Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 84090
  • *Latest: Hest

  • *Total Posts: 895731
  • *Total Topics: 15756
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 27
  • *Total: 30

Author Topic: "Magnet shear to direct pull work ratio"  (Read 4837 times)

Online Floor

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1877
Re: "Magnet shear to direct pull work ratio"
« Reply #15 on: May 04, 2021, 03:18:46 AM »
continuing...
                    The shearing work measurements...
27.
28.
29.  20 g      --- 95.5 deg      25 x 2            = 50
30.  10 g      --- 100 deg       15 x 4.5         = 67.5
31.    5 g      --- 107 deg       7.5 x 7           = 52.5
                                                          total = 11293

Had we stopped our measurements at 95 degrees in both of the measurement sets
instead of continuing on to 107 degrees in the one set...

the ratio would have been 11173 (sliding) to 9998 (direct pull)
                               because 11293 - 120 =  11173 
at 100 degrees  there are 67.5 units of work  +  the 52.5 units of work at 107 degrees
                        (67.5 +52.5 = 120)
                                    and
                        11173 - 9998 = 1175 (still greater than zero).

                   See ? 
                        We are not done yet !
                              floor

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Online Floor

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1877
Re: "Magnet shear to direct pull work ratio"
« Reply #16 on: May 04, 2021, 05:52:19 AM »
Force times displacement equals energy (in the form of mechanical work).

A mass of 102 grams, exerts approximately 1 newton of force (down) in earth's standard gravity
(as weight).

If we lift that 102 gram mass 1 meter, we do approximately 1 joule of work upon it, as that lifting.

Force times displacement equals work. 1 newton times 1 meter equals 1 joule of work.

But the force present in magnet interactions changes at differing distances.

So then, how does one calculate the energy present in magnet interactions ?




Online Floor

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1877
Re: "Magnet shear to direct pull work ratio"
« Reply #17 on: May 04, 2021, 08:35:13 AM »
So..
The travel of a magnet (A) due to magnetic forces can be of a shorter
length than some other magnet's (magnet B's) travel due to magnetic
force and yet ...

if the average force along the travel of magnet (A) is greater
than the average force along the travel of magnet (B),  there can
be more energy present in the action of that magnet (A) than is
present in the action of magnet(B).

There is more potential to do mechanical work in the sliding magnet action
(presented / measured) than is present in the direct (face to face) action.

Next, we see if it can be looped as a net gain in work from magnets ?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: "Magnet shear to direct pull work ratio"
« Reply #17 on: May 04, 2021, 08:35:13 AM »
Sponsored links:




Online Floor

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1877
Re: "Magnet shear to direct pull work ratio"
« Reply #18 on: May 04, 2021, 09:00:24 AM »
Here it is...
the other two measurement sets...

less than 5 grams force, over the course of the one travel
               and
negative five grams force, over the course of the other travel.

   done...
     back to the other magnet device...

     @ https://overunity.com/16987/td-replications/msg556715/#msg556715


« Last Edit: May 04, 2021, 03:16:49 PM by Floor »

Online Floor

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1877
Re: "Magnet shear to direct pull work ratio"
« Reply #19 on: May 04, 2021, 03:18:41 PM »
Disappointment again here, no spiny thingy !
Just cyclical work from magnets with a net energy gain ?

       later ...
         Always remember that ..
           While time might fly like an arrow,
              fruit flies like a banana.
« Last Edit: May 05, 2021, 06:28:08 AM by Floor »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: "Magnet shear to direct pull work ratio"
« Reply #19 on: May 04, 2021, 03:18:41 PM »
Sponsored links:




Online Floor

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1877
Re: "Magnet shear to direct pull work ratio"
« Reply #20 on: May 05, 2021, 06:29:44 AM »
Not done.
  Still here.


Online Floor

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1877
Re: "Magnet shear to direct pull work ratio"
« Reply #21 on: May 05, 2021, 06:43:16 AM »
Why ?

   Back face / far field interaction...

        video below

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7f0md2

               OK to start at 6 min 05 seconds

Should use cube or bar magnets as recommended  in the "EDEN project" PDF,

    @ https://overunity.com/18511/floors-magnets-explained/dlattach/attach/176430/

rather than wafer shaped ones...
                     and  / or use a longer out put stroke

     floor

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: "Magnet shear to direct pull work ratio"
« Reply #21 on: May 05, 2021, 06:43:16 AM »
Sponsored links:




Online Floor

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1877
Re: "Magnet shear to direct pull work ratio"
« Reply #22 on: May 05, 2021, 02:51:30 PM »
Please Keep in mind that...

there are numerous ways in which I am not following the parameters
met in the Kedron Eden project PDF. 
                                @
https://overunity.com/18511/floors-magnets-explained/dlattach/attach/176430/

So, we cannot consider this present endeavor as a replication nor as an invalidation
of that other project.

Note..

One of the reasons that this method interests me, is that it functions
in attraction modes.   

This means that even when using ceramic magnets, one might get a long life
expectancy from the magnets.

Online Floor

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1877
Re: "Magnet shear to direct pull work ratio"
« Reply #23 on: May 05, 2021, 05:09:19 PM »
Utilizing a longer out put stroke would decrease the input needed
to move from position two to position three and also increase the
output in moving from position three to position four.

For this reason and....

 if / when, the magnets used were to be of cube shape, as in the Eden
project PDF, it looks like a net gain is possible here.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: "Magnet shear to direct pull work ratio"
« Reply #23 on: May 05, 2021, 05:09:19 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Online Floor

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1877
Re: "Magnet shear to direct pull work ratio"
« Reply #24 on: May 08, 2021, 08:53:54 PM »
OK...
we got it ...

              JPG below


   best wishes
              floor

Online Floor

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1877
Re: "Magnet shear to direct pull work ratio"
« Reply #25 on: May 08, 2021, 11:37:55 PM »
Maybe 69% more energy as mechanical work out, than the mechanical work
which was input.





Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: "Magnet shear to direct pull work ratio"
« Reply #25 on: May 08, 2021, 11:37:55 PM »
3D Solar Panels


Online Floor

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1877
Re: "Magnet shear to direct pull work ratio"
« Reply #27 on: May 09, 2021, 04:24:44 PM »
      @ Lota

Kenneth C. Kozeka / the EDEN project PDF

Are already liked to earlier in this topic
                            @
 https://overunity.com/18551/magnet-shear-to-direct-pull-work-ratio/msg553381/#msg553381

                    Thanks for the additional link to that  project / PDF.
                                                      and
                                     Also thanks for the link to the patent.
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...

The magnet actions / motions, I measured are similar to those shown in the patent.
That device is a continuous motion device.

The gear and shaft linkages in the patent drawing, indicate that the magnets must
all be moving , when any one of them is moving.
... ... ... ... ... ... .. .. .. .. .... ...
The interactions I have described are such that, an action begins, that action completes,
a next action begins, that next action completes and so on.  All motion comes completely
to a stop, then a / the next motion begins.
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
     however...
One might also slow an action down so much so (very near to the end of its motion) that it
serves practically the same purpose as does arresting completely that motion.

It seem as though  Kozeka's method is  intended to accomplish this by means of variable
gearing or pulleys.  This is described else where in the patent.
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
    Other wise....
     yes, they are both about lateral and direct magnet attractions.
« Last Edit: May 09, 2021, 11:05:53 PM by Floor »

Online Floor

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1877
Re: "Magnet shear to direct pull work ratio"
« Reply #28 on: May 09, 2021, 05:19:59 PM »
I'm pretty satisfied with this test. 

I going to leave this topic available for others to post in / for me to get feed back in,
for a time.

Eventually I will lock it, so that it remains short and sweet / complete.

                                                        best wishes
                                                               floor
  P.S.
Looking forward to getting back to that other build.

Online Floor

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1877
Re: "Magnet shear to direct pull work ratio"
« Reply #29 on: May 10, 2021, 08:03:58 PM »
note..

I find only a U.S application for a patent not a
patent its self.

                  floor

 

OneLink