Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: "Quantum Receiver".  (Read 38788 times)

skywatcher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #45 on: December 09, 2019, 02:05:40 PM »
I'm still skeptical... but i found 13.56 MHz crystals on ebay and ordered some.   :)

skywatcher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #46 on: December 09, 2019, 02:32:22 PM »

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #47 on: December 09, 2019, 02:38:33 PM »
What is inside the coils ?  Single layer air coils ?


The L-3 coil is single wire air core. This coil is precision wound and has a specific inductance and resonant frequency that resonates at that 13.56 Mhz with the Crystal. Dr. Stiffler formerly sold them. Try and Email Lidmotor to find out how to get one.

The Crystal resonates the "Static Field" of the coil. There is no electrical connection.

Do you have a signal generator?

skywatcher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #48 on: December 09, 2019, 02:50:01 PM »
The L-3 coil is single wire air core. This coil is precision wound and has a specific inductance and resonant frequency that resonates at that 13.56 Mhz with the Crystal. Dr. Stiffler formerly sold them. Try and Email Lidmotor to find out how to get one.

If it's an air coil i can easily make one, and tune it to 13.56 MHz.


Quote
The Crystal resonates the "Static Field" of the coil. There is no electrical connection.

In Lidmotor's video the crystal is part of the circuit, isn't it ?  The output of the oscillator goes from the coil to the LED panel, and then to this crocodile clamp thing on the right side, which acts as some sort of 'virtual ground' ?


Quote
Do you have a signal generator?

Yes, i have an Agilent DDS generator which can also generate 13.56 MHz, with milli-Hz resolution.   ;D

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #49 on: December 09, 2019, 03:37:49 PM »
If it's an air coil i can easily make one, and tune it to 13.56 MHz.


In Lidmotor's video the crystal is part of the circuit, isn't it ?  The output of the oscillator goes from the coil to the LED panel, and then to this crocodile clamp thing on the right side, which acts as some sort of 'virtual ground' ?


Yes, i have an Agilent DDS generator which can also generate 13.56 MHz, with milli-Hz resolution.   ;D


Look, you're really set up nicely for this test! Let me explain a little more. The Neo magnet can substitute for the Crystal. The 13.56 Mhz is the resonant frequency of the Neo magnet's boundary layer. Stiffer attaches a wire from his signal generator set at 13.56 to a L-3 coil then one side of a stack of Neo magnets; Then he exits through an LED array. The coil is tuned to resonate with the magnet static field, and the Crystal merely generates the frequency cheaply. I'll try and upload the relevant videos:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFhRx8PgK8c&t=29s


In this video Stiffler generates power by sandwiching a capacitor between Neo magnets. The static field begins to resonate and generates voltage through a FWBR into a capacitor:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFhRx8PgK8c&t=29s

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #50 on: December 09, 2019, 11:02:25 PM »
Both the transmitter and the receiver need a 13.56 Mhz crystal. Only then can we hope to modulate the amplitude and phase in one and get the isomorphic signature in the twin.

Toolofcortex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #51 on: December 10, 2019, 01:08:44 AM »
Can you make a paint drawing with as much detail as possible?

Box diagram.

Organize all your stuff.

To me this looks extremely complicated, for Dr stiffler to say its hard is a bit of a bummer, so I need all the help I can get.

But that dont mean its no good, I just think it would be better if you layed out your thoughts in a more compact manner.

However, if the guy who initiated me to this idea is acting like an uncooperative autist dude, I might as well totally ignore all of it.

You seemed to have studied this alot. Your failed experiment, what was the setup? What would you like to improve?







synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #52 on: December 10, 2019, 09:42:42 AM »
The "Magnetic Field" is both inside and outside of the magnet, or coil. The "Static Field" is both inside and outside of the magnet or coil too.

We can sense the "Magnetic Field" as physical pressure. We cannot sense the "Static Field" because it is not in the physical World. The static field is infinite voltage. It's in the background, everywhere from the the onset of the Universe. We refer to it as: Quanta, Ether, Vacuum, Plenum etc.

Two resonate "Static Field" Frequencies are both separate and identical when viewed from their different dimensional perspectives. Two magnets and two crystals resonating their static fields simultaneously at the same frequency is not anything we really need a detailed drawing to help describe. (I'll attempt one anyway)

People find this intermediate level project difficult because they keep trying to run electrical current into it, with an incomplete understanding of the "Static Field". There's really nothing to it!

"Magnetism is Matter" and "Static Field is Energy". They exchange states at the boundary layer of the magnet with a power ratio of E=MC2 at 13.56 Mhz. These rates and power ratios are the same in the Earth's core and at the center of the Galaxy.

Stienmetz conceived of this Unified Field Theory, and Einstien applied it to the Physical Universe. There is no room for "Counter Space" in Einstien's theory!

13.56 is the frequency of the Mass Energy exchange in the Galactic and Quanta LC tank, and very close to a Mayan sacred number: 52X260. (Plus the 13 Moon Day out of time leap year factor: 13X28=364-365.25=1.25 .25X4=1).

P.S.

I brought this Mayan divisor up to Dr. Stiffler once. and he assured me he didn't get it to add up that way as a connivance.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2019, 02:38:19 PM by synchro1 »

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #53 on: December 10, 2019, 11:50:25 AM »
We are modulating Non-Magnetic energy. Magnetism has an insulating strength of a 90 degree Lorentz force to energy. Magnetism is a wall to energy.

There exists a Macro Quanta and a Micro Quanta with no difference between them. Photon's are nothing more then frequencies in the Quanta. Light travels in a field of Infinite Energy. This same "Infinite Energy" field is in the micro plane we use to Quantum compute through. Stiffler's "Static Field" frequency obeys the laws of Quantum Physics, not our customary ones.

Modulating the amplitude of a Stiffer frequency in a broadcaster and detecting a reaction in a reciever, generating it's own wave in resonance, would amount to a major (Quantum) advance in our sciences of power and communication.

Both Dr. Stiffler and Lidmotor supply plenty of schematics. The challenge presented here in this thread is to construct two units and attempt a signal transfer.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2019, 02:54:48 PM by synchro1 »

Toolofcortex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #54 on: December 10, 2019, 03:35:40 PM »
No time to watch lidmotor or Stiffler, wouldnt know where that schematic is at.

Why dont you include that in a paint diagram, to go along with these boring lines of text.

skywatcher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #55 on: December 10, 2019, 04:01:27 PM »
I sent a PM to Lidmotor some minutes ago. Maybe he finds some time to post something here.   :)

The 'theory' about the special 13.56 MHz frequency is still beyond me.


I think the most important point is to get a *concrete* and *detailed* description how to set up an experiment which shows unusual effects. The description should include everything necessary to replicate it. In the videos not everything is clearly visible and not everything is explained. I don't have the time to figure everything out by try and error. This might take months or years. I want to see something 'special' which convinces me that there is something worth investigating, and if i have seen this i will invest more time and effort into it. But i'm not willing to invest my time without seeing any positive results, and others telling me 'you did something wrong' all the time.   :-\

One of the basic principles of science is that everything is published i a way which allows others to reproduce the results without needing to start from scratch every time.


skywatcher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #56 on: December 10, 2019, 04:22:29 PM »
Additional remark on describing experiments:

In some cases videos are fine, but in most cases some high-resolution photos together with a written explanation gives a much better understanding.

Many videos on YT are blurry and shaky, the camera is held with one hand and with the other hand something is done, the audio often is hard to understand (especially if it's not your native language) and all this leaves you wondering about the details. Sometimes i wonder why people still seem to use 30 year old camera equipment. High-resolution cameras are affordable for everyone today. And any still picture is better than a underexposed, blurry and shaky video.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #57 on: December 10, 2019, 05:29:26 PM »

1352 in Mayan: Look at the values of the number places.

top=400

middle=20


bottom=1

Toolofcortex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #58 on: December 10, 2019, 05:31:51 PM »
*concrete* and *detailed*

This site has been replaced by space cadet autists and delusionnal ego types that spin their wheels in a loop.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #59 on: December 10, 2019, 05:33:37 PM »
Additional remark on describing experiments:

In some cases videos are fine, but in most cases some high-resolution photos together with a written explanation gives a much better understanding.

Many videos on YT are blurry and shaky, the camera is held with one hand and with the other hand something is done, the audio often is hard to understand (especially if it's not your native language) and all this leaves you wondering about the details. Sometimes i wonder why people still seem to use 30 year old camera equipment. High-resolution cameras are affordable for everyone today. And any still picture is better than a underexposed, blurry and shaky video.


Try and get something from that frequency the way Strffler does, by just oscillating a piece of tinfoil with the capacitance from your scope electrode at frequency with No Power!