Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: CO2 capture and reuse technology  (Read 23747 times)

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: CO2 capture and reuse technology
« Reply #15 on: October 05, 2019, 03:36:19 PM »
Portuguese :   barril = barrel = Fasz
                         fosso =Abfall-or https://www.linguee.de/deutsch-englisch/uebersetzung/sickergrube.html


                           fosso : fossil ,bio-compostil ( an/- aerob)


Conventional fossil fuel car emitts ( in/ direct)                                             30 units CO2 per 100 Km
Hybrid. ?
Electric car with electricity generation mix  ( i/d)                                         7,5 units CO2 per 100 Km
Electric car with renewable wind/ solar electricity emitts (i/d).                 1,25 units CO2 per 100 Km

Improved fossil fuel car                                                                                     5 units CO2 per 100 Km
Clean fossil fuel car                                                                                            1,25 units CO2 per 100 Km
Clean synfuel car.                                                                                                0,625 units CO2 per 100 Km

Fritzsche hybrid + 90% efficient engine + Synfuel + CO2 electric filter                 ? CO2 per 100 Km

       Physically it is a fact that e- drives are not dirtier/cleaner than fossil combustion engine cars  !
               By chemical fair calculation  comparison   !

               But: e- drives are cheaper than ic engines ,less parts/ material need  !


                                                    NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE but wished. ?

Manipulation-Observation in future : wireless https://patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=9081
                                                                   https://patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=14270
« Last Edit: October 05, 2019, 08:57:38 PM by lancaIV »

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: CO2 capture and reuse technology
« Reply #16 on: October 20, 2019, 11:52:53 AM »
Hybrid conversion kits :

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fm.faz.net%2Faktuell%2Ftechnik-motor%2Fmotor%2Fhybridantriebe-sollen-billiger-werden-16431538.html
Mahle hybrid SUV : down to 18 gr.  CO2 per kilometer emission

                                  With CO2- less Synfuels  ?

                                  With emission filter/capture.  ?

                       
                        "open source"- hybrid kits concepts
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=19&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20040805&CC=DE&NR=10304043A1&KC=A1#

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=20&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20020801&CC=DE&NR=10103188A1&KC=A1#

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=9&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19950330&CC=DE&NR=4332378A1&KC=A1#
As cheap consume saving hybrid electricity source :
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-m&q=reinhardt++turbine&oq=reinhardt++turbine&aqs=heirloom-srp..

30    units CO2 per 100 kilometers conentional

15    units          per 100 kilometers hybrid

7,5   units.         per 100 kilometer power saving magnet array electric motor hybrid

3,75 units.        per 100 kilometer synfuel hybrid

< 1   unit            per 100 kilometer.  hybrid fuel (~ gun-) engine optimizer

> 0   unit.           per 100 kilometer optimized syn-fuel engine hybrid with magnet array motor and CO2- filter



From physical view ic-engines are - CO2- related- not worser than full electric cars like Tesla Motors models and other  !

The batteries are " bad CO2 packs" !
A thirthy-five years oldtimer can become as converted hybrid same clean like 2019 new electric cars  models. !

Costs under 5000 US$, nearer 3000 US$ ,by under 1500 $ industrial parts production costs. !
Cheaper than a new car. !

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-m&q=hybrid+conversion+kit&oq=hybrid+conversion&aqs=heirloom-srp.0.0l5
The European and U. S.  market and industry with 800 Mio.  user does not anymore represents the world market with 7,5-8  Billions potentionally consumer and millions of " local car manufacture ateliers". !

https://www.google.com/search?q=renault+kwid&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-m with >0 gr CO2 " mild hybrid" as Renault Kwid :
                                                     +- 7500 Euros new. !





Relatively low cost and fast cleaner emission improvement

https://patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=13082
compared with " gun engine"- conversion parts :

https://peswiki.com/directory:gun-engine


Lower CO2 content synthetic hydro-fuels :

https://patents.google.com/patent/CA2859958A1/sv
compared with

Synthetic Petroleum ~ Syntroleum( TM)
http://www.rexresearch.com/imanakafuel/imanakafuel.html

Conventional.                                                    ic-car 30 units CO2 per 100 kilometer

"gun engine " - conversion parts :                                5 units CO2 per 100 kilometers

Hydro-Synfuel as energetic source.       :                 < 1 unit   CO2 per 100 kilometers

 "gun engine parts" also installed in (portable) CoGen-plants worldwide,comerce-industrial and private households,  !

Bio-/Syngas to electricity
 " gun engine"- conversion :
~
https://overunity.com/17033/briggs-18hp-runs-on-water-s1r9a9m9-web-site-videos-12-youtube-2008/msg539804/#new
Briggs- running on water- engine as hybrid drive source :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=10&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19950330&CC=DE&NR=4332378A1&KC=A1#

Instead 2 x 12 KVA generators 2 x Akio Hara generators = 2x 24 KVA
As CoGen-plant. ? The Briggs engine equipped with waste heat recuperator. ?

In cars :

Instead 1 electric differential motor 2( up to 4) "in wheel electric motors" , with power saving Hallbach magnets array?
« Last Edit: October 20, 2019, 07:28:39 PM by lancaIV »

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: CO2 capture and reuse technology
« Reply #17 on: October 22, 2019, 12:44:09 PM »

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: CO2 capture and reuse technology
« Reply #18 on: October 28, 2019, 02:14:11 PM »
energy from ???
http://www.conflowpower.com/
ConFlow PowerTM acts like a battery and looks like a battery but actually is a generator, essentially regenerating its own power using a combination of nanotechnology and the atmosphere.

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: CO2 capture and reuse technology
« Reply #20 on: November 03, 2019, 06:35:34 PM »
Reply #1,3,4,17 related : CO2- capture/sequestration/farming costs :
https://www.givingwhatwecan.org/report/cool-earth/
"Overall evaluation" : surprisingly low costs per ton CO2 !
#1 : when 6 lt. /100 Km and 12500 Km drive per annum release 1,8 ton CO2 and for each ton CO2 we calculate

with 2 Euros/ton certificate = 3,6 Euros for 1,8 ton CO2 dividing with 750 lt fuel (6 lt./100 Km x 12500 Km)
= less than 0,5 Eurocent/lt.

1800 Kg/12500 Km ~ 144 Gr. CO2/Km
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mahle.com%2Fde%2Fnews-and-press%2Fpress-releases%2Fhohe-kostenersparnis-neuer-skalierbarer-und-modularer-hybridantrieb-von-mahle-72064
E.U. 2030 : 59,4 Gr. CO2 /Km average fleet CO2 emission


Do they mean 220 mpg ~ ( 1 Land mile : 1,609 Km; 1 gal. ~ 3,758 lt.)  94 Km/ liter fuel?!   ::) https://patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=1308
6 Liter/100 Km ~ 16,7 Km/Liter  :  16,7/94 = 0,17 x 144 Gr. CO2 /Km ~   

                             24,5 Gr.  CO2/Liter conventional fuel  compared E.U.   2030 59,4 Gr. CO2/Km fleet average

                             12,25 Gr. CO2/Liter with synfuel



His engine consume improvement parts alternatively. ? 450 mpg  ?  ;)
I assume their calculation only fossil fuel part based  :

450 mpg x 0,1 (90% water/10% fuel)  x 0,225 (20% average engine efficiency /90% gun engine efficiency)

~ 10 miles per gallon

http://gun-engine.pl/en/


For experiments :

https://rqriley.com/product/xr3-hybrid-plans/               125 mpg Biodiesel + above engine improvement  ?

« Last Edit: November 03, 2019, 09:34:34 PM by lancaIV »