SARS-CoVid19
Spikes
Mutation-mechanism :
Prion-Protein-Scrapie
Creutzfeldt-Jakob-Krankheit
Erkrankung/infection + Anti-Vakzine : Kettenreaktions-/chain reaction -Mechanism
https://www.n-tv.de/wissen/Diese-Impfstoff-Nebenwirkungen-gibt-es-article22244799.html"Fett und Wasser trennen sich immer
", erklärt Kaufmann.
Kein Grund aber für stärkere Bedenken, sagt Kaufmann
Solche Begleiterscheinungen sind bei Impfungen üblich, wie
Stefan Kaufmann, emeritierter Direktor am Max-Planck-Institut für InfektionsbiologieKolloides Verhalten :
https://motorkote.com/collections/allSolche Begleiterscheinungen,von ueberschaetztem - unwissenschaftlich wirkendem- Personals begleitet zu sein, sind bei Impfungen ueblich
BONZO-/BONZA-Nation !
John Kanzius and 5/6G
arguments pro/contra
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znHrQIbmsTA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MuKR1htWyFw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfboqgNaQp8 Hochspannungsleitungen,Hochspannungsmast :
Vogelnester,Eier-De-/Formation ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02hGs8gJCPU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HzHpunSrncM et cetera and Pipa ohne P..
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=dr+eneas+carneiro outside Semi-B
inside well formed
"Eu estou do lado desse pequeno grupo, chamado de conjunto de trogloditas, indivíduos da (Era) paleolítica,
que defende o Estado nacional soberano."
Pinto da Costa-destaque : "Penso que isto chama-se CONSTITUTIONALISTA,certeza ?!" ULTRAs ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-57vrz6yVM Saberdoria ? Em theoria é pra(c)tica !
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_RyMKDQ3g4A ` armas transformar em "machinas" de energia libre
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmoSB3OgNMU 
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falange#/media/Datei:Bandera_FE_JONS.svg https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonnengeflechthttps://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7a/Recorrected_manipura.png https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manipura entrada/saida
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lichtkegel#/media/Datei:World_line-de.svgA "techno-political problem" in the 80/90´ for the east german inventor Dr.? Helmut Reichelt,Dresden :
elektromagnetische Verträglichkeit {f} <EMV>electromagnetic compatibility <EMC>
electromagnetic compliance <EMC>electr.
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://www.slimlife.eu/reichelt_heizung.htmlbased by
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=12&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19840321&CC=DD&NR=208029A1&KC=A1#https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=14&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19910228&CC=DD&NR=287597A5&KC=A5#https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=9&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19850619&CC=DD&NR=223743A1&KC=A1#auch als Radar-System :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=15&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19930902&CC=DD&NR=301733A7&KC=A7#In focus :
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=electrosmog+in+ecarshttps://www.archyde.com/electrosmog-in-the-car-german-carmakers-are-fighting-against-radiation/https://www.who.int/peh-emf/publications/facts/fs299/en/ The recommended limits are time-weighted average of 200 mT during the working day for occupational exposure, with a ceiling value of 2 T. A continuous exposure limit of 40 mT is given for the general public. Static magnetic fields affect implanted metallic devices such as pacemakers present inside the body, and this could have direct adverse health consequences. It is suggested that wearers of cardiac pacemakers, ferromagnetic implants and implanted electronic devices should avoid locations where the field exceeds 0.5 mT. Also, care should be taken to prevent hazards from metal objects being suddenly attracted to magnets in field exceeds 3 mT.
https://www.icnirp.org/https://www.intechopen.com/books/modeling-and-simulation-for-electric-vehicle-applications/passenger-exposure-to-magnetic-fields-in-electric-vehiclesConcern regarding potentially hazardous consequences of nonionizing EMR started to raise some decades ago, around the 1950s and 1960s, first about radio waves and microwaves, and more recently about low‐intensity fields as well, such as those generated by power lines, cell phones, and Wi‐Fi devices. The effects of nonionizing electromagnetic fields on the human body have been studied for many years already, and the results are conclusive in some cases and inconclusive in others [
20–
23].
Basically, there are two types of effects that electromagnetic fields can have on biological tissues: short‐term and long‐term effects. Short‐term effects, also known as acute effects, are those that appear instantaneously, or minutes after the beginning of the exposure. In general, these effects only take place under fields of considerable intensity, and disappear as exposure ceases. The biological mechanisms involved in these short‐term effects are relatively well known, as well as the field values (intensity and frequency) that cause them [
24–
27]. They are usually classified into two main groups: electrostimulant effects and thermal effects. The former are caused by the interaction between low‐frequency fields and living matter, either by polarization and dipole reorientation produced by electric fields, or due to induced currents generated by magnetic fields (for instance, a strong alternate magnetic field can induce electrical currents capable of stimulating nerves and muscles in an undesired way). The latter refer to the exchange of energy between fields and tissues, which rises their temperature. These thermal effects are completely negligible for frequencies under 100 kHz, but become relevant at higher frequencies (consider, for the sake of illustration, the operating principle of a microwave oven, whose working frequency is around 2.45 GHz). Electrostimulant effects are instantaneous, while thermal effects have a time constant of minutes.
Long‐term effects, on the other hand, are those that could appear after months or years of exposure. Several studies have tried to determine the relationship between long‐term exposure to electromagnetic fields and different pathologies (cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, etc.), without finding conclusive evidence for it. Approximately half of these studies show small correlations, just statistically significant, between long‐term exposure and these illnesses [
28]. In any case, the possibility of such relationships made the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) to classify low‐intensity, low‐frequency electromagnetic fields, and also radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, as “possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B)” [
24,
25].
Generally speaking, it is extremely difficult to establish direct biological effects caused by long‐term exposure, and to obtain reproducible results [
23]. As a consequence, standards and guidelines to limit human exposure are elaborated based only on well‐known, scientifically proven, short‐term effects (with appropriate safety factors), and therefore long‐term effects are not taken into account. This applies to the two most extended guidelines nowadays, those from the International Commission on Non‐Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) and those from the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE). Both are briefly described subsequently.
3.1. ICNIRP’s guidelines The most extended criteria for recommended exposure limit to EMFs were first proposed by the International Commission on Non‐Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) in 1998 [
22]. These guidelines are based on current scientific evidence, as well as risk analysis performed by the World Health Organization (WHO). They establish protection recommendations considering well‐known mechanisms and appropriate security factors, the latter being due mostly to scientific uncertainty.
Less KW electro-magnetic drive is healthier, instead 300 KW or 30 KW 3 KW nominal e-drive for passengers car drive more than sufficient !
