Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Test topic for moderator discussions and "Other"between members  (Read 27362 times)

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Test topic for moderator discussions and "Other"between members
« Reply #15 on: March 03, 2019, 05:23:18 PM »
Grum , I guess fellows had forgotten or were not aware  ;D [your moderator status in this builders section ]

//Grumage Quote  Some words that I've carried with me most of my life.... " Treat others like you'd like to be treated yourself " have held me in good stead. Let's " play nice " eh?...end quote

and then we remember we are guests too ....
AG--- ATM =""At the moment"

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Test topic for moderator discussions and "Other"between members
« Reply #16 on: March 03, 2019, 06:11:30 PM »
The implicit context is physics, since you were using physics concepts like "Zenneck waves", you must know it.
As these were definitions, only "single words" are needed, and these words are not from me but quoted from scientific definitions, these ones you censored.

Zenneck's waves radiate, whether you like it or not, whether you censor it or not. I'm not here to teach the basics of physics to people who talk about it grossly and peremptorily as if they know it when they don't know more than others. But if I can help modest people of good will to understand and not be deceived by the swagger of the former, I am happy to do so. Giving the right definitions is part of the method.

My dear F6FLT
Again you reverting, redirecting  and derailing  conduct of user <color>, that you used as an excuse to force your own agenda.
You  didn't criticize nor comment user <color> at all.
Methods  of derailing  original  content, used by you, are alike to typical  tools, of some unfriendly to  Western World  propaganda.
I  have provided the prove of  user <color> intentionally  raising  vulgarity, and profanity of  gender  and social  relation into  unprecedented to this forum  level.
It didn't happened before on this forum.

But  only thing you care about is to attack moderator privileges, that you don't like.
That's all that matters to you.
That's all you  complain about.
I'm not against you personally,
but I'm against infestation of any forum with
certain individuals whose agenda is
- intentional, destructive, often paid  for, disintegration of our dedication, unity, deposition and willingness, into better future  of all  of us including these who are paid  by some regimes to oppose.


Dear F6FLT in Your country  there are  people like me too.
It is unfortunate that  in my opinion, you  don't manifest the same approach .. but you  might have reason for it.
Everyone must somehow earn for living ,so is you..F6FLT



"Trying to earn a living"  however  is not always forgivable.
We do not tolerate foreign to us destructive demolishing and deceiving agendas coming from some
Far Eastern losers after their 101 years of constant collapse.

We are the nations  of success.
Our fathers works their life to accumulate  wealth for their children.
Their children have than prosperity, and success if they continue
to respect  trust and dedication in workplace, social life.
And only their grandchildren can be  wealthy at later in life.
 
Trust is build  by years of relationship.
So is our position in social platform.
So is our position in this forum

 

Wesley
« Last Edit: March 03, 2019, 10:09:09 PM by stivep »

F6FLT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 394
Re: Test topic for moderator discussions and "Other"between members
« Reply #17 on: March 03, 2019, 09:21:58 PM »
...Dear F6FLT in Your country  there are  people like me too.
...

I agree with that.
Unfortunately, the world is not perfect, here too we hear slanderers and pseudo-scientific talebearers.
But fortunately, we can answer them without being censored.

"I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
This statement is attributed to the philosopher Voltaire. I hope he will inspire you in the future, dear Wesley.


stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Test topic for moderator discussions and "Other"between members
« Reply #18 on: March 03, 2019, 09:32:17 PM »
It is very unfortunate dear F6FLT.
I do not know how many  of youmakes you,
but you are quite interesting  body.
Brilliant in some way, sparkling, and showing certain level of education.
You could be  great asset of this forum, you could be  a great companion..
But instead you decided to conflict with me.
I never wanted it, nor I'm happy about it.
I'm not the smartest guy, but to my friends in science,
and people meet in symposiums, conferences, meetings
I'm quite in the right level.
And this small world  of guys is  really very demanding. 

Moderator rights  have been given to me to keep my section clean,
short, consistent, with no need to respond to inflammatory comments .
No need to use questioned by you wording to explain something.

I'm avoiding conflicts, discussions, sidetracking .
I have NOTEBOOK.
- digital platform that allows me to keep that  part of my  personal glossary publicly accessible.
and possibly interactive.
No room for spammers,   hostile or deliberately frightening quality or manner individuals.

 
Wesley

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Test topic for moderator discussions and "Other"between members
« Reply #19 on: March 03, 2019, 11:01:28 PM »
   Wesley:   Yet, you have ignored the answers given by these guys, and repeatedly maintain that Zenneck waves are the true cause and workings of Kapanadze's devices.
    What did you expect... open arms and kisses?
    Please answer them without calling anyone names, if you can. There are no trolls here. And you are also being less than fair with their replies to your wild and unproven claims. YOU need to show some proof, to your claims. Or even guys like myself will doubt your opinions and the usefullness of your last several pages of posts.
   In any case, it would be good to separate wireless transfer of energy, from our free energy topics of interests. As there are no similarities between them that have been proven, or even somewhat believable.
   "I have a notebook"  but you can only post things that I agree with. Really??? 
    Trust is built on years of truthful information, not on questionable relationships. This is not about you personally, but on your opinions. We all have the right to our opinions, as well.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Test topic for moderator discussions and "Other"between members
« Reply #20 on: March 04, 2019, 12:20:42 AM »
NickZ the answers  to most of the   questions are  in my  Notebook already  for the long time.
I'm no obligated to jump from my chair, and point at it again  and again
every time someone makes request .

You said NickZ , you are not interested in my posts and comments.
So I open my own space on forum. I do not interfere with you.
You have nothing to complain.
I made 6 comments on your section since .
You made times more on my Notebook.


I do not have to be fair, or not fair  to anyone, in my Notebook or prove anything  to anyone.
Just because Notebook is to make notes at first.
And storage box is to store valuable to me and community  information- from my standpoint as 
I'm responsible to keep it clean and organized.
It is my voluntary contribution at best of my ability to be valuable to community.
I do not  want F6FLT  to criticize me for links, posted by me, in my Notebook,.
I do not want SolarLab to threaten me, to take hostile action against  me  and any displacement of  any of his links to pointed by him article.

so both of  listed gentleman are not welcomed in my notebook
- one for  multiple spamming ( record of that spamming exist for many hours every  few minutes)
- the other for threatening me multiple times and multiple occasions.


In the first post I set character of my Notebook
https://overunity.com/17735/wesleys-kapanadze-and-other-fe-discussion-forum/msg521714/#msg521714
read it Nick.Z.
Quote
My posts will not be frequent.
This is more of storage box.

If someone doesn't like it, than he does not have to visit my Notebook nor reply to it (if allowed.)
I dedicated  possibly more time and money to mutual benefit  of users of this forum than any of known to me members of this forum ever in history of this forum.
Hundreds of travel hours around the world, expenses of such activity, dangers, and not always the material collected was immediately ready to be published.
Hundreds of hours spend in lab or other labs,  often  not charge free.   
My two labs have been used to provide experiments.
Despite use of equipment  normally absolutely too expensive and too exotic, or  for some of you shockingly expensive I have made additional purchases .
So yes I did not have to , but I did.

Out of  around 180 videos in average 3 days to make it per video.
That gives you 540 days ( 16 hours per day) .
I used for video-making  professional equipment of quite significant value  or again I say- for some of you shockingly expensive.
to keep quality  4k and 5.7k
Hundreds of hours spend for translation.
Almost everything is  creative commons free to copy  ,free to use.
My support was provided to others often in monetary value and/or equipment delivered, at no charge , to help them provide experiments .
NickZ show me  members of this forum doing the same in the same extend///

My benefit is you guys.
Your better understanding and comfort of that understanding.
I do what I can, for you. for free.. 

Wesley

SolarLab

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 975
Re: Test topic for moderator discussions and "Other"between members
« Reply #21 on: March 04, 2019, 03:15:09 AM »
F.Y.I.

Some info/advise picked up from another board; might be helpful to keep it in mind.

How To Deal With Board SHILLS:

Do NOT reply to shills
Do NOT demolish their intentionally flawed arguments
Do NOT debate their idiotic "concerns"
Do NOT engage shills.
Do NOT participate in shill KAYFABE

In professional wrestling, kayfabe /ˈkeɪfeɪb/ is the portrayal of staged
events within the industry as "real" or "true", specifically the portrayal
of competition, rivalries, and relationships between participants as being
genuine and not of a staged or predetermined nature of any kind.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kayfabe

Do NOT perpetuate shill SLIDES.
Do NOT reply to shills.
Do NOT pick up spit

If you are NOT sure, LEARN to ID shills
shills = hate
shills = labels
shills = repetition
shills = envy, greed, etc. 

Do NOT correct intentional shill mistakes
Do NOT be triggered by shill taunts
Do NOT eat dead bats off the street
Do NOT bark back at dogs
Do dig, study, analyze, pray.

FIN



SolarLab

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 975
Re: Test topic for moderator discussions and "Other"between members
« Reply #22 on: March 04, 2019, 03:42:36 AM »
However....

F6FLT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 394
Re: Test topic for moderator discussions and "Other"between members
« Reply #23 on: March 04, 2019, 09:56:06 AM »
...
I do not  want F6FLT  to criticize me for links, posted by me, in my Notebook...
...

I don't criticize you for links, dear Wesley.

I criticize their possible inadequacies, or your comments which are pseudo-scientific because mixing the true and the false, and I explain why by logic and scientific references.

I criticize you for deleting messages and slandering, a sad method but the only one possible to compensate for an inability to make rational and technical arguments in response to objections, demonstrating the inconsistency of your assertions.

What you "do not want" is to see free, curious and critical minds in front of you, so it is counterproductive in research for free energy.
Your locked thread proves it, what you show that you want is mainly for others to be silent or to make you allegiance.

AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: Test topic for moderator discussions and "Other"between members
« Reply #24 on: March 04, 2019, 01:29:33 PM »
Yes ;D ;D it's confusing as at the bottom of the page your all ignoring the request by the 'system' POST A REPLY!
|It's not compulsory!

Hi there: I hope everyone is enjoying this long-running anti deep state 'soap'  ;D all we need now is a 'serial' killer to destroy the Monsanto toxins and save the thread but is it in the water the food, I know the 1 % have a plan, 'B' Mars!

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Test topic for moderator discussions and "Other"between members
« Reply #25 on: March 04, 2019, 01:29:33 PM »
I don't criticize you for links, dear Wesley.
Yes you did  criticize me for links, as if it  was any of your business, what links I store in my Notebook.
I criticize their possible inadequacies, or your comments which are pseudo-scientific because mixing the true and the false, and I explain why by logic and scientific references.
Links and comments are for record just because I decided to quote  it or store it.
It is not important if multi billions corporation Viziv and Chevron, Texzone,  uses pseudoscientificly supported patents  issued by PO - in your opinion of course.
This is their money and they do whatever they want to do.
And you dear F6FLT  can not change it by protesting  their pseudoscientific basis to me on  forum,
Crowd of some Russians crumbling in that  particular part  of American Territory  can't change it too.

Criticize you for deleting messages and slandering, a sad method but the only one possible to compensate for an inability to make rational and technical arguments in response to objections, demonstrating the inconsistency of your assertions.
What you "do not want" is to see free, curious and critical minds in front of you, so it is counterproductive in research for free energy.
I'm  not here  to face challenge. Nor I care about it. I manage Notebook,- the storage place.
Quote
I'm not the smartest guy, but to my friends in science,
and people meet in symposiums, conferences, meetings
I'm quite in the right level.
And this small world  of guys is  really very demanding. 
Issue of removing links was already explained by me in previous post.
Your locked thread proves it, what you show that you want is mainly for others to be silent or to make you allegiance.
My dear F6FLT allegiance has nothing to do with my  action .
Everyone  wants  to have small place with your things  placed the way you want it.
You unlikely put your backyard  and garden tools in your living room.
Other people may object but they come back to their  own small spaces and  do the same.
I strongly believe I have contributed to the benefit of this forum the largest amount of my time and money,
anyone did in the history of it till now. And I can do more.
I'm willing to do more.
For that I need to organize my space the way that gives me comfort to do so.
I have no time for arguing who is right and who is wrong in electromagnetic wave theory,
when nuisances  covers important  from my perspective elements of data with their  protests.
I may open it at any time and I remove  posts  if needed according to  character of my Notebook.
Everything must have its own designation , and
my Notebook will not serve as a garage to park someone
Car with explosives.

And it is not important if it is Volga, Lada , or T-90.( joke)

I'm sorry if I can not  make all of you happy.
It is my believe,that I serve you guys  at best I can,
but not as good as some of you may wish I could.
I'm only one of you my dear  friends , till I can not any longer.
I wish you, have all  of your answers and question solved without  urgent  necessity  to
write, in  my  small space at overunity.com

Wesley

AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: Test topic for moderator discussions and "Other"between members
« Reply #26 on: March 04, 2019, 01:49:37 PM »
Wesley Hi putting the above aside you very kindly posted some very nice 'readable' circuits was there any other build
instructions on the coil winding other than already supplied?
Perhaps you have a pointer link where I can get the rest of the publication from.

Many thanks AG 

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Test topic for moderator discussions and "Other"between members
« Reply #27 on: March 04, 2019, 02:20:32 PM »
The Schematics  are somehow accessible.( this is not so important who has it and who make it accessible for whom )
The value of original  or accredited source of schematic is important from our typical  American practice in this field.
The credibility  of that source, and supporting comments.
So you are dealing with classical SR193 concept and its variations.
You are dealing with real value.
However it is in line  even with Viziv  and its two Tesla Towers
https://overunity.com/17735/wesleys-kapanadze-and-other-fe-discussion-forum/dlattach/attach/172149/image//
in its very concept.
But your opinion may be different.

I have no authorization as of yet to tell you more.
But I will,
I do not advertise my experiments and achievements  if  I have reason to do so.
But I will,
If I need/want/can  to do so.

Wesley
PS: There is one schematic that was not translated by me .
You can translate it for others.
Everyone can talk, but I don't see  "much delivery" from Russian speaking SolarLab or from F6FLT.
As if they are with different business and/or activity - I  assume.
 
« Last Edit: March 04, 2019, 05:37:56 PM by stivep »

AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: Test topic for moderator discussions and "Other"between members
« Reply #28 on: March 04, 2019, 03:13:58 PM »
Yes i have already translated it (with google translate)  ;D and ran some tests on the central 'resonator' but it's difficult
to get it to oscillate ie primary and secondary spacing  inner and outer spacing I used in test rig pic, as bigger spacing
the less switching swing till it stops and the greater the transistor heating energy wast in amps, not milliamps  (diminishes to a stop) I get 167khz using a 2SC2500 as I'm assuming BMC 60 is no of turns but Google says it's current  ;D  but if I have a much smaller wind number  oscillations also die. 

Please note come Russian words don't translate or get changed (weird), so don't ask

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Test topic for moderator discussions and "Other"between members
« Reply #29 on: March 04, 2019, 03:27:45 PM »
   Wesley:    Yes, you are right about our opinions being different, concerning the unproven relation of Zenneck waves to any of the self runners that we have seen and known about to this date.   All of the above mentioned problems that you are facing is due to your unfounded opinions concerning these ideas. You are alone in that sense, as we are not of the same mind concerning your supposed "secret" source of power. Which is not what Kapanadze has mentioned, nor any other experimenter on this forum. Nor Akula, Ruslan, Stalker, etz... and much less Tesla.

    "It is in line with Viziv and it's two Tesla towers". 
    That, idea is what is making your life difficult. It is your choice. No one can take that from you.    However, I am on your side, and will some day prove just where and how any "extra energy" is actually obtained.