First video posted here...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWESbALZELQ&feature=youtu.beMeasuring the total work that must be done in order to push the stack of
magnets into a single one of the domed field units (up to the very point at which the stack
is drawn in) must be done in order to know if the input is less than the output. Peak force
is not an indication of the work done / energy expended.
Yes, that is, total work in each direction of entry.
If a linear / series array of the bowls is accelerating the stack of magnets,,,
1. Are the fields from the bowls combining ?
2. If the fields are combining, has this increased the work required to
initially, insert the magnet stack ?
The voltage is successively increasing as the stack progresses through each / the
next bowl.
1. Is this due to an increased speed of travel of the magnet stack ?
2. Is this due to a combining of the bowl fields ?
3. is it work from permanent magnets ?
If the device were self looped the speed of the travel of the stacked magnets
might continue to increase until some balance against wind resistance is arrived at
or the device exceeds its own mechanical strength to retain the magnet stacks against
centrifugal forces.
Higher speed would produce greater energy and greater power.
Net gain, may or may, or may not be there. The test method may be flawed.
Opinion...
The demonstrations and oscilloscope displays do not as yet / definitively, demonstrate
a net gain in work from the magnet interactions.
due to no...
1. peer review
2. replication
3. additional kinds of tests.
Opinion...
1. peer review
2. replication
3. additional kinds of tests.
are merited here
P.S.
Thank you to David La Point
for sharing your explorations !