Warning: ob_start(): function '' not found or invalid function name in /www/htdocs/w00fbde5/overunity/Sources/PortaMx/PortaMxSEF.php on line 340

Notice: ob_start(): failed to create buffer in /www/htdocs/w00fbde5/overunity/Sources/PortaMx/PortaMxSEF.php on line 340
The solution

2nd "law" violations > Heat to electric energy conversion

The solution



Thomas Townsend Brown discovered in 1929 that a charged capacitor experiences a push towards the positive side.
Anyone can check this in a laboratory.

There's only one problem: Electric charges have very little mass, so ...
... according to the Law of Universal Gravitation, this effect is impossible.

This may seem like a paradox, but it is not.

The truth is that we can NOT apply the Laws or Principles of a branch of Physics to the phenomena observed in another branch of Physics (which also has its own Laws).

If we have two objects with different temperatures and we put them in contact, what happens?
What happens is that the object that is at the highest temperature releases energy to the one that has less until the temperatures are even.

Thermodynamics has its own Principles.

It would be a TOTAL absurdity to say that: "According to Ohm's Law this is impossible, because there is no intensity between the objects, the resistance between them is infinite, therefore there can be no heat transfer"

Faraday, in his experiments, discovered that a copper coil reacted to magnetic changes by producing electrical current.

What happens is that copper is a diamagnetic material, and in order to oppose the magnetism of the magnet, it must put its own electrons in motion in order to generate a magnetic field that opposes that of the magnet.

There is no magnetic energy "transforming" into electrons.
There is no kinetic energy of the magnet "transforming" into electrons.

The electrons come out of the copper of the coil to generate a magnetism opposite to the external to it.

The Principle of conservation of energy was enunciated for Thermodynamics, which is the branch of Physics that describes the states of thermal equilibrium.

And when it talks about energy, it refers only and exclusively to thermal energy.

It is NOT demonstrated for any other type of energy (nuclear, electrical...).

But we continue to use it to deny the possibilities of other branches of Physics that have their own Laws.

Making a simple experiment is an added job (no matter how small the experiment).

I guess it's much easier to "seem" smart by saying: "According to the second Principle of Thermodynamics ...", so you don’t have to experiment.

I leave a link for downloading a pdf of only 18 pages with drawings and little text.
I have tried to make it as simple and basic as possible to make it understandable by anyone (even if you do not have much knowledge of the subject).

I assure you that what it says is true, is science and of course verifiable.

I would not publish it here if I had not checked it myself.
The pdf clearly explains the principle on which systems like Tesla, Kapanadze, Gray… are based.

It only remains then to check it or deny everything (without checking or reading it).
 I recognize that the latter is much easier.

Greetings, Gentlemen.



There's no doubt in my mind that you are one of the few people on this planet who has a true free power device! BRAVO, my friend!!!!!!!

The pdf clearly explains the principle on which systems like Tesla, Kapanadze, Gray, Smith… are based.


[0] Message Index

Go to full version