Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Stanley Meyers revisited  (Read 48035 times)

Alfang

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Stanley Meyers revisited
« on: December 17, 2006, 05:32:06 AM »
I know this is probably an old worn out topic, But I've only been a member here for a week and familiar with stanley meyers and his claims for 2 weeks.
I've read so much on the internet about creating hydrogen from water ,read all of meyers patents and so on.
I have an electronics background, and for the last 19 years, an electrician. I have a very good fundamental background in all forms of electricity. One thing that puzzles me, If Stan really created a dune buggy that ran realtime 100% hydrogen, Why can no one duplicate his results?
A) it's a big farce
B) the documents and schematics provided to the us patent office are not correct. ie...missleading

My first thought was it's all crap,.,,,,, then again, many claim he was so paranoid of losing a patent that just maybe.....he gave the patent office a phony schematic and explaination of the principle of operation. So as to mislead people who might steal idea, or maybe he thought the Govt would deem his idea a national defense invention and just take it. either way, he gave just enough info to obtain a patent.

the reason I think he provided phoney schematics for his process? I think I know how he did it, and soon, I will atempt to "fracture" water, and create H2 with little or No electrical input. (probably little)

Before you call me nuts, and hopefully without giving it all away for free. The secret is in a resonant circuit. If any of you electronic experts know how a resonant "tank" circuit works, you should be able to figure this out..

And to those of you who think this information should be let out for the good of the world...
Let me make a billion dollars on it first, It won't take long.

So why do I even write what I have? I'm looking for 1 or 2 or more people who have better skills in electronics than me to work together to make this work. I have plenty of money, I'm not gonna scam anyone, and trust me, no one will scam me so forget it.

FreeEnergy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2014
    • The Freedom Cell Network
Re: Stanley Meyers revisited
« Reply #1 on: December 17, 2006, 06:32:20 AM »
since you have a lot of electrician experience why not help us with something a bit easier? like the dual mechanical oscillation system by Mr. Mikovic. closing the loop on this one should not be hard!

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,1763.0.html

Alfang

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: Stanley Meyers revisited
« Reply #2 on: December 17, 2006, 06:50:18 AM »
Hey Free, LOL this is actually one thats got my attention, and i am working on it.
I am trying to create it on wm2d, and to my surprise, finding the right ratio of pendulem weight length of pedulem, rocker weight etc...it's a tough one( i've only had wm2d for 1 day so am new to that) I do believe at this point, if theres a mechanical closed loop possible, it will be this .....thanks for your endorsement of me. I mean encouragement.

PS gravity wheels wont work,, same amount of energy going down as up reguardless of how you look at it, call it an out of ballance wheel will only keep you chasing your tail.

In the finnal conclusion, that 1 lb weight that comes down one side must go back up the other. reguardless of the path it takes.

And I fear that the energy imposed on the anvil of the pedulem project is not as much as we are guessing from the sound eminated from the "smack" of that anvil. I bet it sounds more
impessive than it is, and the energy there is not enough to perpetuate the swing of the pendulem, I hope i'm wrong.

Alfang

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: Stanley Meyers revisited
« Reply #3 on: December 17, 2006, 06:57:20 AM »
Oh, and BTW free, despite my lack of posts on here, I've spent a week almost, reading myself blind on here, I've read a lot of threads, I repect your opinions. A lot of people can call me a moron, if it came from you it would hurt. :)

g'day John

Alfang

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: Stanley Meyers revisited
« Reply #4 on: December 17, 2006, 06:58:02 AM »
And not only that, how many posts do i gotta do till I'm not a newbie?
TY this a is a gratuitist post no reply required.

Alfang

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: Stanley Meyers revisited
« Reply #5 on: December 17, 2006, 07:04:23 AM »
And one more thing, sorry to babble , Free, the closing the loop on the pedulem thing, it's gonna be a mechanical closed loop, your gonna lose too much going from mech to elec to mech again. g'day

FreeEnergy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2014
    • The Freedom Cell Network
Re: Stanley Meyers revisited
« Reply #6 on: December 17, 2006, 10:04:19 AM »
And one more thing, sorry to babble , Free, the closing the loop on the pedulem thing, it's gonna be a mechanical closed loop, your gonna lose too much going from mech to elec to mech again. g'day

that's fine. we gotta try it first, and if anything we can go from mech to mech instead of mech to elec to mech. ;)

peace

FreeEnergy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2014
    • The Freedom Cell Network
Re: Stanley Meyers revisited
« Reply #7 on: December 17, 2006, 10:10:53 AM »
also you bring up a good point on losing energy etc. for now i think the best way then is to close the loop from mech to mech like you said :) good job!

peace
« Last Edit: December 17, 2006, 12:01:45 PM by FreeEnergy »

h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 641
Re: Stanley Meyers revisited
« Reply #8 on: March 10, 2007, 07:58:29 AM »
Everyone take a look at this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqfiAXIs3Xc&NR

For me this is the way to go :D, I have already started on a new cell design that should do very well as a dielectric destroyer 8). Just having slight proplems with sizing it up right :-\. Need to take more measurements of the cars avaliable space for it. But I belive in fuel replacement systems not fuel mileage boosters ;). For in about 2025 we just might run out of oil, and then what ??? I just wish they never had Killed Mr. Myers, for even if he had been left alone it still would have taken time to change all of the systems over to his technology :'(. Now it seems time is running out, global warming they say will take it's course even if we do an all out stop of burning fossile fuels.

But as for me I am exited in getting my new EDS HCP cell built and the electronics to go with it. I hope it works ::) God Bless everyone with lots of luck on getting this stuff to work. Just me h20power..........

AhuraMazda

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 564
Re: Stanley Meyers revisited
« Reply #9 on: March 10, 2007, 04:51:58 PM »
Everyone take a look at this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqfiAXIs3Xc&NR

I was not too exited about this video when I saw it in full. Peter Lindman came across as expressing to know the secret behind every OU device. Now I wonder if his own car runs on hydrogen.

AM

idnick

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 102
Re: Stanley Meyers revisited
« Reply #10 on: March 10, 2007, 05:05:59 PM »
And not only that, how many posts do i gotta do till I'm not a newbie?
TY this a is a gratuitist post no reply required.

The way you're postin it won't be long!!!  ;D

h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 641
Re: Stanley Meyers revisited
« Reply #11 on: March 14, 2007, 04:15:46 PM »
Hi All,
Getting the electronics together is proving to be a real challange. Guess I have to make the varialbe charging choke, for I could find nothing online, and radio shack doesn't seem to carry anything anymore. Well the case cost me over 300 bucks, but it should hold up to the vacuums a car can produce, for my first cell imploded on me. I am going to try 1000 whinds with the 36 gage wire, since I found a diode that can handle the voltage, but I have to find the 36 gage wire first, lol. And I am still waiting on the cost of the stainless steel. Anyone know who sells a BUZ350 MOSEFT? All I find online is pdf's of the buz350. Someone once told me that the Myer's family will sue me if I started selling this kind of technology, but the patent runs out 6/27/07 and they killed Myer's just before he could come out with his newest design. I think the family will be glade to see that their kin's technology is going to change the world just as Myers had dreamed. I can't figure out the spark plug device that he had, so that will be up too someone else to figure out. Just me h20power doing what he can in his own small way. Keeping this topic alive is what Myers would have wanted.

h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 641
Re: Stanley Meyers revisited
« Reply #12 on: March 27, 2007, 11:51:29 PM »
Well, I got all of the stuff to make the electronics. I am going to wait until the WFC is built to finish the Voltage intensifire circut, going to try and match it with the WFC, for it seems the secondary whinding needs to be matched with the voltage needs of the WFC(water fuel capacitor).  Anyone have any imput on this line of thinking?


h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 641
Re: Stanley Meyers revisited
« Reply #14 on: March 30, 2007, 09:21:51 PM »
This is just about all you need to know on getting Mr. Meyer's technology to work, just note that you will need a VIC circut and too match the diodes used to the 555's and mosfet's switching speeds.

Well I was just looking for the MeyerRep.pdf file online and it seems the MIB guys have pulled it from just about everywhere, for it can't be found. See they are not messing with Magdrive for all he has is mileage boosters, but they are going through great lengths too stamp out Mr. Meyer's ideas. I am still shocked that I can find it online, not even on PESWiki. 

So everyone best get this while they can for it can nolonger be found on the open net.