Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 514297
  • *Total Topics: 15303
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 16
  • *Total: 19

Author Topic: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum [with free speech]  (Read 5630 times)

Offline F6FLT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 409
It was Tesla who claimed longitudinal waves rather than Hertzian during his deposition for the rights to radio and he defined both.  If that does not jibe with current scientific nomenclature then fine but this was not from the guy with the issues everyone is so fond of who introduced this concept.  Further it was Tom Bearden who came up with the name scalar waves which makes no sense, scalar field yes waves no.
Tesla also specifically said his energy was non radiating.  What is also self evident is that Dr Tesla repeated adamantly he was very good at tuning...

I agree with that. Concerning Tom Bearden, if no one has ever been able to use his MEG, there is a reason: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Thomas_E._Bearden

As for Tesla, if the energy radiated, then in the absence of a receiver, or in the presence of receivers taking only a part of it, it would be lost.
It was either a near field, which means it is not autonomous but linked to the source, or a standing wave, which means that even if there is radiation, it is that of waves moving in opposite directions, maintaining the energy in static.
Tesla was much smarter than those who today systematically want to oppose what he did to our knowledge of electromagnetism, when he was a mechanical and electrical engineer, having gone through university.

Wesley's answer, claiming a conspiracy theory from Edison or JP Morgan, people who in his opinion would represent the "current scientific position" when neither of them had any credit with real scientists like Maxwell, is childish. It means replacing rational causes with intentions.

PS - I post in this new thread. In Wesley's one where he exercises his censorship, the posts of those who do not allege his extravagant theses are systematically suppressed, including mine.



Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline F6FLT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 409
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum [with free speech]
« Reply #1 on: March 23, 2019, 01:15:55 PM »
In a recent video, Wesley was seen lighting LEDs by contact with the water in a glass.

Water is conductive because it contains ions, such as seawater, or insulating when it is pure, such as distilled water. The one bought in the shops, that I use for my experiments, has a conductivity of only 2 µS. In both cases the water is a dielectric of high permittivity, which allows it to be used for antennas.
The subject is widely covered, especially over the last 5 years due to the search for efficient and broadband antennas for mobile telephony. There are many engineering papers on water antennas on the IEEE website. A good summary is available here.

Water has a high permittivity. The propagation speed of a wave in this dielectric can be divided up to 9, the square root of its permittivity, allowing tuned antennas very shorter than the wavelength in vacuum.  Wesley's experiment is easily explained: the glass of water is equivalent to a vertical antenna subjected to the close and intense field of a UHF or SHF transmitter, so it can light LEDs. No extravagant surface or Zenneck wave theory, such as Wesley's, is necessary to explain a widely known conventional phenomenon.

Some smart people have even transformed a water jet into a radiant antenna! Great!  :)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tIZUhu21sQ
« Last Edit: March 23, 2019, 10:23:55 PM by F6FLT »

Offline SolarLab

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 185
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum [with free speech]
« Reply #2 on: March 23, 2019, 10:06:38 PM »
F.Y.I.

Westey's comments re: F6FLT restarting his "free speech" version of "Kapanadze's" original hijack.

"For me  F6FLT is trying deliberately supplying false information causing devaluation of my voluntary contribution.
I  have no benefit and no gain  continuing my activity in its  existing form."

- Westey, a while back you HI-JACKED the Original KAPANADZE threads by adding your name to them and began your original version of DISINFORMATION regarding the Kapanadze and similar devices. You do not have to "recall" this, just look backwards a few (many) pages.
- You have never posted anything original regarding Kapanzdze's unit,
- NO usable schematics, technical information, system analysis, viable theories, nor any other usable information; NOTHING.
- NO viable references to any established, or other wise, scientific theory; not even a "food for thought" idea, NOTHING.
- So, one would conclude, and rightfully so, that YOU are the DISINFORMATION shill.

Then, and Now, you attack those that are skilled in the art for EXPOSING your scheme. Your "notes are, in fact, is what they  appear to be - nothing but nonsense garbage cut and paste, meant to mislead and confuse.
You further claim, without evidence or explanation:

"Example of F6FLT disinformation   propaganda is  evident by reading his  two posts.
False assumption and wrong conclusion.

And question to you guys :
Why he is so much paying attention to me?
Why I'm  so important to him?
Why he doesn't open  new forum  with title:
Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY  NickZ? 
or
F6FLT Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum [with free speech]?
Why he uses my name and exact  name of  Wesley's forum?

Please give me your opinion what do you think?"
 
- Let me answer your question as directly as possible:
- He, like most of us who sudy this technology and know the real facts, are duty bound to KEEP THE BS IN CHECK (as much as possible considering your constant and consistant flow of BS and your censoring of any possible exposure to the real truth).
GET IT!
FIN



Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum [with free speech]
« Reply #2 on: March 23, 2019, 10:06:38 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline F6FLT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 409
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum [with free speech]
« Reply #3 on: March 23, 2019, 10:07:48 PM »
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #2390 on: Today at 06:59:01 PM »
Note: F6FLT   opened non authorized by me discussion  forum named:
Quote
Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum [with free speech]
This is NOT WESLEY'S FORUM AND IS MADE TO IN INTERFERE WITH ANYTHING THAT MIGHT BE VALUABLE TO THE PUBLIC.

Using my name   is unfair and misleading trick made to bring attention of the crowd to his take about me.
Whoever F6FLT serves too, and whoever agenda is driving his action it should be clear that, it is  another try to
criticize only and not to contribute.

"Wesley" appears in the title of this thread, since it is the title of Wesley's thread that Wesley himself chose, but accompanied by the mention [with free speech], which leaves no doubt that it is not Wesley's thread, but the one to make the answers he censors in his own.

Using the name "Kapanadze" in the title of his thread, associated with his name, is it not an "unfair and misleading trick" to draw the attention of the crowd to him? Of course not, it would be foolish to use against him, the lamentable defamatory process he uses against others.
He discusses the Kapanadze machine, so he puts the name Kapanadze in the title. I discuss Wesley's (often pseudo-)scientific theses and his activities as a censor, so I keep his name in the title of the thread in question, nothing more normal, that's where is the matter to be discussed!

What is "unfair" is to systematically suppress posts, even purely technical ones, when they criticize his theses in addition for perfectly justified reasons, for example see above.



Offline SolarLab

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 185
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum [with free speech]
« Reply #4 on: March 23, 2019, 10:36:06 PM »
F.Y.I.

At the beginning of 2019 it became clear that the "theory of the Ruslan device operation"  was about to be postulated and could be supported by conventional (orthadox) science and engineering knowledge, as well as actually demonstrated by both computer aided engineering analysis and bench testing.

About that time panic also set in. There are many reasons for this I'm sure but we'll leave that for further speculation. However, in a fit of myopic fear, the subject took a dramatic turn. A feverous posting pace of "garbage" (for lack of a better term) and bashing began followed by censorship and out right nasty accusations and name calling.

This behavour is classic, so it's easy to recognize on the forums - when your over the target, the flack is the heaviest.

 But, rest assured one theory of Ruslan's device (and many others) does hold water, devices are being tested, and the entire "package" will be released to the public in the not too distant future.

This is far too important to all of us to screw it up playing "silly little reindeer games."

FIN

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum [with free speech]
« Reply #4 on: March 23, 2019, 10:36:06 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline SolarLab

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 185
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum [with free speech]
« Reply #5 on: March 24, 2019, 01:28:56 AM »
F.Y.I.

Use this simple method (math) to do a numerical analysis of your "idea."
Try the grenade coil, or at least the preliminary physical structure; and you will learn a lot! Then share the math files amongst yourselves. That's how it's done!

Myself; well, Westey has stolen too much stuff from me, without credit or even a thanks; so I've pulled that plug.

Sorry, but frankly it was too time consuming and too much work,  just to have a useless jerk delete my work and then spin into a childish accusation tyrate about nonesensical politics.

So; have fun all by yourself in your little sandbox with your "educational" videos!

We'll go down another, more professional, route for review and comment.

Mathcad (free) download:

https://www.ptc.com/en/products/mathcad
https://www.ptc.com/en/products/mathcad-express-free-download

Some excellent Worksheets:
Basics - https://community.ptc.com/t5/PTC-Mathcad/Problem-Solving-Using-Physics-Examples/td-p/449703

From the list of worksheets; some good stuff - "Topics in Physics" - especially: from this .zip file:
 
https://community.ptc.com/t5/PTC-Mathcad/PTC-Mathcad-All-Worksheets/td-p/450684

https://community.ptc.com/sejnu66972/attachments/sejnu66972/PTCMathcad/1768/1/Topics%20in%20Physics.zip

Chapter 12 Electric Field and Electric Current

Chapter 13 Magnetic Field

Courses:
http://support.ptc.com/appserver/services/learning/sub/library_courses.jsp?library=MC
Download  Mathcad program and install. Download the .zip (above) and look at (do) the material.

Have a nice one!

FIN

Offline F6FLT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 409
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum [with free speech]
« Reply #6 on: March 24, 2019, 11:44:47 AM »
Wesley, your detractors are trying to muddy the water. They don't want others to know what you know for whatever reason. It is obvious their only purpose is disruption. If they don't like what you say they are free to visit millions of other threads all over the internet. This is your thread so just keep deleting their posts for as long as it takes for them to go away. If they are being paid their bosses will quit paying them because they will have failed. Let them start their own thread and share their brilliant ideas and projects. Why won't Stephan just ban them?
Garry

When you understand the absurdity of the theory of surface waves in a glass of water, as well as many others from stivep, confirmed by the fact that no one could achieve anything real on the basis of his fuzzy speculations, you will understand how much time his speech will have wasted on others.

People like me want to inform with the aim of individual and collective progress and to prevent everyone from going down absurd, counterproductive paths in our quest for free energy.  It is not against an individual, but against his nonsense.

Imagining a conspiracy theory is the easy solution for simple minds who want to avoid the effort of reading the real scientific literature yet provided, or who know they lack the minimum capacity required to understand the basics of physics.
It is indeed people who prefer children's stories to scientific literature that the images of stivep, by their excessive simplifications in the Victorian cartoon style, will touch first and foremost. That said, we have the right to prefer children's stories to scientific literature. Too bad it's on a site dedicated to free energy, as children's stories do not have an operating result in terms of energy.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum [with free speech]
« Reply #6 on: March 24, 2019, 11:44:47 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline F6FLT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 409
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum [with free speech]
« Reply #7 on: March 24, 2019, 07:56:37 PM »
NickZ I'm  not in your space, nor I interfere  with you dear friend.

Will you call Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY waste space with its 1397 pages and no results?
...

There is a big difference.

In "Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY", there are guys who search, ask questions, answer each other, keep their thread open and the discussion free, and work together. We don't know if they'll succeed, but at least it's the right method.

In "Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum", there is a self-proclaimed expert on Kapanadze's secrets when he knows no more than the others, who gives lessons and asserts extravagant theses not verified by experiments, who refuses to work with others and even prevents any progress by suppressing posts that object or propose alternatives.  Not only can no success be expected with this method, but it can also misinform those less involved in physics.

Offline hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7937
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum [with free speech]
« Reply #8 on: March 24, 2019, 09:30:41 PM »
There is a big difference.

In "Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY", there are guys who search, ask questions, answer each other, keep their thread open and the discussion free, and work together. We don't know if they'll succeed, but at least it's the right method.

In "Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum", there is a self-proclaimed expert on Kapanadze's secrets when he knows no more than the others, who gives lessons and asserts extravagant theses not verified by experiments, who refuses to work with others and even prevents any progress by suppressing posts that object or propose alternatives.  Not only can no success be expected with this method, but it can also misinform those less involved in physics.

Why do you critisize Wesley so much ?He has his own thread, where he wants to post his theories...Like these good videos of him:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zE4GjB1cWLQ

Just accept that...
Do your own experiments and then report them in other threads...and please don´t start flame wars or disturb him in his thread.
Thanks for understanding.
Regards, Stefan.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum [with free speech]
« Reply #8 on: March 24, 2019, 09:30:41 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline SolarLab

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 185
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum [with free speech]
« Reply #9 on: March 25, 2019, 12:43:14 AM »

    ;)   



Offline SolarLab

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 185
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum [with free speech]
« Reply #10 on: March 25, 2019, 02:18:09 AM »
Hi Stefan,

Hope all is well and your doing fine.

Please restore the files that got removed during the "transition" of Westey's thread. Many of the 
posts (in particular Solarlab) are referenced in a variety of other places. This has caused problems
when others try and reference them.

There was a great deal of effort and time put into most of these posts. Many of them contain key
information and references leading to the understanding of the underlying technologies and it's use.

An attached .zip file (.rtf - wordpad) contains several examples of the discussions that originally lead
up to the chaos with several snipets of broken thread links. It's clear even from the brief captures 
why and where the root problem stemmed from but that's water under the bridge now.

Anyway, thanks in advance - hate to loose all this hard work and information or spend time sorting through
a "way back" recovery, especially when considering the cause. And re-linking would be a major task.

Regards,

SL


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum [with free speech]
« Reply #10 on: March 25, 2019, 02:18:09 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2936
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum [with free speech]
« Reply #11 on: March 25, 2019, 08:43:57 AM »
Hi Stefan,

Hope all is well and your doing fine.

Please restore the files that got removed during the "transition" of Westey's thread. Many of the 
posts (in particular Solarlab) are referenced in a variety of other places. This has caused problems
when others try and reference them.

There was a great deal of effort and time put into most of these posts. Many of them contain key
information and references leading to the understanding of the underlying technologies and it's use.

An attached .zip file (.rtf - wordpad) contains several examples of the discussions that originally lead
up to the chaos with several snipets of broken thread links. It's clear even from the brief captures 
why and where the root problem stemmed from but that's water under the bridge now.

Anyway, thanks in advance - hate to loose all this hard work and information or spend time sorting through
a "way back" recovery, especially when considering the cause. And re-linking would be a major task.

Regards,

SL
Wesley, if you go onto Russian speaking sites similar to  overunity.com, they don't put up with this type of 'blackmail' off topic full page 'wast of space manuscripts ' they are either removed or shrunk down and hidden but showing a viewable reference for a minority to view or tolerate. I mean this junk would not be tolerated so why is it here?
If you look back to the start we had none of this mafia imposed personalized of topic demands, so why put up with it now ????

Offline hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7937
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum [with free speech]
« Reply #12 on: March 25, 2019, 09:39:42 AM »
Hi Stefan,

Hope all is well and your doing fine.

Please restore the files that got removed during the "transition" of Westey's thread. Many of the 
posts (in particular Solarlab) are referenced in a variety of other places. This has caused problems
when others try and reference them.

There was a great deal of effort and time put into most of these posts. Many of them contain key
information and references leading to the understanding of the underlying technologies and it's use.

An attached .zip file (.rtf - wordpad) contains several examples of the discussions that originally lead
up to the chaos with several snipets of broken thread links. It's clear even from the brief captures 
why and where the root problem stemmed from but that's water under the bridge now.

Anyway, thanks in advance - hate to loose all this hard work and information or spend time sorting through
a "way back" recovery, especially when considering the cause. And re-linking would be a major task.

Regards,

SL
Where was it removed ?in which thread ?Wesley has only remove rights in his own board, not in other boards...Also restoring is not possible...Then people have to look into your ZIP file.... Or just build your own site and post it there...Please stop hammering Wesley in his own board...
Regards, Stefan.

Offline F6FLT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 409
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum [with free speech]
« Reply #13 on: March 25, 2019, 10:05:36 AM »
Why do you critisize Wesley so much ?He has his own thread, where he wants to post his theories...

It is not a personal matter, I am not criticizing a person, but what he says and do, for reasons I justify (see for example, above, the question of water as a resonant dielectric). It seems to me that in a discussion forum, it is essential to be able to oppose points of view.

Unlike me who criticizes technical points, we see stivep defaming me, claiming that I am not the real licensed amateur radio operator, accusing me of being in the pay of whoever... (is it in charter of the forum?) and when I answer, he suppresses my posts, and not only mine. I therefore criticize his methods of arbitrary censorship.

From what I see of stivep, there are far more comments (scientifically wacky) about the work of others, with photos and diagrams taken from others, than there are about personal experiments or theoretical development on his part. When I talk about what he says, I also comment on his contributions, as he does about those of others like Kapanadze.

The more you are competent in physics, the faster you see the experimental biases or the conventional explanations that explain perfectly what you observe. What you can show on a forum is therefore very little compared to what you do.
Conversely, the less competent you are, the less aware you are of experimental errors and of conventional explanations, and the more you invent crazy theories about what you see, just to satisfy your ego or impress the audience.

Stivep does a lot of animation here. I understand that this is interesting for a forum like this. But is this compatible with the aim? Quantity is incompatible with quality and the time required for experiments and their analysis. When it comes to experiments done by others, it is even worse because the lack of technical data means that anyone can claim to be an expert in the secrets of the device and say anything in large quantities and of little relevance on most subjects.

If we want a forum where the rule is the complacent spreading of theories based on no facts or on delusional interpretations, simply to please ourselves, then stivep production is not criticizable.
If we want a forum where we seek for real technical results, then we must eliminate the wrong leads, scams, biased interpretations, and keep the real points that seem promising to us. Then to make the selection, the discussion including detailed factual criticism is necessary.
I assumed that we were in the mindset of point two.

Offline F6FLT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 409
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum [with free speech]
« Reply #14 on: March 25, 2019, 10:23:50 AM »
Where was it removed ?in which thread ?Wesley has only remove rights in his own board...

I replied to this, and my message was deleted (among dozens of others):
"F6FLT  from this forum is not the same, real licensed F6FLT"

We can see he talk only about me, not about the technical points I mentioned.
Is Stivep allowed to defame, to carry out personal attacks, and then to delete messages where you defend yourself?!

 

OneLink