Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: "Quantum Receiver".  (Read 38780 times)

skywatcher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #105 on: December 12, 2019, 03:51:10 PM »
If i understood it right, it's a normal single-wire, single-layer air-core coil. Nothing special. The only parameters which can be varied are wire size, coil diameter, and number of turns. But even if my coil has not exactly the right parameters, it should have a resonence somewhere, and this could be tuned to the desired frequency by varying some parameters, like numbers of turns for example.

Looks like you are spinning some theories here without even having done the most basic experiments...   :o

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #106 on: December 12, 2019, 04:04:14 PM »
If i understood it right, it's a normal single-wire, single-layer air-core coil. Nothing special. The only parameters which can be varied are wire size, coil diameter, and number of turns. But even if my coil has not exactly the right parameters, it should have a resonence somewhere, and this could be tuned to the desired frequency by varying some parameters, like numbers of turns for example.

Looks like you are spinning some theories here without even having done the most basic experiments...   :o


I have wound many coils and built multiple resonant tank circuits. I don't have a scope. I know from experience that you can strip windings back, and get the correct (SRF). You can get nearly close enough with the formula, then the scope work is needed. Stiffler's coils are like precious jewelry. I don't have the precision instruments needed to craft one.

I would offer to buy one from you if you could make one that works. You would find people behind me in line.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #107 on: December 12, 2019, 04:30:08 PM »
@skywatcher,


I would order a gross number if you could help find an outfit that would be willing to manufacture them with high tolerances.





skywatcher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #108 on: December 12, 2019, 04:30:35 PM »
I don't have a scope.

OMG... that's a really serious problem.  Hint: You can get one for free, there are companies throwing out perfectly working digital scopes on the junkyard only because they are 5 years old and so they 'have to' buy new ones. I'm currently using such a scope for which i didn't pay a single penny.


Quote
I know from experience that you can strip windings back, and get the correct (SRF). You can get nearly close enough with the formula, then the scope work is needed. Stiffler's coils are like precious jewelry. I don't have the precision instruments needed to craft one.

What precision instruments you need for winding a coil ?  These instruments are called 'fingers'. 


As i already said, the problem is not tuning the resonance, the problem is that there is not even a resonance, so i don't know what i should tune...

This is my coil:

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #109 on: December 12, 2019, 04:40:30 PM »
I just submitted an order to "Sag Harbor" industries for an estimate on the manufacture of the coils. I know what you're talking about because no one else can figure out how to do it either. It's like trying to make a transistor.

Professional equipment is really needed for it to come out right.

skywatcher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #110 on: December 12, 2019, 04:48:18 PM »
This is Lidmotor's coil. I can not see which wire size he used but the size of the coil is not so much different from my coil.
Maybe it's slightly bigger. But this should not matter because it can be tuned.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #111 on: December 12, 2019, 05:02:01 PM »
 Jonnydavro's L-3 coil is 620 turns of 26 swg wire.

62 of 26? Further evidence of "Mayan Synchronicty"? The "Runes of Saknussemm"? (Fictional character in Jules Verne novel) We may need the lagina brothers!

skywatcher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #112 on: December 12, 2019, 05:21:37 PM »
I got some hints how to measure the SRF (use a 1-turn sensor coil around the coil) and now i'm at least seeing a resonance... which seems to be slightly above 20 MHz so i have to make the coil a little bit bigger.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #113 on: December 12, 2019, 05:31:12 PM »
I got some hints how to measure the SRF (use a 1-turn sensor coil around the coil) and now i'm at least seeing a resonance... which seems to be slightly above 20 MHz so i have to make the coil a little bit bigger.


You're on the right track. Dr. Stiffler makes mention of a "sensor coil". Keep it up, it's getting really exciting. Can you upload a video? They may act as "Crystal Receivers" for a Quantum radio club.

I will buy a scope if you can show me how you made one that works. A lot of people would benifit from that kind of instructional video.

skywatcher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #114 on: December 12, 2019, 06:41:24 PM »
I made a new coil with 32mm diameter. Initial length was 53 mm.  SFR was 8.08 MHz.
So i removed some of the windings... at 40mm length it was 9.48 MHz...
Now i'm at 12mm length (almost nothing left  :o ) and it's at 11.04 MHz.
But i'm getting a second peak slightly above this frequency... 


Maybe i will go back to the 12mm coil. 


synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #115 on: December 12, 2019, 06:47:47 PM »
What wire gauge are you using?

skywatcher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #116 on: December 12, 2019, 06:54:49 PM »
Jonnydavro's ratio would be 620 turns of 26 Swg = 0.018” / 0.457mm.
620 turns of 0.457mm wire would give a length of 283mm.  Which core diameter ?

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #117 on: December 12, 2019, 07:04:31 PM »

Here's one from Blumoon:

L3= 100 turns of 0.3 wire on 3cm plastic tube.

skywatcher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #118 on: December 12, 2019, 07:32:02 PM »
Measuring Self-Capacitance and Self-Resonant Frequency SRF of Inductors


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjbK4LsOQRk

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #119 on: December 12, 2019, 07:34:09 PM »
Two coils, built to the same (SRF) in that wavelength, connected to two variable capacitors and tuned to high "Q" resonance would send a short wave signal to a receiver over International distances through an antenna and ground. Tesla patented this "Double Tuner" and it's known as the "Ham Radio".