Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: floor sweepings dust bin  (Read 6903 times)

Floor

  • Guest
floor sweepings dust bin
« on: May 21, 2020, 09:55:06 PM »

:)

This topic is for deleted posts under the    "Floors MMM-2 builders board".

Interesting but off topic posts may be moved here by me (floor) 
1. as a courtesy
or
2. just to preserve them. 

They may eventually be deleted by me.

                   Message me here if you wish

Edited for spelling corrections 2/2/22
« Last Edit: February 03, 2022, 05:12:29 AM by Floor »

Floor

  • Guest
Re: floor sweepings dust bin
« Reply #1 on: September 02, 2021, 10:30:11 AM »
skywatcher

    Sr. Member
    ****
    Posts: 383

Moved by floor from

 O.U. Magnet force shielding 1
« Reply #35 on: August 30, 2021, 09:45:58 PM »


The construction i've sketched should also work ?

A bar magnet should be equivalent to a stack of single magnets.
I have some magnets 100x25x3 mm, and round bar magnets 60x12 mm (or 10 maybe).
I also have a amsll slider with steel balls, which requires almost no force to move.

Maybe i can build something from this...

Floor

  • Guest
Re: floor sweepings dust bin
« Reply #2 on: February 13, 2022, 01:36:20 AM »
Thank You for opening this up Floor. 

I just wanted to give this link which displays the question a little clearer than the video linked in the post you snipped.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blC3zvR07bs


Floor

  • Guest
Re: floor sweepings dust bin
« Reply #3 on: February 13, 2022, 01:41:45 AM »
"Can the speed of magnetic field changes be out ran,  if not directly in the fields, then
within, for example, an iron core / at a molecular level? "

I think the experiment I repeated again last night relates to this. Feel free to delete this if it is off topic.

I clamped 2 iron core transformers with 1 open side (electromagnets) together tightly.  then I flipped polarities of 1 transformer at timed intervals as I measured output to load. I also unclamped them and held a magnet over the electromagnet in stages to physically feel the effects.

I did roughly 50 tests from 1 microsecond between flips to 1 second between flips.

With the power supply set the exact same for all tests, as the flips got real quick, the input wattage went down drastically. When between around  5-30 milliseconds between flips, holding the magnet over the electromagnet results in a slight vibration that is almost undetectable. But also the input power goes down to hundredths of a watt, as opposed to 12 watts when flipping slowly.

I must say though I am unsure if any of my measurements were even close to accurate, because I was watching input power as displayed on my power supply, and I do not think there is any degree of accuracy when changing that quickly.

One thing is for sure though,  the flipping magnetic  fields are greatly reduced the quicker the flippining.  If this is happening because the input wattage drops, effects from the iron core, or because of a nulling of the fields from speed, I am not sure.

But if interested, I can probably get a video of all this if anyone's interested

Floor

  • Guest
Re: floor sweepings dust bin
« Reply #4 on: February 13, 2022, 01:43:14 AM »
As before, and of course, how you might best / next proceed is up to you.

For me / others to get maximum benefit from your work...

Document all the rpms and
all of the inputs and outputs,
under several conditions

Write them down.

Do this systematically / follow some order of proceeding
that will make it the easiest way for to you to communicate and
for others to understand what each measurement is of and
what are the conditions under which that measurement was taken.

This can give both, you and we the readers a degree of clarity that otherwise
might never otherwise arise / may be not at all.

i.e. follow it through / finish it out.

I think you are correct.  This demonstrates that speed will affect both the energy input
and the        energy transferred       in a pretty clear way. 

Meet as high a degree of precision as your set up can deliver and I believe it will serve
as at the very least a proof of concept.

             If I am understanding your direction at this point...
i.e. quickness of interactions between physical objects interacting through magnetic fields might give rise to something which is     in effect    a kind of magnetic shielding ?

nice builds, good videos, cool concept..

 best wishes

Floor

  • Guest
Re: floor sweepings dust bin
« Reply #5 on: February 13, 2022, 01:44:21 AM »
This requires no spinning or moving parts.  I can flip polarities of an electromagnet very easily and quickly with no moving parts using an H-bridge and ardiuno. I can set the delay between flips from 1 microsecond up.  Measuring should be no problem also with this setup.

I can do this

Floor

  • Guest
Re: floor sweepings dust bin
« Reply #6 on: February 13, 2022, 01:45:56 AM »
This requires no spinning or moving parts.  I can flip polarities of an electromagnet very easily and quickly with no moving parts using an H-bridge and ardiuno. I can set the delay between flips from 1 microsecond up.  Measuring should be no problem also with this setup.

I can do this

Floor

  • Guest
Re: floor sweepings dust bin
« Reply #7 on: February 13, 2022, 01:47:25 AM »
Quote from: floodrod on Today at 12:21:18 AM

    This requires no spinning or moving parts.  I can flip polarities of an electromagnet very easily and quickly with no moving parts using an H-bridge and ardiuno. I can set the delay between flips from 1 microsecond up.  Measuring should be no problem also with this setup.

    I can do this
END OF QUOTE

As soon as you introduce electromagnets you also enter into new complexities.

In pulsing coils (on and off )

ohmic resistance of the coils
magnetic saturation of and permeability of electromagnet core materials
current's lag behind voltage in time
wave forms and resonances that will develop
reluctance and reactance of the coils
capacitance of the coils
Quite a few others...

In short a whole new ball game, while you did not, fully present the last two sets
of interactions in your topic.  There is no clear data #1 and #2  and heading into #3 ? 

Floor

  • Guest
Re: floor sweepings dust bin
« Reply #8 on: February 13, 2022, 01:54:49 AM »
P.S.  for the above


It's like unpainted furniture,  But still, it has merit.

   floor

Floor

  • Guest
Re: floor sweepings dust bin
« Reply #9 on: February 13, 2022, 07:20:57 PM »
@ All readers

      Generally / nearly always,  when I move a post here, this is done to maintain the
continuity of one of the topics.  Please do not consider my moving or removing
of any post as a reflection upon, the otherwise merits of or validity of that post.


   best wishes
         floor

captainpecan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 552
Re: floor sweepings dust bin
« Reply #10 on: March 20, 2022, 02:56:20 PM »
I apologize. I am trying to understand how to remove posts. Do I copy the post and place them in here and you automatically go delete them? Last couple posts in my magnet assisted thread is very full of links and search links and all wrong language. Hides all the content. Any more explanation as to what I am supposed to do to properly remove is appreciated.

Floor

  • Guest
Re: floor sweepings dust bin
« Reply #11 on: March 20, 2022, 04:19:12 PM »
This process is new and not at all well tested.

1. Open two copies of your browser.
2. Login to O.U.
3. in your topic   there     quote the entire post you wish to remove.
4. highlight it and then cut it (controll x).
5 switch to the other browser and navigate   here  to the dust bin.
6. click on    reply    below the latest post in the dust bin.
7 paste the quote (controll v).


Good ordering in regard to which is attached to what does not matter here.

The whole affair is a courtesy any way / for the record kind of thing
and its is all your own call.

8. Post in your topic.  Floor please delete messages x, y. z...
                         example this very message is
https://overunity.com/19040/permanent-magnet-assisted-motor-coil-designs/msg564838/#msg564838
              and
Floor please delete messaage
https://overunity.com/19040/permanent-magnet-assisted-motor-coil-designs/msg564838/#msg564838

                                        Moving Attached files

1. Go to O.U.. com  / login
2. Start a reply in the "Floors dust bin"
3. Open a second browser and goto O.U..com  (you are already loged in)
4 Navigate to the Jpg. or png. or so on... that you want to copy, right click on
that file and select copy.
5.Switch to the other browser that is looking in the "Floors dust bin"
6. Below attach: click browse
7. Right click then select paste.
8. Change the name of the file you just pasted, else it has only a file type or extension.
                                  So ...  Right click on it then select rename.
9. left click on the renamed file to highlight it.
10. Left click on "open"

11. Post in your topic,  "Floor please delete messages x, y. z..."

             Again, the whole affair of moving a post, is a courtesy any way / for the record
             kind of thing and its is all your own call. 

Willy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 236
Re: floor sweepings dust bin
« Reply #12 on: May 10, 2023, 02:41:44 AM »

I see.
From this perspective, the “apparent weight”, which is your net downward gravitational force:
Is different, between the two cases.


With water, the negative force (being that against the downward) is a factor of the displacement,
and if the water in the reservoir is allowed to move upwards, a direct energy correlation can be made, as per Archimedes.
(consider a case where the vessel is completely full, and sealed, the magnet simply falls:
    in this case the column that is being displaced is only ever the height of the magnet, iterated across the number of magnet heights within the column, rather than across the entire surface area. Here the pressure remains constant, instead of varying with gravity then rebalancing to the ambient. It presents a distinctly different scenario when measuring the work done by gravity. Just to add to your arsenal of experimental data)


In the electric case: velocity plays a major role in the generation of negative force. (against gravity)
Consider first the linear case of sliding the magnet laterally through a horizontal tube. This can be done directly using force scales.
Note how changes in transitional velocity affect the opposing force.
Then consider how the applied force changes during this experiment.
Next: repeat the experiment using a constant force, say a 90-degree angle to a string with weight to do the ‘pulling’, and compare to an “artificial gravitational” force equivalent from an applied mechanism.


Note that this removes the direct reference to “apparent weight”
This is to clarify the observation, by performing the experiment within the horizontal plane.
The same “tube” and magnet should be used across all experiments, to alleviate Lorentz variance.


Now we go back to our comparative analysis: Lorentz vs Water
In the case of water (negating water resistance, which IS significant)
The counter force is derived from the same time dependent gravitational acceleration.
Imparting additional downward force to increase acceleration does not change the counter force caused by displacement.


In the electric case, it indeed does.
Now consider the s^2 in the denominator
The magnet is increasing in velocity, the longer it hangs in the tube.
This increases the counter force, further delaying the fall.
However the positive force is constant.
I assume this is the case you “measured” when deciding that the “apparent weight” remained constant during the experiment (?)


This means that the two scenarios are not equivalent, thus comparing them against one another, there is variance.


As per wether or not either of the (dilated) gravitational forces are ‘strong enough’ to reset your twist drive mechanism, this is a matter of your particular set-up.
Certainly there is a mass of magnet, which would do so even in water.
Though this would change the entirety of the experimental data.
And all tests would be redone using the greater mass.


After observing the Lorentz force (in the opposite vector of the magnets motion), now consider a case where the tube itself is on a scaled platform (secured rigidly and with enough copper mass to cause complete repulsion from physical contact).
You can time the free fall, then time the tube fall
Integrate over time and we see the Lorentz force is precisely the missing gravitational force.
When we add the Lorentz to the (dilated) gravitational: we get total gravity. (~9.8)


We can also do the inverse, by mounting the magnet on a post on the scaled platform, and allow the tube to fall around it. We get the same results.

Willy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 236
Re: floor sweepings dust bin
« Reply #13 on: May 10, 2023, 08:53:58 PM »
(it is unfortunate that physics gets censored)


I will again give clarification, if anyone wants to actually read my posts that get censored, pull up the thread on the cached backpages of the date of my posts.




To calculate the “twisted” combined fields:


https://study.com/skill/learn/using-the-principle-of-superposition-magnetic-field-expressions-derived-from-amperes-law-to-find-a-total-magnetic-field-from-2-or-more-current-carrying-conductors-explanation.html




————————————————————
Clarification on use of ceramic magnets:




Ceramics and cobalts have larger, less dense fields, as do iron magnets
Rare earth and metas have tightly compact fields which are stronger and more dense.
The effect can be observed using any type of magnets. Higher the density, the greater the force across a shorter distance. You can observe the differences directly by selecting magnets of various types of the same strength rating.


——————————————————-


Proof of concept independently replicated:


https://youtu.be/bmCQVg9qRmQ


—————————————————-


clarification of the magnetic interactions:


at parallel alignment:
field interactions approach a maximum


At 90-degrees along an axis perpendicular to the axis of magnetization:
field interactions approach 1/2




———————————————-
Engineering:


an ideal twist drive (with no system losses) would provide +50% mechanical leverage
A real world device would provide something less


Any number of machines can be designed using this principle


“switchable magnets” use this to ease the work done by the consumer


earliest known use was in the 1800’s, old timers would use this to pull strong magnets apart


If you find yourself unable to follow the precise replication instructions provided previously,
I will be happy to help you design your twist drive prototypes to fit any mechanisms you have.

Willy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 236
Re: floor sweepings dust bin
« Reply #14 on: May 10, 2023, 11:08:08 PM »
Smoky

Before I MOVE your post.

This is and was a courtesy by the way.
Notice I said move and not REMOVE.

I will, as before, let it stand, until / unless it is in the way of  the continuity of the topic here.

Just as I did with one of your previous posts.

I REMOVED ALL of Ramset's post's.

I distilled and combined his posts with other input and placed it into here
@
https://overunity.com/19468/twist-drive-builds/msg577580/#msg577580

Thanked him, sincerely and posted in this (that) topic, a notice of the new location of that
distillation / compilation composition as such. 

I removed CITFTA's post entirely.  Same event as above, except CITFTA's content
remained verbatim as does your own post.

Your's is here @
https://overunity.com/18497/floor-sweepings-dust-bin/msg577574/#msg577574

I spent considerable time doing these things.  Did you ?  No.

Did your read this topic and understand its direction ?  Apparently not.

Shall we now direct this topic toward Gotoluc's "Proof of concept independently replicated"
Like it or not we shall not.

I do not consider Gotoluke's  build to be a proof of concept for this topic
and I will not discuss it here.

Run a series of topics of your own for a solid year or ten and find out just how difficult
it is to keep continuity.  You haven't any idea, but then that's your own affair.

Read this.
https://overunity.com/18497/floor-sweepings-dust-bin/msg577574/#msg577574
 and this
https://overunity.com/18496/un-hassled-exploration/msg545850/#msg545850