To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

Storing Cookies (See : ) help us to bring you our services at . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: the Wind-car  (Read 3709 times)

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4980
the Wind-car
« on: July 12, 2019, 10:33:47 PM »
eCar average velocity :

eCar back emf potential  velocity related
   5 m/sec = 18 Km/h
10  m/sec = 36 Km/h
15 m/sec  = 54 Km/h
20 m/sec  = 72 Km/h

eCar drive :
 F. E.  for Lord Sinclairs C5,original FOB 300 W changed by

for compact class cars,in average 70 ic-engine hp
 changed by

Electric engine input per hour less eCar body potential energy recuperation/recycling calculation. ?

The compact class e-Car equipped with Michel Porquers transmission and 4 times this e-drive :

ou, comme alternative, quatre fois 2( 2 couples)  x LiYng x 4 "toy Motors" ~ 4 x600 W kinetic torque ?
4 fois

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4980
Re: the Wind-car
« Reply #1 on: February 03, 2021, 05:40:46 PM »

                              Constantinescu transmission + 5 hp ic engine

calculation I to electric drive conversion
A 30 kW electric motor can achieve a torque of 170 Nm, which roughly corresponds to a gasoline engine with a displacement of 2,000 cm³ and 95 kW (129 PS).
                                                 ( 5 hp / 129 hp ) x 30 KW = 1,162 KW nominal electric motor

calculation II to electric drive conversion :

 Re: car energy consume improvements  « Reply #2 on: July 03, 2016, 03:37:14 PM »

from the page:ic-engine:136HP=100KW ~12,5 KW electro motor
"The peak hp of an electric motor is usually 8 to 10 times its  continuous rating."

                                    ( 5 hp / 136 hp) x 12,5 KW = 0,46 KW  nominal electric motor

                         brake energy potential ? Comparison,weight + speed/velocity dependant :   37 KW e drive,
12 KWh consume  and 3 KWh brake energy recuperation = 9 KWh net consume

magnetic array wheel generator/s          [0045] ...  vehicle ... :

Offline seychelles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 927
Re: the Wind-car
« Reply #2 on: February 05, 2021, 12:37:36 PM »

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4980
Re: the Wind-car
« Reply #3 on: February 05, 2021, 01:12:37 PM »
understanding wind as winding/rotation ? ::)

remembering :

a flywheel : a. as energy storage b. step up or step down transmission or as "flying/verting" rotor/disc

target ?

"3 ton " : 3000 Kg
               "  ......  The weight of the mass 110 can be, for example, 2000 to 3000 kg  ......  "
professional flywheel research & Development

                       You can take from a rotor/flywheel only the theoretical inputmax as outputmax !

In the case of the subject matter of the patent application, the electrical input energy which is supplied in a pulsed manner is absorbed simultaneously by both poles of the electromagnet which is mounted, as is shown on the attached schematic drawing, firmly on the outer framework of the subject matter of the application, and is at the same time forced as fast as a flash of lightning from these two poles to both poles of the permanent magnet which in each case rotates past and is in the form of a horseshoe, from which permanent magnets the same input energy is at the same time once again forced back on to both poles of the electromagnet as fast as a flash of lightning and thus acts in a repelling manner four times, that is to say twice with double the force, as fast as a flash of lightning. All the repulsions are in the form of two beams and are mutual, that is to say in each case two times twice, that is to say four times, from in each case one input energy quantum, as in the case of the energy principle of nature between the sun and earth. In the case of the subject matter of the invention, when the electromagnet which is mounted firmly on the outer framework is subjected to current in a pulsed manner in each case, this results in the rotor rotating four times as quickly, on the one hand as a result of the quadruple full-intensity repulsion from in each case one electrical input energy quantum, without any moving-away or passage loss in terms of input energy and on the other hand as a result of the traction of the permanent magnet, which is located on the outer edge of the rotor, to the electromagnet shortly before it is subjected to current, in each case in a pulsed manner, as fast as a flash of lightning.

                                                                               dis-/advantages ?!
or permanent-magnet-flywheels ;)

                                                                            the Biot-Savart law

                             Arrangement for increasing the speed of a gas or liquid flow               

This consists in the fact that an electromagnetic field around an arbitrarily bent wire-shaped conductor and a flow field around an arbitrarily shaped vortex thread are described by the same law, Biot-Savart's law. The quantities "increase in magnetic field strength" and "increase in speed" therefore correspond to one another.
                            mechanical speed accelerating= torque amplifying device  ?
 The rotational speed N of the output shaft 3 is given by: ##EQU1## where n1 is the rotational speed of the first turbine rotor 7
n2 is the rotational speed of the second turbine rotor 10
Z1 is the number of teeth of the internal gear 6
Z2 is the number of teeth of the sun gear or pinion 5

 Thus, it is seen that the rotational speed of the output shaft 3 is twice as high as that of the conventional turbine which is provided with only one bladed rotor. When only one turbine rotor; that is, one turbine rotor 7 with its blades 11 is used, as with the conventional hydraulic energy conversion system, it causes helical downflows, but according to the present invention, the left-handed and right-handed blades 11 and 12 are alternately disposed so that no helical downflow occurs and consequently the efficiency of the conversion of the hydraulic energy into the mechanical energy; that is, the rotation of the output shaft 3, can be remarkably increased. More specifically, the output power becomes the sum of those produced by the first and second turbine rotors 7 and 10.
                                                                        cw and ccw


                                                   a . is twice the speed = twice the torque ?!
                                                                Lebost-turbine                                                                               8)

Little has been done inthe way of molding, shaping, directing, or increasing the velocity of the fluid upon the rotor arrangement.
 In theory, the power available from a fluid current is proportional to the cube of the fluid current velocity.
If the existing fluid velocity could be doubled, the power output would multiply by a factor of 8.

                                                     Fradella variable speed generator
[0092]    At 1000 rpm, Vmax=100 volts, so PWM duty-cycle (Ton)/(Ton+Toff) is essentially zero. Therefore, losses Imax<2>(RL+Rs)+2 VfImax=(10 amp)<2>(0.25 ohm)+(2 volt)(10 amp), amounting to 45 watts loss. Output power=(Imax)·(Vmax)=(Imax)·(VDC)=(10 amp)(100 volts)=1000 watts. Therefore, generator efficiency at maximum speed and maximum power is about 95% for this example of generator and integrated electronics parameters.

    [0093]    At 500 rpm, Imax=(10 amp)/(4)=2.5 amps; and Vmax=(100 volts)*(0.5)=50 volts. So PWM duty-cycle=1⁄2. Average pulse power generated=(Imax)·(Vmax)=(Imax)·(VDC)/2=(2.5 amp)(50 volt)=125 watts. Losses to maintain inductor current=Imax<2>(RL+Rs+Ron)=(2.5 amp)<2>(0.26 ohm)=1.6 watts. Fly-back diode losses=2 Vf·Imax/2=(0.6 v)(2.5 amp)=1.5 watts. So total losses=3.1 watts. Therefore, mid-speed generator efficiency is about 97%.       

         twice the rpm = 500  to 1000 RPM             is 8 times the output = 125 to 1000 Watt ,

           attention :       by             50 V to   100 V increase

       quis,quem,quod + esse + demonstrare :    quod erat demonstrandum ,   q.e.d.

references :
Prof. Wolfgang Priesemuth in Itzehoe. The company owner was considered a brilliant inventor, the man of "1000 patents" – Quelle: ©2021
« Last Edit: February 05, 2021, 03:13:41 PM by lancaIV »

Offline seychelles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 927
Re: the Wind-car
« Reply #4 on: February 05, 2021, 09:00:43 PM »

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4980
Re: the Wind-car
« Reply #5 on: February 06, 2021, 08:15:38 AM »
Good morning,seychelles !

youtube : flywheel

trials target : error and success

A bicycle,horizontal use,,can be a good beginning for idea testes !
With a concrete disc/plate as wheel f.e.


Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4980
Re: the Wind-car
« Reply #6 on: June 09, 2021, 09:51:06 AM »

3:00  + "DRIVING NONSTOP WITHOUT PLUGGING AN ELECTRIC CAR IN ?  (by standing/stopping car/rush-hour : storage preservation !)




and for the commercial Nano-Boxx entrance over-bridging time

Tanaka Saburo or Ramos Suarez or Teka Ozkan battery capacity "refresher"

Offline MagnaProp

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 411
Re: the Wind-car
« Reply #7 on: June 11, 2021, 08:29:36 AM »
Move faster than wind pushing you.