Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: PULSERs ONLY  (Read 26110 times)

EMdevices

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1146
Re: PULSERs ONLY
« Reply #30 on: June 17, 2007, 05:13:42 AM »
gyulasun,

Isn't it fun guessing?    :) 

Are you going to refine your theory after you view the video?

EM

TheOne

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 985
    • Amanatsu Games
Re: PULSERs ONLY
« Reply #31 on: June 17, 2007, 05:55:38 AM »
we have a magician in the forum!! :)

turbo

  • Guest
Re: PULSERs ONLY
« Reply #32 on: June 17, 2007, 09:46:00 AM »
cool ;D

gyulasun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4117
Re: PULSERs ONLY
« Reply #33 on: June 17, 2007, 10:56:53 AM »
Hello EM,

First from your photos I thought the ring floated, meaning there was a small distance between the ring and the flat ring magnet.

Now I think you wrapped up small magnet(s) in the upper part of the floating ring and the resultant weight of this 'stuffed' ring balances against the repel forces from the ring magnet beneath it. The 'stuffed' ring touches the surface of the flat ring magnet.
So there seems no induction involved...  No more guesses from me   :-X  ;D

Gyula

EMdevices

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1146
Re: PULSERs ONLY
« Reply #34 on: June 18, 2007, 02:51:12 PM »
that's pretty close Gyula, congratulations, but here's the kicker,  there are no magnets in the ring   :)

I'm still exploring the effect, but it appears to be a static repulsion one for sure and the ring does contact in one spot, so it's not absolute levitation, that would be nice.

I'll let you all know what I find out.

EM

gyulasun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4117
Re: PULSERs ONLY
« Reply #35 on: June 18, 2007, 05:18:35 PM »
that's pretty close Gyula, congratulations, but here's the kicker,  there are no magnets in the ring   :)

I'm still exploring the effect, but it appears to be a static repulsion one for sure and the ring does contact in one spot, so it's not absolute levitation, that would be nice.

I'll let you all know what I find out.

EM

So you mean you do not know the explanation yet?  Then please tell us what is the wrapped up ring made of?  What material?  The thin ring magnet is a ceramic (ferrit) magnet, right?

Gyula

EMdevices

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1146
Re: PULSERs ONLY
« Reply #36 on: June 18, 2007, 06:45:22 PM »
The magnet is a typical ceramic magnet disk polarized N on the large face (and S on the bottom face, or vice versa).

The coils is ....< blank >  ....   :)

I can't let you guys get ahead of me on this one.   :)

EM
« Last Edit: June 18, 2007, 07:30:11 PM by EMdevices »

Thaelin

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1093
Re: PULSERs ONLY
« Reply #37 on: June 18, 2007, 10:21:02 PM »
   Every part of me wants to say aluminum ring due to its para magnetic property. Just a guess there.

sugra

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: PULSERs ONLY
« Reply #38 on: June 19, 2007, 12:46:46 AM »
Cavitation comes to mind. Dansway had been mentioning this somewhere before and we discussed this in length. The Magnet then bends the field. This is what led me to put the 2 aluminium plates across my reproduction of Marcos last coil. I got zapped off the edges of the plates. I felt this was just a side effect. No pun intended.

--giantkiller.

EMdevices

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1146
Re: PULSERs ONLY
« Reply #39 on: June 19, 2007, 06:10:27 AM »
Here's something to get your mind off and into a different direction (maybe)  :)


Thaelin

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1093
Re: PULSERs ONLY
« Reply #40 on: June 19, 2007, 07:40:24 AM »
   Notice that you got very little movement from the wire? Size and length of the wire makes for a fair amount of resistance. Try that with larger wire and you will see more movement due to the increase in the amps used. It directly relates .  Try that with two strands of lamp wire and you will see what I mean.

sugra

weggl

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: PULSERs ONLY
« Reply #41 on: June 19, 2007, 07:54:33 AM »
 Have not worked out how to post on this site yet, maybe someone could tell me how.
so i am posting this as a reply which is not a reply.
Hi guys, I am rather new to this hydrogen stuff, I am a 68-year-old bloke in Sydney Australia. I have been fooling around with a plate system with the idea of using it as a boost system on a Toyota Corolla. I was not happy with the output as it required too many amps, so I have built a unit that is a Joe cell configuration comprising of a 1?, 2?, 3?, and 4?, 5? and 6? outer, all internal cells are 8?high with the 6? -12? high, 4 of the cylinders are neutral.
I am currently producing (water displacement test) 0.5 l/min at 18 amps and 21deg c
My question is would this amount of gas be sufficient for my purpose?
I know nothing about pulse systems except to say that I have not heard of anyone apart from Meyer who has got one to work, maybe I am wrong?
I am toying with the idea of using a current control device to keep the amps under control as the unit heats up. I gather from what I have read is that it is as advantage to have the unit running hot as more gas is produced in hot water.
I am not at this stage trying to run on hydrogen alone, I need to crawl before I attempt to walk.

I guess you could say I?m crying out for help. ?Help?!

EMdevices

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1146
Re: PULSERs ONLY
« Reply #42 on: June 19, 2007, 02:40:46 PM »
Hi weggl,  welcome to the forum.   Right when you log in you might want to click the FORUM menu item and then select the right sub-forum that is applicable to your needs.  I'm sure there is a Meyers/Hydrogen link.    We here discuss a so called Toroidal Power Unit.  Have a look around, it's interesting.

Hi sugra, thanks for the advice.  Right now my wire has about 0.4 or 0.5 ohms and from the 24 V battery I'm drawing about 40 amps, give or take a few  (there's some voltage drop at the spark gap as well) 

I also included a magnet after I did the measurements and the video, and the wire moved violently.

However,  I'm not so convinced the first movements I was getting are from the interaction with the earth's magnetic field.    I think it's more plausable that the wires influence EACH OTHER,  and I say that based on how they vibrate, NOT UP AND DOWN but SIDEWAYS.   I'll have to calculate the 'B' field from one wire to the other, and then I can compare.

EM

EMdevices

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1146
Re: PULSERs ONLY
« Reply #43 on: June 19, 2007, 02:47:30 PM »
Ok guys I cracked the mystery of the repeling ring.   :)

I hope none of you are disapointed if I just tell you.  I know I would be, I like to ponder and figure out something,  that's why I'm invovled with the TPU after all.

I'll put together a drawing to illustrate.

EM

c0mster

  • elite_member
  • Full Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 183
Re: PULSERs ONLY
« Reply #44 on: June 19, 2007, 03:36:46 PM »
Good work EM

Cam