Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: David La Point and over unity claim  (Read 4261 times)

Offline Jimboot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1232
Re: David La Point and over unity claim
« Reply #15 on: May 01, 2022, 11:45:58 PM »
Thanks floor. I hope to do some of those tests. So far with my second bowl 20% complete, it gets past the sticky point and still shoots the pm a distance of 3m. I hope to have 3 bowls completed by the weekend.
« Last Edit: May 02, 2022, 09:25:52 AM by Jimboot »

Offline Jimboot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1232
Re: David La Point and over unity claim
« Reply #16 on: May 02, 2022, 01:11:43 PM »
This bloke has already answered a lot of questions. Interesting stuff. https://youtu.be/DjNg7mxCNYk

Floor

  • Guest
Re: David La Point and over unity claim
« Reply #17 on: May 02, 2022, 02:44:44 PM »
regarding this video at "tech planet"

                             https://youtu.be/DjNg7mxCNYk

That only a small amount of curvature can be tolerated in the tube / path,
seemed I think obvious from the start.

It remains that the work (not simply peak force) needed to insert the magnet stack
has not been measured / demonstrated.

Without building enough magnet domes to complete a circle, but by building
2, 3 or four domes, one can determine if the work needed to      initially     insert
the stacked magnets increases when there are two, three or four magnet
domes in a row.   I wish the guy at "tech planet" had measured / or might yet
measure this ?

As an aside...
note also, that a        similar        effect can be had, using a series of ring magnets.
Magnets like those found in microwave ovens. Those, are axially magnetized, but have
no dome shape.

Offline ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7622
Re: David La Point and over unity claim
« Reply #18 on: May 02, 2022, 03:18:04 PM »
Smot loop/track of some sort …even an incline ramp with scale on output (distance over height delineation)
To duplicate a static release at input to see if it breaks through the gate ?
I would imagine a loop ( out put overtop return to input ) must have been played
with ?


Seems we will be trying to invite David here for discussion and perhaps others who have experimented.
However it will be most interesting to FE physicist community
His Room temperature fusion experiments ? !
Respectfully
ChetKremens@gmail.com



Floor

  • Guest
Re: David La Point and over unity claim
« Reply #19 on: May 02, 2022, 10:36:58 PM »
   Partial quote
However it will be most interesting to FE physicist community
His Room temperature fusion experiments ? !
Respectfully
ChetKremens@gmail.com

                Agree...

Offline Jimboot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1232
Re: David La Point and over unity claim
« Reply #20 on: May 16, 2022, 02:03:15 PM »
Magnet will fire through two bowls with minimum force. I’m going to measure the difference in force and distance travelled when firing through 1 bowl vs 2. Eyeballing there seems no difference.

Offline Jimboot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1232
Re: David La Point and over unity claim
« Reply #21 on: May 17, 2022, 02:14:01 PM »
Ok same results as David and tech planet. 360gr of force will propel the pm the same distance with one or two bowls. Due to the shape of the bowls the opposing field at the top is weaker than the focused smaller attracting field at the base. So as soon as it ejects the first bowl it is already past the the sticky point in the second and is in attraction . This gate in theory imho could do what David claims. Before I get to fusion I’d like to investigate these fields more.

Offline truesearch

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 285
Re: David La Point and over unity claim
« Reply #22 on: May 25, 2022, 01:10:05 AM »
Jimboot

Anything new to report on your experimenting?
Just curious where this might go. . . .

Offline ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7622
Re: David La Point and over unity claim
« Reply #23 on: May 25, 2022, 01:38:20 AM »
Sir
Jim started a new board here
https://overunity.com/19120/primer-field-overunity-device/msg567190/#msg567190


I believe it is hoped that Mr.LaPointe may eventually contribute to the topic .


Respectfully
Chet K