(this has been translated with google)
These are simply 2 rotation axes placed perpendicular to each other (a carpenter would say "in team")
The 2 imaginary axes must intersect perfectly otherwise we get dynamic imbalances that are not going well.
If 2 axes of rotation are required, then 2 electric motors are required.
To distinguish them in the drawing one engine is green and the other is pink.
The purpose of the pink engine is to generate a very strong gyroscopic effect, so strong as to be almost inflexible.
The purpose of the green engine is to quickly rotate the rotation axis produced by the pink engine.
The effort to make the green engine is remarkable because the gyroscopic effect generated by the pink engine is remarkable.
The pink engine has to do 40,000 rpm, instead the green motor has to do 20,000 rpm.
We must remember that the gyroscopic effect has the tendency to keep the axis of rotation fixed in space.
The torque generated by the green engine should generate heat or potential energy, instead it does not generate any of the two forms of energy, so it seems that the famous law of energy conservation is not respected.
In fact: in order for the law of conservation to be respected, it must necessarily happen that the ("space_time") that is above the pink motor must start to turn on itself and then accelerate with a rotary motion.

This creates an barrier anti-gravity that prevents gravity from passing, so one kilogram placed on a scale weighs will be less than 9.8 newtons.

The more we increase the speed of the rotation axis A, the more the antigravity barrier becomes efficient

Note: you should not exaggerate to shield the gravity too much because the excessive shielding of the gravity could provoke a tearing of the ("space_time"), the laceration of the ("space_time") could provoke a gigantic explosion.

I'm not thinking zero gravity, I'm thinking almost zero gravity.

The theory is supported by the law of energy conservation.

Since the green engine works like a pack beast because it fights against the gyro effect, somewhere energy must end.

With the exception of internal frictions, there is no heat production and there is also no increase in potential energy, so if the famous law of conservation of energy must be respected, it must necessarily begin to rotate the ("space_time"), but by rotating the ("space_time") happens that ("space_time") expands itself, but if ("space_time") expands itsself the gravity of the planet Earth is partially shielded.

Now do you have understood ?

(I apologize for grammatical errors but I am Italian)

I'm not thinking zero gravity, I'm thinking almost zero gravity.

The theory is supported by the law of energy conservation.

Since the green engine works like a pack beast because it fights against the gyro effect, somewhere energy must end.

With the exception of internal frictions, there is no heat production and there is also no increase in potential energy, so if the famous law of conservation of energy must be respected, it must necessarily begin to rotate the ("space_time"), but by rotating the ("space_time") happens that ("space_time") expands itself, but if ("space_time") expands itsself the gravity of the planet Earth is partially shielded.

Now do you have understood ?

(I apologize for grammatical errors but I am Italian)

The gyro effect does not defeat gravity. It appears to me that you assume it does, but it doesn't.
I will also ask the same question as F6FLT; Why exactly 20k and 40k rpm?


Vidar

without the 20.000 rpm being connected to a surface (earth)
the gyroscopic effect would be lost no?
artv

A gyroscope is forced to point its axis in one direction due to the spinning mass. If your gyroscope was "floating" in air, it would change the axis with respect to the ground as the earth turns around - approx 15° per hour.
Fixing the gyroscope to the earth, will not do anything other than stressing the axle material in the gyroscope, but the spin will continue effortless, and the gyroscope will not do anything with gravity.


Vidar

I apologize, I forgot to draw the connection of the wires and brushes

Without some kind of anchor point, how can a gyroscopic effect be produced?
If there is nothing to apply force against, how can a force opposite pop into existence?
artv

Higher is rpm, higher wil be the effect of the barrier.

There is no equation, simply 40 thousand rpm is the maximum speed an electric motor could do.

the rpm of green engine must be less because there does not want gyroscopic effect

So to understand each other better, starting now, the pink engine is gyroscopic engine and the green engine is main engine.

Higher is rpm, higher wil be the effect of the barrier.

There is no equation, simply 40 thousand rpm is the maximum speed an electric motor could do.

the rpm of green engine must be less because there does not want gyroscopic effect

So to understand each other better, starting now, the pink engine is gyroscopic engine and the green engine is main engine.

An electric Motor can have ultra-high RPMs :
https://www.google.com/search?q=ultra+high+RPM+motor&safe=active&client=firefox-b&oq=ultra+high+RPM+motor&gs_l=mobile-heirloom-serp.3..0i22i30l2.17231.32500.0.33203.34.23.0.6.6.3.251.2835.1j17j2.20.0....0...1c..34.mobile-heirloom-serp..12.22.2240.ouQcxdzOYvo
Normal calculation for bearing life-time : 3000 RPM ~ 20.000 hours ( twenty thousands ) ~ 3,6 billion Rounds