Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Two kinds of induction - Henry  (Read 21376 times)

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Two kinds of induction - Henry
« Reply #45 on: July 16, 2020, 08:25:42 AM »
few words from floyd sweet about motional e field, something very close to if not the same as a field.

i think he is wrong about the detail that flux is not actually being cut

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Two kinds of induction - Henry
« Reply #46 on: July 16, 2020, 08:49:21 AM »
some more on motional e fields (very interesting)

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Two kinds of induction - Henry
« Reply #47 on: July 19, 2020, 01:52:03 AM »
just to add, funny that mass of a proton is 1,836 times the mass of an electron

numerical value of 9, key to magnetism (source: richard t. miller tapes)

just like 12 is key to gravity (source: only planet of choice phyllis v. schlemmer)

according to sweet above we might conclude motional electric field (gravity?) is produced mainly by the electron

we find confirmation for this also in ummo papers, i quote

Quote
You know that one of the attributes of the electron is Mass. When the mass of the electron describes a harmonic motion, under certain conditions it creates gravitational waves with an equivalent loss of energy. Under these conditions the electron disappears to be transformed into what you would call ANOTHER SUBATOMIC PARTICLE.

Electron degenerates as it emits quantified energy in gravitational form.

These gravitational waves have an energy much weaker than the radio waves you know (about 10 power -39).

there are other confirmations of this. ning li rotated electrons trapped in superconductor lattice in which they form cooper pairs. spun at high speed she claimed to have developed a forcefield of 8kg, attractive or repulsive depending on polarity (positive or negative ions i suppose).

it seems gravitational field can be produced by two same opposing (phase conjugate) em signals and that distance between the antennas determines the quality of the artificial ether produced, and also that field is amplified by addition of strong electrostatic field and even more so by rotation of heavy crystaline matter.


nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Two kinds of induction - Henry
« Reply #48 on: July 19, 2020, 02:04:49 AM »
bismuth

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Two kinds of induction - Henry
« Reply #49 on: July 20, 2020, 12:36:45 AM »
hutchison ball stablized

https://youtu.be/pPYCKySAePQ?t=126


nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Two kinds of induction - Henry
« Reply #51 on: July 31, 2020, 08:23:10 AM »
...

kajunbee

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 161
Re: Two kinds of induction - Henry
« Reply #52 on: July 31, 2020, 11:56:17 AM »
My conclusion is that the other form of induction is actually “self induction” which he is credited for discovering. The shielding effect I believe is the difference between high and low frequency or static magnetic field. Steel can somewhat shield magnetism but not copper or aluminum. But a fast changing magnetic field will induce focault (eddy) currents in these metals and therefore act as a shield. It’s why you sometimes see transformers wrapped in a thin sheet of copper. Anyway that’s by best guess. As you said before they expressed there thoughts differently in those days so it’s difficult to follow.

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Two kinds of induction - Henry
« Reply #53 on: August 01, 2020, 04:15:15 AM »
ofc, that is not true

kajunbee

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 161
Re: Two kinds of induction - Henry
« Reply #54 on: August 01, 2020, 06:55:12 AM »
Am I supposed to just take your word on it. Maybe you have better explanation. I’m always willing to learn something new. I’m all ears!

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Two kinds of induction - Henry
« Reply #55 on: August 01, 2020, 11:52:02 AM »
i already said possible explanation is in terms of a-field or motional electric field, which appear to be similar to gravity, but not necessarily the same.

kajunbee

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 161
Re: Two kinds of induction - Henry
« Reply #56 on: August 02, 2020, 11:34:58 PM »
I’ve done some more research and believe my conclusion is correct. It was only the difference in which the experiments were carried out. Henry had stumbled upon eddy currents and the effects associated with high frequency. I’ve included a couple videos that clearly show these effects. Notice how copper has no effect at low frequency but does at high frequency.
https://youtu.be/EZLu8v3tTfY
https://youtu.be/_Zq6qiuuINE

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Two kinds of induction - Henry
« Reply #57 on: August 03, 2020, 10:37:43 PM »
i seen those videos. still, there is more to it than eddy currents, read the long screenshot on the first page of his experiemnts and you'll see why it is so

besides, we're not talking just henry, but also MEF and A-FIELD.

kajunbee

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 161
Re: Two kinds of induction - Henry
« Reply #58 on: August 03, 2020, 11:42:13 PM »
This is from page 124 of the link you provided in your first post. Could you point me to a specific paragraph on the screenshot.

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Two kinds of induction - Henry
« Reply #59 on: August 04, 2020, 09:26:09 AM »
paragraph 51

he arranged a delicate setup in which induced currents perfectly neutralized each other measured by two galvanometers and a needle to detect the induced magnetic field if present.

placing zinc plate on one coil galvanometer remained at 0 showing two induced currents still perfectly canceled each other, and yet, needle became powerfully magnetic.

current was 0 in two opposing coils, needle should not have become magnetized

and with iron plate he found currents no longer cancel out and needle also became magnetized

https://i.imgur.com/exKSHHB.jpg


which again reminds me of edgar hollingshead who discovered that discruptive, high voltage discharges separate neutral energy from electrcity, same thing as radiant shockwaves of tesla.

holingshead beautifully defined this, saying that this neutral energy is present in all forces and matter with only difference being it's speed, that in electricity being orders of magnitude faster than in matter

he found that treating metals with this neutral energy changes what he called "atomic speed" which i like to think of as frequency of quarks. he spoke of 3 phase nature of force, positive, negative and neutral and that their ratio is 3, 6 and 9.

changing just positive or negative phase makes matter get hot or cold, changing all 3 at once changes it's gravitational potential.

he made aluminum 20% lighter, disintegrated matter to nothing etc.

rota also spoke that treating metals with neutral energy makes them aquire negative weight, his wingless plane of ~90kg flew by radio control.