Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Bedini Window Motor came from Newman & How Story Changed  (Read 8203 times)

rickfriedrich

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
Bedini Window Motor came from Newman & How Story Changed
« on: June 13, 2019, 08:27:10 PM »
This is major news!
I think it is rather important for everyone to realize that the Bedini Window Motor/Energizer really came from Newman. I have proven that and that the motor came after 1984 (not 1971) in recent videos where I quote Bedini himself in his 1984 audio interview on the Open Mind.
https://youtu.be/KJlcQc8CrRY
This video shows that the 1984 Bedini Testimony disproves several of his Fake Lab Notes later added dates. You can see that during those early years John actually recommended the Newman motor (as the recently released 1984 video from psychotronics ends with John doing just that). You can see from the audio John admits when and how he first came to believe in free energy (from Bearden's 1983 book, and after making his first Energizer setup according to Bearden's direction). His booklet is then published, and he THEN looks to find these processes in other motors such as Kromrey, Adams, Newman, etc. Bedini's old website and lab notes show this progression.

But years later (2006) John decided to change his history as I show in this video: https://youtu.be/0tS94bNcYas
After he gave me his lab notes to scan and digitalize I posted them to my private Window motor group (which is now available). There you can see John is asking me for permission to post the files there. When I scanned the files there was a blank page with 1971 written on it and for some reason John decided create a new history for himself as you can read from his email in that forum. He eventually shares this with Tony C who republishes the second 2011 edition of Free Energy Generation book with the new window motor material and with this claim right on the front cover that the window motor booklet was first published and copyrighted in 1971 when John was only 22 years old (and 13 years before he even believed in free energy). This false claim is even on the copyright page.

However, not only do we have John admitting in late 1984 that he was just getting started that year, but I just realized that the Energy From The Vacuum video 7, which I was also in, has John saying the following:

Second part, minute 32--32:30: "It's been known ever since the Watson, Jim Watson, and the FIRST free energy motors that we did. That when you charge them negative-wise well the normal charger can't fill in the holes. "How long did you work with Watson?' "For over two years before he did the motor. Well, remember that THIS MOTOR CAME OUT OF THAT LITTLE BOOK that I did IN THE BEGINNING, Bedini's Free Energy Generator."
[BTW, this is a very important DVD that everyone overlooked. It is exactly what I am presenting in the third stage process. If Bedini only did this video, or the first part of this video on impulse, then the whole free energy community would be much better off. You can almost ignore everything else he said because of how valuable this is. I spent an entire day teaching on this at a private meeting last week. In the video he makes his most impressively claim, but because his body language was not consistent nobody realized how important it was. This was John hiding the truth in plain sight and giving it out to only those worthy of the information (ie, those who pay attention). He said: "So no matter how many nodes, at the right rate you can KEEP ADDING these circuits like Tesla did."]

Ironically this admission that the window motor came from his 1984 book actually contradicts the 1971 claim on the front cover of the book that he was giving to Tony C around the same time. And I also didn't remember John making this statement in the DVD7 (I don't think I ever watched it because I was there in the video). So John lied to everyone and to Tony, which makes a real mess for Tony to deal with as a publisher making false copyright claims.

These major contradictions show how John attempted to later change his history and try to erase Newman's influence. For those of us who knew John we understood from John the influence of Ron Cole upon him, and Newman's influence upon Ron Cole. Cole was attempting to improve upon Newman's system. They were using different switching. You can see the old website and lab note dates that were not faked that show late 1980s dates when specific geometric configurations were first realized. Yet the 2011 publication includes this fake document purporting to be from 1971 where all these ideas developed by Cole and Bedini in the late 80s were all in mature form in one document!!!

Nobody realized this great Bedini lie until I re-listened to the 1984 audio some years back and carefully went over all the history. And then my former dealer Aaron Murakami decided to expand his lies and slander against me by offering up Bedini's faked lab note (faked as the date is clearly 3 years prior to Bedini's belief in free energy, and the writing is clearly put in after the fact) as some kind of disproof against me on his website. Aaron didn't know any history of Bedini and didn't realize that that lab note was actually my digital file that I made in 2006. So now Aaron has shot himself in the foot by forcing this major Bedini lie to be exposed. So what are these guys going to do about it? Will Aaron apologize for attacking me? Will he admit that John was a liar? Again, why did John lie about this? Because he was trying to erase Newman history and give the appearance that he was around longer than he was. And this is why I bring this up here.

John lied about other history and people as well, and often exaggerated his stories and claims. Since I promoted him and substantially boosted his popularity it becomes me to let the public know the truth. John also lied about his history with me on his history page on his website. There he changed the story and dates of what happened and when. People like Aaron suppress these truths and you can realize why they do that. This is all about selling story-telling and revisionist history to controll the opposition. To some extent this relates to cointelpro.

I will be curious to see if this major news gets ignored or buried or deleated.

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Bedini Window Motor came from Newman & How Story Changed
« Reply #1 on: June 13, 2019, 09:15:47 PM »
I did not know that you, Rick Friedrich, are here in the forum member  !
Why do you let promote a.king21 and benfr your work and DVDs and do not personally demonstrate the resultsfrom your research  ?

Counter-rumor :
 http://www.energyscienceforum.com/showthread.php?t=3782
WHAT IS PHYSICALLY POSSIBLE WITH YOUR DEVICE / CONCEPT ?

high efficiency < 100% or output > 100% related to input : C.O.P. ?00%



Sincerely
OCWL
p.s. : C.O.P. of the " loving path" charge system ?

http://potentialtec.com/   

http://www.r-charge.net/Free-Energy_ep_56.html
Rick Fradella battery charger : 90- days lead- battery lasted 10 years with proper charge controller

rickfriedrich

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
Re: Bedini Window Motor came from Newman & How Story Changed
« Reply #2 on: June 13, 2019, 09:45:42 PM »
I don't use the forums because they are generally distracting people. So I don't really look at them anymore. Of course I was a major contributor to free energy forums starting in 2004.
I don't let or promote these people you mention so I don't understand your point. I do in fact personally demonstrate my stuff. That is IN PERSON. I don't put any value in video demonstrations if that is what you are looking for. You should not be convinced by any video. All I do in my videos is show people how to do things themselves. Now if you are talking about RICK (Resonance Induction Coupler Kit) I did just demonstrate 100 coils being powered by the transmitter at my last meeting. And that was just one layer. When I get some time I'll post a picture of it all lit up with 18 people watching it (who actually helped me set up all the coils).

But why bring this up here? That has nothing to do with the Bedini or Newman motors.
Rick

[quote author=lancaIV link=topic=18241.msg535239#msg535239 date=1560453347
I did not know that you, Rick Friedrich, are here in the forum member  !
Why do you let promote a.king21 and benfr your work and DVDs and do not personally demonstrate the resultsfrom your research  ?]

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Bedini Window Motor came from Newman & How Story Changed
« Reply #3 on: June 13, 2019, 10:02:59 PM »
Here the two members a.king21 and benfr wrote " positively" and with DVD buying promotion ( " as donation")
https://overunity.com/17491/confirmation-of-ou-devices-and-claims/msg535241/#new
You are not delivering new " Newman/Bedini motor" technology news but wish to " correct" wrong accusations  about relationships in the history.
We are here not a " mea/ sua culpa" forum or tribunal !

What interests actually is : what is your RICK and other developments economically worth !?
How much savings/ gains can become reached and by which R.O.I.- time !?

Sincerely
OCWL


rickfriedrich

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
Re: Bedini Window Motor came from Newman & How Story Changed
« Reply #4 on: June 13, 2019, 11:46:41 PM »
If you bother to read my post you will see one of the most significant facts that I just revealed which I quoted from DVD7. This is new news because no one noticed it. It is the revelation of how to multiply the negative energy output from an inductor as many times as you wish.
Again, I don't understand why you divert from what I shared and go into other OU devices of mine. I fail to even understand what you are trying to say here. Are you speaking good about this or wish to talk about the Resonance kit? Why would you bring that up here?
As for the history focus of this post, it is a fundamental fact. Are you wishing for people to not learn these facts? I am bringing out the development of the technology over the years. I sell the Window motor, and have been doing that for years. I have introduced this as a historical context as people have a right to know how all this came about. You are saying that this history is not important? Who made you the judge of that? I am trying to give Newman credit here, and trying to encourage people to carefully consider testimonies, etc.

So as for sharing specific new things, I don't see you sharing anything new. I will make an important point however, seeing that you insist something new has to be revealed on this website. Newman and Bedini both insisted that the coil has to wrap around the motor and that was the reason John called it a window. Now I found that to be most inconvenient as it meant you had the shaft in the way of the windings. So when you have more than one N and S pole I found that the coil merely could be placed in front of one N and the S next to it. This gave the same benefits. It really wasn't anything different, but both these men made such a deal about their coils that they said my coils were a different motor.

Anyway, I am not looking for approval or tribunal here. I am simply sharing very important information that affects a lot of people all over the world.

Can you take a little more time to properly write out your sentences. I do not understand your letters or even if you are asking questions or what subject you are even on.
Rick

Here the two members a.king21 and benfr wrote " positively" and with DVD buying promotion ( " as donation")
https://overunity.com/17491/confirmation-of-ou-devices-and-claims/msg535241/#new
You are not delivering new " Newman/Bedini motor" technology news but wish to " correct" wrong accusations  about relationships in the history.
We are here not a " mea/ sua culpa" forum or tribunal !

What interests actually is : what is your RICK and other developments economically worth !?
How much savings/ gains can become reached and by which R.O.I.- time !?

Sincerely
OCWL

AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: Bedini Window Motor came from Newman & How Story Changed
« Reply #5 on: June 14, 2019, 01:00:21 AM »
If you bother to read my post you will see one of the most significant facts that I just revealed which I quoted from DVD7. This is new news because no one noticed it. It is the revelation of how to multiply the negative energy output from an inductor as many times as you wish.
Again, I don't understand why you divert from what I shared and go into other OU devices of mine. I fail to even understand what you are trying to say here. Are you speaking good about this or wish to talk about the Resonance kit? Why would you bring that up here?
As for the history focus of this post, it is a fundamental fact. Are you wishing for people to not learn these facts? I am bringing out the development of the technology over the years. I sell the Window motor, and have been doing that for years. I have introduced this as a historical context as people have a right to know how all this came about. You are saying that this history is not important? Who made you the judge of that? I am trying to give Newman credit here, and trying to encourage people to carefully consider testimonies, etc.

So as for sharing specific new things, I don't see you sharing anything new. I will make an important point however, seeing that you insist something new has to be revealed on this website. Newman and Bedini both insisted that the coil has to wrap around the motor and that was the reason John called it a window. Now I found that to be most inconvenient as it meant you had the shaft in the way of the windings. So when you have more than one N and S pole I found that the coil merely could be placed in front of one N and the S next to it. This gave the same benefits. It really wasn't anything different, but both these men made such a deal about their coils that they said my coils were a different motor.

Anyway, I am not looking for approval or tribunal here. I am simply sharing very important information that affects a lot of people all over the world.

Can you take a little more time to properly write out your sentences. I do not understand your letters or even if you are asking questions or what subject you are even on.
Rick
Rick Hi there I'm not really sure what it is your giving us here in the form or an advantage  in knowledge other than buying and building expensive projects have got any thing of a project any one of us can build and test that actually produces zero point energy simply from stuff most of us have in the surplus box ? that would be really nice and would certainly put you at some considerable advantage.##

Kind regards AG

rickfriedrich

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
Re: Bedini Window Motor came from Newman & How Story Changed
« Reply #6 on: June 14, 2019, 01:20:32 AM »
Man, is that all you guys are going to do here, keep repeating that "I'm not sure what you are giving us"? I'm giving you history and perspective into a very important context. Anyway, in the midst of that history I shared the most important thing Bedini ever showed. I quoted what everyone overlooked from DVD7, how you can multiply the energy output going to the charging battery AS MANY TIMES AS YOU WANT. Now is the next guy going to come along and repeat what these two guys have done and pass over this as if I didn't say it? Now the point is that I have taught on this subject in my videos since that time 2006. This is one of the most important processes in free energy technology. It relates to how to make use of resonance, and impedance matching with the negative energy so that it can be multiplied indefinitely. So if you want to continue and ignore that then that is your choice. I have demonstrated this process at all my meetings for the last 5 years, and I have explained it in my videos over the last 3 years. John Bedini does a good job of going over it in that video. So what I am saying in this email discussion thread is that you don't even need to bother with anything else John said when you consider this important point that he hid in plain sight.

What is it? You take your SSG or any solid state oscillator that produces the negative energy that normally charges a battery. Now you consider what Tesla taught in his one wire processes. This is to do with unidirectional impulses, impedance matching, and resonance. So normally you just charge a battery (and the bigger the battery the more charging you can get--yes nothing new but no one bothers to do that...) Now instead of multiplying cells in series you multiply various inductors with matched impedances as nodes. These all have their loads. If everything is done just right then you can add as many as these nodes as you want as John claimed. Ask yourself why no one paid attention to that statement?

And why was this teaching not in the advertised Advanced Bedini SG manual? This is the advanced teaching they have been keeping from you. I have shared this for years for those who have ears to hear.

So you can think of the primary side as the prime mover and each node with load as perpetually additive in an ever increasing network in all directions if you wish.

And if you're nice I'll share more...
Rick

Rick Hi there I'm not really sure what it is your giving us here in the form or an advantage  in knowledge other than buying and building expensive projects have got any thing of a project any one of us can build and test that actually produces zero point energy simply from stuff most of us have in the surplus box ? that would be really nice and would certainly put you at some considerable advantage.##

Kind regards AG

AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: Bedini Window Motor came from Newman & How Story Changed
« Reply #7 on: June 14, 2019, 01:51:04 AM »
Man, is that all you guys are going to do here, keep repeating that "I'm not sure what you are giving us"? I'm giving you history and perspective into a very important context. Anyway, in the midst of that history I shared the most important thing Bedini ever showed. I quoted what everyone overlooked from DVD7, how you can multiply the energy output going to the charging battery AS MANY TIMES AS YOU WANT. Now is the next guy going to come along and repeat what these two guys have done and pass over this as if I didn't say it? Now the point is that I have taught on this subject in my videos since that time 2006. This is one of the most important processes in free energy technology. It relates to how to make use of resonance, and impedance matching with the negative energy so that it can be multiplied indefinitely. So if you want to continue and ignore that then that is your choice. I have demonstrated this process at all my meetings for the last 5 years, and I have explained it in my videos over the last 3 years. John Bedini does a good job of going over it in that video. So what I am saying in this email discussion thread is that you don't even need to bother with anything else John said when you consider this important point that he hid in plain sight. Well that is interesting perhaps you have a pointer to share ?

What is it? You take your SSG or any solid state oscillator that produces the negative energy that normally charges a battery. Now you consider what Tesla taught in his one wire processes. This is to do with unidirectional impulses, impedance matching, and resonance. So normally you just charge a battery (and the bigger the battery the more charging you can get--yes nothing new but no one bothers to do that...) Now instead of multiplying cells in series you multiply various inductors with matched impedances as nodes. These all have their loads. If everything is done just right then you can add as many as these nodes as you want as John claimed. Ask yourself why no one paid attention to that statement? could it be that most of the guys who have read it don't know how to ?

And why was this teaching not in the advertised Advanced Bedini SG manual? This is the advanced teaching they have been keeping from you. I have shared this for years for those who have ears to hear.

So you can think of the primary side as the prime mover and each node with load as perpetually additive in an ever increasing network in all directions if you wish.

And if you're nice I'll share more...
Rick
Oh you have my full interest available !

WhatIsIt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 651
    • At The End It Will Matter!
Re: Bedini Window Motor came from Newman & How Story Changed
« Reply #8 on: June 14, 2019, 03:04:37 AM »

What is it? You take your SSG or any solid state oscillator that produces the negative energy that normally charges a battery.


What do you mean about negative energy?
More energy on output, so you feedback to battery or something else?

Can you explain more about that term "negative energy" ?

Thanks!

rickfriedrich

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
Re: Bedini Window Motor came from Newman & How Story Changed
« Reply #9 on: June 16, 2019, 09:36:41 PM »
I continued these points over here:
https://overunity.com/17491/confirmation-of-ou-devices-and-claims/msg535343/#msg535343

See the ending. The earlier points actually relate to this thread however. I only bring them up as other use the drama to distract others from these important truths. Therefore my historical focus is important to clear the way. Anyway, see the direction I have pointed everyone. I taught in depth on this subject for several days last meeting in NC. Obviously I'm not going to do that on these forums where I mostly just get attacked. But there may be a few open people left on these forums. Most serious people are not on these forums anymore.

Oh you have my full interest available !

rickfriedrich

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
Re: Bedini Window Motor came from Newman & How Story Changed
« Reply #10 on: June 16, 2019, 10:56:08 PM »
Well it is a big subject that takes a little time to develop. If I do that then I only get attacked for all my details. You can't win. You say a few words and they get misunderstood and tend to oversimplify the matters. You give details and they lash out at you as if that is a bad thing.
The word negative is even used in the mainstream which wikipedea represents the pinnacle of. It is often associated with the back emf. Once again I will refer to the video Bedini and I did in DVD7 of Energy from the Vacuum where he uses these words in a specific context. The idea is that when you create an impulse with an inductor, at the moment of switch closure, both at the beginning of the first switch, and with the moment you turn off the input switch (which is the usual focus) in both cases we have something mysterious happening that people have described in different ways according to their understanding of the aether. The switches create an opening event, a potential difference, where the environment produces this 'negative' phenomena. It is called negative because it is considered reversed in flow (when actually if flows in all directions), and because it is essentially opposite in every way to positive energy we are used to, and because for engineers it is a 'negative' experience/problem they have to solve or get rid of.

It is not what you see on the oscilloscope in the spike itself, or the oscillations that follow. That is just it's effect. This is supposedly faster than the speed of light because it isn't travelling to anywhere but merely converging in upon the particular areas along the path. Because it is coming from 'counter-space' therefore the larger the wire or loads positioned the more energy will manifest. Thus we have charged up huge batteries with little tiny motors to produce much more useable energy over time than when smaller batteries are placed in the same place under the exact same conditions. But batteries were just the first example shown... The associated path becomes a negative resistance path that is bathed or saturated with this charge converging into itself. So engineers are completely baffled with their meters because nothing adds up. Their meters only measure the wasted energy in a closed loop, and in this experience we can even produce the phenomena and charging or powering of loads without voltage or amperage being indicated.

There are many things to say about this and I have taught on this for many years now. See my latest YouTube videos for more details as I feel that I will be attacked for going on this long.

What do you mean about negative energy?
More energy on output, so you feedback to battery or something else?

Can you explain more about that term "negative energy" ?

Thanks!

WhatIsIt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 651
    • At The End It Will Matter!
Re: Bedini Window Motor came from Newman & How Story Changed
« Reply #11 on: June 16, 2019, 11:54:14 PM »
Well it is a big subject that takes a little time to develop. If I do that then I only get attacked for all my details. You can't win. You say a few words and they get misunderstood and tend to oversimplify the matters. You give details and they lash out at you as if that is a bad thing.
The word negative is even used in the mainstream which wikipedea represents the pinnacle of. It is often associated with the back emf. Once again I will refer to the video Bedini and I did in DVD7 of Energy from the Vacuum where he uses these words in a specific context. The idea is that when you create an impulse with an inductor, at the moment of switch closure, both at the beginning of the first switch, and with the moment you turn off the input switch (which is the usual focus) in both cases we have something mysterious happening that people have described in different ways according to their understanding of the aether. The switches create an opening event, a potential difference, where the environment produces this 'negative' phenomena. It is called negative because it is considered reversed in flow (when actually if flows in all directions), and because it is essentially opposite in every way to positive energy we are used to, and because for engineers it is a 'negative' experience/problem they have to solve or get rid of.

It is not what you see on the oscilloscope in the spike itself, or the oscillations that follow. That is just it's effect. This is supposedly faster than the speed of light because it isn't travelling to anywhere but merely converging in upon the particular areas along the path. Because it is coming from 'counter-space' therefore the larger the wire or loads positioned the more energy will manifest. Thus we have charged up huge batteries with little tiny motors to produce much more useable energy over time than when smaller batteries are placed in the same place under the exact same conditions. But batteries were just the first example shown... The associated path becomes a negative resistance path that is bathed or saturated with this charge converging into itself. So engineers are completely baffled with their meters because nothing adds up. Their meters only measure the wasted energy in a closed loop, and in this experience we can even produce the phenomena and charging or powering of loads without voltage or amperage being indicated.

There are many things to say about this and I have taught on this for many years now.
 
See my latest YouTube videos for more details as I feel that I will be attacked for going on this long.

I want judge you! There is always people who is interested and those who thinks that there is nothing in there and it is waste of time to follow the information.
Both are here on this forum. So, don't be alarmed when somebody attack you. It is normal thing amongst people.

Just say what you wanna say and let readers decide if the reading is for them or not?

And I am also interested in the subject.
I will watch your latest videos to see if there is some information for me.

Is there any other way (scope, multi meters...) to detect phenomenon?
Or we can only observe its consequence in shape of spikes and oscillations?

Can you tell more of yours experiences with it?

Thanks!

rickfriedrich

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
Re: Bedini Window Motor came from Newman & How Story Changed
« Reply #12 on: June 17, 2019, 12:26:02 AM »
Thanks,
I don't have enough time to repeat what I have shared over years and even the last few months. If you go over those videos starting about 2 months ago you will get a lot of details that would take me hours to repeat here. My words are subject to change but you can get the meaning.
I will add here that you use a little cheat method to get a sort of feel measure at the basic level of this that is more of an instant indication over trying to measure a charging battery over time. Now this is only a basic indicator and does not apply to proper impedance matching and phasing. You place a big 100W or several 100W modules in parallel in series to your charging battery if we are talking about the SSG circuit. Then you can tune it and see the amount of light produced rather than look at the battery charging rate over many cycles, etc. Even with a small setup one 100W module may not be enough. Oh, and put a cap across it as well. Of course the question is how can a 35V LED light up at all in such a case when a 12V battery is powering the motor? And the battery also charges. Now this is running the tesla one wire through the bulb which is kind of like c) or d) of figure 5 of True Wireless.

To answer your question, we can only detect the results of this as the energy is converging upon the objects rather than travelling to them. This is why there is no amperage. There is no current flow.

I want judge you! There is always people who is interested and those who thinks that there is nothing in there and it is waste of time to follow the information.
Both are here on this forum. So, don't be alarmed when somebody attack you. It is normal thing amongst people.

Just say what you wanna say and let readers decide if the reading is for them or not?

And I am also interested in the subject.
I will watch your latest videos to see if there is some information for me.

Is there any other way (scope, multi meters...) to detect phenomenon?
Or we can only observe its consequence in shape of spikes and oscillations?

Can you tell more of yours experiences with it?

Thanks!

Acca

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 563
Re: Bedini Window Motor came from Newman & How Story Changed
« Reply #13 on: June 17, 2019, 08:29:26 PM »
Rick just read your posts from the start...well done  !
Newman realized that this discharge spark was the "energy"  as it was present at an instant of the coil discharge..
Parallel loading old lead calcium wet batteries after lead sulfate was formed allowed this to catch this form of energy..as this is way... too...simple as most people want more complex device ... Bedini was able to show this effect.. as you know.. more impulses the better..
History will give the credit to Newman,  and the many various Newman machines..He was that guy with the massive coil..running that on 60 9 volt transistor batteries ...


So he was "nuts" as the explanation is not standard method.. Who died and society gave his nothing except pos-script as as flake ..The body count is all too numerous for these inventors..Same is true for Bedini, character flaws we all have them and not all are balanced just as there are grays of goodness and evil..Most try to stay on the better side of goodness..Sociopaths are in power as they just don't care about people..so they tend to scramble they way to the top of most societies..


Newman machine, I built the first flipper and charged and ran for months by flipping between 4 small batteries,
reed switch and burned out many ..


RIP Newman and Bedini..


Acca..

plengo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 962
Re: Bedini Window Motor came from Newman & How Story Changed
« Reply #14 on: November 25, 2019, 02:59:39 AM »
@Rick
could you, please, point out to where I could go to learn about this "loving path" findings? I am very aware of Bedini motors. I actually bought a few from you in the past.
Thanks,
Fausto.