Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: "Quantum Receiver".  (Read 38526 times)

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #15 on: December 06, 2019, 09:51:33 PM »
You mean this sort of ring magnet ?
https://media2.supermagnete.de/themes/pdesign/pics/icons/rings_outline.png


That's an axial polarized ring magnet. A tube would be longer. The static field appears in the hollow core, but it's irrelevant. Dr. Stiffler sandwiches first a high perm bifilar toroid coil then a HV capacitor between a stack of Neo discs to modulate the static field. I use a 1" diametricly polarized tube magnet in my synchro coil and wrap it with copper windings. The capacitors on the two receiver LC tanks would need pico farad tuners to get the twin resonant "Q". Crystal oscillators are trouble free.

Two quantuum coupled "Synchro Coils" in static field resonance should share the same rise in voltage potential transmitted through the capacitors from one to the other. A second receiver would rise in voltage from the scaler value along with the first receiver and the transmitter.

I'm talking about touching a 9 volt battery, to the transmitter capacitor electrodes, which could be any one of the three receivers. We charge one, and the other two or multiple numbers would rise to the same voltage instantly tuned to the same static field resonant frequency.

Toolofcortex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #16 on: December 06, 2019, 10:36:36 PM »
Well I guess Synchro1 that you do a crappy job @ explaining then.

Your audience is not getting you.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #17 on: December 06, 2019, 11:09:54 PM »
Well I guess Synchro1 that you do a crappy job @ explaining then.

Your audience is not getting you.


Position two Neo tube magnets next to crystal oscillators with tin foil attached and batteries connected, so both magnet core static fields resonate at 13.56 Mhz. These magnets are now coupled in the quanta and a superluminal pathway opens between them.

skywatcher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #18 on: December 06, 2019, 11:19:29 PM »
So let's say i have a cylindrical neo magnet (you said the hole in the center is not important) for example i have some N42 neos with 10 mm diameter and 60 mm long.


Then i need a crystal oscillator tuned to 13.56 MHz. Is any other (tunable, but stable) oscillator also possible ?

What i don't get: How is the oscillator coupled to the magnet ?  Is there a coil ?  A picture would be helpful. 

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #19 on: December 06, 2019, 11:40:05 PM »
You will get it eventually. Stienmetz: There are two equal energies in the Universe: One static (Energy) the other magnetic (Matter). E=MC2. This is the Lorentz force field dielectric ratio of magnetism and voltage.
The infinite voltage inside the static magnet core field is equal in potential to the static field in the vacuum of space that surrounds it. This constitutes a fifth dimension, continuum or Quanta (Whole). This field is not in space and time. Modulation of this field is in counterspace.

Voltage has no magnetic value. Electricity does. This static field oscillates from static (electricity) not an electrical connection. The static Plenum of zero point (Infinite Voltage) is outside the material and physical World.

Everything else is insulator dielectric, blocking this power around itself with magnetic field lines. This field shows up inside the Neodymium magnet core dielectric as C2 (Light Squared) power field potential. That is equal to everything around it with nothing in the way. So a signal through this (Hyper-Dimensional rabbit hole) goes everywhere with no resistance or impedance. Nothing to slow it down. Instantaneous and superluminal.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #20 on: December 07, 2019, 12:35:44 AM »
The static field potential in a Neo magnet core is in equilibrium with the the surrounding Plenum potential that is infinite and timeless. The magnetic field connects to a larger field outside itself as well, but it's on the physical plane in the 4th dimension..

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #21 on: December 07, 2019, 01:49:33 AM »
Wrapping the two tube magnets with bifilar coils would allow us to increase the magnetism in one. hence raising The capacitive charge level of the static field, and measuring the rise in potential in the receiver coil through the other bifilar wrap. The resonant frequency of the bifilars should match the 13.56 Mhz of the static field oscillating crystals.

We could Skype between Earth and Mars in real time from laptops connected to the quantum through Neo magnet cores just like this "Dollar Store" table version.

Lidmotor should step to the plate at this time to score his rightful place as our "Quantum Marconi". I'm Lobbing this one to Randy, Dr. Stiffler's best pupil.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #22 on: December 07, 2019, 01:59:52 PM »
The first public demonstration should be a convention event coupled with the formation of a new company:

                                                          Quantacom

This event would be as important as Marconi's first Transatlantic broadcast.

Toolofcortex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #23 on: December 07, 2019, 02:35:03 PM »
If you cant desig a complete circuit from A to Z and express yourself with a complete drawing.

You cant be a position to know how FE energy works. Dont expect others to design your theory for you. For that, you would need to come up with excellent box diagram communication methods that better describe your circuit.

Of how you THINK its going to work. Right now, its all LAZY talk.

Simple as that. This is basic engineering.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #24 on: December 07, 2019, 02:44:14 PM »
If you cant desig a complete circuit from A to Z and express yourself with a complete drawing.

You cant be a position to know how FE energy works. Dont expect others to design your theory for you.

Simple as that. This is basic engineering.



You're right about that; However, examining the consequences of a success is not completely invaluable. A new Zenith would be achieved that would completely revolutionize our current technology.

Toolofcortex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #25 on: December 07, 2019, 02:45:19 PM »



Your right about that; However, examining the consequences of a success is not completely invaluable. A new Zenith would be achieved that would completely revolutionize our current technology.

No, I want none of that smooth talk.

Zip it. I dont want excuses.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #26 on: December 07, 2019, 02:47:46 PM »
No, I want none of that smooth talk.

Zip it. I dont want excuses.


I am not your sneaker.

Toolofcortex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #27 on: December 07, 2019, 02:48:58 PM »
Well if you dont know how to express yourself, go and learn how to do it, then come back.

This has to come form you.

Otherwise, keep being that talking clown.

I'm done here.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #28 on: December 07, 2019, 04:06:14 PM »
Well if you dont know how to express yourself, go and learn how to do it, then come back.

This has to come form you.

Otherwise, keep being that talking clown.

I'm done here.


My test failed.

skywatcher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
Re: "Quantum Receiver".
« Reply #29 on: December 07, 2019, 09:13:14 PM »
The basic question (which has not yet been answered) still is: what about the 13.56 MHz ?

Is this frequency based on some 'theory' (if yes, i would like to hear more about it), or has it been discovered by experiments ?
Have any experiments been done at all ?  Or is it only some idea 'out of the blue' ?