven circuit, slightly more than usual. The extra flux produced is taking minimal power from the circuits. Also the output in a usual condition dampens the magnetic field, regulating and allowing more input current.

The transformer operates something like a car differential and the pinion movement indicates magnetism. If the wheels move together in the same direction the pinion spins and when they are opposite and equal the pinion is stationary. Anything in between, one wheel turning faster than it should at that moment in time will turn the pinion by some amount.

When two currents flow in the same direction they add together to make a large field and there is the most opposition and saturation can occur. By setting up the condition of a bias to produce more amp turns in one winding than the other as the currents go in opposite directions it is possible to use voltage to force more current to produce flux in the core. Therefore not by getting the currents more out of phase but rather using AT more magnetism is produced.

There is a tendency to overdo the amount required.

The problem that exists is that with a strong field very few heavy turns are required for power.  A resonant filter smooths the AC but at 50 hertz this is cumbersome with few turns.
« Last Edit: August 27, 2020, 01:25:02 AM by EMJunkie »

#### AllanV

• Jr. Member
• Posts: 54
##### Re: Alan's Transformer as a Generator
« Reply #1 on: August 27, 2020, 05:45:05 AM »
The following drawings show a simple layout

#### onepower

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1116
##### Re: Alan's Transformer as a Generator
« Reply #2 on: August 27, 2020, 08:09:34 AM »
AllenV
Quote
Over unity of 10 watts is easily achieved but from testing and experimenting a gain of at least 2000x is possible. The correct and most simple method is the challenge. What can be done with 10watts?

Ah, a newcomer, welcome. Few here have a clue what your talking about but some do so it's cool.

Quote
The idea is to produce greater power in two circuits by separately generating a much increased flux in the core.
This will reduce turns and the devices footprint and require minimal circuitry. Set up cost is small.

It stands to reason that an increase in flux, the magnitude of the magnetic field change increases the power transferred between two circuit elements however we cannot create something from nothing only use what is present. Begging the question what is present?.

Quote
The magnetism that links two separate circuits, an input and an output, is insignificantly small and so is the power to make it.
Some technical information on transformers reads that the flux in the core depends on the voltage applied to the windings, the frequency but not the current the transformer is delivering.

The magnetism that links the two circuits is normally proportional to only the current input which produces the magnetic field change which induces the secondary. This is true because the input voltage(electrical pressure) is what drives the current (the flow of electrons) which produces the field change. Frequency is simply a change in the flow of current dependent on the applied electrical pressure not something in itself but a result of something.

Quote
In a transformer - Pressure (voltage) and rate of change (frequency) produces the flux.

Yes, however it is the pressure (voltage or difference in potential) which causes a current (the flow of electrons) and both produce a change at a specific rate we call the frequency. The frequency does not produce a magnetic field or flux the current does due to the applied differential pressure or voltage.

Quote
In a generator acting on one winding it is the rate of change and the strength of the field. There is a lot of opposition.

Agreed, the opposition is Lenz Law and it is dependent on the "magnitude of change" encompassing both the rate and magnitude of change as both represent a change in something present. Here we should understand the totality of it, any change in any element effects every other thing thus there is a dependency in some respects.

Quote
In a two winding situation it would be applying more AT in one winding in a 1/4 cycle and then more AT in the other in the next 1/4 cycle. This produces large currents which when increasing diminish magnetism and decreasing makes the flux. The flux is present with almost no current.

Not normally, the magnetism is dependent on the current, which is dependent on the applied electrical pressure which produced the current. The cycle is simply a graphical or numerical representation of where the pressure and flow are dictating where the field strength is at any given moment. We must first understand cause to then understand effect. We should not be attributing virtues to an effect in itself without understanding the cause first and foremost.

Quote
The transformer core is NOT involved in limiting the power delivered. Heat in the winding and voltage drop is the limiting factor.
This is written by technical people who make and build equipment but not necessarily FE advocates.

Agreed, however do you know what really intrigued me?. I could not seem to understand the concept of a voltage drop. Why a drop, for what reason, what is the mechanism, why does it occur?. It was only when I understood why it dropped that I also began to understand the conditions in which is could rise. One of those Eureka moments...

Quote
A method has been developed to get more magnetism into the core with very little opposing voltage. From some testing and experimentation and understanding transformer action it is possible. Doing this does not involve the power in the input or output.

Agreed, it's not the input nor output but what happens in between the two.

Quote
When a short or overload occurs on the secondary winding an installed fuse will blow, but not always. The huge increase in the magnetic field and the resulting voltage spike can damage equipment.
A transformer can have a gap up to 1mm with a strong magnetic field present is inefficient and produces less output.

Agreed to some extent, the gap in the core or an open core which I prefer opens the field and can cause inefficiency. However by opening the field it also opens up other possibilities such as induction of multiple circuit elements. When we close the core we close the number of possibilities to induce other elements do we not?.

Quote
The difference is the short produces magnetism that occurs from two currents slightly out of phase while flowing in opposite directions. The output current is lagging as a driven circuit, slightly more than usual. The extra flux produced is taking minimal power from the circuits. Also the output in a usual condition dampens the magnetic field, regulating and allowing more input current.

Ah, the input/output field dilemma, been there done that. The best lesson I ever learned in this respect was from Faraday's lectures and we should understand the magnetic field is a product or result of something, it is finite. We input X energy and the result is X change as a field change. There is no getting around it otherwise were creating something from nothing which was never present. Pick your fight, the result is always after the fact and what your looking for is the cause.

Quote
The transformer operates something like a car differential and the pinion movement indicates magnetism. If the wheels move together in the same direction the pinion spins and when they are opposite and equal the pinion is stationary. Anything in between, one wheel turning faster than it should at that moment in time will turn the pinion by some amount.

Actually you have it backwards and I have rebuilt/fixed more than a few rear ends sometimes at 3am, at -25 C in the middle of a blizzard... long story. The pinion is the driver off the drive shaft which turns the ring gear, attached to the ring gear is the spider gears which only turn when there is a difference in rotation between the axles. So no Electro-Magnetism is nothing like a differential and that's a very bad analogy.

Quote
When two currents flow in the same direction they add together to make a large field and there is the most opposition and saturation can occur. By setting up the condition of a bias to produce more amp turns in one winding than the other as the currents go in opposite directions it is possible to use voltage to force more current to produce flux in the core. Therefore not by getting the currents more out of phase but rather using AT more magnetism is produced.

Hmm, agreed I think. Now your finally getting into the crux of this matter and I suspect most have no idea what your seeing. It generally starts as a discrepancy, looking at the the big picture and thinking this doesn't add up. You have this image of something but the pieces are fragmented and your not sure how they fit together yet. I'm not exactly sure why it happens in some people and not others. Some are always imagining the future and some are stuck in the past I suppose.

Quote
There is a tendency to overdo the amount required.
The problem that exists is that with a strong field very few heavy turns are required for power.  A resonant filter smooths the AC but at 50 hertz this is cumbersome with few turns.

So far as I can figure, some in the past did this with basically no turns and with great induced power. Which begs the question what kind of induction they were using, what is the true cause, to what end?. It would seem we have many questions and few answers.

Regards

#### AllanV

• Jr. Member
• Posts: 54
##### Re: Alan's Transformer as a Generator
« Reply #3 on: August 27, 2020, 11:59:44 PM »
AllenV
Ah, a newcomer, welcome. Few here have a clue what your talking about but some do so it's cool.

It stands to reason that an increase in flux, the magnitude of the magnetic field change increases the power transferred between two circuit elements however we cannot create something from nothing only use what is present. Begging the question what is present?.

The magnetism that links the two circuits is normally proportional to only the current input which produces the magnetic field change which induces the secondary. This is true because the input voltage(electrical pressure) is what drives the current (the flow of electrons) which produces the field change. Frequency is simply a change in the flow of current dependent on the applied electrical pressure not something in itself but a result of something.

Not normally, the magnetism is dependent on the current, which is dependent on the applied electrical pressure which produced the current. The cycle is simply a graphical or numerical representation of where the pressure and flow are dictating where the field strength is at any given moment. We must first understand cause to then understand effect. We should not be attributing virtues to an effect in itself without understanding the cause first and foremost.

Agreed, however do you know what really intrigued me?. I could not seem to understand the concept of a voltage drop. Why a drop, for what reason, what is the mechanism, why does it occur?. It was only when I understood why it dropped that I also began to understand the conditions in which is could rise. One of those Eureka moments...

Agreed, it's not the input nor output but what happens in between the two.

Ah, the input/output field dilemma, been there done that. The best lesson I ever learned in this respect was from Faraday's lectures and we should understand the magnetic field is a product or result of something, it is finite. We input X energy and the result is X change as a field change. There is no getting around it otherwise were creating something from nothing which was never present. Pick your fight, the result is always after the fact and what your looking for is the cause.

Actually you have it backwards and I have rebuilt/fixed more than a few rear ends sometimes at 3am, at -25 C in the middle of a blizzard... long story. The pinion is the driver off the drive shaft which turns the ring gear, attached to the ring gear is the spider gears which only turn when there is a difference in rotation between the axles. So no Electro-Magnetism is nothing like a differential and that's a very bad analogy.

Hmm, agreed I think. Now your finally getting into the crux of this matter and I suspect most have no idea what your seeing. It generally starts as a discrepancy, looking at the the big picture and thinking this doesn't add up. You have this image of something but the pieces are fragmented and your not sure how they fit together yet. I'm not exactly sure why it happens in some people and not others. Some are always imagining the future and some are stuck in the past I suppose.

So far as I can figure, some in the past did this with basically no turns and with great induced power. Which begs the question what kind of induction they were using, what is the true cause, to what end?. It would seem we have many questions and few answers.

Regards

Hi, thanks for the reply.

Many go after free energy and if it is possible the best way to generate power is in a transformer action. The transformer is reasonably good and the larger devices can be up to 99% evidently. 1kw losses in 100Kw.

A diagram in a Motorola switch mode power supply book showed the set up to test for saturation. Through experimenting it was realized a transformer was operated just slightly above the residual field that exists with no current at all. When DC was alternated by hand on the primary winding of a transformer, the analogue meter pointer deflection on the secondary was good. If DC of the same direction was pulsed there was a very small deflection.
The transition by the residual field from one polarity to the other was the best for output and is how a transformer operates.

But the residual field is creating the opposition with the opposing current on top of it as well. Much more voltage and a much larger device is used than is actually necessary. The sine wave is a modulating effect and produces a tiny magnetic field that draws large currents, and this effect can be used in another way altogether.

Electric motors are the same. By modulating the magnetic flux they are designed to draw as much current as possible from a generator. Obviously this is so the power can be metered and billed.

By testing an 80 watt transformer it was determined that only 0.9volt DC and 0.035A (80W/0.032W= 1/2500) was required to make the magnetic field.

The Motorola test showed that the actual saturation was occurring at such a low point on the graph to be almost nothing.

The question then was how to get passed the sticking point where magnetism will not exceed an amount determined by the core.

Why is it impossible to get magnetism into the core as fast as it collapses and is removed?

First: A gap or open core will help to break the residual field.

Second: Two winding currents interacting together can immediately strongly magnetize the core and as quickly as it is removed.

Third: There is a sticking point that once passed allows all the current in one winding to appear directly as magnetism in the core.

Four: There is a practical limit only.

I think the differential analogy is very good. Just forget about it being in a vehicle. If a a couple of novices with a little intelligence, lifted the vehicles drive wheels off the ground, with a transformer winding drawing in front of them and some arrows, they should figure it out.

MY Quote
In a two winding situation it would be applying more AT in one winding in a 1/4 cycle and then more AT in the other in the next 1/4 cycle. This produces large currents which when increasing diminish magnetism and decreasing makes the flux. The flux is present with almost no current.
End Quote

"Not normally, the magnetism is dependent on the current, which is dependent on the applied electrical pressure which produced the current. The cycle is simply a graphical or numerical representation of where the pressure and flow are dictating where the field strength is at any given moment. We must first understand cause to then understand effect. We should not be attributing virtues to an effect in itself without understanding the cause first and foremost."

When current is maximum in a transformer there is no magnetism because there are two windings of equal and opposite AT and they cancel out. Some experimenting with an 80watt transformer shows that 1/2500th of the power is in the mag field. The small current needed is greatest at maximum voltage where for one tiny instant the currents add together before they both change direction for the next half cycle. Conditions change every quarter cycle.
By vectors magnetizing current makes a small to no difference on the power circuit.

The text books give the wrong impression and when younger I could pick up mistakes in them. The different authors were copying each other almost word for word. They were not doing or not understanding the experiments and it was theoretical only.

I appreciate your feed back. It focuses my thinking.

Thanks, regards,

Allan

#### onepower

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1116
##### Re: Alan's Transformer as a Generator
« Reply #4 on: August 28, 2020, 07:40:44 AM »
AllenV
Quote
When current is maximum in a transformer there is no magnetism because there are two windings of equal and opposite AT and they cancel out. Some experimenting with an 80watt transformer shows that 1/2500th of the power is in the mag field. The small current needed is greatest at maximum voltage where for one tiny instant the currents add together before they both change direction for the next half cycle. Conditions change every quarter cycle.
By vectors magnetizing current makes a small to no difference on the power circuit.

When I studied transformer action I measured input/output current and voltage as well as internal/external magnetic and electric field strengths. All these variables were measured in real time then plotted graphically with engineering software called Labview. What was also neat was being able to plot all the actual field based rates of change to any other measure as they change at different rates. Which is how I know that when input current is maximum the magnetism is also maximum regardless of the number of turns or turns ratio.

Quote
Why is it impossible to get magnetism into the core as fast as it collapses and is removed?

That is a very good question most people wouldn't even know to ask however I did as well. The material is only 1% matter and 99% EM fields, so when we want to align the electron orbits producing a magnet we are acting against both the non-aligned electrons and the EM field they are immersed in. However on a field collapse the electron orbits don't have to move as far to become unaligned so it occurs faster. It's simply easier to create chaos than organization because the universe is inherently chaotic or dynamic on every level.

Understand when we say an electric current we mean electrons which carry a field moving in a conductor however when we say a magnetic field we mean something which interacts internal and external to the conductor. It interacts with the space it occupies and beyond it and many cannot wrap there mind around the concept that something is present in that space.

Which is why always working against nature is generally hard while working with it is easy. Which is also why we should never load the apparatus when generating a magnetic field only when allowing it to degenerate because the universe is acting with us not against us. It's just common sense isn't it?.

Regards

#### AllanV

• Jr. Member
• Posts: 54
##### Re: Alan's Transformer as a Generator
« Reply #5 on: August 29, 2020, 12:22:42 AM »
AllenV
When I studied transformer action I measured input/output current and voltage as well as internal/external magnetic and electric field strengths. All these variables were measured in real time then plotted graphically with engineering software called Labview. What was also neat was being able to plot all the actual field based rates of change to any other measure as they change at different rates. Which is how I know that when input current is maximum the magnetism is also maximum regardless of the number of turns or turns ratio.

That is a very good question most people wouldn't even know to ask however I did as well. The material is only 1% matter and 99% EM fields, so when we want to align the electron orbits producing a magnet we are acting against both the non-aligned electrons and the EM field they are immersed in. However on a field collapse the electron orbits don't have to move as far to become unaligned so it occurs faster. It's simply easier to create chaos than organization because the universe is inherently chaotic or dynamic on every level.

Understand when we say an electric current we mean electrons which carry a field moving in a conductor however when we say a magnetic field we mean something which interacts internal and external to the conductor. It interacts with the space it occupies and beyond it and many cannot wrap there mind around the concept that something is present in that space.

Which is why always working against nature is generally hard while working with it is easy. Which is also why we should never load the apparatus when generating a magnetic field only when allowing it to degenerate because the universe is acting with us not against us. It's just common sense isn't it?.

Regards
Hi,

There is a problem with software and it is noted by some.

A bit more thinking it through is required. If current is maximum in the winding then it is not being reflected in the core. It is interacting with the other winding current which is opposite. They almost cancel each other out. The AT are only close to equal because there is slightly more current flowing in the output with a load because this dampens the field and regulates the input.
In transformer construction a 10% over wind is placed on the output winding to make allowances for the magnetic field effects created by a load that drop the voltage.
Wire resistance is considered as well. A 5% loss in each winding is usual and the size of the wire and of the transformer for a certain load is mostly to accommodate heat build up.

Current in the primary could be 1/7 of the load, just for the discussion, but is not all actually reflected in the flux of the core. 240volts on a winding instantaneously sees only the resistance and then as a tiny current begins to flow it takes one instant to establish the link with the core. The rate of change is close to exceeding what the core can accept and is about 80% on the way to saturating but is held in check. The residual magnetism has to be reset into the opposite polarity as well. The core area and material the windings wrap around determine what the transformer does.

The sum total is that the actual set up current in the primary without a load on the secondary is not all used to make the flux.
A 1.5 volt battery on the 240 volt winding is enough through the number of turns for magnetism to extend out of the core.
With a 80watt transformer at 0.9 volts DC and 0.0312A on the 240volt input, magnetism is not detected. With 240volt AC magnetism is not detected outside the core with even more current.

There is a residual magnetic field in the core material permanently but it changes polarity as the transformer operates. It  remains in a polarity direction at which ever part of the AC the circuit is switched off.
The input output currents push the flux just slightly above the residual. The current adds very little but drives down the flux into the opposite polarity and this gives the output.
There is only small power to make the magnetic effect. This can be worked out from another direction and they both agree.

If done correctly the magnet field can be created as quickly as it leaves in a transformer action. The two currents will set up a tension between them that allows more current to flow in one of the windings. The AT in the one winding directly make more flux in the core. This affects the voltage and current swings in both circuits.

There are some scriptures that indicate how everything is made.
The eternal, everlasting God who covers Himself with light as with a garment. We all live move and have our being in God.

God's covering is the binding of the atom, magnetism, gravity, light and He gives life also.
Everything is manifested instantly from nothing.

The planet and all creation is subject to decay, entropy, degeneration and death but does this mean that there are not ways to refine and build to overcome its effects.
In the future there is going to be regeneration and some will be immortal.

All the best,

Allan

#### onepower

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1116
##### Re: Alan's Transformer as a Generator
« Reply #6 on: August 31, 2020, 07:02:24 AM »
Allenv
Quote
A bit more thinking it through is required. If current is maximum in the winding then it is not being reflected in the core. It is interacting with the other winding current which is opposite. They almost cancel each other out. The AT are only close to equal because there is slightly more current flowing in the output with a load because this dampens the field and regulates the input.

Ah, I understand now. Coils with opposing turns, cancelling currents like partnerd coils and god is great... got it.
Jesus christ is there anyone left here who isn't mentally deranged or a Russian troll?.

Quote
The planet and all creation is subject to decay, entropy, degeneration and death but does this mean that there are not ways to refine and build to overcome its effects. In the future there is going to be regeneration and some will be immortal.

No that is incorrect and Entropy (radiation) is always balanced by Syntropy (gravitation). Let's ask a preschool question everyone should know and if entropy dictates everything radiates outward then where in the hell do you think it goes?, uhm nowhere?. Well no that's retarded and it must go somewhere which is towards other planets and galaxies which they see as gravitating towards them. So you throw a ball at me radiating from you (Entropy) which I see as a ball gravitating towards me (Syntropy). It's not rocket science.

You see all I have to do is ask an intelligent question and your whole argument falls flat on it's face. So how do you get something from nothing exactly?. If something is created from nothing where did the stuff it's made of come from, nothing?... that's obviously bs and everyone knows it. So if I went to the bank and wrote a check for money I don't have and they knew it and I told them it would be created from nothing do you think they would believe me?. Well no they would probably start laughing hysterically and throw me out on my ass with good reason because ... you can't get something from nothing.

Although I have to give you credit and you did have me going until you brought up the god/creation nonsense but then it all fell apart in my opinion. Let me put it this way, I know you may think you have some credibility speaking of creation because it's popular however this is not true in reality.

Regards

#### AllanV

• Jr. Member
• Posts: 54
##### Re: Alan's Transformer as a Generator
« Reply #7 on: August 31, 2020, 11:13:42 PM »
Allenv
Ah, I understand now. Coils with opposing turns, cancelling currents like partnerd coils and god is great... got it.
Jesus christ is there anyone left here who isn't mentally deranged or a Russian troll?.

No that is incorrect and Entropy (radiation) is always balanced by Syntropy (gravitation). Let's ask a preschool question everyone should know and if entropy dictates everything radiates outward then where in the hell do you think it goes?, uhm nowhere?. Well no that's retarded and it must go somewhere which is towards other planets and galaxies which they see as gravitating towards them. So you throw a ball at me radiating from you (Entropy) which I see as a ball gravitating towards me (Syntropy). It's not rocket science.

You see all I have to do is ask an intelligent question and your whole argument falls flat on it's face. So how do you get something from nothing exactly?. If something is created from nothing where did the stuff it's made of come from, nothing?... that's obviously bs and everyone knows it. So if I went to the bank and wrote a check for money I don't have and they knew it and I told them it would be created from nothing do you think they would believe me?. Well no they would probably start laughing hysterically and throw me out on my ass with good reason because ... you can't get something from nothing.

Although I have to give you credit and you did have me going until you brought up the god/creation nonsense but then it all fell apart in my opinion. Let me put it this way, I know you may think you have some credibility speaking of creation because it's popular however this is not true in reality.

Regards

Hi, how about spelling my name correctly.

All the best,

Allan

#### AllanV

• Jr. Member
• Posts: 54
##### Re: Alan's Transformer as a Generator
« Reply #8 on: August 31, 2020, 11:58:47 PM »
Allenv
Ah, I understand now. Coils with opposing turns, cancelling currents like partnerd coils and god is great... got it.
Jesus christ is there anyone left here who isn't mentally deranged or a Russian troll?.

No that is incorrect and Entropy (radiation) is always balanced by Syntropy (gravitation). Let's ask a preschool question everyone should know and if entropy dictates everything radiates outward then where in the hell do you think it goes?, uhm nowhere?. Well no that's retarded and it must go somewhere which is towards other planets and galaxies which they see as gravitating towards them. So you throw a ball at me radiating from you (Entropy) which I see as a ball gravitating towards me (Syntropy). It's not rocket science.

You see all I have to do is ask an intelligent question and your whole argument falls flat on it's face. So how do you get something from nothing exactly?. If something is created from nothing where did the stuff it's made of come from, nothing?... that's obviously bs and everyone knows it. So if I went to the bank and wrote a check for money I don't have and they knew it and I told them it would be created from nothing do you think they would believe me?. Well no they would probably start laughing hysterically and throw me out on my ass with good reason because ... you can't get something from nothing.

Although I have to give you credit and you did have me going until you brought up the god/creation nonsense but then it all fell apart in my opinion. Let me put it this way, I know you may think you have some credibility speaking of creation because it's popular however this is not true in reality.

Regards

Hi, Your comments would be easy to slide past and ignore but I can tell you what happened to me.

I purchased some land with my wife, we had saved enough to pay cash, and we lived there for two years without power or phone and at first no road. We had money in the bank and did not need payed employment for a while. There were few bills.

While doing some woodwork a dream from the previous night came to mind and then an energy enveloped me and I was lifted out of my biology. The mind of an immortal was experienced and it was as though I then was able to think from this mind. Many concepts were revealed. The power of what happened was very strong and it definitely got my attention. There is a God and he knows each of us by how we do not measure up and we are immersed in His Spirit. Our biology and the mind we think from is flawed and everyone degenerates in tune with the planet. We rust from the inside as we see it happening around us. It leads to final death for us as humans. And it is all in the mind.

There was some UFO activity at that time all though this was unknown to me as I had no interest in it.

I was shown a concept of energy that showed how developed gradients in the space around and object could lead to dimensional travel. Because the human mind is developed from biological experience with flaws that lead to death, the effects of these fields are harmful. The magnetic effect around a conductor carrying a current when understood is an example. The planets progression in relation to the sun shows a spiral of energy and the gradient principle. The earth is fixed in space by it relationship within the solar system but could easily be dimensionally shifted.  This is how the earth changes its position now. We understand mass and inertia the way we do because we are biological.

I have an engineering background which involves much work and schooling, went tramping, and there was not much time left until the property was purchased. It was the first pause in my 26 years and I was in my Bliss when the experience occurred. Not so much for my wife because there was a baby that took her attention.

For three years I was deeply connected with the mind that was giving me details about many things.
But I eventually shook it off, a little fear was noticed at that moment. I then got on with my life.

It was part of the package that I received in my mind from outside of it that lead me to research energy and the efficiency of prime movers.
The more that it is looked into the worse it gets.

All the best,

Allan

#### AllanV

• Jr. Member
• Posts: 54
##### Re: Alan's Transformer as a Generator
« Reply #9 on: September 01, 2020, 12:01:30 AM »
Hi,

There is only one way to get an FE increase and that is from the cheaply created flux change of a transformer action.
Most inventions that get a gain use it to some extent. But many fail to optimize the effect. The best inventions would never be seen.
There are a few variations but the more common used 50Hertz 240 volt power source is convenient. Or charge a battery and use conventional sine wave inverters.

An ordinary transformer with two low volt outputs will show the principle. I have a transformer that has two 15volt outputs and each has a 12volt tapping. Use a variable voltage source on the 240volt input to orientate the outputs.  The outputs are connected together. Connect one end and get a voltage across it and the other output is oriented the same way so that there is no voltage difference between them.
DC will flow through, +ve in and to their connection on one end out the other winding to -neg.

These will be very low resistance.

Disconnect the variable voltage source on the 240 volt winding and keep it well away. This winding will not be used.

A resistor is required when DC is sent through the two 15 volt windings, remember they are connected together at one end only. The current should be limited to the maximum rated on each winding.

The magnetic effect will cancel out. Change the +ve connection to the 12 volt tap on one winding a flux is created. Next change the connection back to the 15volt on that winding at the same time the connection is made to the 12 volt tap on the other 15 volt winding at the -neg end.

The magnetic flux has made an excursion through a complete change in orientation.

A piece of sheet metal will be attracted to the core when there is flux in the core if the best resistor is .

If the speed of the change is fast enough a voltage could be read on the 240 volt input but this is not where to get the power out.
An 80 watt 240volt 50 hertz transformer has 0.032Watt DC equivalent link between two windings, the input and output, which is 1/2500th of the 80 watt load power.

Draw a sine wave on a piece of paper and then draw another one close beside it and it becomes obvious. Maximum voltage occurs when currents are zero, almost, no voltage occurs with maximum current and this is where the flux changes. The currents take turns leading.

Each side of the sine wave is like DC, but voltage needs to be stored and then applied to drive down the flux which increases current to maximum on the other side of the sine wave.

It is so simple it can make your eyes water.

regards,

Allan

#### AllanV

• Jr. Member
• Posts: 54
##### Re: Alan's Transformer as a Generator
« Reply #10 on: September 02, 2020, 08:20:33 AM »
Hi,

An ordinary transformer with two low volt outputs will show the principle. I have a transformer that has two 15volt outputs and each has a 12volt tapping. Use a variable voltage source on the 240volt input to orientate the outputs.  The outputs are connected together. Connect one end and get a voltage across it and the other output is oriented the same way so that there is no voltage difference between them.
DC will flow through, +ve in and to their connection on one end out the other winding to -neg.

These will be very low resistance.

Disconnect the variable voltage source on the 240 volt winding and keep it well away. This winding will not be used.

A resistor is required when DC is sent through the two 15 volt windings, remember they are connected together at one end only. The current should be limited to the maximum rated on each winding.

The magnetic effect will cancel out. Change the +ve connection to the 12 volt tap on one winding a flux is created. Next change the connection back to the 15volt on that winding at the same time the connection is made to the 12 volt tap on the other 15 volt winding at the -neg end.

The magnetic flux has made an excursion through a complete change in orientation.

A piece of sheet metal will be attracted to the core when there is flux in the core if the best resistor is .

If the speed of the change is fast enough a voltage could be read on the 240 volt input but this is not where to get the power out.
An 80 watt 240volt 50 hertz transformer has 0.032Watt DC equivalent link between two windings, the input and output, which is 1/2500th of the 80 watt load power.

I forgot to mention the windings in the transformer have a resistance of 0.1ohm and only 0.3volts is necessary to get 3 amps to flow. 3 amps through 15turns is 45AT and may not be enough to feel magnetism outside the core. The idea would be to supply a pulse on the connection to increase the amps in one winding and this will improve the AT dramatically. In 75 turns 0.5A would be plenty. The pulse would need to change current direction with the change in the connections of the input.

As the flux increases more voltage is required to push current.

regards,

Allan

#### leonelogb

• Full Member
• Posts: 122
##### Re: Alan's Transformer as a Generator
« Reply #11 on: September 05, 2020, 07:54:54 PM »
Hi AllanV thank you for share your Transformer as a Generator

There are several things I would like to know.
a) In the upper left of the diagram ... Are you using the triac to discharge the capacitor? . what is doing that other coil that is parallel to the 300t? please give more details of each item used.
B) Are they two separate transformers? (I guess so), what kind of transformer are they?(E I..?), can you put a photo please.
C) how much energy have you been able to get out of that transformer and is it using at home?
Your answers will be very helpful to warm me up this winter ...

God bless you!

Other thin..
Fernandez in other thread, He teach something similar, check it.

#### AllanV

• Jr. Member
• Posts: 54
##### Re: Alan's Transformer as a Generator
« Reply #12 on: September 06, 2020, 12:53:03 AM »
Hi AllanV thank you for share your Transformer as a Generator

There are several things I would like to know.
a) In the upper left of the diagram ... Are you using the triac to discharge the capacitor? . what is doing that other coil that is parallel to the 300t? please give more details of each item used.
B) Are they two separate transformers? (I guess so), what kind of transformer are they?(E I..?), can you put a photo please.
C) how much energy have you been able to get out of that transformer and is it using at home?
Your answers will be very helpful to warm me up this winter ...

God bless you!

Other thin..
Fernandez in other thread, He teach something similar, check it.
Hi leonelogb,

Thanks for your reply. I looked at the link you provided and they appear to be over doing what is required.

The sine wave drawing shows how, as the currents in two windings change in relation to each other, they produce flux. First in one polarity direction and then the other. Draw a sine wave with another one just beside it and show the voltage as well. Think about it for a while.
For one instant the currents are equal and opposite and also one current is always able to maintain the flux in the transition to the next half wave.
Voltage occurs at maximum flux when the currents have been forced to a stop. And then voltage is necessary to drive more current in one winding to diminish the flux for maximum current where flux polarity change begins to happen.

By passing current around in a circle a tension is created between the transformer 300 and 330 turn windings and then more current can be passed through one winding to further increase AT. No more than 15% difference max otherwise there is saturation and the current increases faster than the flux in the iron can keep up. It may prove to be less but a resistor can make up the difference.
It is possible to get flux into the core as fast as it disappears because a transformer operates just above the residual field with no current at all. There is a sticking point to get passed.

This action needs to be understood because this understanding will help to configure a device to inject a little energy into the build up of flux.
There is only a small dampening of the flux in a transformer with a load current. The flux and the decrease by dampening will have to be put into the transformer, the resonant input and the load will do the rest.

The drawing of the actual circuit isn't totally correct. But it has all the elements. Some knowledge is required and involves a few different abilities, coil winding, electrical and electronics with some understanding of how a transformer operates. It is cheaper to use junked parts as long as they are in good condition.

a)  In this configuration a triac is being used to discharge a capacitor, but would be too strong. It is being used to force a small amount of extra current in one winding to diminishes the flux and increase current. The small inductor is a transformer with two windings with one about 15% more turns. It needs heavy wire. One winding is on the driver circuit the other on the driven load circuit. The bigger inductor below the main transformer, is more of a dampening device, has uneven turns, and will force even more current to flow making more AT in conjunction with the capacitor.

B) It is one transformer with two windings E I 15% difference in turns.

C) I only use 80watts continuous at my house and have a wood burner but intend to stop using it. I am making a supply at the moment to produce up to 5Kw. My welder needs at least 7KW. The core area is 5cmx5cm wide window but it may be over built. I have accumulated lots of large transformers of good condition and re-use these to keep the cost down. They have to be taken apart.

Understanding how a transformer works in its simple form is important.
Input 180 degrees shifted from the output with a driver driven situation, with a smaller shift that is often disregarded and is considered of no consequence in any calculations. Very few books make reference to it. With equal turns the output shows more current and it relates to this smaller shift and is very small but measurable.

When a load is on a transformer the flux strength is diminished by about 10% therefore there is an over wind of 10% to make up the voltage. Of course the turns ratio now means the output current is less than the input.

The situation can be likened to two DC circuits of opposite directions, each in half a cycle. Voltage is necessary to make the transition from one side of the sine wave to the other in a full cycle. The sine wave drawing indicates how it should happen.
Large current will flow unless the set up makes the transition where the smallest current produces voltage. This is where the current changes direction.
But of course the idea is to only use transformer action to make up the loss in flux caused by a load circuit current.

The example of the 80watt transformer would mean the power to make up the decrease would only be a small amount. When tested the transformer flux needs about 0.032 watt DC equivalent (1/2500th) therefore it only needs about 10% of this (0.0032watt).
This amount is so small that it is easy to over do what is required and difficult to comprehend.

In the 5Kw transformer generator, there is a gap in the core, the magnetic circuit, of 1mm that is a 0.5mm shim, this means a little more power will be required to produce the flux.

With 300 + 30 input and 300 + 30 output,  a resonant circuit is created on one winding and eventually with a series winding of a smaller transformer that is wound to have 15% turns difference. The other side of this transformer, the fewer turns, is in series with the load circuit. This transformer is there to keep the currents going in opposite directions with slightly more in the load circuit.
The input is first powered up with a variable voltage source through a capacitor to get the best voltage in the input circuit without the smaller transformer.  The other series capacitor value can be found through testing. Install the smaller series transformer with a load of a 100 watt light bulb, on the out put.

The idea now is to pass a current through another completely isolated circuit to make up the dampening effect on the flux with the output load current. The transition from one pole direction to the other produces the best output.  Ampere turns is used to make each circuit and this will first increase and then diminish the flux.
Some added voltage is necessary to reduce the flux but a voltage is created when two currents of different amounts come to a stop with the increase to maximum flux.
A dual inverter circuit is needed. Just a simple timer and 4017 four output configured decade counter is necessary. The voltage to the driver mosfets is changed not the pulse width.

Your skill level is unknown and I could go through a build, step by step as I make the larger 5Kw.
The best heater could be the one that uses fluid adhesion to build heat. There are stationary discs and discs on a shaft with 1mm to 1.5mm spacing between them, driven at slow revolutions in oil. All contained and supposed to have a COP of 5. Electric motors can be optimized to use less power. The AC motor is designed to use as much power as possible.

It is always easier with pictures and it will help if you draw it all out. It is best to just work out the AT to make it easier.

All the best,

Allan

#### leonelogb

• Full Member
• Posts: 122
##### Re: Alan's Transformer as a Generator
« Reply #13 on: September 06, 2020, 06:55:41 PM »
Thank you very much for your reply, I appreciate that.
For me it is very difficult to understand only with words everything that you have done, but I think I am very close to understanding, I can compare it to Stanley Mayer's with two opposite coils and one of them is adjustable.
I also have several transformers that I would like to disassemble and put one of them in reverse but that has been very difficult, but I keep working on it.
I am looking for the best way to feed my house with F.E. as you have done but I wait for God's time, I know, I will get it.
Thank you!

Hi leonelogb,

Thanks for your reply. I looked at the link you provided and they appear to be over doing what is required.

The sine wave drawing shows how, as the currents in two windings change in relation to each other, they produce flux. First in one polarity direction and then the other. Draw a sine wave with another one just beside it and show the voltage as well. Think about it for a while.
For one instant the currents are equal and opposite and also one current is always able to maintain the flux in the transition to the next half wave.
Voltage occurs at maximum flux when the currents have been forced to a stop. And then voltage is necessary to drive more current in one winding to diminish the flux for maximum current where flux polarity change begins to happen.

By passing current around in a circle a tension is created between the transformer 300 and 330 turn windings and then more current can be passed through one winding to further increase AT. No more than 15% difference max otherwise there is saturation and the current increases faster than the flux in the iron can keep up. It may prove to be less but a resistor can make up the difference.
It is possible to get flux into the core as fast as it disappears because a transformer operates just above the residual field with no current at all. There is a sticking point to get passed.

This action needs to be understood because this understanding will help to configure a device to inject a little energy into the build up of flux.
There is only a small dampening of the flux in a transformer with a load current. The flux and the decrease by dampening will have to be put into the transformer, the resonant input and the load will do the rest.

The drawing of the actual circuit isn't totally correct. But it has all the elements. Some knowledge is required and involves a few different abilities, coil winding, electrical and electronics with some understanding of how a transformer operates. It is cheaper to use junked parts as long as they are in good condition.

a)  In this configuration a triac is being used to discharge a capacitor, but would be too strong. It is being used to force a small amount of extra current in one winding to diminishes the flux and increase current. The small inductor is a transformer with two windings with one about 15% more turns. It needs heavy wire. One winding is on the driver circuit the other on the driven load circuit. The bigger inductor below the main transformer, is more of a dampening device, has uneven turns, and will force even more current to flow making more AT in conjunction with the capacitor.

B) It is one transformer with two windings E I 15% difference in turns.

C) I only use 80watts continuous at my house and have a wood burner but intend to stop using it. I am making a supply at the moment to produce up to 5Kw. My welder needs at least 7KW. The core area is 5cmx5cm wide window but it may be over built. I have accumulated lots of large transformers of good condition and re-use these to keep the cost down. They have to be taken apart.

Understanding how a transformer works in its simple form is important.
Input 180 degrees shifted from the output with a driver driven situation, with a smaller shift that is often disregarded and is considered of no consequence in any calculations. Very few books make reference to it. With equal turns the output shows more current and it relates to this smaller shift and is very small but measurable.

When a load is on a transformer the flux strength is diminished by about 10% therefore there is an over wind of 10% to make up the voltage. Of course the turns ratio now means the output current is less than the input.

The situation can be likened to two DC circuits of opposite directions, each in half a cycle. Voltage is necessary to make the transition from one side of the sine wave to the other in a full cycle. The sine wave drawing indicates how it should happen.
Large current will flow unless the set up makes the transition where the smallest current produces voltage. This is where the current changes direction.
But of course the idea is to only use transformer action to make up the loss in flux caused by a load circuit current.

The example of the 80watt transformer would mean the power to make up the decrease would only be a small amount. When tested the transformer flux needs about 0.032 watt DC equivalent (1/2500th) therefore it only needs about 10% of this (0.0032watt).
This amount is so small that it is easy to over do what is required and difficult to comprehend.

In the 5Kw transformer generator, there is a gap in the core, the magnetic circuit, of 1mm that is a 0.5mm shim, this means a little more power will be required to produce the flux.

With 300 + 30 input and 300 + 30 output,  a resonant circuit is created on one winding and eventually with a series winding of a smaller transformer that is wound to have 15% turns difference. The other side of this transformer, the fewer turns, is in series with the load circuit. This transformer is there to keep the currents going in opposite directions with slightly more in the load circuit.
The input is first powered up with a variable voltage source through a capacitor to get the best voltage in the input circuit without the smaller transformer.  The other series capacitor value can be found through testing. Install the smaller series transformer with a load of a 100 watt light bulb, on the out put.

The idea now is to pass a current through another completely isolated circuit to make up the dampening effect on the flux with the output load current. The transition from one pole direction to the other produces the best output.  Ampere turns is used to make each circuit and this will first increase and then diminish the flux.
Some added voltage is necessary to reduce the flux but a voltage is created when two currents of different amounts come to a stop with the increase to maximum flux.
A dual inverter circuit is needed. Just a simple timer and 4017 four output configured decade counter is necessary. The voltage to the driver mosfets is changed not the pulse width.

Your skill level is unknown and I could go through a build, step by step as I make the larger 5Kw.
The best heater could be the one that uses fluid adhesion to build heat. There are stationary discs and discs on a shaft with 1mm to 1.5mm spacing between them, driven at slow revolutions in oil. All contained and supposed to have a COP of 5. Electric motors can be optimized to use less power. The AC motor is designed to use as much power as possible.

It is always easier with pictures and it will help if you draw it all out. It is best to just work out the AT to make it easier.

All the best,

Allan

#### AllanV

• Jr. Member
• Posts: 54
##### Re: Alan's Transformer as a Generator
« Reply #14 on: September 06, 2020, 10:40:47 PM »
Thank you very much for your reply, I appreciate that.
For me it is very difficult to understand only with words everything that you have done, but I think I am very close to understanding, I can compare it to Stanley Mayer's with two opposite coils and one of them is adjustable.
I also have several transformers that I would like to disassemble and put one of them in reverse but that has been very difficult, but I keep working on it.
I am looking for the best way to feed my house with F.E. as you have done but I wait for God's time, I know, I will get it.
Thank you!

Hi leonelogb,

It is not like Meyer's circuit.

Some transformers are more difficult than others but EI cores can be purchased.
A transformer could be purchased but it could be difficult to get apart.
A two winding output say 50v x 50v could give about 250 turns on each, add another  2 x 15%  = 37turns. that would be 250 + 37 for each. Or 50v + 7.5v.

Look at the sine wave drawing of the currents and what is required is to make a floating supply to increase and decrease the flux. By putting currents through a different number of windings 250 + 37 on one side and then only 250 on the other then if two ampere flows there is 2 x 37 AT = 74AT. The current must flow in one side and out the other. Then immediately the current must flow in the opposite winding 250 on one side and 250 + 37 on the other. This will create the most current for the least voltage. The magnetism has gone through one cycle with one half wave similar to DC.

Try building a DC circuit only.