I have what seems a unique stance on Rick F
and I suppose most of his successful replicators too [if there are any]?
Hi Ramset. Replicated what exactly? Rick F has never demonstrated anything that I have seen which
suggests over unity. A number of other people who actually understand electronics have pointed this out as well.
The reality is a true over unity device is something that is not at all easy to achieve, assuming that
it is even possible to achieve. Here is a reality check. I have never seen a single video from Mr. John Bedini in
which he demonstrated any sort of device which looks like it might have been actual over unity or self-sustaining.
That is not to say he necessarily didn't have such a device, but I have never seen any such demonstration from Mr. Bedini.
If anyone knows of such a video demonstration, can you please post a link here?
Likewise, although Don Smith did demonstrate his suitcase device on video at one of his presentations,
the demonstration was just too short to be able to draw any sort of reasonable conclusions about
that device of his. Towards the end of his short demonstration, it was clear that the battery which was running
his suitcase device was starting to run down, as the voltage at the output started to drop off, and then
Don Smith ended his demonstration. So, although both Don Smith and John Bedini have helped generate
interest in over unity research during their time, we really don't have anything concrete, demonstration-wise,
such as a video demonstration, that I am aware of anyway, to be able to try to judge whether either of those two
actually did have a true over unity device which could stand up to scrutiny by people who have a real understanding
of electronics and proper electronics circuit analysis.
Yet the claims about John Bedini and Don Smith supposedly having had over unity devices still persist, despite the lack of
any reasonable evidence. No one helps the over unity research community by perpetuating false or unsubstantiated claims.
That actually just continues to further discredit the over unity research community, which is viewed by many
as just looney people who make all sorts of claims about OU devices but which can never seem to produce
any sort of reasonable demonstration or evidence which stands up to close and proper scrutiny.
I am actually very open minded about over unity myself, but a person being open minded in no way means
they should blindly believe or accept stuff without at least some sort of reasonable demonstration or reasonable
evidence which can stand up to close scrutiny.
Kapanadze did a number of demonstrations over the years that suggest he might possibly have one or more legit
over unity devices, but no one can really say for sure since Kapanadze never submitted any of his devices for
independent testing, that I am aware of. The infinity Sav guys in South Korea may also possibly have one
or more true over unity devices as suggested by some of their video demonstrations, but, again, until they submit
one or more of their devices for independent testing, we can't really know for sure if their claims are legit or not
as well. This is in no way being 'negative'. This is being reasonable. The fact is there has been a lot of BS and outright frauds
out there over the years in regards to this topic, so being extra cautious is very essential for a person to keep their head
above water on this topic.
My hat will go off to anyone who will actually do a clear and reasonable and open demonstration of a
claimed over unity device which people can clearly see and analyze without having to guess at what
actually is going on there.
